Jump to content
IGNORED

What would a pro tournament where the pros were blind to the course before playing it be like?


jshots
Note: This thread is 4190 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I had a thought. A lot of these pros, I assume most if not all, learn a course inside out and backwards before they play in a tournament on it. They know exactly where to play their misses, what yardages to play to, every little change in slope on a green, etc..

I'm curious as to what thesandtrap thinks a tournament would look like where the pros were not allowed to see the course before playing it. Would it be an interesting tournament or more boring? How much would scores increase by? What would change about how they approached the course?

:whistle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by jshots

I had a thought. A lot of these pros, I assume most if not all, learn a course inside out and backwards before they play in a tournament on it. They know exactly where to play their misses, what yardages to play to, every little change in slope on a green, etc..

I'm curious as to what thesandtrap thinks a tournament would look like where the pros were not allowed to see the course before playing it. Would it be an interesting tournament or more boring? How much would scores increase by? What would change about how they approached the course?

When I play a course for the first time, there are maybe 2 or 3 times during the round where I say "darn, I wish I knew that was there before I hit the shot" in regards to a false front on a green, a hidden bunker, trees, etc.

Pros probably aren't any different in that regard, so I would say that scores, on average would go up 2-3 strokes on Thursday, and zero to 1 after that since they have now seen the course.

I'd say average scores would go up about 4 strokes over the course of a whole tournament.

I don't think it would be any more or less interesting, other than the fact that you might have some of the more methodical guys walking all the way to the green prior to hitting their approaches since they've never been there before.  Probably would be seeing 6 hour rounds on Thursday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

don't think it would be any more or less interesting, other than the fact that you might have some of the more methodical guys walking all the way to the green prior to hitting their approaches since they've never been there before.  Probably would be seeing 6 hour rounds on Thursday.

Yeah I suppose you would probably need a time restriction.

:whistle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Take all the flags down as well, including on the greens. Merion has the right idea with that. Make them guess the wind.

Taylor Made R11S 9 Degree

Callaway X 3 Wood

Taylor Made 3 & 5 Rescue

Mizuno MP57 5-PW

Titleist Vokey 52, 60

Ping Scottsdale Anser

Link to comment
Share on other sites


... and they could be blindfolded and spun around like pin the tail on the donkey or hitting a pinata.

Hell, just make them hit pinatas.

In my bag ... 12 year old Balvenie DoubleWood

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This would be unwatchable, even if they were allowed lasers. They'd have their caddies pace off everything and spend forever reading putts, and never be confident in their club, leading to some backing off too much. It would take so damn long unless most of the players fundamentally changed their play style.

Some players would probably have less trouble, those with really good scrambling and short games would likely clean up where most of the good ballstrikers might hit great shots all day but with the wrong club. Those with really good caddies should also be OK, I think Phil would manage due to his good short game. Fewer birdies though. Par 3s would be affected the most but par 5s not so much. I could see a lot more running approaches like a links course because they can more easily judge the carry to a nearer landing spot, and wouldn't know how much spin or height to play.

Also, expect a lot of bag watching for their playing partners.

In My Bag:

Adams Super LS 9.5˚ driver, Aldila Phenom NL 65TX
Adams Super LS 15˚ fairway, Kusala black 72x
Adams Super LS 18˚ fairway, Aldila Rip'd NV 75TX
Adams Idea pro VST hybrid, 21˚, RIP Alpha 105x
Adams DHY 24˚, RIP Alpha 89x
5-PW Maltby TE irons, KBS C taper X, soft stepped once 130g
Mizuno T4, 54.9 KBS Wedge X
Mizuno R12 60.5, black nickel, KBS Wedge X
Odyssey Metal X #1 putter 
Bridgestone E5, Adidas samba bag, True Linkswear Stealth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think it would be great..  I would LOVE to see some tourney's played without any help whatsoever.. YES, that means NO caddies.. No Coaches on the range.. No Yardage books etc..etc.. The only thing the pros would be allowed to do with what we amateurs do all the time.. Use the fairway yardage markers..

Link to comment
Share on other sites


How would they do?

Extremely well. They're pros.

If the intimation is they wouldn't play well if they didn't have perfect conditions, thorough knowledge of the course thru practice rounds & yardage books, well, maybe they would lose a couple of strokes in the course of a tournament, so instead of say 15 under they would shoot 12 under.

Remember, the whole reason they have that kind of access to that information (which, presumably we amateurs don't) is this is their livelihood. It's their jobs, their careers. It's like saying what kind of job would a master carpenter do without a blueprint to a house he's building or his favorite tools. The carpenter would still do an extremely good job...they're master carpenters .

Pros are still the best players on the planet, and they would still score better than anyone else on the planet. Maybe not as low as they would with all that information, but still better than anyone else could.

So I guess the question is, how much does local knowledge & research (re practice rounds) help their games? I'm sure it has an impact. But it's one thing in knowing it's 193 yards to the pin & quite another to hit the ball 193 yards, ten feet from the pin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I do feel that there is some advantage to knowing a course really well, but these guys are really good and have experience learning a course quickly so their play would not suffer a whole lot.

Originally Posted by jshots

A lot of these pros, I assume most if not all, learn a course inside out and backwards before they play in a tournament on it. They know exactly where to play their misses, what yardages to play to, every little change in slope on a green, etc..

I think good touring Pros do a very good job in learning a course in a relatively short time period (Monday-Wednesday) before a tournament.  I have no doubt that most have their yardages spot on and know where to miss it generally on most holes, but I am not so sure about knowing every little change in slope on a green.  Yes, they may chart the green and some technology has advanced a lot for this in the last 5+ years, but you still see guys who miss read putts at times.

Originally Posted by LuciusWooding

This would be unwatchable, even if they were allowed lasers. They'd have their caddies pace off everything and spend forever reading putts, and never be confident in their club, leading to some backing off too much. It would take so damn long unless most of the players fundamentally changed their play style.

Some players would probably have less trouble, those with really good scrambling and short games would likely clean up where most of the good ballstrikers might hit great shots all day but with the wrong club. Those with really good caddies should also be OK, I think Phil would manage due to his good short game. Fewer birdies though. Par 3s would be affected the most but par 5s not so much. I could see a lot more running approaches like a links course because they can more easily judge the carry to a nearer landing spot, and wouldn't know how much spin or height to play.

Also, expect a lot of bag watching for their playing partners.

Why would they pace everything off even if they had lasers?

It is absurd to think they would play your standard PGA course more like a links course.  I think playing run ups takes a lot more course knowledge than figuring out how far to fly a shot that typically stops close to where it lands.  Unless you are going under the assumption that they are not even given 150 markers, why is it easier to judge the carry to a nearer landing spot?  If they were allowed lasers, it is certainly much easier to know the distance to the pin than try to laser the distance to  spot short of the green and then guess how far the ball needs to run to make it to the pin.

:mizuno: MP-52 5-PW, :cobra: King Snake 4 i 
:tmade: R11 Driver, 3 W & 5 W, :vokey: 52, 56 & 60 wedges
:seemore: putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


How would they do? Extremely well. They're pros.

Exactly. Those guys are STUPID good. The average recreational golfer can't even begin to comprehend how good they really are......

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

When visiting a new course, Ben Hogan always asked what the course record was and who owned it.  If it was the local pro, Hogan would make sure not to beat it since Hogan saw himself as his guest.  At my local course, a highly rated college links course, a touring pro showed up one day and beat the record the first time he ever saw it.

My guess is that this happens a lot.  I agree with David - these guys are stupid good, and we have no idea how great they are.  There is a big chasm between a scratch golfer and a touring pro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

They would do very well but be up a few strokes at the end of the tournament.  Scoring would improve after the first round because they would know where not to miss.

It would be kind of like some Mountain Bike races I've done where they didn't let you ride the course first.  The stronger riders still beat you even if it was a bit slower from not knowing the obstacles.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4190 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I did read the fine print tonight. It said replace with “similar features & function”.  8 yeas ago my purchase had features that today are available on the lower end models and the current version of my model has more “bells & whistles” than what I got 8 years ago.  So I am thinking they honored the agreement and I can’t argue the offer. since getting a credit for the full purchase price all I am really out over the past 8 years was the cost of the extended warranty, which was less than a low end  treadmill would have cost me. now the question is which model to replace with.  I’ll stay with Nordic Track or I forfeit the $1,463 credit so I will get Nordic Track.  And they honored the warranty and were not hard to work with which is a plus.
    • Generally speaking, extended warranties are a terrible deal and should almost always be avoided. They are a huge profit center for the companies that offer them, which should tell you almost everything you need to know about how much value most consumers get when purchasing them.  This is correct, and the old adage applies - only buy insurance when you can't afford the loss. This usually doesn't apply to most consumer goods.  To your second question, no I don't believe the offer is fair. They are replacing it, but it is not being replaced at "no cost to you". Since the amount being disputed (over $500) is non-trivial, I would probably push the issue. Don't waste your time on the phone with a customer service agent or a supervisor. They have probably given you all they have the authority to do. Rather, I would look at the terms of your agreement and specifically legal disputes. The odds are you probably agreed to binding arbitration in the event of a dispute. The agreement will outline what steps need to be followed, but it will probably look something like this.  1. Mail the Nordic Track legal department outlining your dispute and indicate you are not satisfied with the resolution offered.  2. Open up a case with the AAA (American Arbitration Association), along with the required documentation. 3. Wait about 4-5 weeks for a case to be opened - at which point someone from Nordic Track's legal department will offer to give you the new model at no cost to you.  They certainly don't want to spend the time and energy to fight you over $500. 4. Enjoy your new Nordic Track at no cost to you. I recently entered binding arbitration against a fairly large and well known company that screwed me over and refused to make it right. In my demand letter, I made a pretty sizeable request that included compensation for my time and frustration. Once it hit their legal department, they cut me a check - no questions asked. It was far cheaper to settle with me than to send their legal team to defend them in the arbitration.
    • I never thought of looking at it on multiple purchases like you said.  Yes, the extended may help me on 1 or 2 items but not the other 5 or 6.
    • Day 84 - Forgot to post yesterday, but I did some more chipping/pitching.    Back/neck were feeling better today, so I did a much overdue Stack session. 
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬛⬛🟩🟨⬛ 🟩⬛🟩⬛🟨 🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...