Watching Adam Scott this week, he should be the poster child for allowing anchoring.

It definitely looks like a stroke when he putts and his putting proves there is no advantage to using an anchored stroke.

Quote:

Originally Posted by meenman 

It definitely looks like a stroke when he putts and his putting proves there is no advantage to using an anchored stroke.

No it doesn't.

See what I did there?

Quote:

Originally Posted by meenman 

It definitely looks like a stroke when he putts 

Not sure I understand this part.  Are you saying it doesn't look like he's anchoring, or that it still looks like a putting stroke even though he's anchoring?  You seem to be ascribing some aesthetic definition to putting, in the latter case.  And if it was based on aesthetics, he should be the poster-child for banning it.  He is actually the only player on tour that makes me fast-forward nearly every time he putts on-screen.

Quote:

Originally Posted by phan52 

Quote:

Originally Posted by sacm3bill 

 

Good point. Just curious, are you aware of any amateur competitions that have used the new groove rule yet?

Some that won't....

 

http://www.thestate.com/2013/02/17/2637049/cga-scga-wont-follow-grooves-rules.html

As I have read it, the recommended implementation for 2014 only applies to "major amateur tournaments, collegiate golf tournaments, and state golf association championships". The link you provided states that they won't implement the rule for South Carolina Golf Association tournaments in general, but that's expected. The real question is will they implement it for their state championship, which is not addressed in that article.

Quote:

Originally Posted by meenman 

Watching Adam Scott this week, he should be the poster child for allowing anchoring.

 

It definitely looks like a stroke when he putts..

Of course it's a stroke. An anchored stroke.

Not that this is relevant to the anchoring ban, but - how so?  Do you have some way of proving he'd putt the same or better with an unanchored stroke?

Quote:

Originally Posted by bplewis24 

 

Not sure I understand this part.  Are you saying it doesn't look like he's anchoring, or that it still looks like a putting stroke even though he's anchoring?  You seem to be ascribing some aesthetic definition to putting, in the latter case.  And if it was based on aesthetics, he should be the poster-child for banning it.  He is actually the only player on tour that makes me fast-forward nearly every time he putts on-screen.

it is a stroke even though he is anchoring

Quote:

Originally Posted by sacm3bill 

 

Of course it's a stroke. An anchored stroke.

 

 

Not that this is relevant to the anchoring ban, but - how so?  Do you have some way of proving he'd putt the same or better with an unanchored stroke?

I'm just saying that (from what i;ve seen) there is no advantage. oh wait, all the anti-anchoring peeps say there is no advantage, they just want to ban it because they dont like the look.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCfanatic35 

Is their a way I can unfollow this thread so I don't have to see it anymore? I think people are just retyping their same argument over and over again just to be annoying.

You can "block" certain users, so there might very well be a way to block certain threads too.  Or, what I do is just hover my cursor over the latest post in "new posts" and a window pops up showing a good portion of what they said.  So you might be able to tell what they're about to say, and then know not to click on it. :)

Last time i checked (and someone please correct me if i am wrong) - no one is forcing anyone to read anything

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCfanatic35 

Is their a way I can unfollow this thread so I don't have to see it anymore? I think people are just retyping their same argument over and over again just to be annoying.

Until a couple of months ago there was a facility to mark threads as read without opening them but it disappeared

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCfanatic35 

Is their a way I can unfollow this thread so I don't have to see it anymore? I think people are just retyping their same argument over and over again just to be annoying.

Go into your "subscriptions" and hit the small "x" to delete it from the threads you follow.

Quote:

Originally Posted by meenman 

Last time i checked (and someone please correct me if i am wrong) - no one is forcing anyone to read anything

I like seeing your posts.  Not because I agree with you, which I do not, but because as a fellow Giants fan I like the Tom Brady picture.

Stacy Lewis: If I am playing match play and my opponent walks onto the first tee with a long putter, I have a smile on my face because I know they can't putt.

Quote:

Originally Posted by phan52 

Stacy Lewis: If I am playing match play and my opponent walks onto the first tee with a long putter, I have a smile on my face because I know they can't putt.

Irrelevant quote. This thread is about ANCHORED putting not long putters. After 71 pages you should have figured that out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by phan52 

Stacy Lewis: If I am playing match play and my opponent walks onto the first tee with a long putter, I have a smile on my face because I know they can't putt.

Anyone who walks onto the first tee with any putter makes me smile, because I know they can't play golf. Who tees off with a putter? 

The three people that I know that use a belly putter can putt with any kind of putter. They use the belly because they can putt better with it. I guess it is relative, as it has been worth about one extra one putt per round over the course of a year. I am sure there are people that it was there last option, but in my circles that has not been the case. 

PGA president: 'Bifurcation seems destined' if anchoring banned

• By Will Gray
• Mar 15, 2013 5:08 PM ET

http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golftalkcentral/pga-president-bifurcation-seems-destined-if-anchoring-banned/