Anchored Putters Rules Change - Page 19

Quote:

Originally Posted by bplewis24 

How is it a tired argument?  It has merit that hasn't been challenged on any direct level in any argument I've seen to date.  Is anybody here willing to challenge it on the merits?  Is an anchored stroke and a non-anchored stroke fundamentally and mechanically the same?  Does one promote a different mechanic in order to put a consistent strike on the ball?

Again, the croquet style Sam Snead was banned from using was a stroke by your definition.
What happened?
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by JerseyThursday 

 

Again, the croquet style Sam Snead was banned from using was a stroke by your definition.
What happened?
 

Straddling the line of the putt.

Quote:

Originally Posted by phan52 

Straddling the line of the putt.

Was anything anchored? Was he making a stroke?

Quote:

Originally Posted by JerseyThursday 

Was anything anchored? Was he making a stroke?

It's a different rule. You cannot straddle the line of a putt.

He eventually started putting side saddle, leaning way over the putt from the side.

Quote:

Originally Posted by meenman 

Why would you be *happy* about the decision? How has that one person that you saw anchoring a putter affected your life/golf game?

I'm happy about it. I've been arguing that the practice should be banned for almost a decade. I'm "happy" because I think that the Rules will more properly reflect what I feel is the inherent nature and method for playing the game.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JerseyThursday 

The rules regarding putting are convoluted to say the least.

I disagree. I think they're really simple.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JerseyThursday 

The tired argument that a “stroke” shouldn’t involve the club anchoring with anything but your hands doesn’t hold true when hitting a putt croquet style. For some reason that was made illegal.

 

It's a "tired" argument now? Croquet straddles the line of the putt. The Sam Snead photo is actually sidesaddle, which you'll note has no anchoring and is a free swinging stroke. It looks odd but I don't think it's problematic.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by JerseyThursday 

Sidesaddle. Perfectly legal in 2016.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texian 

The USGA must think we're idiots, which we are if we believe that this is "about the stroke, and not the equipment."

Uh, if you say so. It's about the stroke in my opinion.

Quote:

Originally Posted by iacas 

I disagree. I think they're really simple.

 

So, if you your hand/thumb grazes your chest (or shirt? or pants?) while using the “permitted stroke” you now get a two stroke penalty.

That really simplified things and should be a lot of fun to enforce.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mchepp 


Seems Odyssey has done that.
http://www.putterzone.com/2012/11/odyssey-metal-x-arm-lock-putters.html

That is interesting.  Without having tried that, it seems like it would be very uncomfortable...at least at first.

Quote:

Originally Posted by zeg 

I don't use a long putter, I don't have any friends who use a long putter, and I don't foresee either of these ever changing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by iacas 

Uh, if you say so. It's about the stroke in my opinion.

Then you're choosing to ignore the inconsistency in the USGA's "explanation" graphic that calls a stroke anchored with two forearms touching the body with a short putter legal and one with one forearm touching the body with a long putter illegal.

Everyone's entitled to their opinion. Obviously, the ones in the USGA and R&A who think like you have more votes.

That aside, I enjoy the forum and look forward to other discussions.

Quote:

Originally Posted by iacas 
 Croquet straddles the line of the putt. The Sam Snead photo is actually sidesaddle, which you'll note has no anchoring and is a free swinging stroke. It looks odd but I don't think it's problematic.

 

 

It's about the stroke in my opinion

Straddling the putt also “has no anchoring and is a free swinging stroke”. So it’s no longer about the “stroke” it’s about the angle your body is positioned to the ball?

And, that's not convoluted?

Quote:

Originally Posted by bplewis24 

That is interesting.  Without having tried that, it seems like it would be very uncomfortable...at least at first.

I think that is almost exactly how Matt Kuchar currently putts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texian 

Then you're choosing to ignore the inconsistency in the USGA's "explanation" graphic that calls a stroke anchored with two forearms touching the body with a short putter legal and one with one forearm touching the body with a long putter illegal.

 

Everyone's entitled to their opinion. Obviously, the ones in the USGA and R&A who think like you have more votes.

 

That aside, I enjoy the forum and look forward to other discussions.

Well, if you want to get that picky about it, then all shots are anchored because my hand bone is connected to my arm bone, and my arm bone is connected to my shoulder bone, etc, etc.

I don't find the distinction to be that difficult to understand at all (that is if you are trying, and not just being contrarian for fun).  You cannot create an anchored PIVOT POINT.

In the example in red, his forearm is braced such that his left hand can act like a pendulum, just as if he braced it against his chest or chin.

In the blue example, the forearms are braced against the side of the body, but there is no pivot point that the club is being anchored to ... you still have to swing it with either your shoulders or wrists.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Golfingdad 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texian 

Then you're choosing to ignore the inconsistency in the USGA's "explanation" graphic that calls a stroke anchored with two forearms touching the body with a short putter legal and one with one forearm touching the body with a long putter illegal.

 

Everyone's entitled to their opinion. Obviously, the ones in the USGA and R&A who think like you have more votes.

 

That aside, I enjoy the forum and look forward to other discussions.

Well, if you want to get that picky about it, then all shots are anchored because my hand bone is connected to my arm bone, and my arm bone is connected to my shoulder bone, etc, etc.

 

I don't find the distinction to be that difficult to understand at all (that is if you are trying, and not just being contrarian for fun).  You cannot create an anchored PIVOT POINT.

 

In the example in red, his forearm is braced such that his left hand can act like a pendulum, just as if he braced it against his chest or chin.

 

In the blue example, the forearms are braced against the side of the body, but there is no pivot point that the club is being anchored to ... you still have to swing it with either your shoulders or wrists.

It's the same old tired attitude.  Some people just have to defy authority, and when that doesn't work, then they bitch.  The possibility that anyone can tell them what they can do on the golf course is untenable to them. 

Quote:

Originally Posted by JerseyThursday 

 

Straddling the putt also “has no anchoring and is a free swinging stroke”. So it’s no longer about the “stroke” it’s about the angle your body is positioned to the ball?

And, that's not convoluted?

It's a different rule, governing a different principle.  You're conflating two separate issues.  

It's like saying that there should be no rule against grounding a club in a hazard because it's still "has no anchoring and is a free swinging stroke."

Quote:

Originally Posted by JerseyThursday 

 

So, if you your hand/thumb grazes your chest (or shirt? or pants?) while using the “permitted stroke” you now get a two stroke penalty.

I'd love to know what thesaurus has "accidentally grazing" as a synonym for "anchored." And again, Potter Stewart.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texian 

Then you're choosing to ignore the inconsistency in the USGA's "explanation" graphic that calls a stroke anchored with two forearms touching the body with a short putter legal and one with one forearm touching the body with a long putter illegal.

No I'm not. The PUTTER is not simply rotating around a fixed axis point.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JerseyThursday 

Straddling the putt also “has no anchoring and is a free swinging stroke”. So it’s no longer about the “stroke” it’s about the angle your body is positioned to the ball?

And, that's not convoluted?

I find "you can't straddle the line of any stroke" pretty simple. Again, perhaps your thesaurus is screwed up. Are you sure you're not looking at the antonyms for "anchored" and "convoluted"? Beyond that I'll defer to bplews24's post just above mine.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mchepp 


Seems Odyssey has done that.
http://www.putterzone.com/2012/11/odyssey-metal-x-arm-lock-putters.html

Awesome, no wonder they are the "#1 Putter In Golf"  Now I don't have to make one they had one ready for me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JerseyThursday 

 

Straddling the putt also “has no anchoring and is a free swinging stroke”. So it’s no longer about the “stroke” it’s about the angle your body is positioned to the ball?

And, that's not convoluted?

Straddling is specifically about Rule 16-1e. No more no less.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fourputt 

 

It's the same old tired attitude.  Some people just have to defy authority, and when that doesn't work, then they bitch.  The possibility that anyone can tell them what they can do on the golf course is untenable to them. 

Nailed it.