Quote:
Originally Posted by
Old1964 
Great question.
If I was no. 1 in the world, at the top of my game, and expected to make a few million in the upcoming season with my current clubs, would I jeopardize that? Probably not. For me, I think I could live well on a few million and enjoy not having to change anything.
On the other hand, though Rory didn't answer the reporter's question about his contractual obligations - as to whether he could swap out clubs (e.g. his putter), I suspect he must have that freedom. If that's the case, I would take the money and then play whatever clubs felt best to me. Of course, all this is merely academic as neither one of them play Mizzys.
So, if you were No. 1 in the world at 23 years old and was contractually obligated to play 14 of their clubs, you would not take a guaranteed 250million deal over 10 years? Especially when the #2 golfer (former #1 for 600+ days) also signed to the company has 60+ wins and 10+ majors with the same brand. Furthermore, at 23 years of age, you have endless amounts of time to get accustomed to the equipment? And again, you are 23 years old with 25 millions guaranteed dollars in the bank for the next 10 years? You really really really really really really really really think you would say...NO.
I find that very hard to believe and judgement on Rory's decision is hypocritical. Even if Rory suffers this season, it's still only a season when he has 20+ years of "seasons" left in him.
Anyone passing judgement on Rory's decision today has a severe case of short sided vision.