Jump to content
IGNORED

Anyone try these shoes?


Note: This thread is 4080 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I'm starting to look at the casual, new style cleats to replace my 3 year old cheapo Footjoy's.

I have narrowed it down to 3 choices: Ecco BIOM Hybrid $190, Adidas Adicross II $90, or the FJ Contour Casuals $100.

It's just time to switch the type of shoe to see how I enjoy it.  It's really 50/50% whether I walk or ride.

Has anyone had any experience with these?  One thing I am concerned about is the life of the cleats.  I will not be using them as a all-around shoe, but will be wearing them to the course and whatnot instead of changing when I get there; like I did with my FJ's.  I really like the looks of the Ecco's but can't justify spending that extra $100 over the adidas when it can be better spent elsewhere; like on a new wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I use the Ecco Biom Hydromax with the spikes,  hands down the best shoe ever made.  just feel the leather and you will know they are built to last.  no pain in my feet after walking 18.  I have tried every brand out there and they are the best for me.  The second best were the puma's I wore last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I was going to get the Eccos to replace my Oakley Ripcords (Comfortable and light shoe, but they wore too quickly) based on a few local recommendations until I got a review on here from someone who had owned them (and loved them), but ended up leaving them in the car after buying a set of True Linkswear Shoes.  You may want to check them out as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4080 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Of course. I've used different words to start, but like 90-95% of the time it's been this one. And I'm unlikely to switch now.
    • Welcome to TST @Camjr.   We're glad you've joined.  
    • Angle is not a factor. I hit the ball 100’ high. Par is net birdie. My CH is 16. The rough between the bunkers is like 10’ wide though. That’s not something you’re going to try to hit on purpose. Most of the area to the left of that is fescue/native vegetation and I’m pretty sure there isn’t a flat lie in any of it. It’s the second hole.
    • Hello all.  I'm about to be 57 yrs old, started playing when I was 16, and have quit and restarted the game more times than I can count.  I had started playing a weekly round with a friend, and finally made the jump to Senior A shafted Tour Edge clubs.  Instantly gained 10 yds with an easier swing (why didn't I make that jump sooner???).  Glad to be a part of the group. Cheers all,
    • I think I like this hole.  It is a clear "Risk-Reward" choice.  Since most of the shots in your cone cleared the bunkers I would say they are a minor risk and not a big issue.  Playing the aggressive line may give you 70ish yards in from what looks to be playable rough while conservative play is 120ish from fairway.  I know you said 70 vs 120 is minor for you but how does the approach angle in impact your results?  I figure both strategies are playing for Birdie since holing out from either is mostly luck. Looking at your proximity hole I think it says @ 50 feet when hitting from the fairway from 100-150 and 40 feet if hitting 50-100 from the rough.  Neither of those is an easy birdie putt.   I like the approach angle from the rough between the bunkers & the adjacent tees over the angle from @ 120 in the fairway but I really do not like the idea of hitting onto the adjacent tee boxes and that may impact my confidence with making the shot.  Also, too far left may be a worse approach angle then from the fairway short of the bunkers. For me this may come down to how confident do I feel when I reach that tee box.  If I am stroking it well off the tee leading up to the hole I would try for over the bunkers and the better angle in but if I am struggling that day I would likely opt for the fairway to take more bad stuff out of play.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...