Quote:
Originally Posted by
logman 
Did you have a look at the wrist brace /non wrist brace video? There's no lead wrist break, is there. I don't know what else to do or say here.
This thread is not about your wrists. Final notice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
stoverny 
In terms of shifting weight forward, I think its role in power production is overestimated.
It's not a large percentage but it's there. For it to be "overestimated" you'd have to know what our estimates are AND what reality is.
The far, FAR bigger reason for getting your weight forward deals with the geometry of the golf club, controlling low point, etc. I've never said any differently.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
stoverny 
Using another baseball analogy... imagine a 3rd baseman running in to field a bunt down the 3rd-base line. He picks it up barehanded and throws underhanded across his body to first while he is falling towards the 3rd-base line. Obviously he cannot get quite as much power behind his throw as when stepping into it, however he can still get a surprising amount of power on it even if he is falling away from 1st base as he throws. He uses his arm and wrist levers to "snap" the throw and generate power. Contrast that with the image of a baseball player who is standing upright and steps into the throw normally, but imagine he does not use any levers in his arm while throwing... his elbow and wrist never break and the throw is done with a straight arm. He would get almost no force behind the throw even though he is stepping into it with his weight. The bullwhip-type force of the arm levers provides much more of the power than the weight shift does.
Bad example. The baseball player throws the ball half as fast when he's falling away as when he can really step into it, and their "weight forward" is vastly different than the weight forward in golf - both in purpose (theirs is a lot more about power and speed) and how it's accomplished (hips forward in golf, upper body forward in baseball).
Multi-sport comparisons typically fail. Bad example. In many ways worse than using a machine (Iron Byron) as you did before.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
logman 
To be clear, I'm not arguing against weight shift, I'm arguing against it as a non negociable in the swing. I'm just not convinced that it's the important element that most guys on here seem to.
It is, and I've told you why now several times, and per your typical approach, you simply ignore it and continue to believe steadfastly in what you think without actually being able to articulate any valid or logical reasons why.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
logman 
I don't want to" fall out of the shot", But I know that if I can be anywhere from 50/50 to 70/30 then "weight forward" doesn't get in the way of my swing. I also know that if I go way forward in my transfer then that introduces a whole new can of worms and there all bad.
Then keep moving the ball back like you do. Keep hitting low shots that aren't at all like what good players hit. Have fun.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Golfingdad 
Point 1: Erik said you can't hit it out of your own shadow if you don't use your wrists at all. (Not really Erik, but moreso physics that says that, but whatever)
Point 2: You can hit the ball 250 meters.
Your conclusion: Erik (and physics) is wrong.
Reasonable persons conclusion: You USE your flippin' wrists in your swing!*
* Or a substitute lever, but again, no further posts about anyone's wrists are allowed in this thread. They're...

Quote:
Originally Posted by
stoverny 
When I start my swing the weight is over the back foot. When I finish it is over the front foot. However at impact
my feel is that I am still over the back foot. In reality it may be more like 50/50 but the contact and distance are good. I don't need to be forward at impact, and not thinking about being forward simplifies the swing. For me at least.
Oh for ****'s sake we're arguing about your ****ing FEEL now? You lose your place in this discussion when you bring THAT to the table. And "in reality" it's likely NOWHERE NEAR 50/50. I think you'd be surprised, but at this point, I'm no longer interested in what you have to say based on your "feels" during YOUR swing. We have data. You have "feels."
Quote:
Originally Posted by
stoverny 
Perhaps it might not be the "best" way but my point was that it works. Many here are stating that it ia virtually impossible to hit a solid shot without weight forward, or even if you do the ball won't go anywhere. Neither of those things are true.
You don't get to say what's true or not when you're basing what you say on your FEEL.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
stoverny 
Again you heard a lot of the same reactions to SnT, people said you couldn't possibly get any power, it's a reverse pivot, etc. Clearly those doubters were wrong and had never actually tried the swing.
And it turns out that S&T was wrong that there isn't a weight transfer (pressure transfer) in the swing.