Jump to content
IGNORED

My Review of the TaylorMade Superfast 2.0 3-18* Rescue club - regular flex


Note: This thread is 3950 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Picked one up this weekend for a meager $90 and played two rounds with it.

First Impressions

Address: I love the white crown and black face.  I almost feel like I can see it in my peripheral in my downswing which gives me the (possibly false) confidence that I will strike the ball well (golf is a mental game, right?). The regular flex shaft certainly has flex but feels firm.  This club inspires confidence at address and resembles the driver identically expect for of course the size.

The clubhead cover is clean sturdy and compact.  No BS frills just a clean headcover.  It is very thick and cushioned.

Trackman

I compared this TM-SF to my Jesse Ortiz 19* hybrid.  The TM's ball flight was higher and about the same distance (maybe +3 yards or so).  I felt like my baby fade was reduced with the TM which is neither good nor bad, just something I need to adjust to.  My swing speed was about the same but felt much easier with the TM.

A mishit between the hosel and sweet spot resulted in a slight pull that would be characterized as a mishit by most standards but would not translate terribly on the course, being only 10-15 yrds left of target.  The club feedback certainly let me know that I didn't hit the ball well, but the flight of the ball was very forgiving.  I'd wager that if one were to have watched the shot on the course they wouldn't have even noticed that it was a mishit.

On the Course

This club is a nice 190-210 distance for me (I know, you all hit your 18*s like 230, bug off).  It proved itself nicely both off of a clean fairway and out of the tangly brush.  I had too many beers and accidentally splashed a little pee on it but after a towel down it shined up nicely.

It is worth noting that the TM's higher trajectory makes for stopping the ball on the green much easier, compared to my old Jesse Ortiz that might have run off because of a lower trajectory entrance to the green with the same overall distance.

The sound of impact is awe-inspiring and makes a long walk to the green (hopefully) that much more enjoyable.

The Moment The Old Club Was Gone

The moment I knew it was the club for me was after a drive faded off right a little too much and ran from fairway up onto a hill on the right side of the fairway.  It was nearly buried in the rough stuff but teed up off the ground.  With 175 yards to the middle of the green (back flag) and a tree in my way, I lined up open stanced and tried to work the TM for a strong fade around the tree.

Normally this is a tough shot for a golfer like myself.  I gave it a slow backswing and focused on working my swing outside-in to get a turn around the tree.  The TM responded nicely and despite what seems like a large hybrid head, it cut right through the rough stuff like a knife.  I mean this stuff is tangly and rough, you gotta understand.

Kept the hands strong and the TM rewarded me with a 180yd fade around the tree and to the back of the green for a two-putt par save.  I must note again the stopping power of this hybrid on greens.

Hope that you've enjoyed reading and if you're thinking about getting one, do it.  Best $90 I ever spent at Golfsmith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

Could you post this review on the product itself?

http://thesandtrap.com/products/taylormade-burner-superfast-2-0-rescue

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3950 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
    • Very much so. I think the intimidation factor that a lot of people feel playing against someone who's actually very good is significant. I know that Winged Foot pride themselves on the strength of the club. I think they have something like 40-50 players who are plus something. Club championships there are pretty competitive. Can't imagine Oakmont isn't similar. The more I think about this, the more likely it seems that this club is legit. Winning also breeds confidence and I'm sure the other clubs when they play this one are expecting to lose - that can easily become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
    • Ah ok I misunderstood. But you did bring to light an oversight on my part.
    • I was agreeing with you/jumping off from there.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...