Jump to content
IGNORED

My Review: Bridgestone J40 Cavity Back Irons


Note: This thread is 3323 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I obtained a brand new set of Bridgestone J40 CB irons about a month ago.  They came standard length and lie with Nippon NS Pro 1050gh shafts (reg flex).  I put them in the bag right away and played 6 rounds with them and wanted to share my thoughts and review of these irons with everyone.....

I've never been one to really care too much about the looks of a club as I prefer performance all day over looks.  With this being said, if you can have a club that performs great and looks amazing on top of it, why not?  Keeping the look classic, Bridgestone did a great job and arguably they are the best looking irons out there.  Smooth lines and classic looks has you thinking that it's a blade at first until you realize that it is a true cavity back.  I lost track of the compliments that I received from people that saw them and thought they were beautiful.

While they are cavity backs, these irons are more player irons than game improvement.  There is much less offset and the head of each iron is much thinner than most cavity back offerings from other manufacturers.  They are fully forged (not just a forged face) and are well made.

I was coming off playing Taylormade R11 irons and you could clearly see that the J40's were better made with their forged heads but also had smaller heads, less offset, and would be potentially less forgiving.  This turned out to be very true.  The first thing I noticed was the rather large difference in lofts versus the R11's and the J40s.  Now each set of irons are going to have their own lofts but the difference was quite big comparing the R11's versus the J40's.  We are not talking about just a degree or two here and there, the difference was at least one club and in some cases even more than that.  It started at the 4 iron of the J40's which had the same loft as the 5 iron did in the R11's.  It continued as you went higher with the 9 iron of the J40's being 43 degrees which was almost equal to the PW of the R11 (45 degrees).

Just this difference alone took some getting used to as far as picking the right club was concerned.  I tried not to let it affect me but I know that it did, the fact that I was supposed to be playing newer and better irons yet for some reason they were not going nearly as far as my older irons that were of poorer quality.  While my ball flight improved (that's why I got the new irons), the distance loss was noticable and was going to take a lot of getting used to.

The J40's were less forgiving but I noticed that they seemed to "cut" through the rough better which made shots out of rough a bit easier.  I had to be very careful though as they were overall much less forgiving than the R11's.  If you got too steep with one of the J40's on a shot from the fairway, you were going to pay for it.

Both sets of irons had regular flex shafts and I was expecting I would like the Bridgestone's more since the shafts were heavier.  Maybe I just have not gotten used to them enough but last weekend I put the R11's back in the bag and shot my first round of sub 80.  I'm not giving up completely on the J40's, I just need to play them more and get used to them more.  They are great irons, but your ball striking has to be very good and I guess mine is just not there yet.  I am dissapointed with the Nippon shafts.  Apparently the J40's are offered with the Project X shafts which I have heard nothing but good things about and I should have probably gotten these irons with those shafts.

Overall a very good set of irons that I plan on "growing into" as my game continues to improve.  While they are cavity backs, I would say that they are much more of a players irons versus a game improvement iron though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

How about posting a copy of this review here:

http://thesandtrap.com/products/bridgestone-j40-dual-pocket-cavity-irons

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There are two j 40's....

One is a V cavity conventional with a MPF of 455... A players club really...

And a straight cavity with a MPF of 682... Game improvment...

Your r11's have a MPF of 508 conventional...Players club... ( not forged right?)

But I dont believe the maltby thing to some extent...

Dont know which one you have but there is no reason you should not be able to hit it coming from the r11's...( espeacially the straght cavity) Its my experience with old blades, blades,  and forged clubs that the sweet spot is more towards the hosel... So when you set up you should be like cupping the ball if you know what I mean....

I hit the callaway x forged at a demo and that has a 373 MPF... I hit that better that any club out there... Even the ultr game improvments...

Just my opinion...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 1 year later...
  • Moderator

If anyone is looking for a new set of these, I have a few I'm selling due to job loss.


Welcome to the forum.  We have a section for equipment sale called Marketplace. If you take pictures, you can post them there with a price.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3323 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 119: 4/24/24 Chipping and pitching followed by putting through 50 mm gates.
    • @boogielicious and I are definitely in for the Stay & Play and will need the extra night's stay on Friday. I don't know what the plans are for our group on Friday but even if we don't make it for dinner with the rest of the Friday arrivals, I'll be more than happy to meet up somewhere for a beer or something.
    • Taking your dispersion and distance in consideration I analyzed the 4 posible ways to play the hole, or at least the ones that were listed here. I took the brown grass on the left as fescue were you need to punch out sideways to the fairway and rigth of the car path to be fescue too.  Driver "going for the green"  You have to aim more rigth, to the bunker in order to center your shotzone in between the fescue.  Wood of 240 over the bunkers I already like this one more for you. More room to land between the fescue. Balls in the fescue 11% down from 30% with driver. Improve of score from 4.55 to 4.40. 4 iron 210 yards besides the bunkers.    Also a wide area and your shot zone is better than previous ones. This makes almost the fescue dissapear. You really need to hit a bad one (sometimes shit happens). Because of that and only having 120 yards in this is the best choice so far. Down to 4.32 from 4.40. Finally the 6 Iron 180 yards to avoid all trouble.    Wide area an narrow dispersion for almost been in the fairway all the time. Similar than the previous one but 25 yards farther for the hole to avoid been in the bunkers. Average remains the same, 4.33 to 4.32.  Conclusion is easy. Either your 4iron or 6 iron of the tee are equaly good for you. Glad that you made par!
    • Wish I could have spent 5 minutes in the middle of the morning round to hit some balls at the range. Just did much more of right side through with keeping the shoulders feeling level (not dipping), and I was flushing them. Lol. Maybe too much focus on hands stuff while playing.
    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...