Jump to content
IGNORED

Tees moved back, adjust rating or no?


Dave2512
Note: This thread is 3898 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

A course I play often had the blue tees moved back so far it played like a different course. I'm not exaggerating when I say it was as much as 20-25 yds on some holes. One par 3 was so far back we were hitting 4h when we usually hit 6i. I jotted the yardage down on the card just because I track driving stats and according to my GPS the course played nearly 400 yds longer than what's listed on the card. They don't put championship tees out but it's marked on the card. The course played within 160 yds of those tees. Usually I'd blow it off for subtle differences but the ratings difference is significant, blues are 70.2/129 and golds are 73.2/133. If they moved the tees back just 9 yds per hole we would have been playing from the championship tees. The differential difference between the tees is enough to worry about, IMO. What to do?

Dave :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If it's being setup significantly longer than rated yardage, you can use adjustments per 5-2g of the USGA handicap manual.

http://www.usga.org/Rule-Books/Handicap-System-Manual/Rule-05/

In a perfect world there should be a balance of front, middle, and back tee markers so the net affect is a total yardage close to the rating yardage, which is determined from the middle of the tee box on every hole..

Regards,

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Dave2512

Thanks, I suppose the real question is what qualifies as significant.

There's nothing in the tables Dormie linked about a "significant" distance change being necessary before changing the rating and slope. Anything more than 11 yards (over the entire course, not one hole) does so.

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by sacm3bill

There's nothing in the tables Dormie linked about a "significant" distance change being necessary before changing the rating and slope. Anything more than 11 yards (over the entire course, not one hole) does so.

I didn't see that in the manual but I could have missed it not like I poured through it. I have used the tables before in the winter when tees aren't out or when mowers left them on the side of the box.

Too late to post it from the back tees, already posted the score. That was why I questioned it and honestly I am bummed. From the back tees the differential would have been towards the lower end of my ten best. I suppose I could shoot the handicap committee guy an email explaining the dilemma.

Dave :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by sacm3bill

There's nothing in the tables Dormie linked about a "significant" distance change being necessary before changing the rating and slope. Anything more than 11 yards (over the entire course, not one hole) does so.

I think Dormie's link refers to UNRATED tees.  I agree that it makes sense to adjust when the rated tees are positioned quite a bit different from where they were rated from, but 11 yards does not cut it for me.  I would think you would need to be off by at least 100 yards given the fact that sometimes they might move the tee up, but put the pin back or vice versa.

A side note- it looks like you would come up with 2 different ratings depending on whether Dave worked back from the blues or up from the Championship:

Blue + 390 yards= 72.0/133

Championship - 160 yards = 72.5/131

:mizuno: MP-52 5-PW, :cobra: King Snake 4 i 
:tmade: R11 Driver, 3 W & 5 W, :vokey: 52, 56 & 60 wedges
:seemore: putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm sure he meant 11 yds average per hole. Honestly I don't sweat that in most cases it's not even a club difference. In this instance there was one par 3 where the blues were just 4 yards up from where the golds would be, they don't put those tees out. Blues on the card list 185 and gold at 210, my gps said 206. The cool thing was they had just moved them today, may have been a mower mistake. Anyway those boxes were pristine. Not a mark on them, they looked like greens.

Dave :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by sacm3bill

There's nothing in the tables Dormie linked about a "significant" distance change being necessary before changing the rating and slope. Anything more than 11 yards (over the entire course, not one hole) does so.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave2512

I'm sure he meant 11 yds average per hole. Honestly I don't sweat that in most cases it's not even a club difference. In this instance there was one par 3 where the blues were just 4 yards up from where the golds would be, they don't put those tees out. Blues on the card list 185 and gold at 210, my gps said 206. The cool thing was they had just moved them today, may have been a mower mistake. Anyway those boxes were pristine. Not a mark on them, they looked like greens.

The chart shows adjustments starting at 11 yards for the entire course, so I think that is what he meant.  I agree that unless it is closer to 11+ per hole (and all the same direction), its not worth worrying about.  The question is whether there is anything official as to when a player should adjust the CR/SR.  i.e. Players should only make adjustments to rated tees when the total course is more than 200 yards shorter or longer than the rated distance.

:mizuno: MP-52 5-PW, :cobra: King Snake 4 i 
:tmade: R11 Driver, 3 W & 5 W, :vokey: 52, 56 & 60 wedges
:seemore: putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Again I must have missed it. Obviously I'm not overly concerned if I didn't take the time to read carefully through it. Slightly bummed that I posted my score before asking. The differential difference is 2.2 using the conservative adjustment. It only matters to me because as is it falls just outside my ten best. I'm heading out now to play the course again.

Dave :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I've seen this happen at courses before because they had been playing significantly lower than rated yardage - you may want to see if the course had recently been re-rated or if someone auidited the distances.

I wouldnt sweat it too much - too many guys are in such a rush to lower their HC - i prefer to suck the 3 non tourney weeks a month personally.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:
Originally Posted by MEfree View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by sacm3bill View Post

There's nothing in the tables Dormie linked about a "significant" distance change being necessary before changing the rating and slope. Anything more than 11 yards (over the entire course, not one hole) does so.

I think Dormie's link refers to UNRATED tees.  I agree that it makes sense to adjust when the rated tees are positioned quite a bit different from where they were rated from, but 11 yards does not cut it for me.  I would think you would need to be off by at least 100 yards given the fact that sometimes they might move the tee up, but put the pin back or vice versa.

Agreed - but I interpreted the OP as saying the tees had all been moved but not yet given a new rating. Usually if some tees are moved back then others are moved forward and it all averages out - but since it sounded like *all* the tees were back I assumed they were reconfiguring the course somehow. I guess I'm unclear on the nature of the tee movement.

Quote:
A side note- it looks like you would come up with 2 different ratings depending on whether Dave worked back from the blues or up from the Championship:

Blue + 390 yards= 72.0/133

Championship - 160 yards = 72.5/131

Yep, I assume that's why the tables specify adjusting from the closest set of rated tees (which would be the Championship in this case.)

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites


From manual, may help determining how much the total rating would change.

Quote:
(i) Effective playing length is obtained from official measurements of the course and an evaluation of the factors that cause the course to play significantly longer or shorter than its measured length. (Section 13-1d .) Yardage must be measured accurately. An error of only 22 yards in overall length will change the USGA Course Rating by 0.1 of a stroke for men. An error of only 18 yards will change the USGA Course Rating by 0.1 of a stroke for women.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


The table is indeed for unrated tees, but could be used for other reasons.  For example,  a tournament setup on a particular day that takes into account current weather.   A couple of holes into the wind are played on a shorter tee box.  This happens at out club.

I believe the OP was talking about a number of tee markers at the back end of their respective tee boxes.  If there are not a similar number of tees played on the forward end of their boxes, the course is setup longer than rated.

I used the term significant because if you look at the table, a couple of tees played back is not going to make much of a difference in the rating/slope and consequently is not going to give you an out of line differential when you post your score.  As I said, the table is really for different tees that are not rated or tees not part of the normal rated setup, not a few tees played back or forward.

Unless you have at least a couple of hundred yard difference in course length vs. rated length, I wouldn't bother trying to adjust anything.  Your differential, which is computed from four elements, (Slope and Rating being  two of them), really isn't going to change that much.

Also, if the tees markers are on the correct tees, you just can't just adjust for back tees, you would have to also adjust for any tees forward to get a true rating.  In a perfect world, there is suppose to be a balance of forward, middle, and back tees on any given day.

Regards,

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Dormie1360

The table is indeed for unrated tees, but could be used for other reasons.  For example,  a tournament setup on a particular day that takes into account current weather.   A couple of holes into the wind are played on a shorter tee box.  This happens at out club.

I believe the OP was talking about a number of tee markers at the back end of their respective tee boxes.  If there are not a similar number of tees played on the forward end of their boxes, the course is setup longer than rated.

I used the term significant because if you look at the table, a couple of tees played back is not going to make much of a difference in the rating/slope and consequently is not going to give you an out of line differential when you post your score.  As I said, the table is really for different tees that are not rated or tees not part of the normal rated setup, not a few tees played back or forward.

Unless you have at least a couple of hundred yard difference in course length vs. rated length, I wouldn't bother trying to adjust anything.  Your differential, which is computed from four elements, (Slope and Rating being  two of them), really isn't going to change that much.

Also, if the tees markers are on the correct tees, you just can't just adjust for back tees, you would have to also adjust for any tees forward to get a true rating.  In a perfect world, there is suppose to be a balance of forward, middle, and back tees on any given day.

And, if it's not a permanent change, it's a single round with the course set up a bit longer.  Happens all the time.  It's also worth noting, that adjusting the CR for that one round will be to your detriment as it will lower your differential a bit.  But again, not enough to make any real difference over a single round.....

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Dormie1360

The table is indeed for unrated tees, but could be used for other reasons.  For example,  a tournament setup on a particular day that takes into account current weather.   A couple of holes into the wind are played on a shorter tee box.  This happens at out club.

I believe the OP was talking about a number of tee markers at the back end of their respective tee boxes.  If there are not a similar number of tees played on the forward end of their boxes, the course is setup longer than rated.

I used the term significant because if you look at the table, a couple of tees played back is not going to make much of a difference in the rating/slope and consequently is not going to give you an out of line differential when you post your score.  As I said, the table is really for different tees that are not rated or tees not part of the normal rated setup, not a few tees played back or forward.

Unless you have at least a couple of hundred yard difference in course length vs. rated length, I wouldn't bother trying to adjust anything.  Your differential, which is computed from four elements, (Slope and Rating being  two of them), really isn't going to change that much.

Also, if the tees markers are on the correct tees, you just can't just adjust for back tees, you would have to also adjust for any tees forward to get a true rating.  In a perfect world, there is suppose to be a balance of forward, middle, and back tees on any given day.

This sounds reasonable to me...is it the official USGA policy or just your common sense?

:mizuno: MP-52 5-PW, :cobra: King Snake 4 i 
:tmade: R11 Driver, 3 W & 5 W, :vokey: 52, 56 & 60 wedges
:seemore: putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This also begs the question in regards to the play it forward campaign where many of the courses I play in CO have been moving there tees forward but I know they have not re rated them for the new yardages.

In the bag-

Driver- Ping Anser 9.5  Diamana Ahina
3 Wood-RBZ tour 15
Hybrid-RBZ tour 4 Irons-  Ping I20s 4-GW with soft stepped X100sWedges 58 and 54 SM4s with soft stepped X100s Putter- Ping TR Senita

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by MEfree

This sounds reasonable to me...is it the official USGA policy or just your common sense?

Can't speak for the USGA, but I  think the handicap folks would tell you if you play rated tees, just post the score as is.  If you play a course where the tees are consistently placed mostly forward or back causing the course to play significantly different than it's rated yardage,  I'd mention it to the folks responsible for this.  If you're concerned that your score(s) are significantly affected by this, take a look at the chart if you want.  But remember, you have to compute the differences for all 18 tees.  I'm betting it really won't change your differential.

As mentioned, the chart is for playing different and/or unrated tees.  The USGA assumes the course is being setup correctly, an equal distribution of front, middle, and back tees.  I should mention this goes for flags as well.  Don't' forget, the course yardage is based on middle pins also.  As with tees, there should be a even distribution of front, middle, and back pin placements.

So, as you can see, there is a lot that has to be considered.  That's why I'd not worry about a few back tee placements.

BTW, anyone can call the USGA, and say you have a question concerning a handicaps.  They'll get you to a handicap person who can help out.

Regards,

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3898 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Agree. The next omission needs to be that ridiculous team concept. Nobody cares about a team when they really don’t represent anything except being a group of diminished morality and/or washed up pro golfers. Or wait, we’ve also got total nobodies who’ve accomplished nothing who now get a participation trophy! Doesn’t that sound invigorating!
    • LIV moving to 72 holes is a subtle admission that 54 holes was nothing but a joke all along. 
    • I was going to start a thread, but this seems like the place.  Yesterday I played my matchplay match at my local club.  My opponent is a notorious sandbagger by reputation.  The pro once pulled his tournament rounds from the past several years and said that it is impossible his tournament rounds are legit based on his handicap. here is what happened last night.  I am getting 4 shots from him.  His current handicap index is 15.3 i shot 45 on the front.   Was down 4 after nine, he had three birdies and shot even par. I was closed out on thirteen, we halved with a bogey.  That bogey put him one over par for his round.   He then took a triple on 14 and then left. As if that wasn’t bad enough, he lied about his score.   I wrote down on my scorecard what the score was.  He put higher values that didn’t affect the outcome of the match to pad his score and apparently make it not look as obvious.   He shot 36 on the front, but claimed 40.  The higher values for his score were in the online scoring app our club uses.  He did it this way: I won #7. He had a 2 foot putt for par that if he made would still lose the hole.   He picked up and said it didn’t matter since I won.  He took a 5 instead of a 4 after picking up a gimme. on #8 his approach shot on this par 4 was 8 inches.  I verbally conceded the putt but I had hit into a hazard.  I finished the hole with a 6.  Instead of birdie he put in for par. on #9, another par 4, his approach was to 18 inches.  I missed my par putt and then knowing how close I verbally conceded the putt.  I missed my bogey putt, he never conceded mine.  Instead of birdie he put down a bogey. He padded his score by 4 shots on the front.  And then did again on 10.  I rinsed one and made 6 on a par 4.  I putted out and he was fishing balls out of the lake so I drove off to the next tee.  He had 15 feet laying two but claimed a 5.     love to know the odds of a 15 handicap being even thru 12 holes on a round of golf. 
    • They've been chuckling since they hooked the shark. I think Greg doesn't realize the jokes on him.
    • to confirm, I'll need a hotel for Friday and Saturday, planning to share with you
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...