What part of "IMO" don't you understand? What part of "circumstantial" don't you understand?
And it is based on the evidence that he initially said he saw nothing when he was confronted, and later amended it to say he thought it oscillated. Why did he stop moving the stick? It is my OPINION that it is more likely that he had to see it when it moved. He had the best seat in the house.
And it's not a stretch to think Tiger is trying ot get away with something. Ask Elin about that.
You're confusing "moveMENT" with "moved." No f**king doy that he saw moveMENT in the ball and that is why he stopped trying to move the stick. He said as much. What reasonable person wouldn't stop moving the stick once he saw movement? After that, we have two choices ... take the man at his word, or ignore what he's telling us and form our own opinion based on the fact that he cheated on his wife several times, seveal years ago.
I'm not going to bother asking you which of those two you think is more reasonable, because I know your answer.