Jump to content
IGNORED

Ok, someone please explain this to me


atxpkrgolf
Note: This thread is 3813 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Handicaps are redone every 15 days in Texas by my 'home course'.  I have been playing a lot better recently and I'd consider myself a 5-7 handicap as I shoot between 74-82  95% of the time and the other 5% a 72-73  or 83-85 if I play awful.  I am by no means a 'scratch golfer' or even a 0.8 which is what my index now says. What the heck???

From Ghin.com Index for player    0.8

I 10/15/13 83 75.0/134 6.7 Falconhead Golf Club
AI 10/13/13 78 72.9/130 4.4 Falconhead Golf Club
I 10/10/13 76 75.4/126 0.5 Winstar Golf Course South/East
AI 10/9/13 80 75.4/126 4.1 Winstar Golf Course South/East
CI 10/8/13 75 76.2/128 -1.1 Winstar Golf Course South/West
AI 10/8/13 73 70.4/123 2.4 Winstar Golf Course South/West
AI 10/7/13 82 76.5/153 4.1 Oak Tree National
I 10/7/13 79 74.5/137 3.7 Tour 18 Dallas
I 10/3/13 78 73.0/123 4.6 Winstar Golf Course South/West
I 10/3/13 81 72.1/117 8.6 Winstar Golf Course East/West
I 10/1/13 74 74.8/124 -0.7 Winstar Golf Course East/West
I 9/27/13 83 72.7/124 9.4 Winstar Golf Course South/East
I 9/25/13 76 72.1/117 3.8 Winstar Golf Course East/West
CI 9/22/13 76 68.4/112 7.7 Winstar Golf Course West/East
I 9/17/13 75 75.4/126 -0.4 Winstar Golf Course South/East
I 9/13/13 75 74.8/124 0.2 Winstar Golf Course East/West
I 9/12/13 76 72.7/124 3.0 Winstar Golf Course South/East
I 9/11/13 84 75.6/126 7.5 Winstar Golf Course South/West
I 9/10/13 74 72.7/124 1.2 Winstar Golf Course South/East
9/9/13 79 75.4/126 3.2

Winstar Golf Course South/East

I did shoot a 72 and a few 73's the 2 week period before this but this just can't be right.  I am super excited over how much better I've gotten and my goal is to be a scratch golfer soon but I know some scratch golfers and I am not one of em. What gives?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Your handicap index is based upon your best 10 of your last 20 differentials...NOT scores.  If you look at your differentials, you shot a 75 that calculated out to be a -1.1 differential and another 75 that calculated out to -0.4 differential. I used the handicap calculation in the USGA manual and yes, you are a 0.8 handicap index player.  Appears you are mixing up the tee boxes you play.  You might want to move back and play from the tougher tee boxes more often.  Congratulations on a very good handicap.

Bag: Titleist
Driver: TM RBZ 9.5
Fairway metals: TM RBZ 3 wood
Hybrids: TM RBZ 3, 4 and 5
Irons: TM Burner 1.0 6 thru LW stiff steel shafts
Putter: Ping B60
Ball: TM Tour Preferred X or ProV1x
Check out littlejohngolfleague.com  A Greater Houston TX traveling golf league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I always play the back unless Im in a group where their are bets and everyone is playing up one.  Im not gonna give up $ to play 40 yds back  but I understand that. thx 4 reply, I knew it only took best 10 but to be a scratch I thought you'd have to shoot 10 scores of par out of last 20 but I clearly dont know anything about how handicap works

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I always play the back unless Im in a group where their are bets and everyone is playing up one.  Im not gonna give up $ to play 40 yds back  but I understand that. thx 4 reply, I knew it only took best 10 but to be a scratch I thought you'd have to shoot 10 scores of par out of last 20 but I clearly dont know anything about how handicap works

you consider yourself a 5-7 handicap, yet you put 1.6 has your index in your profile?   i think you're simply posting to brag.  well, it worked...  jealous i am.

In my Grom Stand bag:

 

Driver: Ping G20, 8.5 Tour Stiff
Wood/Hybrid: G20 3W, Raylor 19*, 22*
Irons: R9 5I - SW, TM CGB LW

Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi-Mid

Favorites: Old Ranch (Seal Beach), Ike/Babe (Industry Hills), Skylinks (Long Beach), Desert Willow (Palm Desert)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


you consider yourself a 5-7 handicap, yet you put 1.6 has your index in your profile?   i think you're simply posting to brag.  well, it worked...  jealous i am.

I posted myself as what Ghin.com said I was when I joined

^^^^^

What he said.  Let your game speak for itself and avoid tooting your own horn too much.

I expect this from a interent forum but not even close to what Im saying if u cared to read. I DON'T THINK I'M  a 2  by any stretch which is why I was curious how this is done or if it's even right  Sigh

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

I posted myself as what Ghin.com said I was when I joined

I expect this from a interent forum but not even close to what Im saying if u cared to read. I DON'T THINK I'M  a 2  by any stretch which is why I was curious how this is done or if it's even right  Sigh

Please read up on course ratings and how handicaps are calculated.

You can be a scratch golfer without every shooting par or better if you play highly rated (course rating) courses.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Look at your scores compared to the course rating not par. However those courses have funky ratings. I've never seen a course here with that high of a CR and that low of a SR.

Dave :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

When looking at your handicap, you need to consider the difficulty of the course (I.e. Course rating & slope rating). You play courses/tees that are rated more difficult than what is considered average. Look at your score on 9/10 versus 10/1. They are both 74, but the tee you played from on 10/1 is rated more difficult than the tee you played from on 9/1. So, your differential is going to be better. So compared to what is considered a perfectly average course, you are essentially a scratch golfer (or at least 0.8 from being so)
Link to comment
Share on other sites


LOL, never knew that HC was figd as it was from course rating and yes I do play courses that are generally tougher than average.  Okay, that makes a lot more sense. I was wondering what the heck. So if it is a 75.6  course rating and I shoot 77 that's +1.4 and then u take top 10 of 20.  Sorry boys, I was dropped on my head as a baby apparently

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Look at your scores compared to the course rating not par. However those courses have funky ratings. I've never seen a course here with that high of a CR and that low of a SR.

It's not that difficult, since course rating is mostly determined by length, while slope is determined by difficulty.  A very long course without a lot of unusual difficulty could achieve that quite easily.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

LOL, never knew that HC was figd as it was from course rating and yes I do play courses that are generally tougher than average.  Okay, that makes a lot more sense. I was wondering what the heck. So if it is a 75.6  course rating and I shoot 77 that's +1.4 and then u take top 10 of 20.  Sorry boys, I was dropped on my head as a baby apparently

Yup, it's the only reason I'm a 17. I haven't had a sub 90 round in three years.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

One of my favorite courses got re-rated a few years back when they added an additional set of tee markers (not tees, just markers) on most of the holes.  They did add a couple of tees boxes that made the course longer.  Not that it really matters but the tee designation was black (very back), then blue, white, gold and red (up front).  They had the spacing from tee to tee done as it should be when the rating was done.  Well, then the members started complaining about the length of the white tees so next thing you know they have moved the whites back to about where they originally were on most holes and then the blues got moved forward too.  Also, when the course was rated, the greens were reduced in size by simply not mowing them as wide and deep and letting the rough grow up around the greens.  The course got a more difficult rating.  Later, they increased the size of the greens back to around the size they originally were.  From the whites, the slope rating used to be 123.  Now it is 131.  The blues used to be 130, now they are 135.

Let me tell you, shooting a few good rounds there is a killer for your handicap.  It sure makes you look better than you really are and it makes for a handicap index that does not travel well.

Bag: Titleist
Driver: TM RBZ 9.5
Fairway metals: TM RBZ 3 wood
Hybrids: TM RBZ 3, 4 and 5
Irons: TM Burner 1.0 6 thru LW stiff steel shafts
Putter: Ping B60
Ball: TM Tour Preferred X or ProV1x
Check out littlejohngolfleague.com  A Greater Houston TX traveling golf league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It's not that difficult, since course rating is mostly determined by length, while slope is determined by difficulty.  A very long course without a lot of unusual difficulty could achieve that quite easily.

I understand how courses are rated and I don't think it's impossible it just seems odd. He's playing a facility with 3 9's so he's getting combined ratings. But when was the last time you saw a 7000 yard course with a sub 130 SR? Obviously his course are an exception but I can't think of any. Especially in the conservation era. Haven't seen a course that was just long since the 80's. Up here even with consideration for altitude the only course I play with a CR over 75 has a SR of 144 and it's 7700 yds.

Dave :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fourputt

It's not that difficult, since course rating is mostly determined by length, while slope is determined by difficulty.  A very long course without a lot of unusual difficulty could achieve that quite easily.

I understand how courses are rated and I don't think it's impossible it just seems odd. He's playing a facility with 3 9's so he's getting combined ratings. But when was the last time you saw a 7000 yard course with a sub 130 SR? Obviously his course are an exception but I can't think of any. Especially in the conservation era. Haven't seen a course that was just long since the 80's. Up here even with consideration for altitude the only course I play with a CR over 75 has a SR of 144 and it's 7700 yds.

The Nicklaus designed Old Works course in Montana is over 7700 yards from the tips and is a 75.8 rating with 135 slope.  It purely depends on the length vs. the overall difficulty.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I agree...that slope rating is insanely low considering the CR.  When I read the initial post, my first thought was this course must be built in a wide open field.............. I went to the course website and this was a featured pic:

Talk about spray and play!  I'm sure the whole course isn't like this, but if the course chose this pic to be a feature pic on he website.............that says something!   The course looks pretty damn wide open...... It looks like a nice quality golf course, in spite of the wide open spaces.  I'm sure it will be toughened up over the years to come...

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I agree...that slope rating is insanely low considering the CR.  When I read the initial post, my first thought was this course must be built in a wide open field.............. I went to the course website and this was a featured pic:

Talk about spray and play!  I'm sure the whole course isn't like this, but if the course chose this pic to be a feature pic on he website.............that says something!   The course looks pretty damn wide open...... It looks like a nice quality golf course, in spite of the wide open spaces.  I'm sure it will be toughened up over the years to come...

Dude, it's wide open. I mean if u spray it u are dead but there is only 3 holes where u can't play to safety. In all honesty I could hit a 3 wood off of most tees and be fine.  The part that makes it tough is the wind and the greens as the wind in the prairie is blowing > 20 mph every dang day & it seems to never help

Link to comment
Share on other sites


that picture is amazing.  my home course is short but damn does it punish you if you are out of its narrow fairways.  Even a gentle slice or hook usually requires some kind of sideways (or even backwards) second shot unless you roll the dice and try to hit through the trees/bushes/etc.  Also lots of leaning and overhanging trees that force you to play one side of the fairway to have an angle to the green.  I think I could pass myself off as a decent golfer at ATXPKR's track.  Love it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3813 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I did read the fine print tonight. It said replace with “similar features & function”.  8 yeas ago my purchase had features that today are available on the lower end models and the current version of my model has more “bells & whistles” than what I got 8 years ago.  So I am thinking they honored the agreement and I can’t argue the offer. since getting a credit for the full purchase price all I am really out over the past 8 years was the cost of the extended warranty, which was less than a low end  treadmill would have cost me. now the question is which model to replace with.  I’ll stay with Nordic Track or I forfeit the $1,463 credit so I will get Nordic Track.  And they honored the warranty and were not hard to work with which is a plus.
    • Generally speaking, extended warranties are a terrible deal and should almost always be avoided. They are a huge profit center for the companies that offer them, which should tell you almost everything you need to know about how much value most consumers get when purchasing them.  This is correct, and the old adage applies - only buy insurance when you can't afford the loss. This usually doesn't apply to most consumer goods.  To your second question, no I don't believe the offer is fair. They are replacing it, but it is not being replaced at "no cost to you". Since the amount being disputed (over $500) is non-trivial, I would probably push the issue. Don't waste your time on the phone with a customer service agent or a supervisor. They have probably given you all they have the authority to do. Rather, I would look at the terms of your agreement and specifically legal disputes. The odds are you probably agreed to binding arbitration in the event of a dispute. The agreement will outline what steps need to be followed, but it will probably look something like this.  1. Mail the Nordic Track legal department outlining your dispute and indicate you are not satisfied with the resolution offered.  2. Open up a case with the AAA (American Arbitration Association), along with the required documentation. 3. Wait about 4-5 weeks for a case to be opened - at which point someone from Nordic Track's legal department will offer to give you the new model at no cost to you.  They certainly don't want to spend the time and energy to fight you over $500. 4. Enjoy your new Nordic Track at no cost to you. I recently entered binding arbitration against a fairly large and well known company that screwed me over and refused to make it right. In my demand letter, I made a pretty sizeable request that included compensation for my time and frustration. Once it hit their legal department, they cut me a check - no questions asked. It was far cheaper to settle with me than to send their legal team to defend them in the arbitration.
    • I never thought of looking at it on multiple purchases like you said.  Yes, the extended may help me on 1 or 2 items but not the other 5 or 6.
    • Day 84 - Forgot to post yesterday, but I did some more chipping/pitching.    Back/neck were feeling better today, so I did a much overdue Stack session. 
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬛⬛🟩🟨⬛ 🟩⬛🟩⬛🟨 🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...