Jump to content
IGNORED

2014 NCAA Football


saevel25
Note: This thread is 3349 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Well since my Buckeyes currently SUCK at basketball. I thought I start something a bit more uplifting. NCAA FOOTBALL!!! Never too early to start discussing it.

Well as of right now the current big thing is the new proposed rule change. Basically a "FALL START" penalty for offenses that snap the ball with in the first 10 seconds of the play clock. Here is why I think it is total BS. Another reason why I am glad that Bret "The Crybaby" Bielema is out of the Big Ten.

All though they wave the rule for the last 2 minutes. Some teams need to hurry up for as much as the whole fourth quarter for a comeback. So this will actually inhibit the excitement of a comeback. Unlike what has been said, fast pace offenses DO NOT cause more injuries. In actuality injury reports say they cause LESS injuries. Probably more to do with scheme then fast pace, it still is a blow.

Bret cited death certificates, basically throwing CAL University under the bus because one of their players died during a training run. Hence this was not in a scrimmage, not in a game, it was during training.  What Bret should have advocated is for better physical screenings to make sure players who might have some sort of heart defect or other physical problem that could arise are ineligible to play. They can also review the practice methods as well. Claiming just because CAL runs high pace offense and a player died has nothing to do with fast pace offense is horrible twist of a tragic situation for that university.

Those advocating the change are NOT those who run high pace offenses. It would be different if a coach who use to run fast pace came forward claiming he saw negative impacts on athletes from his offense and wanted to make sure that they are protected. If you look at the two teams that like to control the clock, run it down, slow the game down it is Nick Saban and Bret Bielema. Makes me wonder what agenda they have.

I know he use to be a coach for that team up north. I give Rich Rod props for standing up for his philosophy on football and producing this,

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

@saevel25 ,

It's March and there is a foot of snow on the ground.  I don't start thinking about football until I can smell fall in the air!

Agreed on the false start penalty.  It is exciting to watch fast pace teams.  Peyton Manning would have a stroke if this happened in the NFL.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...

It's never too early or too late to talk about football in this state. There's football season and getting ready for football season and no time in between. ;-) Of couse Saban wants a rule change to slow the game down. It's pretty obvious that a fast paced offense is his Achiles heel...And he is WAY too stuborn to use it to his advantage on offense (so far and I figure forever). When he threatened to walk if he didn't get a new contract I would have told him it's been really fun, we really enjoyed it, and don't let the door hit you on the way out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 1 month later...

I hope they were some good crab legs!!!

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I hope they were some good crab legs!!!

Ha ha!

BTW. How did the Buckeyes look in spring training?

Alabama looked like crap!

Of course playing against yourselves it's always hard to tell for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Go Irish!

Driver: Taylormade RBZ :tmade: Irons: Titleist AP1 :titleist: PW-4 All other clubs are needing upgrading as I am able to afford it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Ha ha!

BTW. How did the Buckeyes look in spring training?

Alabama looked like crap!

Of course playing against yourselves it's always hard to tell for sure.

A lot of guys sat out, so there were a lot of 2nd and 3rd string guys in there. I think it did well to show the depth. I know the score was low, but Meyer knows he has Braxton back. He has a stable of talented running backs. Some serious speed on the edge, and a few guys with a year under their belts. If the offensive line can solidify then that offense will score on anyone. So really I was more concerned with the defense.

The D-line is just stacked. They got 8-10 guys who could flat out start for any team in the country. They already talked about how they are getting away from 1st and 2nd team for the D-line, and move them into pods or platoons. This is Larry Johnson's idea to curb the fast offenses. They have 4 guys who can switch in and out FAST. They don't switch out one or two guys, but the whole line. So they got 8-10 guys who can flat out terrorize an offense. Think of it this way. They return all starting D-lineman from last year. This D-line was ranked 9th in rushing defense. They ranked tied for 7th with 42 sacks last year. Want to guess how many of those were coverage sacks. Probably about 5 of them. If the secondary plays better, this D-line will cause some havoc next year.

As for the linebackers, finally some players are stepping up. Looks like the depth is finally developing.

Now the secondary is what will make or break this team next year. With the addition of Ash as the co-defensive coordinator. He switched to a coverage scheme similar to Narduzzi at Michigan State. A lot of press coverage. Simplify things down, solidify the secondary with what the linebackers and d-line is doing. Really allowing the the DB's to play more athletically. So, we'll see how that goes. There is hope, the Ash guy looks to be a very good young, smart defensive minded coach.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10868843/pac-12-coaches-critical-sec-decision-maintain-8-game-conference-schedule

The big, bad SEC is apparently afraid to play games against the big, bad SEC.  Methinks that if you choose to schedule one less game against a solid conference opponent and replace it with one more game against Northeast South Dakota A&M;, then you put a big ding in your argument about how tough your conference is.

I agree with the coaches in the article ... that all of the conferences should play the same amount of conference games.  Of course, I also think that they should all play solid non-conference opponents as well.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't mind an 8 game schedule. I know the Big Ten is going away with scheduling non-FBS schools opponents. If things are heading towards the 5 super conferences. It would be interesting to see how that effects scheduling.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10868843/pac-12-coaches-critical-sec-decision-maintain-8-game-conference-schedule

The big, bad SEC is apparently afraid to play games against the big, bad SEC.  Methinks that if you choose to schedule one less game against a solid conference opponent and replace it with one more game against Northeast South Dakota A&M;, then you put a big ding in your argument about how tough your conference is.

I agree with the coaches in the article ... that all of the conferences should play the same amount of conference games.  Of course, I also think that they should all play solid non-conference opponents as well.


They should have gone to 9 conference games just to pacify the Pac 12. Would have made very little difference in strength of schedule anyway. Even Nick Saban wanted to go to 9 games.

After all we've heard for years that the bottom half of the SEC isn't any good!

Does seem a bit ironic that another conference would talk out of one side of it's mouth and say that the bottom half of the SEC is weak and out of the other side of it's mouth complain that another conference game wasn't added, thus weakening the schedule.

I really couldn't care less because a team in a conference with a weak bottom half might actually be toughening their schedule by playing less conference games.

What I do hate (and always have) is the scheduling of "rent a victim" directional schools no matter who does it.

If I could have my way all major conferences would play 8 conference games but be required to schedule teams from the other major conferences for at least 2 (preferably 3) of the non-conference games. That would be better for college football and would give us many more regular season matchups between schools from the major conferences. It would also give the playoff selection committee a much better cross reference of the strength of conferences every year. Over time it would level the playing field quite a bit.

I would love to see the equivalent of Alabama/Ohio State or Alabama/USC twice a year every year on everybody's regular season schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


They should have gone to 9 conference games just to pacify the Pac 12. Would have made very little difference in strength of schedule anyway. Even Nick Saban wanted to go to 9 games.

After all we've heard for years that the bottom half of the SEC isn't any good!

Does seem a bit ironic that another conference would talk out of one side of it's mouth and say that the bottom half of the SEC is weak and out of the other side of it's mouth complain that another conference game wasn't added, thus weakening the schedule.

I really couldn't care less because a team in a conference with a weak bottom half might actually be toughening their schedule by playing less conference games.

What I do hate (and always have) is the scheduling of "rent a victim" directional schools no matter who does it.

If I could have my way all major conferences would play 8 conference games but be required to schedule teams from the other major conferences for at least 2 (preferably 3) of the non-conference games. That would be better for college football and would give us many more regular season matchups between schools from the major conferences. It would also give the playoff selection committee a much better cross reference of the strength of conferences every year. Over time it would level the playing field quite a bit.

I would love to see the equivalent of Alabama/Ohio State or Alabama/USC twice a year every year on everybody's regular season schedule.

I don't think that anybody would argue that the bottom half of the SEC is not as good as Florida Atlantic, Southern Miss and Western Carolina though.  So if you're going to play the patsies with all of your non conference games, then it does seem fair that they should all play the same amount of conference games.

Stanford (whose coach was the main one quoted in the article) plays two really weak non-conference opponents as well, so his argument does make a lot of sense.  They have 2 "guaranteed" wins (their other non-conference game is ND) against UC Davis and Army, whereas Alabama has 3, against the aforementioned schools.

Of course, if the one game you are taking off the schedule is from the bottom of the conference, then, yeah, it doesn't make much difference, but that isn't always the case.  The two teams Stanford is not playing this year are both from the bottom half of the league.

Two of the teams that Alabama is missing this year are Missouri and Georgia ... not exactly bottom half teams.  If you're able to play one extra game against a C-USA team instead of Georgia, you're going to have an easier time of it.

But I'm mostly arguing just to argue, because I pretty much agree with everything you said.


By the way, this is music to my ears: http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10872678/fewer-bowl-games-set-new-year-eve-day-accommodate-college-football-playoff

I loved growing up and being able to watch most of every game on New Year's Day, and also knowing that the only games being played that day, were games that mattered.  Now it's back to that, apparently. :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It all depends on how the 5 conference come out of their talks and wanting to break away from the NCAA. I am sure the Big Ten is fine with 8 games or 9 games. So really if it comes down to it, you have the SEC wanting 8, and the Pac-12 wanting 9 games. Well I would prefer 8 games myself because if the trend is to play more FBS schools and more quality opponents, I want to see as many as those as I can. I rather see Ohio State play 3 good quality non conference games than 2 game + a Big Ten opponent. Just my take on it. I like variety.

To me it all depends on if expansion goes to 14 or 16 teams, and what bylaws they want on scheduling. I would hate for them to shun all non big-5 schools.

I would almost like to see a premiere soccer league style of play, were the worst team gets dropped from a conference, then you add someone who is on the list in a geographical similar area.

For example. Lets say you have 14 teams in each of the top 5 conferences. That is 70 schools. Currently you have 126 FBS schools. I would personally like to see 6 divisions, which could happen with the remnants of the expansion. Lets say you have 70, then say each conference has 10 schools in the subdivision. Those schools would battle to get into the top 5 divisions.

Just some ideas

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...

Somebody serious about naming the stadium after Johnny Manziel.

Really? :doh::doh::doh::doh:

C'mon. Sure he was a good player. Even won a big game one time, but seriously...Not like he was a one man show either (note the NFL draft picks he had around him).

I can think of absolutely no circumstances where a player that had just left (and without even winning a conference championship I might add) would make anybody think about renaming "Byant Denny", "Jordan Hare" or any other stadium that I can think of.

SMH!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


In most college football crazy areas, it is about getting as many home games as possible to generate revenue.  9 SEC games means having one less home game every other year which turns into millions of $$ for the university and the local economy.  Sure we all want to see Alabama, LSU, Auburn vs Ohio State, USC, FSU but the presidents and athletic directors want to see big bank accounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 1 month later...

Ohio State just landed the top inside linebacker and the 6th ranked strong side defensive end!! They are good pace to maybe grab the top dual threat QB, and a top 10 running back as well!!

Keep it up Meyer!!

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Ohio State just landed the top inside linebacker and the 6th ranked strong side defensive end!! They are good pace to maybe grab the top dual threat QB, and a top 10 running back as well!!  Keep it up Meyer!!

Hes such a good recruiter he made Brett Bielema take his ball and go to Arkansas ha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hes such a good recruiter he made Brett Bielema take his ball and go to Arkansas ha.

I think Brett wanted to get out from under Alvarez's thumb at Wisconsin

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3349 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 82: 3/18/24 Tried a Stack session but could not certify my warmup. Finished with indoor chips and putting. 
    • Day 96 (18 Mar 24) - Continued work with the Divot Board with the GW and hard foam balls.  Focused on small target/small miss…setup to hit target about 30yds out - success if it hit within 6’ circle of target, fail if outside.  Had decent success averaging about 3 out of 4 (hitting in groups of four).  
    • Wordle 1,003 3/6 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩   felt a little like Wyndham when the first three green and I began the fist pump…
    • I'm relieved someone finally defined hiking. I was giddy when I saw these new TPI videos a day or so after they dropped. Very easy to understand the problem and solution the way they have presented it. Been working on fixing this for about a year and a half now. It's nice to be able to call it something so communication becomes easy.  I was working on more lateral and up too, but just having someone define it clearly in video form was so helpful for me to continue confidently with what I thought was wrong and how I had to fix it.  My conceptual error here was just trying to rotate like a tour pro but without including the necessary forward pressure/weight shift associated with enough lateral and upward motion of the pelvis.  This video is great too, as is Greg Rose.
    • Day 2.    couple mins of rolling putts end over end.    10 mins of Slow, mirror work, working on starting the downswing and impact wrist positions. Hit a couple balls into the net after.    Then finished with a couple chips to see if I could repeat what I worked on yesterday. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...