Jump to content
IGNORED

U.S. Should Consider Something like Seve Cup


FarawayFairways
Note: This thread is 3420 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I'm not an advocate of doing the thing that makes the most short term money. I'm not even an advocate of doing the thing that makes the most money, even if I happen to think that's winning, so in this case would be a mutual benefit by coincidence !!! But I'm curious ....

What event would have the largest commercial appeal

A North versus South match featuring 24 American players and 2 captaincy teams of Americans

or

The US versus Australia and few Southern Africans

I ask becuase Europe has the 'Seve Trophy' where the UK & Ireland play continental Europe. It's low key and doesn't command a television audience of any note. What it is being used for increasingly is a training ground. Most of the top players don't play it anymore (don't need to) and to be honest, we don't learn anything by them participating other than a handful passing on experience. In the past Rory's played it, but no longer does. I think Poulter might have been the senior pro on the last round with Lawrie

Basically 24 emerging European players play it and in effect bond, train, and learn in an environment that replicates aspects fo the team match play. We've seen the deadly partnership of Dubuisson and Super Joost form!!! Beware.

Mind you, I should say that we saw Stephen Gallacher flop in it, yet that wasn't enough to prevent McGinley picking him!!! It doesn't always work. McGinley got away with his mistakes (or his team bailed him out) Watson didn't

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
Just for context, this was posted a couple of hours ago in the Fred Couples thread where the issues of the Presidents Cup was being questioned, but for some reaosn has shown up here as a new thread

Because it was off topic in that other thread, where the topic was Fred Couples making comments on Tom Watson and the RYDER Cup.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If I had to choose between U.S. North vs. U.S. South or U.S. vs. AUS+RSA, I'd choose the former because the latter would be a bloodbath (and also very similar to the Presidents Cup). Wait, now I'm confused. Do you mean U.S. North and South or North America vs. South America?

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Because it was off topic in that other thread, where the topic was Fred Couples making comments on Tom Watson and the RYDER Cup.

Even though the proceeding post was about reforming or removing the Presidents Cup from the roster and mine a resposne to that. I trust you moved that as well?

No - didn't think so

So someone block quotes me in the previous post, turns the issue (legitimately) into an open question about how America might like to use the Presidents Cup, by way of preparing for the Ryder Cup. I respond to it, (legitimately) and you remove it and create a new thread! Very poor moderating I'm afraid

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
Even though the proceeding post was about reforming or removing the Presidents Cup from the roster and mine a resposne to that. I trust you moved that as well?

No, because the preceding post was discussing the Ryder Cup. The poster only mentioned the Presidents Cup once as a random suggestion (somewhat facetiously, mind you) towards improving the Americans' performance in the Ryder Cup. [quote name="FarawayFairways" url="/t/78614/u-s-should-consider-something-like-seve-cup#post_1084685"] No - didn't think so So someone block quotes me in the previous post, turns the issue (legitimately) into an open question about how America might like to use the Presidents Cup, by way of preparing for the Ryder Cup. I respond to it, (legitimately) and you remove it and create a new thread! Very poor moderating I'm afraid [/quote]Two things: [list] [*]You didn't quote anyone, so it was unclear that you were responding to someone at all. Doesn't change the fact that what you wrote was off topic. [*]Moving off topic posts and discussion into their own threads where they can be discussed properly is exactly what good moderating is. It keeps threads clean and easy to read through.[/list] Look, your train of thought merits its own discussion. I don't see what the big deal is about. Discuss it others here, or don't. Up to you :-)

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

"up to me"

You're quite right, I'll take that decision, and I see you've been interefering with posts again

Any board depends on its contributions and what its membership wants to talk about. It is the contributors that define the board not its moderators. Officious moderators who seek to become the centre of attention will usually do more damage than good.  If you'd looked back at the thread in question you'd realise it was full of suggestions about how America might improve it's Ryder Cup performance (plenty that don't include box quotes too as if that makes any any difference and is in your T&C;'s). Threads will drift in the direction of the flow that the members take them from time to time. You should embrace this in name of free speech as they usually get back on track without soem commissar continually ruining them. The only scope you leave I'm afraid is narrative, so might as well put up a ticker of RSS newsfeed to inform people of what the latest Fred Couples statement is rather than invite people to broaden it out and comment.

Sadly you're palpably struggling to realise this, and frankly if you're going to intervene to impose your own will on the direction threads take then there really is little point continuing with this place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

@FarawayFairways , please stick to the topic here. Your post (which was off topic enough to warrant being moved to its OWN thread) is the topic, not your opinions of my moderation.

Any board depends on its contributions and what its membership wants to talk about. It is the contributors that define the board not its moderators.

Absolutely. Of course, the membership also enjoys threads full of relevant discussion that isn't cluttered with confusing, off-topic posts. When that happens, moderators move posts to clean it up.

Officious moderators who seek to become the centre of attention will usually do more damage than good.

The irony is, nobody would have known your post had been moderated at all if you didn't bring it up. Who's the one that wants to be the center of attention?

If you'd looked back at the thread in question you'd realise it was full of suggestions about how America might improve it's Ryder Cup performance (plenty that don't include box quotes too as if that makes any any difference and is in your T&C;'s).

Yup, it sure was. And your post has absolutely nothing to do with it. Nothing. There isn't a single mention of the Ryder Cup in it.

Threads will drift in the direction of the flow that the members take them from time to time. You should embrace this in name of free speech as they usually get back on track without soem commissar continually ruining them. The only scope you leave I'm afraid is narrative, so might as well put up a ticker of RSS newsfeed to inform people of what the latest Fred Couples statement is rather than invite people to broaden it out and comment.

I'm completely baffled as to how you fail to realize that your post was off-topic in the other thread. Somehow moving it here prevents people from commenting? I don't get it.

You wanted to talk about proposing changes to the Presidents Cup or possibly creating something like the Seve Cup in America. Here it is, in it's own dedicated thread. Even had someone comment on it, too, but you didn't address anything he brought up.

Sadly you're palpably struggling to realise this, and frankly if you're going to intervene to impose your own will on the direction threads take then there really is little point continuing with this place.

Have a nice day :-)

  • Upvote 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So the idea is to have the US players play in a yearly or biannual 'training match' against somebody? Sounds good.-Lets do it. The stars wont play in it but thats fine-The young ones who hope to play in it will be eager to because it could make them a more appealing captains pick. Bring back 4 picks.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

What event would have the largest commercial appeal

A North versus South match featuring 24 American players and 2 captaincy teams of Americans

or

The US versus Australia and few Southern Africans

None.

As it is, the Presidents Cup is only interesting for some people some of the time. For example Australian viewers when it is played in, say, Melbourne.

The U.S. players have to pretend they find it important. The non U.S., non Euro players have to like it because it's that or nothing. And a poor relation to the Ryder Cup.

Most people like the Ryder Cup because it has history and drama and the disturbing pattern it has taken on over the least decade, and what it reveals about U.S. players.

Any other competition would be as interesting as a silly season cashfest with very little (or zero) commercial interest/potential.

  • Upvote 1

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


None. As it is, the Presidents Cup is only interesting for some people some of the time. For example Australian viewers when it is played in, say, Melbourne. The U.S. players have to pretend they find it important. The non U.S., non Euro players have to like it because it's that or nothing. And a poor relation to the Ryder Cup. Most people like the Ryder Cup because it has history and drama and the disturbing pattern it has taken on over the least decade, and what it reveals about U.S. players. Any other competition would be as interesting as a silly season cashfest with very little (or zero) commercial interest/potential.

I agree with every word. We've finally gotten rid of most of the silly season nonsense. Let's keep it that way!

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3420 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 119: 4/24/24 Chipping and pitching followed by putting through 50 mm gates.
    • @boogielicious and I are definitely in for the Stay & Play and will need the extra night's stay on Friday. I don't know what the plans are for our group on Friday but even if we don't make it for dinner with the rest of the Friday arrivals, I'll be more than happy to meet up somewhere for a beer or something.
    • Taking your dispersion and distance in consideration I analyzed the 4 posible ways to play the hole, or at least the ones that were listed here. I took the brown grass on the left as fescue were you need to punch out sideways to the fairway and rigth of the car path to be fescue too.  Driver "going for the green"  You have to aim more rigth, to the bunker in order to center your shotzone in between the fescue.  Wood of 240 over the bunkers I already like this one more for you. More room to land between the fescue. Balls in the fescue 11% down from 30% with driver. Improve of score from 4.55 to 4.40. 4 iron 210 yards besides the bunkers.    Also a wide area and your shot zone is better than previous ones. This makes almost the fescue dissapear. You really need to hit a bad one (sometimes shit happens). Because of that and only having 120 yards in this is the best choice so far. Down to 4.32 from 4.40. Finally the 6 Iron 180 yards to avoid all trouble.    Wide area an narrow dispersion for almost been in the fairway all the time. Similar than the previous one but 25 yards farther for the hole to avoid been in the bunkers. Average remains the same, 4.33 to 4.32.  Conclusion is easy. Either your 4iron or 6 iron of the tee are equaly good for you. Glad that you made par!
    • Wish I could have spent 5 minutes in the middle of the morning round to hit some balls at the range. Just did much more of right side through with keeping the shoulders feeling level (not dipping), and I was flushing them. Lol. Maybe too much focus on hands stuff while playing.
    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...