Jump to content
IGNORED

somethings wrong with my old callaway iron clubs and shaft.


Note: This thread is 3293 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I have my old callaway x tour forged cavity back irons and i still use them. The shaft is ns pro 950 R Flex and whats funny is that i hit the 7 iron. The max is 150 yards. I tried other one srixon blade with a stiff+ kbs tour c taper shaft 7 iron at my lesson studio and i hit it 170 yards. Same swing and same speed. I dont get it. Is theres something wrong with the set i currently use?

I tried the other shaft with fujikara multi composite the one thats mixed with steel and graphite R flex and it hit 170 yards too.

I also tested the muira blade with kbs tour R flex and it also hit 170 yards.

When i tried my callaway 7 iron over and over again, it still goes 150 yards.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites


First of all, please clarify...

Are you hitting the Callaway X.Forged irons (circa 2007)? Callaway made X Tour irons, and the X.Forged, but no X.Tour Forged.

For Srixon, I'm assuming the "blade" is the Z745 iron.

So, let's compare the 7 irons:

X.Forged...Loft = 35° , shaft 37" // NS Pro 950 R = 95 grams, w/ mid launch

Z745........ Loft = 32° , shaft 37" // KBS C-Taper X = 130 grams, w/low launch

...............................................// KBS Tour R = 110 grams, w/mid launch

Part of the difference in distance - 150 vs. 170 yards - will be the stronger loft of the Srixon 7i.

Also, the NS Pro is 15 to 35 grams lighter in weight than either KBS shaft. Are you also ballooning the 7i shots from the X.Forged?  If so, the heavier KBS shaft(s) may match your swing tempo better than the NS Pro.

The shaft weight remarks are speculation. Gather some launch monitor data on your shots, and you can better tell what's going on.

Also, I find it interesting that you hit the same distance with C-Taper X and the KBS Tour R.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hello,

Yes it is Callaway x tour 2007 cavity back. and its forged too cos it says forged on the back of the hosel. The x forged is different one with the blade design. Here is my current iron set picture.

A kind of a balloon but i cant really tell when its in straight line to target but it goes like really high. No matter what i tried to swing really fast and it still goes high.

Thankks

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Height in iron shots is good, unless you have too much of it. Sounds like you get better performance and more distance with the heavier - and sometimes stiffer - iron shafts you tested with the Srixon irons. Also, The Srixon 7i is +3º stronger in loft than the X Tours, which also would increase distance.

IF you check on a Mizuno shaft optimizer, I suspect you would also find that you have a rather forceful transition movement from the top. A quick transition swing often benefits from stiffer shafts.

There's likely nothing wrong with the X Tour iron set structurally - it's probably a case that they no longer fit your swing.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

thank you for your reply

so that means either get the x tour reshafted or get the blades ones from any top manufacture like callaway etc

If its gonna be re shafted, which one do you think its best for me either the kbs, project x or dg x100? Though i have heard kbs has its own problems of bending or snapping off the hosel. I have not hit the latest project x and the x100.

I heard the nippon modus shaft was really good too.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You are at 14 HDCP. I would suggest you simply get a new set of irons. By the time you reshaft with a premium shaft, you won't save much $$ by getting it reshafted. Here's your probable cost per iron.

Reshaft labor $20 + new grip $8 + regrip labor $3 = $31 per club, not counting shaft.

So $31 x  8 clubs = $248 for labor and regrip.

Cost of shafts: Nippon Modus $37 x 8 = $296  // Project.X  6.0 set of 8 = $296 //  KBS Tour C-Taper $37 x 8 = $296 (the shafts you like are all the same price!)

Total cost to reshaft set = $248 + $296 = $544. That's a lot of $$ to put into 10-year-old irons.

You could get the Callaway XR.Pro upgraded with Project X 6.0 shafts for about $1,000 or you could look at recent trade-in clubs and find one with the shafts you want. Do a test hit, get any tweaks needed, and you can get a slightly used set for about $600.

Also, a Game Improvement head on a heavier, lower launching shaft might be preferable to a true blade iron. True blades are hard to hit - that's why many pros no longer use them.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

oh geez,

arent the x tour game improvement irons? and you mean the true blade are muscle back ones?

I can hit a blade like titliest ap2 because i like the feel and it goes further than cb which kind of a different feeling.

I am trying to get the iron set working for me haha

thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That's right. The 2005 X.Tour are GI (had nearly a 3 year production run), and the 2007 X.Forged are the Player's - an early muscle-cavity rather than a true blade. The 2009 X.Forged has a cleaner muscle-cavity look.

The X.Tour broke the numbering between the X16 and the X18, X20 and X22 models, which had both standard and Pro/Tour variants. You almost need Maltby's MPF iron family playability charts to see where the X.Tour fits in.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3293 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Hit my tee shot just into the penalty area and barely found it. Swung hard just in case I hit it. It was slightly downhill with a heavy tailwind. I don't actually hit my 9i 170 yards.
    • Right. The difference between being 120 out and 70 out for me (this is the important part) is negligible and not worth putting other risks into play off the tee.   Ok the argument against driver is that my shot cone is comically large. It puts every possible outcome into play. You can't see the green from the tee so there's a good chance I'd have to wait for it to clear which would slow down play. That's the third tee right in the middle of the firing range there. I really don't want to wait just to hit a terrible shot and I especially don't want to injure somebody. Yea I have no problem playing out of the rough short of the bunker if I'm just going to lay up short of the bunker, but I absolutely need to avoid flaring it right into the penalty area if I'm going to be laying up in the first place. As a general strategy I understand where you're coming from. But since we're specifically talking about me (this is a shot I'm going to have to hit on Saturday), I think the cost is fairly marginal. I hit the ball 8' closer on average from 50-100 than I do from 100-150 from the fairway and rough and the green success % difference is 4%. Bunker might as well be a penalty drop. Based on the data,  Here's my SG:A data compared to a 10: I honestly don't know how to use SG for decision making. That's why I was mostly looking at proximity to hole and green success rate for comparison. I mostly use SG as a way to track my progress. All good. Like I said, I appreciate the discussion. It makes me think. If I didn't want to see alternative/opposing viewpoints to my own I just wouldn't post anything. You should post it! In your own swing thread, of course. It's been a fun exercise.
    • Played my first 2024 round at Pierce Lake. Boomed my first drive down #10 fairway, then slowly slipped into mediocrity. 83 (69.6/131). The high point was going 2 of 4 on sand saves. My sand game is pretty marginal but today I must have discovered the secret for a couple hours.
    • day 34. Technique practice. Became too quick and outcome oriented. need to slow down and work on technique again. 
    • Day 534, April 18, 2024 Practice before lessons today. Priority piece. No sim this time. 🙂 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...