Jump to content
IGNORED

Question about Handicap


Buck Nutz
Note: This thread is 3271 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I am prepping for a golf trip in two weeks and the group is having a hard time pulling their stuff together as far as handicapping rounds. We just have a foursome but we are rather scattered in skill. Our top player is an 8, followed by a 12, 14 and a 24. We try to keep things simple, even and fun. Before we go out the card gets marked up to show how many strokes player A gives to B,C,D. The way it has worked in the past is player D is 16 shots diff from player A so he gets a stroke on the hardest 16. Player C get strokes on the top 6 holes and player B gets a stroke on the top 4. This seems simple enough and we have done it like this for years but now player A says he is getting jobbed for strokes. Full disclosure, the handicaps will move a bit on our trips as people are playing good or bad. We play some low dollar games the first day (36) and set finals hancicaps for the last two days were we do a match play with some other side games. Player A has never won the match play and I see his point about having the deck stacked against him giving up a stroke on 16 holes. Player D is the kinda guy that will run off a string of pars and have an absolute blowup to sink the scorecard. I guess what I am asking, is ther a more equitable solution or,does it sound like we are doing it right? Thanks
Link to comment
Share on other sites


What format are you playing?

In match play the strokes would be figured like this:

A vs B (A gives 4)

A vs C (A gives 6)

A vs D (A gives 16)

B vs C (B gives 2)

B vs D (B gives 12)

C vs D (C gives 10)

1. If the handicaps are correctly calculated (and based on honest scores) that should product equitable results.

2. Don't forget ESC when figuring your handicaps, it is possible you are overstating D's handicap.

3. If A is the sort of player who will shoot 10 pars and 8 bogeys and D is a player who will shoot 12 pars and 6 quads A will lose to D nearly every time (and A giving D only 6-8 strokes would not change the picture much).

4. How are you calculating the handicaps to begin with?  (and how are you adjusting them?) That could introduce some bias to the numbers too.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

One other question, how are you doing the match play within the group?

Something like this? (assuming 36 a day):

A vs B, C vs D (Morning day 2)

A vs C, B vs D (Afternoon day 2)

A vs D, B vs C (Morning day 3)

#1 vs #2, #3 vs #4 (Afternoon day 3)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

You're doing it right, to wheel off the low man and to give strokes on the lowest handicap numbered holes. It's worth mentioning, that holes receive their handicap rating relative to each other not based on overall difficulty , but rather the difference in the average number of strokes that it takes a scratch golfer to play the hole versus that of a bogey golfer. @fr0sty is right when he says that the higher hcp players are likely to have a slight advantage in match play due to the greater variance in their scores from individual hole to individual hole. To counter that, an easy/popular solution is to play everyone to 80% of their handicap for match play only.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

" 4. How are you calculating the handicaps to begin with?  (and how are you adjusting them?) That could introduce some bias to the numbers too. [/quote] One of the guys tracks the round and plugs them into a program he has (not sure which one). It seems accurate as it matches what my official handicap is and I only keep my own. We turn in true scores due to playing with each other pretty regularly and we won't let things slide with .25, .50 cents on the line. To answer the match play format, we "roll the tee" on the morning of day 2 to get the matchup. We play a different game in the afternoon (usually wolf or East vs West). On the morning of day 3 the two winners from the previous day play and the two losers play. The terms of the bet are worked out between the two players. Afternoon round day 3 (final round) it's a stroke play with money in the hat and winner take all. It's a great time but a lot to keep up with.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3271 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Makes sense.  Like I said, I wouldn't have been upset at their original offer either, and based on the fine print it seems like they've held up their end of the deal.  
    • If you've only had to adjust retroactively one time in 8 years and have around 5 people each year without handicaps, that's like 40-50 people total so it sounds like you're doing a pretty good job. I think your questions give enough to go off of. This might be a good way to get new people to actually post a few scores during the 6 weeks leading into the first event. Something like "New members will be eligible for tournament money once they have at least 3 posted rounds in GHIN" or something like that. If they can get 3 rounds in prior to their first event, then they're eligible. If not, they'll soon become eligible after an event or two assuming they play a little bit outside of events.
    • This is a loooooong winded narrative so if you don't like long stories, move on. 😉 Our senior club typically gets about 25 new members each year. We lose about 25 members each year for various reasons (moved to FL/AZ, disabled, dead, too expensive). Of the new members, usually 20 have an active GHIN handicap. About 5 each year do not have a GHIN handicap. When they join our club, we give each member a state association membership that includes GHIN handicapping services. We play a series of handicapped tournaments over the summer. When we sign up a new member who does not have a GHIN handicap, we attempt to give them an estimated index until they have sufficient scores posted to have an actual GHIN index.  Our first event typically is around May 15 so, in theory, a new member has about 6 weeks to post a few scores. Posting season in the Mitten starts April 1. Inevitably, several of the unhandicapped individuals seem  to either not play until the first tournament or can't figure out how to enter scores (hey, they are seniors). That situation then leads to my contacting the new member and asking a series of questions: a. Did you ever have a GHIN handicap? If yes, which State and do you recall what it was? b. Do you have an alternate handicap through a non-GHIN handicap service or a league? c. What do you think your average score was last year (for 9 or 18) d. What was your best score last year? Where did you play and which tee was used? e. What do you consider a very good score for yourself? Based on their responses I attempt to give them an index that makes them competitive in the first couple events BUT does not allow them to win their flight in the first couple events. We don't want the new members to finish last and at the same time, we don't want someone with a "20" playing handicap to win the third flight with a net 57. In the event some new member did shoot a net 57, we also advise everyone that we can and will adjust handicaps retroactively when it is clear to us that a member's handicap does not accurately reflect their potential. We don't like to adjust things retroactively and in the 8 years I have chaired the Handicap Committee, we have only done it once. So here are the questions to the mob: Any ideas how to do this better? Any questions one might ask an unhandicapped individual to better estimate their index/handicap? Would it be reasonable to have a new player play once (or more?) without being eligible to place in the money?
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Awesome! I got that a while back with my start word! Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨 ⬜🟨⬜🟩⬜ ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...