Jump to content
IGNORED

When Does a Tour Player Become a "Name" Player?

mvmac

By mvmac,
in Tour Talk

 Share
Note: This thread is 3269 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
mvmac Incredible Member

mvmac

  • Moderator

Some discussion of no-names being on the leaderboard at the Players. Someone mentioned Chris Kirk and I kinda disagree with that, he's won 3 times on tour and almost made the Ryder Cup last year. He's not a big name but he's also not coming "from out of nowhere". Since I follow golf regularly I might be a bit biased on what I consider a "name" player.

So at what point do you think it happens? When they win a major? A big event like a WGC, Players or Tour Championship? When they're on the cover of Golf Digest? Rickie Fowler has "only" won once but is obviously one of the most recognizable players in the world.

Some players come to mind that were once no-names that are now name players:. Billy Horschell, Jason Dufner, Zach Johnson, Graeme McDowell, David Toms, Miguel Angel Jimenez.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook! 
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My Facebook, Twitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1

Ernest Jones Incredible Member

Ernest Jones

Didn't they all come out of nowhere at one point, minus a few exceptions like Tiger who were SO dominate at the amateur level that they were on the radar before even turning pro? I guess I would consider anyone that has shown some consistency in terms of top tens as a "name" even if they haven't yet won. If you see him on the front page of the leaderboards often enough you're going to be aware of him.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1

ChrisP Great Member

ChrisP

I don't even know if winning a big tournament would make them a "name player". Not many people know who Craig Perks, Lucas Glover or even Trevor Immelman are. I think consistency is the big thing. Couple that with wins and that helps. Rickie Fowler only has one win but he's pretty consistent on leaderboards. Same with Billy Horschel. He only has a few wins, but he's consistent. But you also need to stay consistent or people forget about you...such as Stewart Cink.

Of course, you can also become a "name player" for the wrong reasons......such as Jean Van de Velde.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aguirre Great Member

Aguirre

I can't define it clearly.  To me, it's when their name interests me on the leaderboard.

My buddy and I have a name for players who are just leaderboard filler on Thursday and Friday:  Chalmers.  As in Greg Chalmers.

To me, everybody is a Chalmers until I'm excited to see their name on the board. Billy Horschel and Chris Kirk are still Chalmers for the time being, despite their talent.

EDIT--Horschel is close, though.  A Tour Championship is a big deal.  But I'm not like, "Oh, look at this leaderboard, Spieth, Furyk, and Horschel.

"Witty golf quote."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

saevel25 Incredible Member

saevel25

I think a lot of self promotion helps. I think Ricky was a bit over-rated in terms of living up to the hype around him. His name is always mentioned and has done a great job being one of the young guys on tour who wants to be the face of golf going forward,

I think it is much more media driven then success driven. I would say that if Ricky has a major and a few more wins he would probably be even more well known.

I think consistently having a lot of mentioning on sunday helps out. You can get guys who might win a few and be in the top 10 a few other times, but then just disappear into the middle of the pack. It clearly helped Ricky when he was in the top 10 in all of last year's majors. I think it has more to do with personalities as well. He stands out.

I think it is a mix of personality and winning. Some players can just blend into the background, like Zach Johnson.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: :titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Mac62 Great Member

Mac62

I think consistency is the key also.  A guy who comes from out of nowhere and wins a major, then disappears back into obscurity might be a major winner, but he's still a no-name in the big picture - much more so than the guy who's never won, but is on the leaderboard all the time and has a bunch of top 10 finishes.  Hard to call a guy like that a no-name.

  • Upvote 1

Mac

WITB:
Driver: Ping G30 (12*)
FW:  Ping K15 (3W, 5W)
Hybrids: Ping K15 (3H, 5H)
Irons: Ping K15 (6-UW)

Wedges: Cleveland 588 RTX CB (54*, 58*)

Putter: Ping Scottsdale w/ SS Slim 3.0

Ball: Bridgestone e6

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1

Rick Martin Great Member

Rick Martin

I think consistency is the key also.  A guy who comes from out of nowhere and wins a major, then disappears back into obscurity might be a major winner, but he's still a no-name in the big picture - much more so than the guy who's never won, but is on the leaderboard all the time and has a bunch of top 10 finishes.  Hard to call a guy like that a no-name.

I believe that is the key.

I think a lot of self promotion helps. I think Ricky was a bit over-rated in terms of living up to the hype around him. His name is always mentioned and has done a great job being one of the young guys on tour who wants to be the face of golf going forward,

I think it is much more media driven then success driven. I would say that if Ricky has a major and a few more wins he would probably be even more well known.

I think consistently having a lot of mentioning on sunday helps out. You can get guys who might win a few and be in the top 10 a few other times, but then just disappear into the middle of the pack. It clearly helped Ricky when he was in the top 10 in all of last year's majors. I think it has more to do with personalities as well. He stands out.

I think it is a mix of personality and winning. Some players can just blend into the background, like Zach Johnson.

I see some similarities w/ Payne Stewart and Fowler in that their dress brought them more attention and fans early in their careers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Golfingdad Incredible Member

Golfingdad

I think a lot of self promotion helps. I think Ricky was a bit over-rated in terms of living up to the hype around him. His name is always mentioned and has done a great job being one of the young guys on tour who wants to be the face of golf going forward,

I think it is much more media driven then success driven. I would say that if Ricky has a major and a few more wins he would probably be even more well known.

I think consistently having a lot of mentioning on sunday helps out. You can get guys who might win a few and be in the top 10 a few other times, but then just disappear into the middle of the pack. It clearly helped Ricky when he was in the top 10 in all of last year's majors. I think it has more to do with personalities as well. He stands out.

I think it is a mix of personality and winning. Some players can just blend into the background, like Zach Johnson.

I think consistency is the key also.  A guy who comes from out of nowhere and wins a major, then disappears back into obscurity might be a major winner, but he's still a no-name in the big picture - much more so than the guy who's never won, but is on the leaderboard all the time and has a bunch of top 10 finishes.  Hard to call a guy like that a no-name.

I think you put these two answers in a blender and that's the best overall answer. :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Kieran123 Great Member

Kieran123

If you're a unique type of player it somewhat helps.

Keegan Bradley - some weird shit going on before he swings the club

Dufner - dufnering, also extremely laid back

Fowler - flat brim hat, unique style

If your wearing khakis and a shirt that's too big for you vs a guy wearing all orange - who's gonna get more exposure?

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

isukgolf Great Member

isukgolf

I think having a hot, high profile, girlfriend helps :) ... and of course winning ...

Ken Proud member of the iSuk Golf Association ... Sponsored by roofing companies across the US, Canada, and the UK

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1

Golfingdad Incredible Member

Golfingdad

If you're a unique type of player it somewhat helps.

Keegan Bradley - some weird shit going on before he swings the club

Dufner - dufnering, also extremely laid back

Fowler - flat brim hat, unique style

If your wearing khakis and a shirt that's too big for you vs a guy wearing all orange - who's gonna get more exposure?

Yes.  I've heard more about Chesson Hadley and his finger snapping thing that he does than any other up and comers.  Being 6'-2" tall and 85 lbs also helps him stand out a bit as "unique." ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Natural Patrick Great Member

Natural Patrick

Yes.  I've heard more about Chesson Hadley and his finger snapping thing that he does than any other up and comers.  Being 6'-2" tall and 85 lbs also helps him stand out a bit as "unique." ;)


Oh come on man, Chess is every bit of 120#  LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ElWagonne Dedicated Member

ElWagonne

I would add staring down a name-brand down the stretch in a big event.  This is how David Toms got on the radar, via staring down Mick at the PGA, or YE staring down Tiger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. Desmond Super Member

Mr. Desmond

When TST says he is a "Name" Player.

Silly question...

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1

Vinsk Incredible Member

Vinsk

Depends on the audience as well. What generation? But currently these items come in to play I think: 1. Obviously a win in a major. 2. Consistently in the top 10 in any year in popular tournaments 3. A big hitter. Non-pure golf issues can effect the magnitude of these issues: 1. Off course behavior (good or bad) 2. Strange behavior on the golf course (clothing, attitude, swing ) 3. Famous parents, siblings, etc. Sometimes there can be many wins, a lot of good finishes but the player is just plain boring and remains relatively unrecognized. And of course the opposite is true. I believe we all can think of several players who fall into the above criteria.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1

saturday Great Member

saturday

Didn't they all come out of nowhere at one point, minus a few exceptions like Tiger who were SO dominate at the amateur level that they were on the radar before even turning pro?

I guess I would consider anyone that has shown some consistency in terms of top tens as a "name" even if they haven't yet won. If you see him on the front page of the leaderboards often enough you're going to be aware of him.

This.

Also, whether people like to hear it or not the media plays a part in the development of a "name" player just by the spotlight put on players constantly.

:titleist: 913 D2 w/ Oban Kiyoshi Purple :ping: G25 3 Wood w/ Graphite Design Tour AD-DJ6 :titleist: 913H 21* w/ Diamana Blue :ping: G25 4 - PW :vokey: SM4 Oil Can - 52, 56, 60 :cameron: Studio Select Newport 2 :golflogix: :bushnell: Tour V3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 3269 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up

  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.

  • Posts

    • retoid
      A Novice Journey to Building a Bag. (Help Appreciated)

      By retoid ·

      First off please forgive me if this is not a proper post or not in the proper location, still learning the ropes around here. Second, it's important that I mention I am very new to the game with only about 10 rounds of golf under my belt, most being 9 holes. Only this year have I started playing 18. That being said, I am hooked, love the game and am very eager to learn and improve. To give you an idea of my skill, the last 2 18 rounds I played were 110 and 105. Not great at all, however I am slowly improving as I learn. Had been having bad slicing issues with the driver and hybrids but after playing some more and hitting the range, I've been able to improve on that quite a bit and have been hitting more straight on average. Irons have always come easier to me as far as hitting straight for some reason. Wedges have needed a lot of improvement, but I practice chipping about 20-30 mins about 3-5 times a week and that's helped a lot. Today I went to the range and started to note down some distance data, mind you I am averaging the distances based off my best guess compared to the distance markers on the range. I do not currently own a range finder or tracker. From reading some similar posts I do understand that filling gaps is ideal, but I am having a some issues figuring out those gaps and understanding which clubs to keep and remove as some gaps are minimal between clubs. Below is an image of the chart I put together showing the clubs and average distances I've been hitting and power applied. For some reason I am hitting my hybrids around the same distances and I am not sure why. Wondering if one of them should be removed. I didn't notice a huge loft difference either. The irons I have are hand me downs from my grandfather and after playing with them a bit, I feel like they're just not giving me what could potentially be there. The feel is a bit hard/harsh and underwhelming if that makes sense and I can't seem to get decent distances from them. Wondering if I should be looking to invest in some more updated irons and if those should be muscle backs or cavity backs? My knowledge here is minimal. I have never played with modern fairway woods, only the classic clubs that are actually wood and much smaller than modern clubs. I recently removed the 4 and 5 woods from my bag as I was never using them and I don't hit them very well or very far. Wondering if I should look into some more modern fairway wood options? I appreciate any feedback or advice anyone is willing to give, please forgive my lack of knowledge. I am eager to learn! Thank you.  
    • snapfade
      Is This Club Blatantly Sandbagging?

      By snapfade ·

      I would think that 3 in a row with the same players might get some behind the scenes examination from the SCGA if they were suspect.  Are there any clubs questioning the results?
    • iacas
      Is This Club Blatantly Sandbagging?

      By iacas ·

      What simple fact? A golf match is not a coin flip — there is a fact for you. I'm trying to help you, and you're throwing out what could easily be called sour grapes. Come with FACTS, not weak analogies. Then you've got nothing. Hopefully they've done a better job of making their case. 😛 
    • Big C
      Is This Club Blatantly Sandbagging?

      By Big C ·

      It's pretty close. The odds of a 50/50 shot going your way 21 times are greater than 1 in a million!  I guess your point is, that simple fact is not enough to declare these guys dirty rotten sandbaggers. I disagree, but fair enough. I posted it here on the message board to get different perspectives, after all.  I probably won't be digging further into specific scores. I have no dog in this fight beyond a generalized contempt for sandbagging. With that said, it would not surprise if a lot of clubs shared my concern and were grousing about it to the SCGA.
    • snapfade
      The Pro Tours Random Thoughts and Musings Thread

      By snapfade ·

      I had an article on Cam Smith pop up along with this..... Current major eligibility list for all LIV Golf players Here's a look at which majors, if any, all LIV Golf players are eligible.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

  I accept
The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...