Jump to content
IGNORED

A shadow to indicate line of play - does intent matter?


Golfingdad
Note: This thread is 3197 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Another hypothetical that would almost certainly never occur, but, hey, it's still fun to learn, right?

The situation:

Playing a leisurely early evening round with my 6 year old last night and I arrived at my ball in the fairway of the 11th hole and parked the cart to the west of the ball ... without really thinking about it.  (With a 6-year old in tow you're paying attention to a lot of non-golf related things ;))

When I start to line up my approach shot I realize that I've put the cart shadow in front of my ball.  I like to use an intermediate target when lining up shots as well, and you can imagine that this shadow helped me with that.  I was most definitely not thinking about that when I parked the cart, so the question becomes: Is playing a shot with the cart there, and the shadow assisting in getting the line, a violation?

The rule (8-2) states: Except on the putting green , a player may have the line of play indicated to him by anyone, but no one may be positioned by the player on or close to the line or an extension of the line beyond the hole while the stroke is being made. Any mark placed by the player or with his knowledge to indicate the line must be removed before the stroke is made.

The second sentence is where it's at, I believe.  I would argue that the carts' shadow would certainly qualify as "any mark placed by the player."  The question involves the next portion of the sentence - "to indicate the line."  In this case, the mark was not placed to indicate the line, it just so happened that it did.  So does the intent when placing the mark matter?

I also glanced through the Decisions, but didn't find any that pertained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

My interpretation is that intent matters. If not, the rule would have ben written "Any mark placed by the player or with his knowledge which indicates the line must be removed before the stroke is made. The fact that it indicates the line isn't material....that it was placed specifically to indicate the line is.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There are several cases where indicating line of play inadvertently is not a violation.  For instance, if a caddy removes the pin and inadvertently stands with his foot on a direct extension of the putting line, that's not a violation - as long as there was no intent and it was truly inadvertent.

Or if your partner was ahead of you and placed his bag on the hill and happened to put it right along your line of play, it would not be a violation unless it was done on purpose to indicate the line of play to you.

So no, accidentally parking your cart where the shadow happens to coincide with line of play would not be a violation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'd say that intent certainly matters, by the explanation in the rule itself.  If you purposely parked the cart there with the intent for the shadow to indicate a line of play, then IMO you'd be in violation of the rule.  If there was no such intent and it just happened to turn out that way, then I'd say there's no violation - no different than using a divot mark, weed sprout, dry patch, etc. ahead of your ball as an intermediate target to line up your shot.

Mac

WITB:
Driver: Ping G30 (12*)
FW:  Ping K15 (3W, 5W)
Hybrids: Ping K15 (3H, 5H)
Irons: Ping K15 (6-UW)

Wedges: Cleveland 588 RTX CB (54*, 58*)

Putter: Ping Scottsdale w/ SS Slim 3.0

Ball: Bridgestone e6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3197 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Oh I'm dumb, I just noticed I did the MyStrategy from the wrong tee box. I don't think it changes anything, though. I'll play it as a three shot hole and I still don't really want to miss right (guy I played with on Sunday never found his ball he hit just over the trees right). I think the trees left are considered part of the environmentally sensitive area because it's part of the drainage area for the course. I actually like this hole a lot. I'll try to remember to take a picture next time. I probably overestimated the wind speed. We had sustained winds of like 12-15mph with gusts up to 25mph. The wind is actually forecast to be WNW on Saturday instead of WSW like was when I played on Sunday so if I play this hole again the wind will be pushing towards that bunker. Similar speeds, though. Wind is always a factor at this course because there's really nothing blocking it. I'm definitely going to have to pay attention to it, especially with the wind. I hit a handful of short iron approaches a lot farther than I thought I would on Sunday. As of right now the only thing I know for sure is I'm starting on Ridge. I don't know if the back 9 will be played on Meadow or Lake.
    • Day 113: 4/18/24 Stack training progress check after finishing my 6th program, and 4th Full Speed Spectrum Training session, which is recommended for my next program.     Gained 1 mph with driver, 195 g, 95g. Maintained with 280 g , and gained 2 with 145 g. Lost 1 mph on both lead and trail arm. Felt like I lost distance in my last round…
    • Please forgive the sweaty shirt.  Just got off the treadmill and decided to do my Evolvr drill.  
    • I'd agree that 4w seems like the right play here. I'm not a course designer or anything but that hole looks like it could be so much more fun if everyone played from those front 2 tee boxes that are right outside your shot cone and they cut down most of the trees down that left side of the fairway. That would give risk reward to long hitters who want to try and push it up to that left fairway, allow more players to reach that second fairway, and still allowing it to be perfectly playable for someone who only hits driver like 150yds off the tee.   Yeah it looks like 4iron aimed at that inside edge of the right bunker is the play there, especially if you don't expect a 20mph tailwind again. If it is down wind again, 5iron would be just fine too, it'd still get you inside 150yds for your approach.  Keep in mind tee marker locations too, you measured that one from the back so if those tee markers are moved all the way towards the front of that box then 5 iron is probably best just to be sure that right bunker is never in play. 
    • Day 1: worked on my drill for my arms.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...