<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crazy Week in Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesandtrap.com/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review</link>
	<description>Golf News, Reviews, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:22:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12157</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/?p=2523#comment-12157</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;12152&quot;]It&#039;s arguable that if she &#039;turns in&#039; an unsigned scorecard that she has in fact turned in nothing at all, (as if I had paid you with an unsigned check) meaning that if she subsequently signs a card and turns it in that action could be coinsidered to the first &#039;turn in&#039;.[/quote]

I&#039;m sorry, but no. If you&#039;ve &quot;turned in&quot; your card per the rules, you&#039;ve turned in your card. You&#039;ve not &quot;not turned in&quot; something and you&#039;ve not &quot;turned in nothing.&quot; If your &quot;turned in&quot; card lacks a signature, per the Rules of Golf, &quot;too bad, so sad&quot; for you. The current rules have no ambiguity. They&#039;re clear, concise, and easy to understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quote_header"><a  href="http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12152">Jeremy said</a> on July 30, 2008:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12152"><p>
It's arguable that if she 'turns in' an unsigned scorecard that she has in fact turned in nothing at all, (as if I had paid you with an unsigned check) meaning that if she subsequently signs a card and turns it in that action could be coinsidered to the first 'turn in'.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I'm sorry, but no. If you've "turned in" your card per the rules, you've turned in your card. You've not "not turned in" something and you've not "turned in nothing." If your "turned in" card lacks a signature, per the Rules of Golf, "too bad, so sad" for you. The current rules have no ambiguity. They're clear, concise, and easy to understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12152</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/?p=2523#comment-12152</guid>
		<description>hmm... I see what you are getting at Erik

&#039;In other words, the Rules of Golf require that you &quot;turn in&quot; a properly signed scorecard. The LPGA defines when &quot;turning in&quot; the card occurs.&#039;

It&#039;s arguable that if she &#039;turns in&#039; an unsigned scorecard that she has in fact turned in nothing at all, (as if I had paid you with an unsigned check) meaning that if she subsequently signs a card and turns it in that action could be coinsidered to the first &#039;turn in&#039;.

I can see the value of a rule against signing an incorrect card, but on this one I don&#039;t see who or what benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm... I see what you are getting at Erik</p>
<p>'In other words, the Rules of Golf require that you "turn in" a properly signed scorecard. The LPGA defines when "turning in" the card occurs.'</p>
<p>It's arguable that if she 'turns in' an unsigned scorecard that she has in fact turned in nothing at all, (as if I had paid you with an unsigned check) meaning that if she subsequently signs a card and turns it in that action could be coinsidered to the first 'turn in'.</p>
<p>I can see the value of a rule against signing an incorrect card, but on this one I don't see who or what benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12118</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/?p=2523#comment-12118</guid>
		<description>Fair enough. Thanks for clearing that up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough. Thanks for clearing that up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12091</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/?p=2523#comment-12091</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;12061&quot;]So I ask again: what is the rule that states you must sign cards in a particular area designed to prevent or control?[/quote]

The USGA Rules of Golf stipulate that a card must be signed when it is turned in (rule 6-6). The LPGA further defines when you&#039;ve turned your scorecard in as &quot;when you leave the scoring area.&quot; It&#039;s pretty clear.

In other words, the Rules of Golf require that you &quot;turn in&quot; a properly signed scorecard. The LPGA defines when &quot;turning in&quot; the card occurs.

The Rules of Golf seek to eliminate as many &quot;grey areas&quot; as possible, and any of the possible rules revisions people have proposed to &quot;fix&quot; this rule introduce grey areas or unnecessary complexity. It&#039;s not like this rule has tripped up more than about, oh, one person in the past ten years.

I disagree that it&#039;s a stupid rule. Your signature means something, and the way it&#039;s currently defined, it&#039;s very clear when you&#039;ve turned your scorecard in. Furthermore, the rule has to work for a junior golf tournament, a club championship or member-guest, and pro events as well.

I &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt; agree that the LPGA failed its fans and its players by not having an official in the tent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quote_header"><a  href="http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12061">John said</a> on July 25, 2008:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12061"><p>
So I ask again: what is the rule that states you must sign cards in a particular area designed to prevent or control?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The USGA Rules of Golf stipulate that a card must be signed when it is turned in (rule 6-6). The LPGA further defines when you've turned your scorecard in as "when you leave the scoring area." It's pretty clear.</p>
<p>In other words, the Rules of Golf require that you "turn in" a properly signed scorecard. The LPGA defines when "turning in" the card occurs.</p>
<p>The Rules of Golf seek to eliminate as many "grey areas" as possible, and any of the possible rules revisions people have proposed to "fix" this rule introduce grey areas or unnecessary complexity. It's not like this rule has tripped up more than about, oh, one person in the past ten years.</p>
<p>I disagree that it's a stupid rule. Your signature means something, and the way it's currently defined, it's very clear when you've turned your scorecard in. Furthermore, the rule has to work for a junior golf tournament, a club championship or member-guest, and pro events as well.</p>
<p>I <em>do</em> agree that the LPGA failed its fans and its players by not having an official in the tent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shortgame85</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12090</link>
		<dc:creator>Shortgame85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/?p=2523#comment-12090</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;12055&quot;]foundational.huh??

Yeah but my birthday card isn&#039;t rendered invalid because I didn&#039;t sign it within a specially designated fenced off area.[/quote]

You are lacking a Wie bit of relevance, here, my man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quote_header"><a  href="http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12055">Mark said</a> on July 25, 2008:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12055"><p>
foundational.huh??</p>
<p>Yeah but my birthday card isn't rendered invalid because I didn't sign it within a specially designated fenced off area.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You are lacking a Wie bit of relevance, here, my man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12061</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/?p=2523#comment-12061</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;12055&quot;]foundational.huh??

Yeah but my birthday card isn&#039;t rendered invalid because I didn&#039;t sign it within a specially designated fenced off area.[/quote]

Thanks for backing me up on that one Mark.

Whether or not you sign the card inside or outside a designated area makes no difference as long as you sign your name to a card showing the correct scores. I asked in a previous comment which never got published what the rule that caught Wie was supposed to prevent or control but as I said this comment was never published and thus I never got an answer.

So I ask again: what is the rule that states you must sign cards in a particular area designed to prevent or control?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quote_header"><a  href="http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12055">Mark said</a> on July 25, 2008:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12055"><p>
foundational.huh??</p>
<p>Yeah but my birthday card isn't rendered invalid because I didn't sign it within a specially designated fenced off area.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks for backing me up on that one Mark.</p>
<p>Whether or not you sign the card inside or outside a designated area makes no difference as long as you sign your name to a card showing the correct scores. I asked in a previous comment which never got published what the rule that caught Wie was supposed to prevent or control but as I said this comment was never published and thus I never got an answer.</p>
<p>So I ask again: what is the rule that states you must sign cards in a particular area designed to prevent or control?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobsuruncle</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12060</link>
		<dc:creator>bobsuruncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/?p=2523#comment-12060</guid>
		<description>Of the 3 golfers who made waves at The Open, I believe Paddy has it in him to win perhaps 1 more major, likely a third Claret Jug. The reason I say this is bcoz, of the current crop of major winners on tour, the most anyone not named Tiger holds is 3. This includes such superstars as Phil, Vijay, and Ernie. They then seem to fade away. 

I don&#039;t see either Greg nor DD making more waves. Greg just doesn&#039;t practice enough to keep 4 good rounds going. 

Like IBF (Ian Baker Finch), DD has &quot;lost it&quot; mentally and it&#039;s very difficult to come back from there. Tiger is Tiger coz he has the strongest mind in golf today. Without the mind, the body can&#039;t follow. Sorry DD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of the 3 golfers who made waves at The Open, I believe Paddy has it in him to win perhaps 1 more major, likely a third Claret Jug. The reason I say this is bcoz, of the current crop of major winners on tour, the most anyone not named Tiger holds is 3. This includes such superstars as Phil, Vijay, and Ernie. They then seem to fade away. </p>
<p>I don't see either Greg nor DD making more waves. Greg just doesn't practice enough to keep 4 good rounds going. </p>
<p>Like IBF (Ian Baker Finch), DD has "lost it" mentally and it's very difficult to come back from there. Tiger is Tiger coz he has the strongest mind in golf today. Without the mind, the body can't follow. Sorry DD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobsuruncle</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12059</link>
		<dc:creator>bobsuruncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/?p=2523#comment-12059</guid>
		<description>While the &quot;rules are the rules&quot;, and some rules are &quot;dumb&quot;, etc...the main point to take away here is Wie&#039;s maturity and focus, or lack thereof. 

I think Butch Harmon once said of Tiger (who was then a teenager also) - once he stepped &quot;inside the ropes&quot; (the boy) had the &quot;head of a 35 year old veteran&quot;. The way Tiger conducts himself on and off the course, the focus, dedication, etc is a credit to both himself and his upbringing (and hence his parents).

Perhaps the Wie&#039;s can learn from this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the "rules are the rules", and some rules are "dumb", etc...the main point to take away here is Wie's maturity and focus, or lack thereof. </p>
<p>I think Butch Harmon once said of Tiger (who was then a teenager also) - once he stepped "inside the ropes" (the boy) had the "head of a 35 year old veteran". The way Tiger conducts himself on and off the course, the focus, dedication, etc is a credit to both himself and his upbringing (and hence his parents).</p>
<p>Perhaps the Wie's can learn from this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12055</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 05:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/?p=2523#comment-12055</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;12038&quot;][quote comment=&quot;12036&quot;]Anyone care to enlighten me?[/quote]

foundational 

Almost every other rule is based on the fact that, at the end of the day, the player is accountable for his own actions, and attests to that by checking his card, signing it, and turning it in. We sign our checks, we sign contracts, we sign letters we send to relatives or friends on their birthdays, and we sign our scorecards. A signature means something.
[/quote]

foundational.huh??

Yeah but my birthday card isn&#039;t rendered invalid because I didn&#039;t sign it within a specially designated fenced off area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quote_header"><a  href="http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12038">Erik J. Barzeski said</a> on July 24, 2008:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12038">
<p class="quote_header"><a  href="http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12036">John said</a> on July 24, 2008:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12036"><p>
Anyone care to enlighten me?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>foundational </p>
<p>Almost every other rule is based on the fact that, at the end of the day, the player is accountable for his own actions, and attests to that by checking his card, signing it, and turning it in. We sign our checks, we sign contracts, we sign letters we send to relatives or friends on their birthdays, and we sign our scorecards. A signature means something.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>foundational.huh??</p>
<p>Yeah but my birthday card isn't rendered invalid because I didn't sign it within a specially designated fenced off area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trav</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/crazy_week_in_review#comment-12052</link>
		<dc:creator>Trav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/?p=2523#comment-12052</guid>
		<description>Peripatetic but knowledgable observer John Feinstein commented yesterday on radio that he thinks Wie is simply &quot;not that smart.&quot;  Not as in failing to understand there is such a rule, but as in acting like an unfocused and mentally undisciplined child who doesn&#039;t have it together enough upstairs to pay attention to such routine things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peripatetic but knowledgable observer John Feinstein commented yesterday on radio that he thinks Wie is simply "not that smart."  Not as in failing to understand there is such a rule, but as in acting like an unfocused and mentally undisciplined child who doesn't have it together enough upstairs to pay attention to such routine things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
