I'm sure you are a very fine and intelligent person, but you can't seem to grasp the difference between proof and suspicion. I'm not going to re-list the items that are contained in this thread and have been published in medical documents that can lead one to be suspicious of PED use only to have you respond line-by-line with possible reasons why they might not apply to Tiger or anyone else for that matter. I'm tired of that game. And, I'm not going to ask you to prove a negative. As you know, facts and opinions are different. You can mix the two, but they aren't the same. All I'm going to say is stop trying to interpret an opinion as fact. Just stop. It makes you look less intelligent than you probably are.
99% of the people who think Tiger Woods may, MAY,
MAY
have taken PED's hate him? LOL. I must be in the 1%, then. I think your point might be valid, though. I can believe there is a large % of people who believe that Tiger took PEDs who want to see him fail. It might have to do with racism. It might have to do with the enjoyment of watching the mighty fall. It might be that some people just don't like his personality or he treated them rudely by not signing an autograph between holes. Maybe they don't want to see Jack's record fall. Who knows? Whatever the reason, NO ONE can deny Tiger has been great for his sport and has been a source of excitement and interest during his career. So was Dale Earnhardt, but not everybody loved him, either. By the way, I also believe those same people who hate Tiger and want to see him fail don't care if the cause is PED's, infidelity, injury, swing changes or whatever the reason.