We're in that special hell of rules controversies with the implementation of the new Rules of Golf. There have been some growing pains with the new rules, and that has allowed the golf media to tee off on its favorite target, the USGA. Which, to be fair, can make itself an easy target:
That aside, I wanted to talk about the "controversy" about the knee-height drop
Welcome to my blog. I've decided to do something a little bit different from a normal golf blog by focusing a bit more on the Rules of Golf.
The impetus behind this blog is that I volunteered to be the Rules Chairman for my men's club this fall. Now, I am of fairly sound mind, but volunteering to do that is probably a bit crazy. It is fair to ask why I volunteered. Well, I've been interested in the Rules of Golf since I started playing golf seriously. I never really had them introduced to m
Discussing the actual definition of a word is one thing, because even if that word is religious in nature, the conversation is not religious.
This has veered into discussing religion, which is forbidden. It ends now.
$100,000 to the charity of your choice if you can provide a SINGLE shred of evidence that would suggest that "god" exists.
Inconvenient, I know. I'm not sure why this question is so difficult to "engage" with.
It's an academic discussion, not a personal attack. I genuinely am interested in knowing what motivates such beliefs once one reaches a certain age and is capable of independent thought. It can't be based on observation.
Read the Declaration of Independence.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights...."
Unalienable......unable to be taken away from or given away by the possessor.
Endowed.....to provide with something freely or naturally
In other words, these are natural rights. They cannot be taken away