Jump to content
IGNORED

More Fun To Hit It Perfectly Or Score Well?


PerfectStriking
Note: This thread is 1796 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Which is more fun?  

53 members have voted

  1. 1. Is it more enjoyable to strike the ball perfectly or score well?



Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Piz said:

I would rather score well if, as a few others have mentioned, it is possible to strike perfectly and not score well.  Nothing in golf bothers me quite so much as feeling like I blew it: frittering away an excellent opportunity due to poor putting.  

Not to get caught up in semantics but striking it perfectly ain't gonna happen for the pros, let alone guys that are posting about golf on a message board. That said, it is absolutely possible to strike it well above your average and score poorly. I recently shot an 84 with 39 putts (41 if you counted putts from the fringe). I hit the ball great, but it was a brutally disappointing round.

 

24 minutes ago, billchao said:

Me. I mentioned it before, but I've had lower scores where I'm fighting my swing but scramble well and those days are more frustrating than the days I hit the ball well but end up pitching and putting poorly. I go home from the course feeling pretty good about the latter and not such much with the former.

Fair enough. I feel completely opposite, but to each their own. Out of curiosity, is the majority of your golf casual rounds as opposed to competitive rounds? I think that may drive a big part of one's perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

25 minutes ago, Big C said:

I hit the ball great, but it was a brutally disappointing round

I'm questioning this because the extra 3 putts (given a 2 putt per hole) doesn't seem to make up the difference.  You're still shooting 81.  how many GIR and FIR did you have?  You'll pick up more strokes with the long game than with the short game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I voted hit it perfectly.  Don't get me wrong, scrambling for a par or birdie is satisfying in it's own right, but when I visualize a shot and then actually execute it as I've visualized it, those are the most satisfying and memorable shots to me.

  • Like 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

17 minutes ago, ncates00 said:

I'm questioning this because the extra 3 putts (given a 2 putt per hole) doesn't seem to make up the difference.  You're still shooting 81.  how many GIR and FIR did you have?  You'll pick up more strokes with the long game than with the short game.

I haven't used Game golf in awhile, but my average putts per round was somewhere around 31-32 when I was keeping stats. Most decent players are likely in a similar range. 36 putts is a bad putting round. 39 is just brutal. 

I don't remember my GIR that day, but it was enough to reasonably shoot somewhere in the 70's with average putting.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I wanted to choose hitting it perfectly just because that is, for me, more enjoyable during any given round BUT it depends on when you ask. I think I'd enjoy the lower scores afterwards more even if I was not enjoying the round itself. If you ask in the middle of a round where I'm grinding out pars and sweating bullets trying to shoot a decent score I'd probably say I hated it without hesitation. On the flip side, I'd probably not mind not scoring that well if I was striking it perfectly during the round but I might be a bit miffed afterwards counting the score.

Overall though, lower scores bring me back time and time again so... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Edited by benharris
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have rounds where I want one more than another. I would say for casual rounds, like the average weekend, I would like to strike it better. As @Golfingdad mentioned a well struck shot is excellent. However, when playing in a tournament I would like to score better because what I will remember is where I finished more than how it hit it for a tournament.

So I need a "Both, but not in the same round" button. If I am forced to pick, because I play more casual rounds I would rather strike it better.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I voted scoring better, even though if you hit everything perfectly your score should be better. 

Gus
---------------
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hitting it perfectly for me is hitting it as well as I am capable of which is more satisfying to me than a lower score.  Keep in mind that an 84 is as low as I have ever gone but to stay in the 80's I have to hit most of shots well (for my level).  I will take a well struck 86 over a scrambling 84.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
5 hours ago, Big C said:

Out of curiosity, is the majority of your golf casual rounds as opposed to competitive rounds?

Casual, I don't play competitive golf. That may change in the future but I don't see my opinion on this subject changing. I like my recreation to be fun, not work, and grinding out a good score on a bad ballstriking day is work. I get a lot of enjoyment from conceiving and executing a shot well.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

I’d rather hit the ball well. I’ll score fine and it’s more satisfying.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 hours ago, PerfectStriking said:

Would you take this over scoring your best score? Obviously, putting would be the swinger here with those stats.

Would you take those stats and just walk off every green without putting and feel great, or would you feel let down without scoring?

What drives you to come back again and again?

I like it when posters answer their own questions.

I prefer great ball striking versus fortunate scoring.  Yes, score is the one true measure but when one has great ball striking, scoring will follow eventually.

Brian Kuehn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I hit it well today and shot a 98.  Of course, I putted like a blind drunk man today.  Last week, I struggled hitting the ball and shot an 88.  Putted a lot better though...I would rather score well than admire a well struck ball...Actually, I guess I would prefer to hit the ball well and score well....just never happens for me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If you hit it perfectly, you will score well.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, David in FL said:

If you hit it perfectly, you will score well.

Don't tell gbogey that he just said in the post above yours... "Clearly this topic cursed me today - pretty good ball striking day with 9 GIRs, terrible scoring day, not amused!" 🤩 I'm learning a lot from the great answers in this thread, very helpful!

Mark Lyons

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 1796 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I would never do the extended warranty on the $50 slow cooker.  I also routinely reject the extended service plans on those toys we buy for the grand-kids.  I do consider them on higher cost items and will be more likely to get one if the product has a lot of "Electronic Tech" that is often the problem longer-term.  I also consider my intended length of ownership & usage.  If my thought is it would get replaced in 2-3 years then why bother but if I hope to use it for 10 years then more likely to get the extension. I did buy out a lease about a year ago.  Just prior to the lease end date the tablet locked up and would not function.  I got it repaired under the initial warranty and would not have bought it out if they had not been able to fix it since IMO once electronic issues start in a car they can be hard to track down & fix.  They did fix it but when I bought out the lease I paid up for the extended warranty the would cover electronic failures because my intent is to keep that car for another 8-10 years and I just do not trust the electronics to last.  Last week the touch screen went black and was unresponsive.  It reset on the 2nd time I restarted the car but that is exactly how the last malfunction started.  I fully expect to have a claim on that on repair under the extended warranty.  I do not recall the exact cost to fix last time since I did not pay it but I think it was @ $700-$800 and I suspect that will be higher next time.
    • Have you looked at Model Local Rule F-9 Relief from Tree Roots in or Close to Fairway?  You could extend this to cover exposed rocks.  The rule is recommended to be used only for areas relatively near the fairway, a player who hits a shot 20 yards in the woods doesn't really deserve relief.   Players can always take Unplayable Ball relief, they're not required to play it from a rock or a root.  Of course, they hate to take the penalty stroke too.
    • I agree with @klineka, you're clearly doing something right.  Its always going to be a bit of a guessing game if you don't have any scoring history.  On the other hand, understanding that it takes only 54 holes to establish an actual handicap, and they have about 6 weeks in which to play and post enough scores, I don't think its at all unreasonable to require them to have an official handicap before they become eligible for prizes.  I don't know how you structure the fees for the series of competitions, but if its possible they'll play with the group without being eligible for prizes, you could consider a way to let them do that without contributing to the prize pool.
    • I run tournaments and want to put in a local rule that allows relief from tree roots and rocks that are not loose impediments. We have some really terrible lies in some of our courses in my area and nobody is getting paid enough to break clubs. Let me know if you think the verbage for this rule makes sense. Local Rule Roots and Rocks You may move your ball from a tree root or buried rock one club length for free relief no closer to the hole. However you may not use this rule to get relief from a tree, bush, boulder, or other foliage hindering your swing. Your only option here is to play it as it lies or take an unplayable for a one stroke penalty.
    • Makes sense.  Like I said, I wouldn't have been upset at their original offer either, and based on the fine print it seems like they've held up their end of the deal.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...