Jump to content

43 posts / 4843 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts


This is the most impactful test we have ever published. Over the past 10 years, MyGolfSpy has conducted hundreds of tests, and published thousands of articles

You can use the Tableau table directly here if you wish:

AVERAGES

MyGolfSpy 2019 Most Wanted Ball Test - TABLES

I like the tables more than the graphs because the graphs make things appear farther apart than they are, because the scale and range of the axes.

Anyway, Callaway doesn't come off very well here.

Also, within the text, they say some things that I've been saying for years based on what I had learned from ball engineers:

  • Firmer balls = faster balls
  • You don't have to "compress the core"
  • Performance is pretty linear - a fast ball at 115 MPH is a fast ball at 85 MPH
  • Amateurs over-value "soft feel" and it may be costing them distance.

I still think I prefer the MTB Black over the MTB-X because I prefer not to have too much green side spin, but my daughter will likely enjoy the change from the MTB Red to the MTB-X when she runs out of Reds. 🙂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

They also raised the idea that ball fitting was the next big thing. Nothing will have as broad an effect on your game as the ball. It will be interesting to see if personalized balls become a thing for the high end market. I currently play the ProV1x which seems to be a good fit but I wonder if I am adapting to the ball of fitting the ball to me?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The data is nice to see.   Thanks for sharing.   It is interesting to see the difference when you change the club head speed.     At the slower speed I was comparing the Snell MTB Black and the Srixon Q Star Tour.   There isn't much difference.    At the higher club head speed, there is a difference.   Very interesting.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Not a great chart here for the MTB-X, though.

image.png

17 minutes ago, criley4way said:

They also raised the idea that ball fitting was the next big thing. Nothing will have as broad an effect on your game as the ball. It will be interesting to see if personalized balls become a thing for the high end market. I currently play the ProV1x which seems to be a good fit but I wonder if I am adapting to the ball of fitting the ball to me?

Yeah, I still don't think ball fitting is that big of a deal. For many people, the balls perform pretty similarly. There's not a ton of room there, IMO. Maybe they're just suggesting that we fit everything else, so the last small percentage of "fitting" is going to be the ball.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

21 minutes ago, iacas said:

Not a great chart here for the MTB-X, though.

Since this is robot testing, that would be just consistency of product?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Since this is robot testing, that would be just consistency of product?

Probably, yeah. But, yeah, it's not a great look.

And MGS glossed over it pretty well. While they don't accept advertising from the "big name" companies… they do from Snell. And so have we, here, at TST. But we didn't just gloss over a huge discrepancy like that in an article while touting our lack of bias, either.

Nor would we. I've upset sponsors in the past by giving an honest take on products.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

42 minutes ago, criley4way said:

They also raised the idea that ball fitting was the next big thing. Nothing will have as broad an effect on your game as the ball.

When I looked at this data, I actually concluded that there isn't much difference between balls. Look at the difference in carry distance and spin between Titleist ProV1s, ProV1xs, the Bridgestone balls, and the Snell balls. They're virtually the same. Or at least close enough that most amateur golfers aren't going to notice a difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

15 minutes ago, DeadMan said:

When I looked at this data, I actually concluded that there isn't much difference between balls. Look at the difference in carry distance and spin between Titleist ProV1s, ProV1xs, the Bridgestone balls, and the Snell balls. They're virtually the same. Or at least close enough that most amateur golfers aren't going to notice a difference.

Yep.

The charts make things look very separated, but that's what happens when you plot charts from (I'm making this up) "275 to 289 yards" instead of "0 to 290 yards" or something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

21 minutes ago, DeadMan said:

When I looked at this data, I actually concluded that there isn't much difference between balls. Look at the difference in carry distance and spin between Titleist ProV1s, ProV1xs, the Bridgestone balls, and the Snell balls. They're virtually the same. Or at least close enough that most amateur golfers aren't going to notice a difference.

I noticed this too.  Having recently bought 4 dozen of the 3 piece Kirklands ,the discrepancy in the charts caught my eye until I took a look at the y axis.  I think the differences ended up being 2-3 MPH as far as ball speeds went, not to mention I am smack dab in the middle of the 2 swing speed charts, so their data sets don't even correlate to me directly.  Anyways I'm looking at this thinking that ball speed difference pales in comparison to the impacts on ball speeds that quality of strike has, which at my skill level is quite a bit.  The Kirkland spins enough greenside for my needs, so I'm not going to worry about it until I am flushing it at, quite literally, a robotic level of consistency. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

20 minutes ago, DeadMan said:

When I looked at this data, I actually concluded that there isn't much difference between balls. Look at the difference in carry distance and spin between Titleist ProV1s, ProV1xs, the Bridgestone balls, and the Snell balls. They're virtually the same. Or at least close enough that most amateur golfers aren't going to notice a difference.

 

4 minutes ago, iacas said:

Yep.

The charts make things look very separated, but that's what happens when you plot charts from (I'm making this up) "275 to 289 yards" instead of "0 to 290 yards" or something.

 

That was my thought too for the most part minus the driver carry distance chart which seems pretty significant. My current ball, Vice Pro Plus, comes in 13 yards shorter than the MTB-x, thats a whole club shorter approach!

I think that is enough that I will at least give them a try.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jshots said:

That was my thought too for the most part minus the driver carry distance chart which seems pretty significant. My current ball, Vice Pro Plus, comes in 13 yards shorter than the MTB-x, thats a whole club shorter approach!

I think that is enough that I will at least give them a try.

Yeah, this is lost in what I was saying because I was really only looking at a few balls. There does appear to be tiers of golf balls, but the difference in performance among those tiers isn't that big. I was a little surprised that some balls (like the Callaway balls) didn't end up in the high end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thanks for sharing, really good read. I emailed the link to that article to a bunch of guys I play with. Interesting to see the Srixon ball perform so well, I think I will have to give them another try as I can get them cheap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Very interesting data indeed! I've been playing Chrome Soft since the middle of last summer. But I see the Oncore Elixr scored fairly well and I just happen to have received a free sleeve. I'll definitely give them a try now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I’ve read today MGS has a beef with Callaway for awhile now.

Also I wonder how many hits they measured with each ball. Those are important numbers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 4/30/2019 at 10:05 AM, iacas said:

The charts make things look very separated, but that's what happens when you plot charts from (I'm making this up) "275 to 289 yards" instead of "0 to 290 yards" or something.

What about shot area? 128 on the low end vs 2,180 on the high end. I wonder of that is in square feet.12 yards off line vs less than a yard. All from a robot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So we've all been suckered into believing the marketing hype, basing our buying choices on said hype. I too fell for the low compression, more feel but same distance hype but I should have known, you can't kick a soft football as far as a firm one, doh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The data is pretty interesting but doesn't surprise me all that much tbh. I noticed very little difference between all the golf balls I've tried. The only one I had a visible/measurable change with was the Titleist AVX (Which launched lower and spun less), I gained about 5-10 yards per club.

Edit: I found that MGS did a podcast about the testing and findings.

 

Edited by JxQx
Added video

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • Okay, I know you are getting a whole pile of advice here. I'll throw one more thing at you. Consider doing the "5 minute per day practice challenge" on this forum.  For many people 5 minutes of practice daily can be as effective or possibly more effective than 1-1/2 hour practice sessions once a week.  I tried to do the 5 minutes a day practice challenge a while back, but I kept missing my weekend updates. It may be time for me to try again. 
    • I said 4-6, which is round dependent for sure. If my timing is on I can strike a lot of very solid feeling shots, but the clubs I use could be masking those off center hits with the forgiveness built into them. I can also mishit pretty horribly those same rounds. If I'm having a really bad round I'd probably struggle to hit 1-3, but I don't know that I go a full round without hitting at least one flush shot. Of course, I could be completely delusional too.
    • View this round on GAME GOLF Really my second full individual round(a stroke play event), or 4th if you count scrambles, on the year.  I am actually hitting my driver and irons decently as far as path and face is concerned and for distance as well.  My driver play is going especially well considering the lack of play.  I am definitely struggling a bit with low point but not as much as I thought I would. Had some great shots out of bunkers as well. I can't seem to figure out my wedge distances as is fairly obvious from this round.  My new Glide 2.0 wedges are confusing me a bit on some controlled distance shots.  I kind of miss my Edel wedges for that.  My touch around the greens is just not in form right now as would be expected.  I had some three putts out there but these greens are some of the toughest multi tiered greens I have played on.  We played with a scratch guy out there who shot a 77.  If i catch one thin or toe it a bit the hand also is in a fair amount of pain yet.  I look forward to the continued healing in the hand as far as that goes.   If i can avoid injuring myself this winter I hope to play a lot more next season.  Hopefully I can get out to Erin Hills and Sand Valley.  If anyone would be interested in playing theses courses next year with me, let me know. I am a bit on the fence over if I should work on the swing and try and get rid of the Furyk/Moore like loop or if I should just own it as it seems to be giving me the best face/path relationship I have maybe ever had.  At the end of the day if I can shoot in the low 80's from time to time next season I think it should be a lot of fun to play again.  
    • I’m typically around 4-6 if not even a bit higher. My issues come when I miss I miss big and start bringing big and crooked numbers into play
    • I don't know that that is accurate, and it definitely depends on the state.  In Colorado and California, for example, medical marijuana is exactly the same as the recreational strains available in dispensaries.  The difference is the level of taxation.  I did find one article that stated that 14 states limit THC potency, but after researching state-by-state wasn't able to pin that down.  I don't disagree that it's possible, but will argue the efficacy of doing so.  But to your point - Florida is considering legislation to limit the potency to 10% THC because levels above that "can induce psychosis in some users" (anyone seen Reefer Madness? 😄) A fools errand - the pot our parents smoked was around 7%, with the high-end "sinsemilla" coming in at around 9.5%.  It still gets you high.  Admittedly, the strains produced these days are much stronger, with 18-20% being considered high potency, and 30% being the upper limit for flower.  Extracts from marijuana plants, like hash oil, generally come in between 50 - 80%. To tie it all back together so I'm less off topic - regardless of the THC level, marijuana impairs a person mentally more so today than it did 20 years ago.  Golf is proven to have a significant mental component, aligned closely with the physical aspects of the game.  Thus weed absolutely has a negative impact on ones golf performance - though it might make a shitty round more fun.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. AmirReza
      AmirReza
      (32 years old)
    2. BushwoodCC
      BushwoodCC
      (53 years old)
    3. cozelos
      cozelos
      (34 years old)
    4. RollingStoppie
      RollingStoppie
      (50 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...