Jump to content
IGNORED

USGA Takes it On the Chin from Anonymous Whiny Tour Babies


iacas
Note: This thread is 1767 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, iacas said:

I disagree: I think much of the criticism is undeserved. I think the complaining is way overblown, and the result of that complaining is the "too soft" and "too easy" course we saw yesterday.

I also disagree that they have "greater information, knowledge, and perspective." PGA Tour players can be wrong about things, and they can say things that advance their own agendas without consideration for much else. The USGA just became a punching bag; had the Masters done even a few of these things, you can bet nobody would have said a thing, even (chickenshit) anonymously.

None of them complain about the ridiculous crazy golf greens at Augusta, which are much faster than they were designed to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


They do not mind being called professional golfers and making their living playing golf.  Them complaining about courses and how they are set up gets no sympathy from me.  They are "good" and should be able to adjust their game to whatever the course throws at them.  I hear them talk about how conditions of a course change from morning to afternoon...yes it does, but they know that and should adjust their game to it.  Other professional sports have to make adjustments as conditions may change from the start of an event (game) to the end of the game....

Here is the bottom line...one has to hold himself accountable and not pass the blame for a bad performance on others.  Just play, enjoy it, and take your lumps when they come and enjoy the good times when they come...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 6/15/2019 at 5:03 AM, weekend hacker1 said:

None of them complain about the ridiculous crazy golf greens at Augusta, which are much faster than they were designed to be.

Well, they did for a while, so you have a point! But, they've dialed it back. I read an article a long time ago that was titled, "What Happened to the Augusta Roar?" The author was referring to the fact the the Augusta grounds crew had made the greens so slick and fast, that there was no drama on the back 9 any more! 

And more recently, there was an instance where a golfer replaced his ball on the 15th green, only to have the wind blow it off the green into the pond fronting it. Augusta took plenty of hell that year because they, kind of, did let the greens get away from them. 

I also read another article that wondered how Augusta would play this year, seeing as a women's championship was played the prior week. The author said that people should relax, since Augusta has the expertise, money, and staff to make the course act in any way it wants it to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1767 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I think I like this hole.  It is a clear "Risk-Reward" choice.  Since most of the shots in your cone cleared the bunkers I would say they are a minor risk and not a big issue.  Playing the aggressive line may give you 70ish yards in from what looks to be playable rough while conservative play is 120ish from fairway.  I know you said 70 vs 120 is minor for you but how does the approach angle in impact your results?  I figure both strategies are playing for Birdie since holing out from either is mostly luck. Looking at your proximity hole I think it says @ 50 feet when hitting from the fairway from 100-150 and 40 feet if hitting 50-100 from the rough.  Neither of those is an easy birdie putt.   I like the approach angle from the rough between the bunkers & the adjacent tees over the angle from @ 120 in the fairway but I really do not like the idea of hitting onto the adjacent tee boxes and that may impact my confidence with making the shot.  Also, too far left may be a worse approach angle then from the fairway short of the bunkers. For me this may come down to how confident do I feel when I reach that tee box.  If I am stroking it well off the tee leading up to the hole I would try for over the bunkers and the better angle in but if I am struggling that day I would likely opt for the fairway to take more bad stuff out of play.
    • Wordle 1,035 2/6 🟨🟨🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,035 1/6 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Finally. Been waiting for this.
    • Wordle 1,035 2/6 🟨⬜🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩    
    • 🏅.. First ace??
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...