Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
iacas

Insider Peek at TRUE Linkswear's New TL-01

26 posts / 14781 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

The Skinny

I'm excited to share a little bit of an insider peek here at the next shoe from TRUE Linkswear: the TL-01.

Though I wear a lot of my TRUE shoes everywhere - to the movies, to dinner, to a bike trail, etc. - the TL-01 is specifically designed to go everywhere from the job to the tee box.

I'm really looking forward to giving these a try, specifically as a teaching shoe - the zero drop shoe (a nice return from the admittedly pretty-low-but-not-quite-zero Major, Original, and Knit) will be comfortable and stylish, and yet if I have a free block and want to play some golf or hit some shots, will be perfect. Or if I have to meet my wife at dinner.

Some photos of the shoes first…

TL01-01-heel-flex.pngTL01-01-heel-pair.pngTL01-01-sole.pngTL01-01-pair-aerial.pngTL01-01-toe-flex.pngTL01-02-pair-angle.pngTL01-02-back-heel-angle.pngTL01-03toe-flex.pngTL01-02-profile.pngTL01-03-pairaerial.png

The Details

Sizing: 8, 8.5-11.5, 12, 13

Colorways: Classic Black, Vintage White (both July 1), Grey Area (late July)

Overview: The insanely light TL-01 is a shoe created to seamlessly transition from the office to the links and everywhere in between. The TL-01 is crafted from the finest full grain weatherproof Nappa leather and is durable enough for anything your life can throw at it. Don't be fooled, though, as the TL-01 weighs only 8.7 ounces, TRUE's lightest shoe yet. Packed in the TRUE canvas bag (the Majors come in these, too), this complete package makes the TL-01 a perfect shoe for just about any activity… especially golf!

Basically:

  • Lightweight - Weighing 8.7 ounces, you'll barely notice the TL-01 on your feet despite the full grain Nappa leather upper.
  • Zero Drop Cushioned Outsole - Featuring a natural zero-drop outsole for stability and natural balance, with just enough cushion to keep your feet feeling great all day long.
  • Versatile Tread - The TL-01 has ample grip to take on the links (the tread is the same depth as the Original and the Major), but works well on pavement, carpet, and everything in between, from the board room to the card room to the locker room.
  • Traditional Width Fit - A bit of a narrower shoe than the other TRUE offerings, the TL-01 will form to your foot over time and accommodate up to an E width.

_H2A0030.jpg

_H2A0140.jpg

_H2A0460.jpg

_H2A0537.jpg

_H2A0788.jpg

_H2A8851-Edit.jpg

_H2A9097.jpg

_H2A9597.jpg

JUD_1661.jpg

JUD_1663.jpg

JUD_1682.jpg

JUD_1704.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Those will be a pass for me. They just don’t suit my eye so to speak. The Major will be the next shoe after the Original. I like the concept  just not the look.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ll end up buying a pair. I emailed them, and for me I’ll probably get a size 10. I asked them what size I should get if the original ran true to size for me. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Very cool.  I'll probably buy a pair of the white ones.  I like white shoes with colored soles (beige in this case)...helps them stay looking new for a much longer time.

From the photos, it looks like I need to get some joggers!

1 hour ago, iacas said:

the zero drop shoe (a nice return from the admittedly pretty-low-but-not-quite-zero Major, Original, and Knit) will be comfortable and stylish

FWIW, the Original is actually zero-drop (part of the reason I bought them).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I've used a pair of their Elements Pro shoes for a while now. I do quite like the thin sole and the zero drop design, but the one thing I just can't work with is the width of the shoe offerings from TRUE. 

To put it bluntly, my feet are seriously fat. I personally am not fat so I'm not squishing them or adding fat rolls to my toes, it's just a hereditary thing (my maternal relatives all have the same wide feet). My feet fit the length of a size 10.5 or 11 perfectly (just under 11" long), depending on brand, but they are 4.75" wide. Going off the "standard" sizing charts I can find, that falls somewhere between a 4E and a 6E width for a size 11 shoe.

From practical experience my choice in footwear is pretty limited. Not all brands make a size 4E shoe, and even fewer make a 6E. I can honestly say I've only ever seen a 6E in a store, and not just as an online option, once in my entire life. For my everyday tennis shoes I pretty much have to stick with Asics and New Balance just because other brands like Nike and Adidas don't actually make a true 4E shoe (their shoes labeled 4E fit closer to a 2E). For the western boots I wear for riding the options are a little better thanks to big square toes being in style, but there are still brands like Nocona and Cody James that just plain don't make them wide enough short of a size 13+. Credit to Twisted X though, their 2E is actually wide enough for my fat feet and they're super comfy to boot.

With that background, I really would like to wear, use, and enjoy my shoes from TRUE but unfortunately they're simply not wide enough. They weren't bad when I first received them, but despite losing 10 pounds since then my feet have only grown wider (thanks bunions!) and I've found I can no longer fit into them. When my feet did fit I found them quite comfortable after a short break-in period, and the zero drop was definitely a noticeable improvement after carrying my bag all day long. 

I realize I'm part of a pretty small minority here and by no means should TRUE change their product development strategy solely to suit people like me. It would be nice, but for companies that aren't already quite large it can be economically infeasible to make that make options for sizing and width. I just wish I had normal feet so I could take advantage of the cool stuff they're doing!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, Pretzel said:

I realize I'm part of a pretty small minority here and by no means should TRUE change their product development strategy solely to suit people like me. It would be nice, but for companies that aren't already quite large it can be economically infeasible to make that make options for sizing and width. I just wish I had normal feet so I could take advantage of the cool stuff they're doing!

The Elements Pro were among their narrowest shoes. The TL-01 are not wide - they make a point of saying that.

You should find and try on some of the Originals, though. I think you may be surprised. They're based on a wider toe box especially, like the original Tours (hence the name), and are a solid shoe.

Just a thought. I would like to focus on the TL-01 here, but it's likely not the shoe for you. But others may be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, iacas said:

The Elements Pro were among their narrowest shoes. The TL-01 are not wide - they make a point of saying that.

You should find and try on some of the Originals, though. I think you may be surprised. They're based on a wider toe box especially, like the original Tours (hence the name), and are a solid shoe.

Just a thought. I would like to focus on the TL-01 here, but it's likely not the shoe for you. But others may be.

I do definitely appreciate their transparency when it comes to the width of their shoes. Finding that kind of information from other manufacturers can be like pulling teeth, since they rarely say anything and you basically have to just try them on your feet to find out for yourself. 

The TL-01 is an attractive looking shoe though. I'd love to find something similar that works for me to wear to my office job rather than the tennis shoes I currently am stuck with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I still use my first two pair of TRUEs that I bought many years ago. I think it was one of the first models.

How do I best measure my foot or figure out which size is right for me? If I lived in US, I could just order and return if they didn't fit, but that's not so easy when I live half across the world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 hours ago, Zeph said:

How do I best measure my foot or figure out which size is right for me? If I lived in US, I could just order and return if they didn't fit, but that's not so easy when I live half across the world.

I recommend sending them an email.

BTW, after donating a few pair (and some blue Elements not shown, but ONE pair of non-TRUE shoes shown here [as yet unworn, an Ashworth pair; see if you can spot them]), here's my current TRUE collection:

IMG_9276.jpeg

I still wear them all, including the top left ones. Also, one pair is not shown here - a black pair of Originals that I'd left inside because I last wore that pair of shoes. They replaced the Adidas slides on the top-right corner.

Black, white, grey, "other"/grey over-runs.

Those Sensei are still great, too. I have another pair of the grey/blue somewhere, too. I should find those. I think they're, oh, I know where they are. Downtown, where I last used them as my workout shoes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

@Zeph email True they are very helpful. If you have a pair of the older models they will be the same depending on the model. I had the Senseis in 11.5. Once I told the person at True this they recommended sticking with them. 

I will say if you haven’t worn Trues for some time, the initial feel will seem big due to the toe box. 

I bought the True Originals for your reference. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, iacas said:

Those Sensei are still great, too. I have another pair of the grey/blue somewhere, too. I should find those. I think they're, oh, I know where they are. Downtown, where I last used them as my workout shoes.

I wish I still had a pair of those shoes. I loved them for workouts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I still have a brand new pair of the green Sensei’s. 11.5. I will never wear them. My wife wants me to throw them out. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on this, I ordered myself a pair of the white ones.  Should be here middle of next week, just in time for my golf trip!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I got my pair of TL-01's today. I found them to be too narrow for my feat. I am going to exchange them for half a size larger and hopefully they fit better. 

I am not sure if it's just the smaller size, or the textile used for the inside of the shoe, but I find the shoe grips the sock a lot. A normal cotton sock didn't slide into the shoe easily. 

Overall, I like the look a lot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    SuperSpeed
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo
  • Posts

    • I wasn't looking at win totals. I looked at how guys from older eras did against players who were on tour during Tigers era. How do you explain Raymond Floyd and Tom Watson and Hale Irwin?  Floyd wasn't at the very top playing against Nicklaus. He also missed quite a few cuts. Yet he was ranked 12th in 1992 and in the top 10 in his late 40s. One of three things has to be true. 1. Floyd got much better as he approached 50  or 2. The fields got much better between 1992 and 1996. or 3. There were more good players than being given credit for. Floyd didn't dominate playing against 1970s fields. He wasn't really close to being the best player.   1 and 2 seem rather unlikely. Since 3 seems most likely and since most of the players I listed above had better records playing directly against Floyd a reasonable conclusion is the fields were not substantially weaker at the top in 1976 vs 1996. Ben Crenshaw won a Master's in 1995. Hale Irwin won a US Open in 1990. This wasn't that long ago.  
    • Just got a pellet grill/smoker delivered yesterday, I went with the RecTeq RT 340 and really like it so far.  Made my first meal on it last night, bone in chicken thighs. They turned out amazing. I used Kosmos Q Spicy Chipotle Honey Killer Bee rub and smoked them at 225 for about 20-30 minutes then cranked the heat to 425 and flipped them once until they were at an internal temp of 165. I am making more for some friends today and I will do the same method except I will bring the heat up to 450 maybe even 475 to get the skin just a tad bit crispier. I am also making a smoked queso dip today as well which I will share pictures of The grill -   The chicken - 
    • The only thing really open for debate is how to spell deny-ers. 😷  
    • Found this topic while looking for a different one, but lawncare is one of my other primary hobbies besides golf. Here are a couple shots of mine from this past season. Just did the last mow of the year last weekend. Back in May after a double cut   And in September - can see my hot peppers growing back in the garden too. I grew 8 plants this year and easily got a couple hundred peppers
    • My family came from Detroit, and even though I grew up in northern Virginia, we'd visit Detroit every summer.  My grandfather lived really close to Chandler Park, but on occasion we drove "all the way out there" to Plumbrook.  I was really just starting the game in high school, so my memories of it are pretty hazy, but it was a real treat at that time.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Augie
      Augie
      (62 years old)
    2. Dukes1304
      Dukes1304
      (35 years old)
    3. Mmgolfwiz
      Mmgolfwiz
      (57 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...