Jump to content
KrisF

Do You Think Harry Vardon's 6 Time Open Record Be Matched or Broken in the Near Future?

Do you think Harry Vardons 6 time Open record be matched or broken in the near future?  

17 members have voted

  1. 1. Could it be broken in the near future?

    • Yes
      2
    • No
      15
    • Abstain
      0


30 posts / 1118 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Feel free to discuss more or about other things!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

No, because the strength/depth of field is many orders of magnitude better now than when Vardon was playing. He had to beat like, what, three people?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

18 minutes ago, iacas said:

No, because the strength/depth of field is many orders of magnitude better now than when Vardon was playing. He had to beat like, what, three people?

I voted no. This.

21 minutes ago, KrisF said:

Feel free to discuss more or about other things!

It will take quite an exceptionally gifted player to come along and do anything like Tiger did. Despite what some mistaken, melancholic people believe, the SOF has and continues to deepen.

There may be a player as talented as Tiger right now but due to the exponential increase in strength and depth of field, he’s hidden. Even just in the past few months we’ve seen brand new fish come out and shoot excellent scores in their first few tournaments and even win. I can’t say what the next Tiger will be able to do, but I can say the one after that will play a game none of us are familiar with or ever see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'll vote no. It's also just tricky to be dominant in the British Open year to year. One day of bad weather during your round can wipe you out if half the field lucks into better conditions. 

And even the Brits and Irishmen who grew up playing links golf to an extent haven't exactly dominated in recent years. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Nope. Watson came super close though. Could easily have 6+. Had chances in 84 and 09. But I don’t really see anyone out there right now capable of doing it and the fields are only going to get stronger and deeper with time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt it.  A certain TW had a chance for a sixth British Open win a few years ago but lost in a playoff.  

To have a chance to do something like making a run of majors, someone would have to pretty much practice only for majors. 

Edited by Shindig
years ago, not days ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I voted no.  Rory was born and bred to do so and he struggles today. Fierce competition now, and these guys do not appear to have the stamina to sustain dominance more than a few years. Koepka is on top now and it will be seen how long he can maintain his dominance.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I voted "yes" just because at some point, it is more likely some phenoms will come along shatter all of the pro golf, tournament records.

It won't happen in my life time, and it might take another 50-100 years. However, it is quite plausible that it will happen.

Fact is no one can be certain what will, or won't happen in the future of pro golf. 

Obviously I am guessing here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Peter Thomson won 5. Is he mentioned as an all time great in any serious conversation? Hardly anyone of note played until Hogan turned up and that was a chore.

Harry Vardon winning 6 Opens would not even be discussed in serioius conversations about achievements in golf. All he could do was beat who he had to come up against - it's not his fault - but let's just say there wasn't the depth of field that there is now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Patch said:

I voted "yes" just because at some point, it is more likely some phenoms will come along shatter all of the pro golf, tournament records.

It won't happen in my life time, and it might take another 50-100 years. However, it is quite plausible that it will happen.

No it’s not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Heck, except for Brooks, no young-ish player on tour today will likely make it to 6 majors total yet alone 6 Brit opens. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Somewhat off-topic, but I wonder if a calendar grand slam will ever happen. Tiger obviously got three in a year and has the "Tiger Slam". But Spieth came close in 2015, and if Koepka wins the Open, you could make the argument he came closer than anyone in history. And Greg Norman would have the calendar slam if a golf tournament was 54 holes. I feel like it may happen one year, maybe not while I'm alive, though.

Back on topic, I think if Seve didn't lose his game in the 90s, he could have easily done it. He had such a great game for the British Open and I thought after he won in '88, he'd top Watson. But sadly, Seve started to lose his game after that '88 win.

Edited by ChrisP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ChrisP said:

Somewhat off-topic, but I wonder if a calendar grand slam will ever happen. Tiger obviously got three in a year and has the "Tiger Slam". But Spieth came close in 2015, and if Koepka wins the Open, you could make the argument he came closer than anyone in history. And Greg Norman would have the calendar slam if a golf tournament was 54 holes. I feel like it may happen one year, maybe not while I'm alive, though.

Back on topic, I think if Seve didn't lose his game in the 90s, he could have easily done it. He had such a great game for the British Open and I thought after he won in '88, he'd top Watson. But sadly, Seve started to lose his game after that '88 win.

Tiger came closer than anyone. He won all the events within 365 days (a year) and held all four. Brooks hasn't won the Masters OR the British Open. That's not closer than Tiger. Not at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

22 minutes ago, ChrisP said:

Somewhat off-topic, but I wonder if a calendar grand slam will ever happen. Tiger obviously got three in a year and has the "Tiger Slam". But Spieth came close in 2015, and if Koepka wins the Open, you could make the argument he came closer than anyone in history. And Greg Norman would have the calendar slam if a golf tournament was 54 holes. I feel like it may happen one year, maybe not while I'm alive, though.

4 months for the majors might make easier for someone to get hot and stay hot. But I think it's unlikely.

Don't think anyone will win 6 British Opens in the future. If you look at the people who have won 4+, they all basically were active before the 1960s, except for Tom Watson. And then the only people in the last 25 years to win multiple British Opens are Tiger, Ernie Els, and Padraig Harrington. Tiger is the only one who has more than 2. So yeah, it's unlikely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

41 minutes ago, iacas said:

Tiger came closer than anyone. He won all the events within 365 days (a year) and held all four. Brooks hasn't won the Masters OR the British Open. That's not closer than Tiger. Not at all.

I’m talking in a calendar year. Tiger didn’t really contend at that 2000 Masters. Spieth was close in that he won two and came just shy of winning two more in the same calendar year. Same with Brooks should he win this week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, ChrisP said:

I’m talking in a calendar year. Tiger didn’t really contend at that 2000 Masters. Spieth was close in that he won two and came just shy of winning two more in the same calendar year. Same with Brooks should he win this week.

A stupid distinction (IMO) that's actually easier than what Tiger did in holding all four at one time with the eight-month gap in between.

Two wins isn't "close" IMO. Even if you want to stick to the "calendar year" thing, winning three is better than winning two.

28 minutes ago, ChrisP said:

Tiger didn’t really contend at that 2000 Masters

He finished 5th.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

16 minutes ago, iacas said:

A stupid distinction (IMO) that's actually easier than what Tiger did in holding all four at one time with the eight-month gap in between.

Two wins isn't "close" IMO. Even if you want to stick to the "calendar year" thing, winning three is better than winning two.

Hence, why I said calendar year. Not taking away what Tiger did holding all four at one time. Just talking same calendar year.

Yes, you could say Tiger was closest in terms of wins. Spieth was closest in that if three or four more putts go down, he has all four. Depends how you look at it.

Edited by ChrisP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, ChrisP said:

I’m talking in a calendar year. Tiger didn’t really contend at that 2000 Masters. Spieth was close in that he won two and came just shy of winning two more in the same calendar year. Same with Brooks should he win this week.

Well Bobby Jones is really the only one to achieve a Calendar Grand Slam in his era. And in my opinion I do think someone could pull off a "modern slam".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • As to the milling being cheaper than inserts I'm going to have to politely disagree there too. AFAIK cheapest inserts are much much much cheaper in production than cheapest milling. You have to factor in the cost of milling tools and their maintenance. A cast clubhead requires zero tools to insert. One human can probably do 400-500 inserts in a day, and the materials are super cheap. Milling requires a mill. And bits. And programs. And people who keep those things running. As far as I know the costs are not comparable at all, and that accounts for why all the cheap clubs at Walmart have inserts while the buying trend is milled. Golf Spy did a piece on this but suffice to say I can't agree with that statement but i respect your opinion. Cheers. 🙂   The TRUE Cost of Making a Putter Manufacturers throw around plenty of buzzwords to justify higher costs, but what does it really cost to make a putter? The answer may surprise you.  
    • Perhaps he was too weak to lift the club after "blasting" that drive...
    • And just to insert a quick reality check here cheapest putter at Walmart is $60 USD and as I mentioned is neither milled, stamped, nor Winn gripped.  Cheers. 🙂 Merchants of Golf 1113533 Tour x Golf Black Putter no.550 | Walmart Canada Buy Merchants of Golf 1113533 Tour x Golf Black Putter no.550 from Walmart Canada. Shop for more Golf Clubs available online at...   Stamping a hosel is not trivial to the mass production of a club if costs are your priority. Ask any club maker they will confirm. Anyhow I appreciate your feedback, noted. Cheers.
    • You're the second person in the past two minutes to say that, and like the other, I didn't miss the point. Patent pending means almost nothing. It doesn't mean they've been granted a patent. It costs very, very little to submit a patent application. Nobody's said "cheap as possible." Except you just now, and me in quoting it right here. The grip may be an aftermarket grip. Dude, it's not an expensive putter. If you can get $10 or $15 for it, go for it. That's my recommendation. It's a flat piece of metal on the end of a stick. I could make a putter that "rolls" things perfectly well enough for $4 in parts from Lowe's and a putter shaft. Hell, a hammer could "roll" it well. You're missing the points: The putter is nothing special. It's not worth much $. It's probably from some overseas, cheap, Chinese type place with no actual web presence or any sort of actual company. If it was a known company, Google would have some information on it. The lack of anything on it is a big key bit of information that you're ignoring.
    • Totally different logo, not the same Red Zone. I googled first, deduced the ones you mentioned were not a match, then came here. You missed the point. I do not see "patent pending" on hosels. I handle lots of putters. I can't explain it's presence to you obviously as I have yet to determine the origin of the putter but anyone who makes clubs knows that stamping the hosel is a step you would never make if you were making "cheap as possible" clubs. Again, no one said it's an expensive club but definitely was not made as cheaply as possible. Walmart's cheapest clubs do not have Winn Pistol grips, you can confirm that easily.   I just want to find out who this company was and this putter if I can, if I can't it's not really something I want to defend to someone who's never touched it. But I appreciate the feedback. It's definitely not manufactured to the cheapest standards, nor does it feel cheap. The roll is on par with more expensive clubs and nothing like the myriad $10 clubs here. Cheers.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. AlohaMarine
      AlohaMarine
      (48 years old)
    2. GL08191951
      GL08191951
      (68 years old)
    3. jmanbooyaa
      jmanbooyaa
      (42 years old)
    4. samie
      samie
      (57 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...