Jump to content
iacas

Ten Reasons Why Winners Win - Quick Commentary

22 posts / 2443 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Written out and modified slightly for my golf team (with some disclaimers about how I don't buy into this stuff very much):

10 Reasons Why Winners Win

  1. Winners are driven by a love of winning, not by a fear of losing.
  2. Winners remain relentlessly optimistic at all times.
  3. Winners focus on solutions when things go wrong.
  4. Winners are fueled by feelings of excitement more than nervousness.
  5. Winners know confidence comes from preparation.
  6. Winners surround themselves with like-minded positive people.
  7. Winners expect to win each time they compete.
  8. Winners slow down the game in their mind and think clearly.
  9. Winners focus more precisely as the game gets bigger.
  10. Winners make losing not an option - they either win or they learn.

© Dr. Jarrod Spencer, 2019, Mind of the Athlete, LLC.


Here's the problem I have with a few of these…

  1. I've heard the opposite from some people, some psychologists, and some very successful people, too.
  2. Ha! Bull.
  3. Sometimes that's true. Other times it's not.
  4. Tiger said he was super nervous all the time, it showed that he cared.
  5. Notice how I modified it for my players? Excessive is by definition "wrong" because it means "too much."
  6. Not really true, and many can't choose who they're around.
  7. Not in golf. And not in other sports either; you'd have to be delusional, especially in team sports.
  8. Okay, but… that could just be a skill. I don't think you can try to make the game slow down.
  9. Okay?
  10. What claptrap is that? Of course losing is an option. It's not a good option, but again, you're delusional. Plus, you can learn from winning, too.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think these type's of things are a lot of BS, this is similar to people writing about what it takes to be a leader.  You can check off everything on a checklist, but it still doesn't mean you can accomplish it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Radio Lab did a show about lying and they talked about self-lying and that in a very small study, the best swimmers were the ones who consistently lied to themselves.

lying-200.jpg

Can we lie to ourselves? If you are the liar, wouldn't you know the truth?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I've read - and understand - how someone like Tiger Woods actually has to blame the club or mud or the wind or whatever to protect his ego so he can continue to believe he's not at fault, and to perform best.

This is in reference to the swimmer's post by @krupa.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, iacas said:

...blame the club or mud or the wind or whatever to protect his ego so he can continue to believe he's not at fault, and to perform best.

Funny, i play with a lot of people that do the same thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I feel silly not blaming myself when I hit a bad shot. But yes, you can't change your style/thoughts zero to 100, but having these 10 steps in mind, could change your behaviour on the course, I feel like. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those 10 reason totally discribed TWoods during his run of best playing days. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As to point #4. I remember reading, quite some time ago, some comments from one of the old time crooners, it might have been Tony Bennett, about "butterflies" before a performance. He said that if he didn't feel the butterflies, he knew it would be a lousy show! Butterflies meant that he was "up" for the performance. 

I also remember reading an article back when the "beta blocker" scandal was hitting the PGA Tour. Some people claimed it was a performance enhancer. A pro interviewed for the article claimed it was anything but! He had a valid medical reason for taking them, and it led to one of his worst years on tour. When he managed to play himself into the running, the drug didn't allow him to get "up" for the round. It smoothed him out to the point where he became too mellow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

What a horrible list, seriously. It's not even sports psychology, it's just bs. Most of the stuff on the list you can't "make" happen.

Do people honestly think DJ, Rory, Tiger, Koepka, all think the same in competition? Of course not. They win because they are extremely good at the physical part of swinging a metal stick and know how to accept and anticipate the ups and downs that come with golf. Some days they are mentally "strong" and win and other days they are mentally weak and still win. 

Not to say mental game doesn't play a role but I'll take DJ's swing and a crappy mental game over my swing and the best mental game ever 😉

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

What a load of BS.

It's like someone saying AFTER they've made a fortune or won something that anyone can do it and that you just have to "believe".

It's like the horse manure theory of Malcolm Gladwell that that fool, dan, of The Dan Plan swallowed hook line and sinker.

Methinks that some of these "sports psychologists" have never played any sport at any level.

Edited by leftybutnotPM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Vinsk said:

Well Bryson apparently has taken #8 quite seriously. 

That is how he hopes to win, slowing the game down so much his competitors lose their minds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I read the book "Zen Golf" a few years back and it pretty much says these 10 things.  These 10 things are good advice, but #5 is, in my opinion, very important.  You need to feel you've prepared as well as you can.   But if you're going to be good an executing these 10 things, you have to practice them just like anything else you wish to be good at.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, ghalfaire said:

I read the book "Zen Golf" a few years back and it pretty much says these 10 things.  These 10 things are good advice, but #5 is, in my opinion, very important.  You need to feel you've prepared as well as you can.   But if you're going to be good an executing these 10 things, you have to practice them just like anything else you wish to be good at.

+1.  You can't expect to do well unless you have prepared in advance.  I see this a lot with weekend duffers.  They complain about bad shots and what not, but they never practice.  The only time they pick up the club is on the day they play.  And they expect to play well.

Only a very minority of people can do this as these are the ones with natural talent and don't need practice to be good at golf.  But 99%+ of the population needs to practice to be good at this game.  

Like everything else in life, you can't expect to be good at something without preparing for it.

As for #1, I agree with this, but I don't necessarily agree it should be on the top of the list.  When I play with my buddies, I notice there are two groups: one who doesn't want to lose and the other who wants to win.  At a first glance this looks to be the same.  But how they approach the game is VERY different.  For example, the ones who doesn't want to lose, are timid when it comes to putting.  They want to "nestle" up to the hole so they won't three putt.  This means they rarely make the putt.  The ones who wants to win are aggressive with putting.  They make sure that the ball has a chance to go in the hole when they putt.  Sometime this means they have a relatively long comebacker putt.  But they tend to make some of those aggressive putts.  They want to win at all cost, even if it means they have a longer putt coming back.

Tiger was like that in his prime, he still is - except his putts are not falling.

Ever since I noticed this difference, I changed my attitude to win rather than not to lose.  Surprisingly, I began winning more and more times compared to five years ago.

As they say, "good defense is a good offence."  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

#5 has some merit. Louis Pasteur said "Fortune favors the prepared mind". I do not believe, however, that being prepared has anything to do with confidence. I've seen people that work their butts off just go to shit when the chips are down, and I've seen the opposite as well. 

My daughter is a heck of a basketball player. She works harder than anyone I know. We've spent thousands of dollars on trainers, etc. The only thing holding her back a bit is her confidence. 

The rest of that shit is exactly that..shit. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 8/28/2019 at 7:16 AM, Yukari said:

+1.  You can't expect to do well unless you have prepared in advance.  I see this a lot with weekend duffers.  They complain about bad shots and what not, but they never practice.  The only time they pick up the club is on the day they play.  And they expect to play well.

Only a very minority of people can do this as these are the ones with natural talent and don't need practice to be good at golf.  But 99%+ of the population needs to practice to be good at this game.  

Like everything else in life, you can't expect to be good at something without preparing for it.

As for #1, I agree with this, but I don't necessarily agree it should be on the top of the list.  When I play with my buddies, I notice there are two groups: one who doesn't want to lose and the other who wants to win.  At a first glance this looks to be the same.  But how they approach the game is VERY different.  For example, the ones who doesn't want to lose, are timid when it comes to putting.  They want to "nestle" up to the hole so they won't three putt.  This means they rarely make the putt.  The ones who wants to win are aggressive with putting.  They make sure that the ball has a chance to go in the hole when they putt.  Sometime this means they have a relatively long comebacker putt.  But they tend to make some of those aggressive putts.  They want to win at all cost, even if it means they have a longer putt coming back.

Tiger was like that in his prime, he still is - except his putts are not falling.

Ever since I noticed this difference, I changed my attitude to win rather than not to lose.  Surprisingly, I began winning more and more times compared to five years ago.

As they say, "good defense is a good offence."  

I agree with much of what you said, but I doubt people who want to win are always aggressive.   I believe they "choose their battles" if you will.  Playing on greens that are 12 or so on the "meter" with a 2 foot downhill, but straight, putt, I'd recommend caution.  There are other examples of where caution might be called for, but I think you get my point.  So while I do believe the "want to win group" plays aggressive compared to the "don't want to lose group",  they do also pick spots where they leave the driver in the bag, so to speak.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s all hogwash. One reason why winners win:

They’re better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Affiliates

    SuperSpeed
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo
  • Posts

    • I really don't have a problem with Bryson losing his cool in the bunker. I've seen it on the course. Shoot, I've done it on the course. He never should have said anything to the cameraman. After the round, he just should have said he was frustrated, and was sorry. He shouldn't have brought up his "brand". I think he's only 26, and I know I did things when I was 26 that I wish I could take back, but I learned from them. He'll be ok.
    • I think this is pretty interesting. I think that it is going to shift from "modern equipment makes the ball go too far" to "I don't like Bryson, he is ruining the game!" I wouldn't be surprised if his worst finish the rest of the year is still in the top 15.
    • We chemical engineers use this easy to read psychometric chart.😀
    • So which topped shot was the best one then?😜
    • Some comments from a GOLF.COM article after Bryson's win: John Wood, PGA Tour caddie for Matt Kuchar (@Johnwould😞 Bryson seems to have broken the code for Bryson. And I think he has transferred what has been done at the long driving competitions for a while now to highly competitive golf. I couldn’t be more impressed. I was watching today and thought how economical this type of game is to practice. You practice drivers, wedges, chips and putting. He won’t often have to hit mid-irons, ever. Maybe a couple a day to par-5s. But for the most part, playing the game like he is playing it, and how courses are allowing him to play it through setup, why would you spend the time on fairway woods and hybrids and long/mid-irons when they will be used so seldom. Sean Zak, senior editor (@Sean_Zak😞 I like what John said. Bryson found Bryson’s template — bomb it a mile, hit easier clubs into greens and if you putt well you’ll win. The difference between his template and other players’ is that his template works better at 80 percent of courses on Tour. That’s the bottom line. It makes it hard to imagine him missing the cut at a cookie-cutter Tour course. Does it work in Scotland? It’s hard to say right now, but across parkland America, he’s going to be dominating if he putts well.    Here is an interesting graphic (from Geoff Shackelford blog post); illustrates the difference between Bryson and the rest of the field at Detroit Golf Club and hole #1   Also from a Geoff Shackleford blog post:  A few stats of note: First player in the 16 years of ShotLink and “Strokes Gained” to lead a field in both driving and putting. Averaged 350.6 on the eight measuring holes, compared to a field average of 301.5. He averaged 329.8 on all drives at tree-lined Detroit Golf Club, compared to the field’s 297.6 average. DeChambeau reached 23-under-par to win by three strokes over Matthew Wolff, who started the day three ahead. Wolff hit five more fairways for the week, if that means anything (38/56 to Bryson’s 33/56). According to CBS’s Jim Nantz, DeChambeau’s drives Sunday ended up 423 yards longer than playing partner Troy Merritt’s. And 143 yards longer than Wolff’s tee shots on the non-par-3s. There are, of course, issues that come with all of this madness. In no particular order: I get more questions asking if there is drug testing instead of equipment or COVID-19 testing. Half of most social media posts regarding DeChambeau descend into unfair character assassination about the naturalness of the weight and strength gain without any evidence this is something other than just hard work and an excessive diet. There are undoubtedly kids and parents watching and sending junior to the gym instead of our to play or practice golf. This has always been a risk of allowing golf to become a long drive contest, and now we have an extreme example to inspire a movement. Even with CBS having their best production yet, highlighted by some excellent storytelling around the DeChambeau dominance, the sight of driver-wedge golf and 8-irons into par-5s lacks any significant give-and-take between player and course. I’m not saying it’s boring, but there is less satisfaction in watching a course unable to call on a variety of skills. The obvious question of such a dominant and shocking performance: where do we go from here on the distance debate?
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Daniel-J
      Daniel-J
      (30 years old)
    2. internal911
      internal911
      (40 years old)
    3. ipadair
      ipadair
      (9 years old)
    4. jwsmith6
      jwsmith6
      (32 years old)
    5. nigel
      nigel
      (62 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...