Jump to content
iacas

2019 Presidents Cup

309 posts / 17244 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Vinsk said:

So what? You have an opinion as to who might be better choices to play than Tiger. Sounds like a decent discussion. No reason to duck it. Hell for alternate shot I’d like to have Cameron Champ in there. 

It just so happens that Champ is one of my 4 picks, especially after today.  I'd pick Varner, Snedeker and Howell over Tiger.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Register for free today and you won't see this ad spot again!

23 minutes ago, Herkimer said:

It just so happens that Champ is one of my 4 picks, especially after today.  I'd pick Varner, Snedeker and Howell over Tiger.  

Well Tiger does have a good PC record, better than his RC. I don’t put near the interest in the PC as I do the RC. I didn’t care for Tiger playing in the last RC. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

59 minutes ago, billchao said:

I have never been excited for a Presidents' Cup, and this year won't be any different.

Seriously, just give the US the W already and lets move on.

Agreed. Least favorite of international competitions. Though I’m still a sucker and will watch it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

Well Tiger does have a good PC record, better than his RC. I don’t put near the interest in the PC as I do the RC. I didn’t care for Tiger playing in the last RC. 

For a man of his extraordinary gifts, his RC record is really bad.  But even though his PC record is much better, to me it really doesn't mean that much at this stage of his game.  In these matches, anybody can win and anybody can lose.  Tiger certainly has proven that.  But he's Captain and he should concentrate on that.  Every Captain has told us how much work goes into it and how much time is necessary for them to do the duties that they are tasked.  No one wants to admit that they're older and can't do what they once could do.  Of course Tiger thinks he's better than everyone else even now and should be playing. I hope that he doesn't even give himself a chance to embarrass himself by playing in this Cup.  

10 minutes ago, HJJ003 said:

Agreed. Least favorite of international competitions. Though I’m still a sucker and will watch it. 

You're not a sucker. You're a golf lover.  This is going to be a great cup and the matches are going to be very exciting. They always are.  

What I'm going to say now will seem contradictory to what I said above. But if Tiger is more interested in excitement, rather than winning the cup, then he should play.  Who wouldn't want to see if he still has it?  [Not me.]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Herkimer said:

Tiger thinks he's better than everyone else even now and should be playing.

I don’t think he thinks that at all. He loves golf and loves competing. He’s the GOAT. He just won the last Masters. Why shouldn’t he be playing? He’s not a John Daly or a Mark O’Meara who have zero chance at a major but still get in there and play. The field is crazy deep now and Tiger won The Masters. I don’t think you’re giving enough credit to him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Herkimer said:

It just so happens that Champ is one of my 4 picks, especially after today.  I'd pick Varner, Snedeker and Howell over Tiger.  

Ha. Yeah, okay.

  • Champ won the same off-season event two years in a row and missed 11 cuts and WDd once in 2019. His game would not be a good fit for Royal Melbourne.
  • Varner finished 102nd in the FedExCup and had ONE top-three finish.
  • Snedeker had a second-place finish in 2019. No other top-three finishes.
  • Howell won once and had five top-10 finishes, with no other top-threes.

Tiger finished top 10 in 1/3 of the events he entered, winning the Masters.

Yeah, no, maybe Charles, maybe Brandt… but Tiger has Varner and Champ beat handily.

Handily.

1 hour ago, Herkimer said:

For a man of his extraordinary gifts, his RC record is really bad.

And most of Ryder Cup matches are partner events.

1 hour ago, Herkimer said:

No one wants to admit that they're older and can't do what they once could do.

Again, dude, he just won the f***ing Masters. Did Champ, Varner, Snedeker, or Howell do that? Hell, they have two regular event wins between them in 2019.

1 hour ago, Herkimer said:

Of course Tiger thinks he's better than everyone else even now and should be playing.

IMO he's better than any of the four players you listed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Tiger was cut at the PGA Championship and cut at The Open.  He withdrew from the Northern Trust and was 37th at the BMW.  He also didn't qualify for Atlanta.  He played great for 4 days 6 months ago.  He's had multiple operations and has had back issues since April.  Captains are really busy and I'll bet they don't get much rest.  I want my players to be rested, especially if they have back issues and are in their forties.  

If he weren't the captain, I might reevaluate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Herkimer said:

Tiger was cut at the PGA Championship and cut at The Open.  He withdrew from the Northern Trust and was 37th at the BMW.  He also didn't qualify for Atlanta.  He played great for 4 days 6 months ago.  He's had multiple operations and has had back issues since April.  Captains are really busy and I'll bet they don't get much rest.  I want my players to be rested, especially if they have back issues and are in their forties.

And he's still clearly better than two of the four players you listed, and has had success at Royal Melbourne, and is still 8th in the OWGR despite playing only 31 events with a divisor of 40 over the last two years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 hours ago, Herkimer said:

It just so happens that Champ is one of my 4 picks, especially after today.  I'd pick Varner, Snedeker and Howell over Tiger.  

I like those four players, but who wants to see them play instead of Tiger? Hell, I would pick Jack over any of them in his current state. It is a made for TV event and viewers would rather see the GOAT than journeymen who had a good tournament or two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If I didn't care about winning, I'd love to see Jack partnered with Tiger in Foursomes.  Against Gary Player partnered with Jason Day.  Now that's an exhibition!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never really followed the President's Cup that much; it seems like a forced event trying to mimic the Ryder Cup. But the Ryder Cup has history on it's side, and this year playing in December makes it unconnected to the season that ended in August. And playing the matches with a 14 hour time difference isn't going to make me watch many matches live.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

18 hours ago, Herkimer said:

I also happen to think it's unfair for any Captain to pick himself.  It's hardly fair and objective.

 

Automatically excluding himself in spite of a fair review, would be just as biased as automatically including himself in spite of a fair review.

A lack of bias does NOT equal self sacrifice.  that's a pretty common fallacy.  and giving priority to appearances over fact and reality is just plain bad logic and bad leadership.

I would reconsider your definition of objectivity.  It absolutely fair and objective as long as he assesses himself with the same criteria as the rest.  I think you mean that you personally have a bias that others in that situation are not capable of objectively comparing themselves to others? (your followup post are pretty clear on that).

It's his duty to consider every American top player.  He's on that list.

Edited by rehmwa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

30 minutes ago, rehmwa said:

It's his duty to consider every American top player.  He's on that list.

In fact he’s near the top of that list.

And he can delegate some captain responsibilities to assistants. And if he plays foursomes that’s only ~15 full swings per round.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 hours ago, Herkimer said:

If I didn't care about winning, I'd love to see Jack partnered with Tiger in Foursomes.  Against Gary Player partnered with Jason Day.  Now that's an exhibition!

I think Jason would get tired of all the talking from Gary. :-P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, rehmwa said:

Automatically excluding himself in spite of a fair review, would be just as biased as automatically including himself in spite of a fair review.

A lack of bias does NOT equal self sacrifice.  that's a pretty common fallacy.  and giving priority to appearances over fact and reality is just plain bad logic and bad leadership.

I would reconsider your definition of objectivity.  It absolutely fair and objective as long as he assesses himself with the same criteria as the rest.  I think you mean that you personally have a bias that others in that situation are not capable of objectively comparing themselves to others? (your followup post are pretty clear on that).

It's his duty to consider every American top player.  He's on that list.

No matter how fair a judge might be, in certain instances, he would have to recuse himself.  If any Captain did not automatically qualify to be a player in any Cup, for the sake of total impartiality, he shouldn't be his own judge.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

for chrissake - now he's a judge and has to recuse himself

I thought this was a game.

"Captain's picks" - by definition it's based on the captain's subjective assessment.  by definition it's his personal bias on what he thinks is best to round out the team.  ---- it actually who he is 'partial' to fill out it out.  else they'd all be automatic picks.  the captain is chosen to make that decision for any scenario - it's the role of the position

luckily it's not a murder trial

Edited by rehmwa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

16 minutes ago, Herkimer said:

No matter how fair a judge might be, in certain instances, he would have to recuse himself.  If any Captain did not automatically qualify to be a player in any Cup, for the sake of total impartiality, he shouldn't be his own judge.  

Uhhhh, no.

It’s not like he wants to play to embarrass himself if he wasn’t actually ready. I think he knows whether he’ll be in shape to play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It’s the same tired attitude regarding Tiger:

1. He’s done. Shouldn’t be playing.

2. He looked okay.

3. Ok, he won a tournament. Let’s see how he progresses.
4. Gosh, he won a major! Go Tiger!

5. He missed some cuts.

6. He’s done. Shouldn’t be playing. 
 

Ridiculous. He’s fit for the PC. Has every right and statistic to compete.

Edited by Vinsk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2020 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • I would agree with this sentiment. To not consider violations of the rules as cheating and penalize them accordingly, whether they be intentional or careless, undermines the entire purpose of having rules in the first place.  As far as pace of play goes, I guarantee you the PGA Tour could play their rounds in 4.5 hours or less every single day of every single tournament if they did one thing: enforced the USGA pace of play policy using Rule 5.6a. Players would be allowed 40 seconds per shot. Players who fail to do this will be assessed one penalty stroke on the first occurrence. The second occurrence results in a two stroke penalty (or loss of hole in match play). The third, and final, occurrence is disqualification.  As soon as penalties are on the table and penalties are strictly and evenly enforced the slow play problem will vanish literally overnight. When playing slow means losing strokes or possible disqualification, it will cause all the slow players on tour to suddenly play at a reasonable pace like they should. The fact that the PGA hasn't done this yet is proof enough that they don't actually care about slow play, considering the penalties they have given are few and far between.
    • Welcome to the best site for anything golf!
    • I believe this may be the case. In any rate, if you're putting the golf ball in your pants or vest pocket you are not doing so to intentionally change the playing characteristics of the golf ball. The only possible way for it to go that far is if you had hand warmers or ice cubes in the same pocket as the ball to try and heat it up/cool it down. Even in such outlandish circumstances, you would need to be deliberately heating the golf ball and intend to change its playing characteristics to be penalized. Penalties only come into play when you deliberately alter the performance characteristics of the golf ball. This means you have to intentionally try to change the way the ball plays. It's not something you can accidentally do, because it's impossible to do something deliberately if it's an accident. So the short answer is no, you will not be penalized for any conventional method of storing, transporting, or carrying your golf balls.
    • My buddy and I played last week at an old haunt that has new carts. The new carts have GPS with a touch screen, blue tooth speakers, but no USB port to charge my phone. We were paired with a twosome, the younger of the two looked early 20's, and was clearly a scratch golfer. Despite little warmup, I played well, had several drives in the 240 range (average around 220), a string of 4 pars, followed by a bird, had made a change to how I grip the putter, and shot an 84, which included a bonehead triple on the 10th. I think I was inspired by playing with someone so good. My buddy drove the cart. There are 'no cart' zones, like the parking lot, tees, being too close to the green, and various spots behind the greens or in the weeds. This is where the cart just stops, and will ONLY go slowly backwards until you are out of the forbidden zone. He was not playing well, and did not have many GIR's, if any. Cart trouble on every hole. 5th hole, he knocks it over the elevated green, into a small valley between our green and the 17th. Takes the cart there, and now he's stuck, and can't figure out how to get going again. Trying to back up a small hill to a maintenance road, he looked like someone trying to back their new boat into the lake, only to jackknife the trailer over and over again. Funny to watch, but I a little embarassed by the whole thing. I don't think the other twosome was too happy either. By the time he made it back, the 4-some behind us was on the our tee, where we hadn't teed off yet. We swapped the clubs on the cart after that, and I drove for the rest of the day.   
    • Last 4 rounds have been pretty decent. 85, 83, 80, & 79. The 79 was at my very familiar home course. The other three at various courses around the area.  My putting has been saving me a few strokes. Those being 32, 30, 30, & 28. The round of 28 involved 5 one putts for either par, or bogey.  Birdies are scarce, and when I do get one, I usually ruin it with a double bogey. I did card a 3 on a par 5, which was uplifting.  No 6s on the score cards, but a few too many 5s which could've/should've been 4s. Practice the rest of this week, and will play again next Monday, weather permitting. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Catcher20
      Catcher20
      (30 years old)
    2. JD15
      JD15
      (55 years old)
    3. Stixman
      Stixman
      (75 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...