Jump to content
IGNORED

Fivesomes on a Weekend Morning


FlyingAce
Note: This thread is 954 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, iacas said:

Playing devil's advocate, a slow player in a group with four other players will make that group slower overall than the same slow player in a group with one other person. (And no, I'm not talking about it in terms of percentages, which would be stupid here.)

The twosome, even with a slow player, they'll generally keep up a reasonable pace. Add a slow player as a fifth, though, and that'll bog that group down a good bit more, as four other people are now being slowed down to accommodate that guy.

This assumes the other players don't almost just ignore the slow player, regularly play out of turn while he's looking over his putt from his fifth angle, etc.

One of the Great Mysteries of Life:  Why is the slow player always the default? Why can't the fast player in the group be the default?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


19 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

One of the Great Mysteries of Life:  Why is the slow player always the default? Why can't the fast player in the group be the default?

Maybe Ben Crane and JB Holmes have the answer to that.

Craig
What's in the :ogio: Silencer bag (on the :clicgear: cart)
Driver: :callaway: Razr Fit 10.5°  
5 Wood: :tmade: Burner  
Hybrid: :cobra: Baffler DWS 20°
Irons: :ping: G400 
Wedge: :ping: Glide 2.0 54° ES grind 
Putter: :heavyputter:  midweight CX2
:aimpoint:,  :bushnell: Tour V4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
1 hour ago, iacas said:

Playing devil's advocate, a slow player in a group with four other players will make that group slower overall than the same slow player in a group with one other person. (And no, I'm not talking about it in terms of percentages, which would be stupid here.)

The twosome, even with a slow player, they'll generally keep up a reasonable pace. Add a slow player as a fifth, though, and that'll bog that group down a good bit more, as four other people are now being slowed down to accommodate that guy.

Well that's why I kind of asked the question, because I don't really know. In my mind I think if you're playing behind five players, a fivesome will play faster than a twosome followed by a threesome. You're only waiting on one group to play a hole instead of two. 

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
1 hour ago, Double Mocha Man said:

One of the Great Mysteries of Life:  Why is the slow player always the default? Why can't the fast player in the group be the default?

Default what? The slow player is the one who holds up the group.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

32 minutes ago, iacas said:

Default what? The slow player is the one who holds up the group.

Understood.  But in the best of all worlds why can't the fast player in the group get everyone else to play at his/her speed?!  I know I'm dreaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


6 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

Understood.  But in the best of all worlds why can't the fast player in the group get everyone else to play at his/her speed?!  I know I'm dreaming.

I'm a fast player, and I can tell you that a slow player has never adjusted his pace to accommodate me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 minute ago, Sandy Divot said:

I'm a fast player, and I can tell you that a slow player has never adjusted his pace to accommodate me.

If they did they would spin out of control and their head would explode... you can't fix slow.

Someone needs to write the book:  "SPEED GOLF - Secrets to Playing Better by Playing Faster".  And it needs to go on the best-seller list!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


22 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

Understood.  But in the best of all worlds why can't the fast player in the group get everyone else to play at his/her speed?!  I know I'm dreaming.

Like everything else in life: a chain is as strong as the weakest link.  Similarly, a group is only as fast as the slowest person.

If slow people played at a fast player's pace, they won't be slow players.

Don

:titleist: 910 D2, 8.5˚, Adila RIP 60 S-Flex
:titleist: 980F 15˚
:yonex: EZone Blades (3-PW) Dynamic Gold S-200
:vokey:   Vokey wedges, 52˚; 56˚; and 60˚
:scotty_cameron:  2014 Scotty Cameron Select Newport 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A long time ago I posted here or on another golf site a bold idea for speeding up play and encouraging others to become faster.

The pro/assistant pro goes out with you for 9 holes and afterwards presents you with a card, either green, yellow or red.

Green = fast player

Yellow = moderate speed player

Red = Slow player

Greens get preferred tee times and can also play in the morning.  Or anytime they want to.  Yellows can only play midday or later.  Reds get the late tee times... and the slowpokes are all out there together!  Kinda like pole positions in the Indianapolis 500.

Wishful thinking, I know.  It would probably mess with the revenue of a golf course.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


7 hours ago, mcanadiens said:

The problem is that allowing 5-somes is bad course policy. That one super-fast 5-some may not be a problem itself, but then you'll have all the other 5-somes that will jam stuff up.

 

That’s the idea I had when I saw this question. 

WITB:
Woods: Cleveland Launcher (Driver, 17 degree, 22 degree)
Irons: Titleist T200 (4-PW)
Wedges: Callaway Jaws (50/54/60)
Putter: Odyssey White Hot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 9/27/2019 at 11:13 PM, billchao said:

Well that's why I kind of asked the question, because I don't really know. In my mind I think if you're playing behind five players, a fivesome will play faster than a twosome followed by a threesome. You're only waiting on one group to play a hole instead of two. 

Not true.  Unless somebody like JB or Ben Crane is in the 2 ball, they will probably be faster than the 3 ball.  Which means you will be playing at the pace of the 3 ball in front of you rather than the 5 ball.  Which will make your game quicker

What's in the bag

  • Taylor Made r5 dual Draw 9.5* (stiff)
  • Cobra Baffler 4H (stiff)
  • Taylor Made RAC OS 6-9,P,S (regular)
  • Golden Bear LD5.0 60* (regular)
  • Aidia Z-009 Putter
  • Inesis Soft 500 golf ball
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

At the proshop where I worked part time, we supposedly didn't allow groups of more than foursomes. The problem was, every Tuesday afternoon, there was a little tournament hosted by the pro who was the co-owner of the course. Since the course runs through homes, you can see much more than the first hole and 9th fairway from the proshop window. As soon as they were out of sight, groups would join up and play between 5-8 together. They quickly developed a reputation for not letting people through and while Tuesday afternoon wasn't the busiest day of the week, I definitely noticed how dead we were after a while. Then internet ratings started mentioning it, but the owners didn't care. I definitely don't miss working there.

I've heard in the past reports claiming 5 or 6 play as fast as 3 or 4, provided they play ready golf. IMHO, i don't believe it.

Edited by DennisMiller
  • Thumbs Up 1

I've had a good day if I don't fall out of the cart...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, DennisMiller said:

I've heard in the past reports claiming 5 or 6 play as fast as 3 or 4, provided they play ready golf...

Generally, significantly faster.  ;-)

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, DennisMiller said:

... they play ready golf. IMHO, i don't believe it.

Ready golf does speed things up. But each golfer needs X amount of time to play 70 to 100 shots while everyone else is essentially standing around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


7 hours ago, Double Mocha Man said:

Ready golf does speed things up. But each golfer needs X amount of time to play 70 to 100 shots while everyone else is essentially standing around.

The problem is that some players think that they need 2 minutes of other people staring at them while they check range, select club, stare off into space, take 4 practice swings with 10 seconds in between each one, and then finally strike the ball. I played with someone exactly like that on Sunday, and he was a very good golfer, but I wouldn't play with him again if you payed me. Anything outside of 10 ft was a 2 minute ordeal it seemed like. The worst was when he was aligning the ball on the green. Potentially 40 seconds of placing, standing up, checking line, getting back down to replace, ad nauseam. These people couldn't play a solo round with an empty course in under 3 hours. And I can't really say anything to them because the course was so slow that we are generally keeping pace, most likely because there is at least one of this type of guy in every group. I could see how a 5 ball could be played in sub 4 hours or even less, but they can't have one of these guys in it, and it seems like every group does.

The "everyone else is essentially standing around" part is what bugs me. You should have your range, club, and a few practice swings in (if you take any or many) before it is your turn to strike. That way when it is your turn, you step up to the ball, take a practice swing, and go. They shouldn't be standing around, they should be planning and preparing for their turn, not oogling someone else's set up. The only argument you could make against this is if you are riding in a cart with someone, and you don't get a chance to get to your ball at the same time because of distance from their ball. My counter argument to that would be to walk instead, or at least pull 2-4 clubs from your bag so that you can walk to your ball and set up. The other person can come pick you up after they are done, and you should be done with your shot by then.

  • :titleist: 917 D2 9.5o EvenFlow blue shaft    :titleist: 917 F2 15o EvenFlow blue shaft    
  • :titleist: 818 H2 19o EvenFlow blue shaft 
  • :titleist: 712 AP2 4-PW
  • :vokey: 52/8o SM6 RAW    56/14o SM6 Chrome      60/4o SM6 Chrome
  • :ping: Anser Sigma G putter
  • :snell: MTB-Black Balls
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 954 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
    • Very much so. I think the intimidation factor that a lot of people feel playing against someone who's actually very good is significant. I know that Winged Foot pride themselves on the strength of the club. I think they have something like 40-50 players who are plus something. Club championships there are pretty competitive. Can't imagine Oakmont isn't similar. The more I think about this, the more likely it seems that this club is legit. Winning also breeds confidence and I'm sure the other clubs when they play this one are expecting to lose - that can easily become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
    • Ah ok I misunderstood. But you did bring to light an oversight on my part.
    • I was agreeing with you/jumping off from there.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...