Jump to content
Club Rat

Partner in Fourball Stands Behind Partner During Putt

37 posts / 2580 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, RonK said:

Can I please add to the discussion. In a 4BBB

If Player A has 5 ft birdie putt (so pretty certain to make par). and Player B has a 6 ft putt for par 9o degrees from Player As ball. 

Can Player B putt his ball to just behind Player As mark and not  at the hole so that his next putt will show Player A the line for his birdie attempt.

thanks.

Well I think it violates the standard of ethics such that rule 5.6a ‘ unreasonable delay of play’ could be called:  

https://t59dl.app.link/en/e584e56416bb272edae34e3f3dfd7eb4c478c63734b4fbd04af4b663fbb21bf6

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Register for free today and you won't see this ad spot again!

9 hours ago, RonK said:

Can I please add to the discussion. In a 4BBB

If Player A has 5 ft birdie putt (so pretty certain to make par). and Player B has a 6 ft putt for par 9o degrees from Player As ball. 

Can Player B putt his ball to just behind Player As mark and not  at the hole so that his next putt will show Player A the line for his birdie attempt.

thanks.

Such action gets the general penalty for serious misconduct, Rule 1.2.  See Interpretation 1.2a/1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, RonK said:

Can I please add to the discussion. In a 4BBB

If Player A has 5 ft birdie putt (so pretty certain to make par). and Player B has a 6 ft putt for par 9o degrees from Player As ball. 

Can Player B putt his ball to just behind Player As mark and not  at the hole so that his next putt will show Player A the line for his birdie attempt.

thanks.

I can't find a rule against that, but I don't really care.  As their opponent, I'd simply concede B's next putt (for bogey), pick up his ball, and hand it to him.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, iacas said:

Against the rules and you can concede anyway. M

I thought that too, but can't find the specific rule.  Can you point me to it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 hours ago, fredf said:

Such action gets the general penalty for serious misconduct, Rule 1.2.  See Interpretation 1.2a/1.

 

1 hour ago, DaveP043 said:

I thought that too, but can't find the specific rule.  Can you point me to it?


@fredf had it. (I deleted the first six examples in the quote to shorten it.)

Quote

1.2a/1 - Meaning of Serious Misconduct

The phrase “serious misconduct” in Rule 1.2a is intended to cover player misconduct that is so far removed from the expected norm in golf that the most severe sanction of removing a player from the competition is justified. This includes dishonesty, deliberately interfering with another player’s rights, or endangering the safety of others.

The Committee must determine if the misconduct is serious considering all the circumstances. Even if the Committee determines that the misconduct is serious, it may take the view that it is more appropriate to warn the player that a repeat of the misconduct or similar misconduct will result in disqualification, instead of disqualifying him or her in the first instance.

Examples of actions by a player that are likely to be considered serious misconduct include:
Deliberately playing away from the hole and then towards the hole to assist the player’s partner (such as helping the player’s partner learn the break on the putting green).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 hours ago, fredf said:

Such action gets the general penalty for serious misconduct, Rule 1.2.  See Interpretation 1.2a/1.

How do you arrive at the general penalty for a breach of R1.2?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Asheville said:

How do you arrive at the general penalty for a breach of R1.2?

Rule 1.2 does seem to indicate that DQ is the only available penalty for "serious misconduct" unless a lesser penalty is specifically incorporated into a Code of Conduct for the competition.  Interpretation 1.2a/1 does say that the Committee may choose to warn the player, but doesn't suggest that it can impose a penalty other than DQ.

Again, this shouldn't be an issue as long as the opponents can concede the next putt after B hits his putt to the position where it could help A.  But in a 4-ball stroke play situation, there ARE no concessions, so that kind of action should be punished pretty severely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

17 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

Again, this shouldn't be an issue as long as the opponents can concede the next putt after B hits his putt to the position where it could help A.

The concession would take place after the infraction.

So there may no longer be an active player to concede the putt to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

14 minutes ago, iacas said:

The concession would take place after the infraction.

So there may no longer be an active player to concede the putt to.

That certainly makes sense, but as I understand the Rule 1.2, the DQ penalty would to be assessed by the Committee for the serious misconduct.  The Committee also has the authority to choose to warn the player, rather than apply the DQ penalty.  In real time,  it seems unlikely that a decision to DQ the player would be made while the hole is still being played.  In real time, and in match play, the smart thing to do is to concede the putt before it can be played.

Edited by DaveP043

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

15 hours ago, RonK said:

Can I please add to the discussion. In a 4BBB

If Player A has 5 ft birdie putt (so pretty certain to make par). and Player B has a 6 ft putt for par 9o degrees from Player As ball. 

Can Player B putt his ball to just behind Player As mark and not  at the hole so that his next putt will show Player A the line for his birdie attempt.

thanks.

I vaguely seem to remember an old decision prohibiting such an action but cannot find it. Am I dreaming?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, RonK said:

Can I please add to the discussion. In a 4BBB

If Player A has 5 ft birdie putt (so pretty certain to make par). and Player B has a 6 ft putt for par 9o degrees from Player As ball. 

Can Player B putt his ball to just behind Player As mark and not  at the hole so that his next putt will show Player A the line for his birdie attempt.

thanks.

The rule in question to prohibit this would be Rule 23.5, which concerns a player's actions affection a partner's play. Specifically in section a it states,

Quote

A player and the player’s caddie may help the partner in any way that the partner’s caddie is allowed to help (such as to give and be asked for advice and take the other actions allowed under Rule 10), but must not give any help that the partner’s caddie is not allowed to give under the Rules.

It would be pretty easy to argue that rule 10.2.b.2 prohibits this when it states:

Quote

The player or caddie must not set an object down anywhere on or off the putting green to show the line of play. This is not allowed even if that object is removed before the stroke is made.

The golf ball is an object on the ground and specifically putting behind your partner would be using that object on the ground the show the line of play. 

It could also be considered to be a breech of rule 1.2 (a or b) depending on any code of conduct standards set by the committee and adopted as a local rule.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

13 minutes ago, Pretzel said:

The rule in question to prohibit this would be Rule 23.5, which concerns a player's actions affection a partner's play. Specifically in section a it states,

It would be pretty easy to argue that rule 10.2.b.2 prohibits this when it states:

The golf ball is an object on the ground and specifically putting behind your partner would be using that object on the ground the show the line of play. 

It could also be considered to be a breech of rule 1.2 (a or b) depending on any code of conduct standards set by the committee and adopted as a local rule.

I think the action proposed here was to putt to a point just behind his partner's ball and then putt again showing the line to his partner. The ball itself wasn't intended to indicate a line.

The decision (??) I thought I remembered was specifically about such an action (ie effectively putting away from the hole).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Rulesman said:

I think the action proposed here was to putt to a point just behind his partner's ball and then putt again showing the line to his partner. The ball itself wasn't intended to indicate a line.

The decision (??) I thought I remembered was specifically about such an action (ie effectively putting away from the hole).

The ball itself would serve to indicate a line though, which is prohibited for physical objects on the green even if they are removed before the stroke is made. 

I was mainly just providing an argument outside of the more obvious rule 1.2 answer if the committee for some reason didn't believe that to be an egregious breech of conduct worthy of a DQ, they could still apply a lesser penalty without having had to specifically mention that action in their own code of conduct with its own penalty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, Pretzel said:

The ball itself would serve to indicate a line though, which is prohibited for physical objects on the green even if they are removed before the stroke is made. 

 

How could it provide a line if it was not exactly on an extension of the line from the hole thru the partner's ball or on the line of borrow?

Edited by Rulesman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pretzel said:

The ball itself would serve to indicate a line though, which is prohibited for physical objects on the green even if they are removed before the stroke is made. 

The ball would only be useful to show the line if it was moving. That was the intention of player B. Player B ball serves no assistance if it’s just sitting there behind player A ball.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 hours ago, Asheville said:

How do you arrive at the general penalty for a breach of R1.2?

Quite right, I erred in saying it was general penalty. The only penalty option for the Committee outside any relevant Code of Conduct is DQ. But the interpretation is VERY clear, this is a Serious Misconduct, which answers the question put. Any Committee that fails to act on a Serious Misconduct, IMO, is not doing the game any favours.  It actually was a general penalty last year (old decision 30-3f/6).

3 hours ago, Rulesman said:

I vaguely seem to remember an old decision prohibiting such an action but cannot find it. Am I dreaming?

30.3f/6 (I haven't worked out multiquote).

3 minutes ago, fredf said:

Quite right, I erred in saying it was general penalty. The only penalty option for the Committee outside any relevant Code of Conduct is DQ. But the interpretation is VERY clear, this is a Serious Misconduct, which answers the question put. Any Committee that fails to act on a Serious Misconduct, IMO, is not doing the game any favours.  It actually was a general penalty last year (old decision 30-3f/6).

30.3f/6 (I haven't worked out multiquote).

 

4 minutes ago, fredf said:

Quite right, I erred in saying it was general penalty. The only penalty option for the Committee outside any relevant Code of Conduct is DQ. But the interpretation is VERY clear, this is a Serious Misconduct, which answers the question put. Any Committee that fails to act on a Serious Misconduct, IMO, is not doing the game any favours.  It actually was a general penalty last year (old decision 30-3f/6).

30.3f/6 (I haven't worked out multiquote).

And I can find no intuitive way to edit my post - the Decision reference should be 33-3f/6 not 30-3f/6.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have gone through the replies and the main claim is 'Serious misconduct'. I get that but it seems like a grey area. open to interpretation. 

I can't find any section of the rules that describe the scenario that i provided and the rules are very specific in terms of objects, balls hit, touched, where participants stand, act etc.

There are other reasons the said example could count as legitimate play. Perhaps Player B is putting away from the hole because he wants an easier uphill putt to finish the hole. Also if  Player B's ball is directly opposite Player A's ball and putts it pass the hole and just pass his partners mark it is an over hit and the putt coming back is going to show the line for the next putt. Misconduct or inherent part of the game. Have we lost the freedom to decide on the direction of the next stroke.

NB. The 4BBB I am referring to would be part of a Team Stableford competion. So there is no conceding putts involved.

 

Ahhh I have found some clarity.

Point 7. 

1.2a/1 - Meaning of Serious Misconduct

The phrase “serious misconduct” in Rule 1.2a is intended to cover player misconduct that is so far removed from the expected norm in golf that the most severe sanction of removing a player from the competition is justified. This includes dishonesty, deliberately interfering with another player’s rights, or endangering the safety of others.

The Committee must determine if the misconduct is serious considering all the circumstances. Even if the Committee determines that the misconduct is serious, it may take the view that it is more appropriate to warn the player that a repeat of the misconduct or similar misconduct will result in disqualification, instead of disqualifying him or her in the first instance.

Examples of actions by a player that are likely to be considered serious misconduct include:

  • Deliberately causing serious damage to a putting green.

  • Disagreeing with the course setup and taking it on himself or herself to move tee-markers or boundary stakes.

  • Throwing a club towards another player or spectator.

  • Deliberately distracting other players while they are making strokes.

  • Removing loose impediments or movable obstructions to disadvantage another player after that other player has asked him or her to leave them in place.

  • Repeatedly refusing to lift a ball at rest when it interferes with another player in stroke play.

  • Deliberately playing away from the hole and then towards the hole to assist the player’s partner (such as helping the player’s partner learn the break on the putting green).

  • Deliberately not playing in accordance with the Rules and potentially gaining a significant advantage by doing so, despite incurring a penalty for a breach of the relevant Rule.

  • Repeatedly using vulgar or offensive language.

  • Using a handicap that has been established for the purpose of providing an unfair advantage or using the round being played to establish such a handicap.

Examples of actions by a player that, although involving misconduct, are unlikely to be considered serious misconduct include:

  • Slamming a club to the ground, damaging the club and causing minor damage to the turf.

  • Throwing a club towards a golf bag that unintentionally hits another person.

  • Carelessly distracting another player making a stroke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • Going to look for good opportunities to back the US to win at a number much shorter than the pre-cup odds.........
    • After 30 years of weightlifting and 21 years of doing and teaching different styles of Yoga I feel totally confident and qualified to answer the question of whether weightlifting and golf go together.  My experience over all those years has me answer without hesitation that it truly depends on the individual.  Some people should not be lifting heavy weights period and are better off using  their own body weight to increase strength. This can be for a  variety of reasons, but there are many ways of increasing your strength without heavy weights if you are one of those people, especially in sports such as golf.  Some people  will benefit from heavy lifting and if that works for them , they should  continue, but to think everyone should be doing it is without merit. I have personally witnessed many bodies that did not take well to weights.  As one of the posters said and I repeat. If you lift heavy consider a flexibility program to complement  the strength training. Putting heavy weights on our back compresses the spine which is already being compressed from gravity over the years and we need to do things to counter that or it can lead to back problems which is what happened to me later in life. Fortunately I found ways to decompress.   
    • It's still the 11th, @Asheville! 🙂
    • Today, the 12th and tomorrow the 13th, we’ll look at the specific Rules for Bunkers and Putting Greens. Rule 12 - Bunkers The Golden Oldie that you cannot escape a bunker for free still stands. Thank you, Lew Blakey. http://www.generalarea.org/  Later in Rules 15 and 16, we’ll see a few restrictions on taking free relief in bunkers. Purpose of Rule: Rule 12 is a specific Rule for bunkers, which are specially prepared areas intended to test the player’s ability to play a ball from the sand.  To make sure the player confronts this challenge, there are some restrictions on touching the sand before the stroke is made and on where relief may be taken for a ball in a bunker. But, what exactly is a “bunker”? Let’s read the Definition: A specially prepared area of sand, which is often a hollow from which turf or soil was removed. These are not part of a bunker: A lip, wall or face at the edge of a prepared area and consisting of soil, grass, stacked turf or artificial materials, Soil or any growing or attached natural object inside the edge of a prepared area (such as grass, bushes or trees), Sand that has spilled over or is outside the edge of a prepared area, and All other areas of sand on the course that are not inside the edge of a prepared area (such as deserts and other natural sand areas or areas sometimes referred to as waste areas). Bunkers are one of the five defined areas of the course. A Committee may define a prepared area of sand as part of the general area (which means it is not a bunker) or may define a non-prepared area of sand as a bunker. When a bunker is being repaired and the Committee defines the entire bunker as ground under repair, it is treated as part of the general area (which means it is not a bunker). What’s in the Rule: 12.1 When Ball Is in Bunker 12.2 Playing Ball in Bunker 12.3 Specific Rules for Relief for Ball in Bunker https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/rules/rules-2019/rules-of-golf/rules-and-interpretations.html#!ruletype=fr&section=rule&rulenum=12 Rule 12 Interpretations: 12.2a/1 Improvement Resulting from Removing Loose Impediment or Movable Obstruction from a Bunker 12.2b(3)/1 Player Is Allowed to Smooth Sand in a Bunker to Care for the Course After Taking Relief Outside the Bunker 12.2b/1 Rule 12.2b Applies to a Mound of Sand from an Animal Hole in a Bunker 12.2b/2 Whether Player May Probe in Bunker 12.2b/3 Rule 12.2 Continues to Apply When Player Has Lifted His or Her Ball from Bunker to Take Relief but Has Not Yet Decided Whether to Take Relief In or Out of Bunker https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/rules/rules-2019/rules-of-golf/rules-and-interpretations.html#!ruletype=interp&section=rule&rulenum=12  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Fourputt
      Fourputt
      (73 years old)
    2. Grizvok
      Grizvok
      (31 years old)
    3. laurakimberly
      laurakimberly
      (26 years old)
    4. Matt C
      Matt C
      (56 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...