Jump to content
IGNORED

Would You Rather…?


Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, onthehunt526 said:

Ok. Very narrow gaps are bullshit trees are 80% air. That being said probably play safe. But in real life I’d probably hit a chip out in between the gap and shorten the 3rd shot.

But that's not how they present themselves to the golf ball, leaves and needles specifically.  Not talking trunks here.  To a flying golf ball they are about 80% obstruction. 

Think of the canopy in layers, vertical layers, running away from you.  I'd postulate that the average deciduous tree has 12-15 layers.  Each layer is, yes, 80% air.  But the open spots are not lined up... so you end up with mostly obstruction after you get past a layer or two.  I need a good analogy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 723
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You know, immediately after I posted my previous post I started thinking I may have gotten it wrong, primarily because of the O-Value. I'll revisit that in a bit, though… Not that much lower.

Definitely hole out from the fairway twice a year for the rest of my life. An eagle on a par four is -2. A hole in one is -2. Two awesome shots/year would be something to look forward to forever.😃

I'm not sure why this is even a question. Would you rather have a 3 foot par putt or a 5 foot par putt?  … Who's going to say they want the 5 footer?

Posted Images

On 10/9/2020 at 9:47 AM, StuM said:

Would you Rather #30 – Play it safe and hope to 1 putt for a personal best or gamble it all and play a high risk shot hoping to have a 2-putt for par to secure your personal best?

Assume you are on #18, a par 4, all you need is par to get a new personal best by 1 stroke.  You hit your drive into a dense cluster of trees @ 125 yards from the green.  You see a very narrow gap that, if you hit absolutely perfectly, you can be on the green putting for birdie or two-putt to save par and the personal best but if you have the slightest mishit you will hit a tree and ricochet to points unknown and most likely be getting bogey or worse.  Alternatively, you can play a safe shot sideways into the fairway leaving a 125 yard approach shot and hope to 1 putt for par to save the personal best.   Also, assume there is no money on the line, no club championship or league standing, only your personal satisfaction.

I'm absolutely going for it. Chipping out means wondering "what if" while going for it gives me a chance at a career round and at a minimum a good story to tell my dad.  

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 10/9/2020 at 10:47 AM, StuM said:

Would you Rather #30 – Play it safe and hope to 1 putt for a personal best or gamble it all and play a high risk shot hoping to have a 2-putt for par to secure your personal best?

Yeah, in this scenario where there is nothing on the line besides a score, I am definitely going for it. I'd much rather miss out on my personal best by two shots because I was going for it and doubled than miss out by one shot after playing it safe.

Beyond that, the chances of me getting up and down from 125 yards really aren't that great, so I may as well take on the risk to improve my chances of a par.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 10/9/2020 at 7:47 AM, StuM said:

Would you Rather #30 – Play it safe and hope to 1 putt for a personal best or gamble it all and play a high risk shot hoping to have a 2-putt for par to secure your personal best?

 

Difficult to reply without visualizing the gap....I do tend to be aggressive vs. hitting it out sideways.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

WOULD YOU RATHER #31: 

Assume you are playing golf for the college team of your choice. Would you rather be Mr. Erratic (i.e you have a 50-50 shot between 60s or high 70s or worse) or Mr. Consistent (you usually shoot around par, with occasional sub-70 rounds)?

For me, I would rather be Mr. Consistent. If I constantly spit out scores in the low 70s, I’m a good man to have because my bad rounds would be just a couple over par, which doesn’t hurt too much. However, if I’m Mr. Erratic, I’m either a hero or a failure. I may go out and shoot 66, which puts us in or close to the leading team, then I’ll follow it up with a 78 or worse, which hurts.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, dagolfer18 said:

WOULD YOU RATHER #31: 

Assume you are playing golf for the college team of your choice. Would you rather be Mr. Erratic (i.e you have a 50-50 shot between 60s or high 70s or worse) or Mr. Consistent (you usually shoot around par, with occasional sub-70 rounds)?

I was Mr. Consistent in college and now I am Mr. Erratic.  I would like to revisit my former self.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Moderator
5 minutes ago, dagolfer18 said:

WOULD YOU RATHER #31: 

Assume you are playing golf for the college team of your choice. Would you rather be Mr. Erratic (i.e you have a 50-50 shot between 60s or high 70s or worse) or Mr. Consistent (you usually shoot around par, with occasional sub-70 rounds)?

I've never been on a college golf team, or even high school, but I think Mr. Erratic might not get a lot of playing time.  If the coach can't depend on you to at least play "decent", why would he select you to play you at all?  I'd rather be Mr. Consistent.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

I've never been on a college golf team, or even high school, but I think Mr. Erratic might not get a lot of playing time.  If the coach can't depend on you to at least play "decent", why would he select you to play you at all?  I'd rather be Mr. Consistent.

I think in a big match, like an NCAA Championship, the coach might want to roll the dice and go with Mr. Erratic to have a chance of winning.  Or of finishing last.  The "all-or-nothing approach" .

Edited by Double Mocha Man
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Moderator
5 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

I think in a big match, like an NCAA Championship, the coach might want to roll the dice and go with Mr. Erratic to have a chance of winning.  Or of finishing last.  The "all-or-nothing approach" .

It certainly could depend on the format.  If you need 4 scores from 5 players, for instance, maybe you could take a flyer on one guy like that.  If its match play, maybe you can take a risk on losing just one match really quickly.  But if you put out 6 players needing 6 scores, do you take the chance that one player's poor day kills the entire team's chances?  I'd still take solid and steady in most circumstances, I'd still prefer to BE Mr. Consistent.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, dagolfer18 said:

WOULD YOU RATHER #31: 

Assume you are playing golf for the college team of your choice. Would you rather be Mr. Erratic (i.e you have a 50-50 shot between 60s or high 70s or worse) or Mr. Consistent (you usually shoot around par, with occasional sub-70 rounds)?

I believe I'd echo what @DaveP043 stated.  I'd personally prefer to be Mr. Consistent but it looks like Mr. Erratic may have more potential down the road.   

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, dagolfer18 said:

WOULD YOU RATHER #31: 

Assume you are playing golf for the college team of your choice. Would you rather be Mr. Erratic (i.e you have a 50-50 shot between 60s or high 70s or worse) or Mr. Consistent (you usually shoot around par, with occasional sub-70 rounds)?

This one reminds me of a story I heard many years ago, I believe it was related to Lee Trevino's qualifying for the Tour.  It seems he was all over the course, i.e. Mr Erratic, whereas his partner was straight down the middle, Mr Consistent.  I recall the author telling the story that we all got to see Lee play on the Tour while the other guy never did. So what is my answer, I am going with Mr Erratic as one thing is certain, the rounds will never be "boring golf"!  Yes, NCAA titles are nice but do we prefer to see boring rounds or watching the elite players having to scramble, therefore justifying our scrambling.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 hours ago, dagolfer18 said:

WOULD YOU RATHER #31: 

Assume you are playing golf for the college team of your choice. Would you rather be Mr. Erratic (i.e you have a 50-50 shot between 60s or high 70s or worse) or Mr. Consistent (you usually shoot around par, with occasional sub-70 rounds)?

For me, I would rather be Mr. Consistent. If I constantly spit out scores in the low 70s, I’m a good man to have because my bad rounds would be just a couple over par, which doesn’t hurt too much. However, if I’m Mr. Erratic, I’m either a hero or a failure. I may go out and shoot 66, which puts us in or close to the leading team, then I’ll follow it up with a 78 or worse, which hurts.

I have been Mr. Erratic for too long and it sucks when that crap round comes out,  knowing you could shoot so much better.  I’ll take Mr Consistent.  I would still have the hope of getting a great round.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 hours ago, dagolfer18 said:

WOULD YOU RATHER #31: 

Assume you are playing golf for the college team of your choice. Would you rather be Mr. Erratic (i.e you have a 50-50 shot between 60s or high 70s or worse) or Mr. Consistent (you usually shoot around par, with occasional sub-70 rounds)?

Mr. Consistent. Boring average 15 pars a round kind of guy. Oh wait I already do that. I think that someone who plays “consistent” as you call it or “boring” as I call it. In the long run, would just need to get hot with the putter for a tournament to go low, and even if they didn’t they’re still shooting between 70-74, with average putting.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

22 hours ago, dagolfer18 said:

 

WOULD YOU RATHER #31: 

Assume you are playing golf for the college team of your choice. Would you rather be Mr. Erratic (i.e you have a 50-50 shot between 60s or high 70s or worse) or Mr. Consistent (you usually shoot around par, with occasional sub-70 rounds)?

 

 

Mr. Consistent. Just ask Charle Schwartzel.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

22 hours ago, dagolfer18 said:

WOULD YOU RATHER #31: 

Assume you are playing golf for the college team of your choice. Would you rather be Mr. Erratic (i.e you have a 50-50 shot between 60s or high 70s or worse) or Mr. Consistent (you usually shoot around par, with occasional sub-70 rounds)?

Mr. Consistent for all the many good reasons cited by previous posters.

Long ago, when it became time to select the Ryder Cup team, there was a faction of fans who wanted the Captain to pick John Daly.  He was never selected, both because his point totals were never near enough to the last qualifier but also because he was too erratic.  He was also a player who might not grind if things were not going his way.  I have played many times with talented but erratic players.  One common trait shared by many of them is the tendency to not keep grinding and try to turn an 82 into a 78. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
On 10/21/2020 at 10:33 AM, dagolfer18 said:

WOULD YOU RATHER #31: 

Assume you are playing golf for the college team of your choice. Would you rather be Mr. Erratic (i.e you have a 50-50 shot between 60s or high 70s or worse) or Mr. Consistent (you usually shoot around par, with occasional sub-70 rounds)?

For me, I would rather be Mr. Consistent. If I constantly spit out scores in the low 70s, I’m a good man to have because my bad rounds would be just a couple over par, which doesn’t hurt too much. However, if I’m Mr. Erratic, I’m either a hero or a failure. I may go out and shoot 66, which puts us in or close to the leading team, then I’ll follow it up with a 78 or worse, which hurts.

Mr Consistent. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 10/9/2020 at 10:47 AM, StuM said:

Would you Rather #30 – Play it safe and hope to 1 putt for a personal best or gamble it all and play a high risk shot hoping to have a 2-putt for par to secure your personal best?

Going for it all day. The probability of me hitting the green from 125 yards is probably 50% or so, so playing it safe, I would have to drain a longish putt or chip in. If I get it greenside or on the green with the risky shot, my chances of making par aren't nearly as bad, and a record round is worth the risk.

On 10/21/2020 at 10:33 AM, dagolfer18 said:

WOULD YOU RATHER #31: 

Assume you are playing golf for the college team of your choice. Would you rather be Mr. Erratic (i.e you have a 50-50 shot between 60s or high 70s or worse) or Mr. Consistent (you usually shoot around par, with occasional sub-70 rounds)?

Mr. Consistent. Low event seems just fine by me, as someone whos scores vary from high 80s to well over 100 sometimes.

Edited by Bonvivant
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...

WOULD YOU RATHER #32: 

Would you rather see the same guy win 10 of the next 16 majors.

OR

Would you rather see each of the next 16 majors won by a first time major champion?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjan21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Not much chance of that since he was banned, Chet.
    • 20 year break!  ... Let me guess, you got married? ...  You had kids? ... Or had a career change? ... Maybe did a little time in the pokey? 🤪 Anyway, welcome back to the game and welcome to the forum.  
    • Whoa! Whoa! Whoa!! Don't go away. Take a step back for a second. Listen, I know quite a few of the folks on this forum personally and they are all really good people, who love discussing golf. It seems you've become very upset because the title of your thread was changed. Think of it this way, when searching for this thread the rest of us need a way to recognize it. The moderator who changed it just tried to make it easier for the rest of us to find your thread.  Over the years I've had many thread titles changed. I've started other threads which have been merged with similar threads as well. This is a huge form. It's been around for 20 years. The moderators are just trying to keep thing tidy to help us all out.  Give us a chance. I think you'll find this really is a great place for golf talk. I'd suggest "The Numbers Thread", "The would you rather" thread, and the "General COVID-19" thread. Go in there and poke around. There's good stuff in there.  Remember a forum is a collection of personalities just like any forum that gets together in "real life". Some folks are better communicators than others. Some folks are wittier than others. (I'm looking at you @Double Mocha Man. I promise you if you hang around here you'll find stuff that will help your son's game. You'll find stuff that will challenge what you thought about some situations. You'll likely even make some friends. Besides if you go, who's going to teach me new words? I had to look up pedantic.... I had no idea what that meant. I was pretty sure it wasn't positive. But I went to Chicago Public Schools so my vocabulary isn't the strongest. 
    • I saw him hit his last home run in Milwaukee in 1976.  I had just graduated high school. A great talent.  RIP.
    • Sticking with the same stuff, left leg slider feel and maintaining the right ankle dorsiflexion. Hitting it well, taken a lot of the left miss out of play, misses recently have been pushes. Went to PING last week to get fit for the new woods, some changes from my last trip which I think is reflective of the swing trending in the right direction. Don't need to tweak the loft lower with the driver anymore and they recommend I hard-step my iron shafts. I like how stable the right foot is on the backswing and how the left foot is rolling to the outstep much less with the face-on.  
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. dpriceva
      dpriceva
      (59 years old)
    2. Jim C
      Jim C
      (60 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...