Jump to content
TRUCKER

Sandbaggers in a Net Six-Man Scramble???

19 posts / 951 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Played in a scramble Thursday. Winning team of 6 shot a net 49. There gross score beat the 2nd place net score of 59. People were yelling out "CHEATERS", and other insults. But they still won...🤦‍♂️

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Register for free today and you won't see this ad spot again!

A six person scramble WITH handicaps?

49 doesn’t seem at all out of the question.

I mean I’ve shot 53 playing with four and no handicaps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, iacas said:

A six person scramble WITH handicaps?

49 doesn’t seem at all out of the question.

Agree.  But how the hell do you handicap a scramble?!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I’ve seen it done where players get 10% of their handicaps and it adds up to the team handicap.

So a 20, 15, 12, and a 6 get 5.

But yeah … generally not handicapped and almost never SIX.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 minutes ago, iacas said:

A six person scramble WITH handicaps?

49 doesn’t seem at all out of the question.

I mean I’ve shot 53 playing with four and no handicaps.

Yeah, you're a pro though. This is the 4th year I've played this tournament. All the other years the winning score has been mid to high 50's. This was a new group.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just now, TRUCKER said:

Yeah, you're a pro though. This is the 4th year I've played this tournament. All the other years the winning score has been mid to high 50's. This was a new group.

I played that round with 6 to 11 handicappers.

No string, mulligans, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, TRUCKER said:

Yeah, you're a pro though. This is the 4th year I've played this tournament. All the other years the winning score has been mid to high 50's. This was a new group.

The power of 2 extra players in a scramble is huge.

6 decent (single digit players) can certainly birdie every hole and shoot 54 gross, without too much drama.  Throw in an eagle or two on the par-5’s, and whatever handicap strokes they get and 49 seems very doable.  Hell, maybe not even all that extraordinary...

 

Edited by David in FL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

🤷‍♂️...I guess so. It seems like a lot of eagles to get that low on a long course. 6500 yards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, TRUCKER said:

🤷‍♂️...I guess so. It seems like a lot of eagles to get that low on a long course. 6500 yards.

Assuming par 72, you don’t need any gross eagles at all.  All birdies and 5 handicap strokes does it.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

10 minutes ago, iacas said:

I played that round with 6 to 11 handicappers.

No string, mulligans, etc.

How many times you think your shot was used? Lol....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That's it? Ok. Well then I guess they did it...🥂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Good god a six person scramble?! How long did that take to play? While I have seen very very few handicapped scrambles they do exist, its like adding stealing to the cheating. 49 is not that bad though I once shot 50 (-22) in a four person scramble gross. Mind you it was 4 scratch golfers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I once played in a 4 person scramble. My team was all guys playing on our home course. We were 10 under after 9 holes (totally legit). Here's the kicker, we finished the round at 8 under, in 5th place. 

There may have been alcohol involved. … just staying. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

34 minutes ago, NM Golf said:

Good god a six person scramble?! How long did that take to play? While I have seen very very few handicapped scrambles they do exist, its like adding stealing to the cheating. 49 is not that bad though I once shot 50 (-22) in a four person scramble gross. Mind you it was 4 scratch golfers.

The longest scramble I ever played in was something called a "One Man Banked Scramble".  They only allowed threesomes.  You got one extra shot each time you hit the ball.  If you didn't use it you could "bank" the extra shot and use it later on the hole, but it didn't carry over to the next hole.  On a par 5 you could conceivably end up on the green with 5 attempts at that birdie!  That round took forever!  I will not play in one of those again.  If you think about it each player can average taking 8 or more shots per hole, except on par 3's.

Edited by Double Mocha Man
typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

I once played in a 4 person scramble. My team was all guys playing on our home course. We were 10 under after 9 holes (totally legit). Here's the kicker, we finished the round at 8 under, in 5th place. 

There may have been alcohol involved. … just saying. 

Not sure if it's a scramble if alcohol isn't involved.😀

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, NM Golf said:

Good god a six person scramble?! How long did that take to play? While I have seen very very few handicapped scrambles they do exist, its like adding stealing to the cheating. 49 is not that bad though I once shot 50 (-22) in a four person scramble gross. Mind you it was 4 scratch golfers.

5 hrs. It wasn't a full field. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • Won the handicap section of the Coffee Cup I played in my home course on Sunday
    • While I think Phil should not be playing because of all the reasons stated.  He is endorsing by his mere presence a government that has numerous instances of human rights violations.  As an elder statesman, so to speak, and future a HOF member of the PGA his presence does provide validation to the tournament. But he could have handled it so much better to avoid some of the flack he is getting. He could have used the same turning 50 logic and that he doesn't expect to have an opportunity to play the tournament again, (whether a true statement of not).  But the real response to put things into perspective would be to say... "Unlike the military weapons that have been sold to Saudi Arabia for decades, the products I use can't be used to kill Americans." I spent 30 years in the defense industry and it is pretty amazing what products are sold to foreign countries.  The products are not the latest products, or upgraded version, and lack sensitive USG capability, but they none-the-less they represent some of the best that America has made.  Unfortunately, allies can become enemies is short order.  None of this is directed to a specific administration, party, or to be interpreted as political in nature.  It has been done for years. What is the most amazing part of a Foreign Military Sale is that a branch of the service, say the Air Force, will negotiate a contract with a defense contractor using DOD acquisition regulations to the benefit of the foreign entity.  I was never able to get my head around hearing an Air Force officer tell Americans working for an American company that his job was looking out for the interests of the country of (insert name of country).  It was utterly mind boggling. So, while I agree Phil should not play, hitting a golf ball seems to pale in comparison. John
    • Probably a PhD in comparative women's studies and Social Environmental Hysteria from a California college. Fill them with scotch and we are talking.  I need a ball retrieval tool, a clean rag, a drill and a straw.
    • I agree.. OSU can not grant Clemson a 21 point lead. Though, I think OSU is equipped to make it close if they do. The number of times they go on a 21 point streak in a short amount of time is still amazing to me. It's been like clockwork. OSU feels out what the other team does for about 3 drives and then just steps on the gas on offense and defense. I am not sure that I would take the Wisconsin game as what this team is though. You have a team motivated for revenge, they worked on all the deficiencies that Illinois and OSU exposed on them, and they threw the kitchen sink at OSU. You have OSU's #1 DB go out and things start to get exposed a bit. Who would have thought that Wisconsin's QB would pull the ball and run it. Great adjustment there for Wisconsin. It gave them a lead at the half, but then OSU held them to 80 yards for the rest of the game (excluding the last drive in garbage time)  Still, OSU needs to match Clemson drive for drive if they come firing right out of the gate. Kinda like how OSU kept up with Michigan and pulled away. 
    • All good points. But the lurking issue for me is how OSU performed for more than half the game against Wisconsin. You give Clemson a 21pt start...you’re done. OSU a great 3-4th quarter team but that sluggish start won’t fair well with any of the top four teams. I think (hope) it’s a dogfight. I’m not too hopeful how OU will do against LSU. Zero discipline and an iffy defense isn’t what you want against LSU.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...