Jump to content
Valleygolfer

Sand Shank… What Did He Do Wrong?

36 posts / 1566 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, leftybutnotPM said:

I'll say it for a third time.

It came off the toe. The clubface was wide open and the toe hit the ball rather than the club hitting the sand.

Just a bad swing. came up early.

Well then I guess you are not one to ask about a golf shot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Register for free today and you won't see this ad spot again!

6 minutes ago, Valleygolfer said:

Well then I guess you are not one to ask about a golf shot.

Even the announcer says something about being "almost bladed". If you look up shank in a golf dictionary, this shot would be the literal farthest distance from it. A cleanly struck ball is closer to a shank than this is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

45 minutes ago, Valleygolfer said:

Well then I guess you are not one to ask about a golf shot.

On the contrary, I am 100% correct. Care to elaborate on your criticism?

The shot is almost the opposite of a shank.

Edited by leftybutnotPM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

18 hours ago, Bonvivant said:

Even the announcer says something about being "almost bladed". If you look up shank in a golf dictionary, this shot would be the literal farthest distance from it. A cleanly struck ball is closer to a shank than this is.

Clearly that is the case, but not the question. You are giving me the result not the why,.

17 hours ago, leftybutnotPM said:

Care to elaborate on your criticism?

See above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A couple days ago, when the pro golfer was putting and the kid in the gallery shouted during his stroke... the reporter who pushed out the story called his 1 inch miss from 6-7 feet a shank.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, colin007 said:

Definitely a shank off the hosel. No question about it.

Not that it's a 3rd World issue, but how can you say that with such surety?!  Do you have super slo-mo video footage to prove it?  Did you talk with the player or the caddie?  Have you ever hit a shot off the toe of your club?  Looks and feels like a shank but it isn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

Not that it's a 3rd World issue, but how can you say that with such surety?!  Do you have super slo-mo video footage to prove it?  Did you talk with the player or the caddie?  Have you ever hit a shot off the toe of your club?  Looks and feels like a shank but it isn't.

A shot off the toe does NOT feel like a shank, and a 2.9 would know that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, iacas said:

A shot off the toe does NOT feel like a shank, and a 2.9 would know that.

It all goes so fast and looks the same.  And in the sand I'd say it virtually feels the same.   Out of the sand I've never hit that shot.  Though I've had a few hosel rockets.

Edited by Double Mocha Man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

Not that it's a 3rd World issue, but how can you say that with such surety?!  Do you have super slo-mo video footage to prove it?  Did you talk with the player or the caddie?  Have you ever hit a shot off the toe of your club?  Looks and feels like a shank but it isn't.

Disagree, I know what a "toe shank" feels like from a bunker because I used to miss them like that. Doesn't feel anything like a hosel shank which I struggled with for an entire year several years ago. 

Definitely looks like a hosel rocket IMO based off the ball velocity and the placement of his strike in the sand. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 11/20/2019 at 9:02 PM, leftybutnotPM said:

On the contrary, I am 100% correct. Care to elaborate on your criticism?

The shot is almost the opposite of a shank.

Dude it was a shank, El Hosel, the laterals, hosel rocket. Not sure why you seem to think you are 100% correct, because the player is the only guy who knows for sure. I've done that several times before, open the face, try and pop it out and crack... hello Mr. Hosel. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

 

On 11/20/2019 at 3:28 PM, Double Mocha Man said:

When you do that the hosel is getting more distant from the ball and the toe is coming into play as the club approaches the ball.

I agree except the hosel getting farther part- you're much closer.  Though much less likely for hosel contact to send the ball to the right (that why I'd agree with it being a toe or bladed contact, not hosel)2019-11-22 12_46_36-Microsoft PowerPoint - [Presentation1 [Compatibility Mode]].jpg

Edited by rehmwa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I agree.  Nice diagrams.  Actually, when I hit a sand shot (sand wedge greenside) I line up the hosel with the ball before I pull the club back, knowing I'm going to cut across it and eventually catch the ball in the center of the face area, with a layer of sand between ball and face.

I love playing sand shots... strong point of my game (though I do try to stay out of those pesky bunkers).  Can't tell you how many times in a scramble I lobby for the ball in the trap over the ball in the rough 15 yards from the green.  I am always overruled; nobody seems to like to play sand shots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

I agree.  Nice diagrams. 

I love playing sand shots...

My power point fu is strong in child like pictures

My sand game is good if I practice, sucks otherwise.  But in scrambles I've been in the same boat.  Usually a better lie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, rehmwa said:

My power point fu is strong in child like pictures

My sand game is good if I practice, sucks otherwise.  But in scrambles I've been in the same boat.  Usually a better lie.

Yep, but virtually all scramble players run from a sand trap like running from Godzilla.  Where's their courage?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Double Mocha Man said:

Yep, but virtually all scramble players run from a sand trap like running from Godzilla.  Where's their courage?!

My philosophy is that one of the four of us will hit a good one.

The last time I convinced my group to play out of the sand, it was because it was much shorter, and we were hitting up toward the pin, whereas the fairway shot was longer, but, mostly because the green was steeply falling away from that angle.

One of the fours of us did hit a good shot, but not me.

Edited by Cartboy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2020 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • Does it have to be beating them?  A very fond memory of mine, from about two years into my time playing golf, was playing with a much better player and matching his score on three holes (two pars and a birdie).  I am 100% certain he beat my scores on the remaining holes.  Just the same, the (much much much) better player was super encouraging to me the whole day, but I particularly remember him complimenting those three.  
    • Day 46.  If today is Tuesday, this must be Belgium speed sticks day.  Protocol one in my back yard this evening.  Green at the end was 113, a new record.  Although it occurs to me, I'm supposed to continuously set new personal bests. 
    • So with it being the offseason still, I find myself reading and watching a lot of topics on the sport. Lately i came across Scott Fawcett and his strategy for teebox decisions. YouTube has a few videos of his but basically, for people who drive it over 270 pretty consistently, gameplanning should consider any trouble that is within a 70 yard dispersion. Now I already have gamegolf so i can see some dispersion patterns but I obviously dont tag the shots where I completely lose a ball so data is missing. I decided to go to a sim bay using a GCQuad and did a 15 shot driver test. In the end I averaged 268 off the tee in total distance. However off those 15 shots....3 were massive misses of 45, 52, and 60 yards offline. In real life at my home course and most trees courses I play those are lost balls with bad penalties applied. They would only be slightly salvageable at a course with adjacent fairways really. I would say when you look at my gamegolf rounds, the GCQuad result of 3/15 being lost/OB is accurate. So it made me start wondering as someone who has read LSW and Every Stroke Counts and understands advancing the ball far but safely.....how wide of dispersion is considered unusable for a driver? Until my swing improved would I be better off statistically going down to my 16* mini driver or just 21* hybrid? ( next time I do the simulator I was going to do dispersion tests for those)
    • While it may seem like a good idea, you can't just "factory reset" your swing. Better to just focus on a priority and make that better. Rather than trying to achieve a certain kind of swing, just improve on what you currently have.
    • OK -  let me make one final post on this as this horse is well and truly beaten. Just so that I'm fully clear on where you stand in the context of this particular discussion.  Please indulge me. 1. What they DID matters. 2. Why we THINK they did it doesn't matter. 3. Your (and my) opinion of what they did or why they did it is irrelevant 4. The only relevant discussion is the penalty for the infringement. 5. A person's opinion of the character any of the people under discussion has nothing to do with the thread. 6. Anything beyond that is essentially moot. Is that a fair summation?  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Catcher20
      Catcher20
      (30 years old)
    2. JD15
      JD15
      (55 years old)
    3. Stixman
      Stixman
      (75 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...