Jump to content
IGNORED

Do You Prefer Faster Or Slower Greens?


Green Speed  

34 members have voted

  1. 1. Do You Prefer Faster Or Slower Greens?

    • Faster
      29
    • Slower
      5


Recommended Posts

Do y’all prefer faster greens or slower greens? If you’re in between, just say which one you’re closer to. For me, I prefer the greens fast, but definitely not US Open fast. Our club keeps the greens at about an 8.5 or 9 on the stimpmeter. For the club championship every summer, they bump it up to about a 10. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

I like smooth true greens.  In my experience, faster greens seem to also be smoother.  But I do agree, greens can become too fast to play appropriately.  I draw the line at the speed where an uphill putt will get within a foot of the hole (where it should be semi-level), and roll back to where it started.  That's either a hole location, or greens too fast for the slopes.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A true roll is the more important thing, but the tendency is for better-conditioned courses to also have faster greens. 

Honestly, if the greens roll true, I'd rather have the slower ones. The home courses have some of the slowest greens in these parts. Of course, they don't roll particularly true either with the amount of abuse they take. The handful of times I go somewhere with legitimately fast greens, I'm a duck out of water.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hands down I prefer slower greens.  I am not a great putter and my logic is this.  If I overhit a putt, it will go way past on a faster green.  I really don't want to be putting 5 feet after missing my first putt 😱

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, pganapathy said:

Hands down I prefer slower greens.  I am not a great putter and my logic is this.  If I overhit a putt, it will go way past on a faster green.  I really don't want to be putting 5 feet after missing my first putt 😱

That's not necessarily true though. I can make a putt go 5 foot past the hole on a fast green or a slow green.

On a fast green you don't have to hit the ball as hard to get it to go the same distance as you would on the slower green, so on the faster green a smaller putting stroke is required which should result in more control.

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

37 minutes ago, klineka said:

That's not necessarily true though. I can make a putt go 5 foot past the hole on a fast green or a slow green.

On a fast green you don't have to hit the ball as hard to get it to go the same distance as you would on the slower green, so on the faster green a smaller putting stroke is required which should result in more control.

Not for me.  It is very easy to overdo a shot for me.  All it requires is a touch too much power or inaccuracy and I am a couple of feet away from the pin for my second.  Three putts add more to my double or triple bogeys than anything else 🥶

Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally, i prefer fast greens to putt on. You can make smoother more rhythmic strokes on fast greens and don't have to worry as much about getting the ball to the hole.  But fast greens are usually harder and more difficult to stop the ball where you want on approach shots and pitches, so theres a trade off in terms of total play. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I definitely prefer fast. I think, at least on the courses that I play, faster greens correlate to higher quality/more well cared for greens, which means less bumps and oddities to bump the ball off line.

Also I have a gross habit of leaving putts 5-6 fee short and it's harder for me to do this on fast greens.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

A little off topic, and I apologize, but how often do you see someone whistle a putt way past the hole, and say "Gee, this green is a lot faster than the rest", when you're thinking "Wow, you hammered that one".

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Trueness is more important than speed. And consistency among all the holes is right there as well. But on the whole- faster is my preference. to a point

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

@dagolfer18, please add polls for stuff like this.

I added one and voted for "faster."

Golfers putt better on faster greens. In large part because, as others have noted, they're smoother.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Or, he understands how it transfers, and he was only around his wife for two months. He didn't need to get tested… because in getting tested, maybe he would have gone out more than he did in isolating at home, perhaps? You are making a LOT of assumptions, as you often do, @Shorty. Cool it.
    • The Club at Lac La Belle - 6.5 I wasn't a big fan of this course. It was beautiful and well-maintained, but I found parts of it to be a little contrived. It's definitely a target golf course and for someone like me who is wild off the tee, it took all the fun of strategizing out of it because the risks were just too high. I did like that there was variety in the course layout with a good mix of short/long, right/left, uphill/downhill holes. I'm not sure I'd make a trip out to this one again if I'm ever back in the area for golf, but it's less than 10 minutes away from a delicious French bakery with the best croissants I have ever had, so that bumps up the score a little  I'd go back just for the croissants. The Sandbox - 7.0 This little 17 hole par 3 course was just fun. It gave you different looks and a variety of options for play. I really liked it and tried a bunch of different things I normally wouldn't have on a regular course. A 7.0 is probably the most I'd give to a par 3 course, though. Lawsonia Links - 7.5 I really enjoyed this course. Overall I found the layout to be good. There were plenty of places to miss, but you still needed to hit good golf shots to play well. I liked the way the mounds and bunkers were designed to play with the shape of the holes visually. There were really only a couple of holes I didn't like - 13 in particular, even though I made par both times using completely different strategies. It's just bordering on too many blind shots for me, though. I'd definitely play this course again if I have the chance. Mammoth Dunes - 8.5 This course was spectacular to look at - absolutely visually stunning. The pictures don't do it justice because they fail to capture the scale of everything. The place is massive. I'll echo what the others have wrote above: it's a journey. You feel like you're not going out to play a round of golf, but rather that you're going on an adventure while hitting a golf ball on the way. I understand now how some other reviews I've read or seen describe a feeling of getting lost, or losing your bearings for a bit. I wasn't thinking about routing. I had no idea where the clubhouse was. I didn't really care about any of it because I was out in this beautiful landscape. The golf itself for me was just there. I would be perfectly happy spending an afternoon just walking the course without playing it. And that's a bit of a detriment, because at the end of the day, it is a golf course. As a golf course, I found it didn't really matter much how you played it as long as you hit decent shots. There was certainly an ideal way to play the course well, and I hit some awful shots and paid the price for them, but plenty of just okay shots I got away with because of the layout. In the end that's fine. I don't need every course I play to be a grueling test of my skills.  I'd make a return trip and play this course again. Sand Valley - 9.0 This one is a golf course first and a spectacular view second. Where Mammoth Dunes focuses on the adventure, Sand Valley focuses on the golf. It's still visually stunning, but just not quite on the grand scale that Mammoth Dunes is. And Sand Valley does not let you forget for even one second that you're out there to do one thing: to play golf. I don't remember having a single shot out there that didn't require my undivided attention. The course absolutely punished you for missing your spots. But the flip side of that coin is that it was extremely rewarding to hit good shots there. An example is #8 mentioned above - I don't think I have ever felt so pleased to hit a GW to 35' before in my life, and I might never again. The course is a challenge in the best way. It makes you want to rise up to face it. I want to go back and battle it again. I shot my best score of the week with an 87 at Lawsonia, but it's the 94 the second time playing Sand Valley that I'm most proud of. Like Mammoth Dunes above, I'd make a return trip specifically to play this course again. Bonus Stuff The facilities at Sand Valley Golf Resort were top notch. The prices at the pro shop were fair. The food and drinks were also reasonably priced and delicious. The food truck at The Sandbox had the best food in the whole complex, IMO. Lac La Belle I felt was fancy but overpriced. I bought a polo at the pro shop at Sand Valley, but a similar shirt at Lac La Belle was like 50% more expensive. The golf carts had beautiful leather seats, but I absolutely hate geo-mapping on the GPS systems. I don't know how many times it slowed me down to tell me not to drive in the fescue even though I was driving parallel to it 20 yards away. Lawsonia had an older clubhouse and it certainly had a quaint feeling to it. That's not a bad thing. I did not look to see the prices they were charging for their merchandise.
    • Every YouTube video should start with a 10- to 45-minute diagnosis to make sure the video you're about to watch applies to you. There are a LOT of reasons why someone hits a slice. YouTube videos do not start with a 45-minute "disclaimer" because nobody would get through it. They just want to stop slicing, but if the video shows a fix for something that the student doesn't do, the video is less than worthless — it may actually cause more damage. Don't watch YouTube videos unless they're just working on some fundamental things, or you're very confident that what they're going to show you actually applies to you.
    • Day 274: worked on my priority pieces with a revised feel rehearsal. Results were an improvement. Trying to feel the left leg straighten and push the left hip back from A5 through impact. 
    • Played again today, a course I played a couple of times before and broke 90 easily. Shot 86 with 2x ob and one water hazard. The work that I put in the last year really shows and I feel that on the right course on the right day I could break 80 even this year. It probably won’t happen but that’s the goal for next season.    I see that I must work on 100 meters and in. So on one of the hardest holes which is a 440 yard par 4 I drove the ball over 310 and then had a pitching wedge in. It was a bit of an awkward stance but I was just left of the green. Almost chipped in but then messed up the comeback putt and instead of an easy par I made a bogey.    Maybe I’m being too hard on myself looking at the tour averages but I feel like that’s one area of the game I need to clean up - no 3 putts and more up and downs. And I really need to put more work / decide on how I want to pitch and then really let that sink in and finally get the distances for all 4 wedges for 1/2, 3/4 and full swings printed out and stick them on the clubs. 
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Armando Araujo
      Armando Araujo
      (46 years old)
    2. chris3putt
      chris3putt
      (54 years old)
    3. CrazyHorsePete
      CrazyHorsePete
      (34 years old)
    4. DHak20
      DHak20
      (44 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...