Jump to content
Sean_D

NCGA Giving Players 95% of their Course Handicap

8 posts / 507 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

I live in Northern California and our competitive calendar was released yesterday. As I was viewing the events in which I want to participate, I noticed the USGA is recommending golfers receive 95% of their course handicap for competition. Is this to compensate for the loss of the .96 multiplier in the index calculation. or for some other reason? When competing in these events last year, we received 100% of our course handicap.It seems odd to me that we get a new index/course handicap calculation, and then the USGA back-doors the old calculation.

I have linked the tournament calendar for those who may be interested. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Register for free today and you won't see this ad spot again!

Presumably, these recommendations are based on the vast number of scores collected over the past decade or more.  The recommendations are in Appendix C of the Rules of Handicapping.  I don't remember seeing a discussion of the reasons behind this particular change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Most likely it's to help even out the fields, because it's always easier for a higher handicapper to shoot a lower net score than a lower handicapper.

That said… 95% isn't much. A stroke for those above 10 and until you get to 31… still just a stroke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thank you @Sean_D and @DaveP043.  I was not aware of the new USGA recommendation.  As handicap chairman I need that be aware of this.  

We flight our competitions so I am hesitant to apply this additional adjustment.  Our B Flight might have almost 30 guys with course handicaps of 8 to 12.  I see no reason to automatically cut the 10-12 guys a stroke.  Some may deserve it but others won't.  Something to ponder during the off season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 hours ago, bkuehn1952 said:

Thank you @Sean_D and @DaveP043.  I was not aware of the new USGA recommendation.  As handicap chairman I need that be aware of this.  

We flight our competitions so I am hesitant to apply this additional adjustment.  Our B Flight might have almost 30 guys with course handicaps of 8 to 12.  I see no reason to automatically cut the 10-12 guys a stroke.  Some may deserve it but others won't.  Something to ponder during the off season.

If you read the appendix, they suggest that for fields of 30 players or less, no reduction is required.  That might apply to any individual flight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thanks for the replies, guys. Course handicaps are what they are, and I don't get upset over gaining/losing a stroke or two (or however many). It just seems curious to me that the USGA was instrumental and influential in the WHS and yet their recommendations look a lot like the old USGA calculation. That being said, your responses make sense and shed light on the situation.

In reality, as long as everyone in the field/flight are playing under the same rules, it is a fair competition and the rest is up to the competitor. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

23 hours ago, Sean_D said:

I have linked the tournament calendar for those who may be interested. 

Why not contact the Northern California Golf Association

Quote

If you have any questions please don't hesitate to contact us in the Rules & Competitions Department at 831-625-4653.

 Your association runs a season long series, much different than Amateur Events in the STL area.
We have the golf channel am tour locally,
but I wish had an opportunity to play in local events with a chance to play Poppy Hills in the finals. 🙂

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 1/15/2020 at 8:52 AM, Club Rat said:

Why not contact the Northern California Golf Association

In my experience they are notoriously bad at answering/returning email.

Edited by Sean_D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2020 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • Does it have to be beating them?  A very fond memory of mine, from about two years into my time playing golf, was playing with a much better player and matching his score on three holes (two pars and a birdie).  I am 100% certain he beat my scores on the remaining holes.  Just the same, the (much much much) better player was super encouraging to me the whole day, but I particularly remember him complimenting those three.  
    • Day 46.  If today is Tuesday, this must be Belgium speed sticks day.  Protocol one in my back yard this evening.  Green at the end was 113, a new record.  Although it occurs to me, I'm supposed to continuously set new personal bests. 
    • So with it being the offseason still, I find myself reading and watching a lot of topics on the sport. Lately i came across Scott Fawcett and his strategy for teebox decisions. YouTube has a few videos of his but basically, for people who drive it over 270 pretty consistently, gameplanning should consider any trouble that is within a 70 yard dispersion. Now I already have gamegolf so i can see some dispersion patterns but I obviously dont tag the shots where I completely lose a ball so data is missing. I decided to go to a sim bay using a GCQuad and did a 15 shot driver test. In the end I averaged 268 off the tee in total distance. However off those 15 shots....3 were massive misses of 45, 52, and 60 yards offline. In real life at my home course and most trees courses I play those are lost balls with bad penalties applied. They would only be slightly salvageable at a course with adjacent fairways really. I would say when you look at my gamegolf rounds, the GCQuad result of 3/15 being lost/OB is accurate. So it made me start wondering as someone who has read LSW and Every Stroke Counts and understands advancing the ball far but safely.....how wide of dispersion is considered unusable for a driver? Until my swing improved would I be better off statistically going down to my 16* mini driver or just 21* hybrid? ( next time I do the simulator I was going to do dispersion tests for those)
    • While it may seem like a good idea, you can't just "factory reset" your swing. Better to just focus on a priority and make that better. Rather than trying to achieve a certain kind of swing, just improve on what you currently have.
    • OK -  let me make one final post on this as this horse is well and truly beaten. Just so that I'm fully clear on where you stand in the context of this particular discussion.  Please indulge me. 1. What they DID matters. 2. Why we THINK they did it doesn't matter. 3. Your (and my) opinion of what they did or why they did it is irrelevant 4. The only relevant discussion is the penalty for the infringement. 5. A person's opinion of the character any of the people under discussion has nothing to do with the thread. 6. Anything beyond that is essentially moot. Is that a fair summation?  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Catcher20
      Catcher20
      (30 years old)
    2. JD15
      JD15
      (55 years old)
    3. Stixman
      Stixman
      (75 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...