Jump to content
cutchemist42

How Tight of Dispersion Is Considered Playable for Driver?

29 posts / 1688 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Just now, Slim_Pivot said:

When I heard of decade and saw Scott Fawcett having success, I thought of lowest score wins...I feel like LSW missed an opportunity to make an app and market what their book states.

i saw he’s coming out with a more generalized app for average golfers...I might look into it

Out of curiosity I looked into it as well, it's a bit expensive IMO, $149 for 12 months then $99 every 6 months, or $99 every 6 months and that's for the simplified version.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, klineka said:

Out of curiosity I looked into it as well, it's a bit expensive IMO, $149 for 12 months then $99 every 6 months, or $99 every 6 months and that's for the simplified version.

Yikes, that’s a bit much for me. I understood LSW but it really helped to hear Fawcett compare it to a shotgun. 

I probably don’t need to spend $200 a year to adjust my already conservative aim by a few yards. 

Understanding the concept is probably enough for my game. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 hours ago, p1n9183 said:

Exactly.. around 100 yards wide. You have to test your other long clubs but normally your dispersion decreses in proportion of the length of the shot.
As scott states.. "if you have to hit 4 iron or less off the tee to avoid penalties, the hole gets too long so it´s better to just hit driver" this doesn´t apply on drivable par 4´s. 

Because of knowing my dispersion and aiming properly I reduced my penalties and lowered my scores. It´s the same principle Iacas teach us with his shots zones and stuff.

Not necessarily trying to argue the point with you but related.....the recent distance report already said a lot of amateurs are driving it around 210. Gamegolf data says the same too.

If I dial back to my mini driver at 240 or even hybrid at 220, arent I keeping up with most of the golfing world anyway?

Also to add....before I fell down a staircase last summer and ruined my golf season I was hitting my approach shots at the same level as a 10hi and even had a round that approached a 5hi level according to gamegolf. I actually think avoiding the penalties while keeping my approach shots as is would lower my score. I'm still 2 months away from testing that theory though...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, cutchemist42 said:

If I dial back to my mini driver at 240 or even hybrid at 220, arent I keeping up with most of the golfing world anyway?

And you’re still hitting a shorter club in than they are.


I play a lot of clubs shorter than driver off the tee. I have a large shot zone with the driver and I lose more strokes playing it and hoping I hit it well versus just laying up off the tee. I’ll still mishit the ball but the miss with an iron is generally not going to cost as many strokes as an equivalent miss with the driver.

That said, my strategy is not a hard rule. I don’t just look at the yardage on a hole or how wide the fairway is and just say ok, I’m laying up here. It’s based on how well I’m hitting the ball, how the hole plays, etc. For example, if the underbrush is clear under the trees or they aren’t dense or something and I’ll have a good shot at hitting a trouble shot out if I end up in them, you bet I’m hitting driver.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Slim_Pivot said:

Yikes, that’s a bit much for me. I understood LSW but it really helped to hear Fawcett compare it to a shotgun.

Dude.

image.png

LSW was first.

That's a shotgun blast right there… and… heck, the favicon for his site is two Shot Zone (oval)s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

23 minutes ago, iacas said:

Dude.

image.png

LSW was first.

That's a shotgun blast right there… and… heck, the favicon for his site is two Shot Zone (oval)s.

Yes I know, that’s why I said LSW could’ve done an app. i tried to give LSW credit for being first in my post without being rude.

Who knew that an app telling ppl to aim toward the fat part of the green could be big bucks? Not me.

It’s not my fault that I didn’t relate swinging my 7 iron to firing a shotgun until I head it on YouTube. I’m sorry his branding got through to me! It’s not my fault! lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Slim_Pivot said:

It’s not my fault that I didn’t relate swinging my 7 iron to firing a shotgun until I head it on YouTube.

😉

It’s a shotgun blast in LSW is what I’m saying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

19 hours ago, cutchemist42 said:

If I dial back to my mini driver at 240 or even hybrid at 220, arent I keeping up with most of the golfing world anyway?

Yes, but this is not about been better than half of the world, it´s about shooting your best scores that your current swing allows you to do. If you can keep the ball in play with your driver you will score better than keeping the ball in play with 3 wood... hybrid or 4 iron. Beeing closer to the green in play makes you score better.

The same apply when lay-up on a par 5. I used to leave me a 90 yard full shot. Now i hit it as close to the green as I can and i´m doing a lot more birdies with half wedge and i don´t practice them at all, closer to the green in play is always better.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Today while hitting on Trackman, I hit some of what I would consider really really poor and offline shots, I was surprised to see that every single one was within either 90 feet left or 90 feet right of center, which would fit into that 60-70 yard dispersion window. 

Now I just need to get in a better habit of looking the courses up ahead of time on Google Maps and measuring out how wide I have between penalty areas on each hole.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 2/26/2020 at 12:21 AM, cutchemist42 said:

 So with it being the offseason still, I find myself reading and watching a lot of topics on the sport. Lately i came across Scott Fawcett and his strategy for teebox decisions.

YouTube has a few videos of his but basically, for people who drive it over 270 pretty consistently, gameplanning should consider any trouble that is within a 70 yard dispersion.

Now I already have gamegolf so i can see some dispersion patterns but I obviously dont tag the shots where I completely lose a ball so data is missing. I decided to go to a sim bay using a GCQuad and did a 15 shot driver test.

In the end I averaged 268 off the tee in total distance. However off those 15 shots....3 were massive misses of 45, 52, and 60 yards offline. In real life at my home course and most trees courses I play those are lost balls with bad penalties applied. They would only be slightly salvageable at a course with adjacent fairways really. I would say when you look at my gamegolf rounds, the GCQuad result of 3/15 being lost/OB is accurate.

So it made me start wondering as someone who has read LSW and Every Stroke Counts and understands advancing the ball far but safely.....how wide of dispersion is considered unusable for a driver?

Until my swing improved would I be better off statistically going down to my 16* mini driver or just 21* hybrid? ( next time I do the simulator I was going to do dispersion tests for those)

I am concerned about this too. The course I played last summer had a back nine that was Donald Ross design that was fairly tight at times. The front nine was a modern Hurdzan design that had some fairways that were much wider. 

I moved to a new state and the course I am considering looks pretty tight all the way around. Most fairways look to be slightly wider than the greens. Maybe 30 to 35 yards. Which I think is more in line with a PGA tournament set up. If you have a consistent, reliable shot shape and no more than say a 20 to 30 yard dispersion, you might have a shot at a decent round. When I am swinging my best, I have a draw with driver so I would play down the right side and be in the fairway often enough. If it didn't draw I might be along the right near or in the rough. If I tugged it a bit I might be along the left side/rough.

Anything consistently 20 to 30 yards off line would seem to me to spell trouble unless you have a wide open course with a short rough and few trees. But then you learn a game that you can't really take elsewhere. I will need to learn quick at my new course and may need to pull out the 3W or 3H on a number of holes instead of driver.

Edited by Carl3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

When I'm at the driving range, the poles at the end are 10 yds apart. So I pick a pole as my target, and my drift to either side is two poles. That should be playable on most courses around here. If the playable area is less than 40 yds. wide, out comes the 3W. From my experience, I'm not going to be any more accurate with my 6i than my 3W on shot dispersion. I may fade my 3W, but I can hook my 6i.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Affiliates

    SuperSpeed
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • This is one of mine from a pre-shelter in place round, #9 at my home course,320 yard, dogleg left par-4, maybe 60-80 feet uphill. Most people hit a mid/long iron to lay up in the wide part of the fairway, which leaves around 120-140 yard uphill shot, with basically a flat lie. The further left you land in the fairway, the shorter the second shot. From any position in the wide section of the fairway, you can't see the green at all, and you're lucky to see the tip of the flag if it is in a front position. I used to play this hole conservatively, and hit 5/6/7-iron to the wide fairway, and then PW/9/8-iron up the hill to the green. Recently I started hitting driver because a well struck drive for me will leave about 30 yards from light rough, usually in a spot where you can at least see where the flag is. I align toward at the green "X" (fork in the cart path), playing my typical draw. If it doesn't draw, the ball will still land on an upslope and might not roll into the rough/trees. If it draws, it will carry the cart path and get a bit of roll up the hill. If it hooks, it might still be okay as long as it doesn't hook too much. The photo below shows how I intend to play the hole. The round in question, I pulled my drive badly into the trees to the left of the tee box, and after pinballing aroudn in the trees, I had this lie. The shot needed here was a punch out between the two redwood trees on the right. I suck at these shots, and anytime I'm in the redwood areas, I'm extra anxious due to the shallow roots, so I think that I unconsciously stand up out of my swing and top the ball in these areas. A topped shot from this spot sends the ball into a muddy, thick rough area, with no chance at all of reaching the green. I managed to pull off a great punch out, and made it on the green with my third leaving a 14-foot putt for par (didn't make par).
    • Just to play devil's advocate, Orr played in a lower scoring era than Gretzky and Lemieux. In the C&B article I linked before, Orr's adjusted PPG is 1.33 which is only a slight drop to his actual number, but Lemieux (1.66) and Gretzky (1.61) both lose more. Orr isn't really in this discussion, though. It's true that he changed the position as people saw it, but I don't believe "most influential" is a factor in being GOAT or we'd be talking about Patrick Roy. Or Jacques Plante. Or Stan Mikita. Gretzky was on the TV broadcast when the Oilers were playing the Devils earlier in the season and said pretty much this. When comparing the game today to when he (and Ken Daneko) were playing, he said, "It's a little different in the sense that the players are bigger, they're faster, the equipment is better... I think all in all, the players of today's age, the skill level's just at a different level."
    • An 81 today from the back tees. I was whining all day about the terrible play, but then I realized that would have killed to have an 81 from any tee a few years ago. All is good.
    • Today, in less-than-ideal conditions, I shot 45-47 for a 92. I had a stretch of seven bogeys in a row on the toughest stretch on the course (6-12), where there’s only one ‘breather’ hole, the last hole in that stretch. My iron play was the best it’s been in a while, and I had at least a par putt on 15 holes, four of those inside three feet, but I couldn’t make a thing.  I only hit one truly disappointing shot today. On the par-3 17th, I pulled a 7I about forty feet left of the green and ended up with triple, having a restricted backswing on my chip shot. But otherwise, a pretty fair day in wet/rainy conditions. I gave myself a chance to make some putts, which I’m really pleased about.
    • They also face goalies who stop a ton more shots. Orr was good but he also, like Jack Nicklaus, played against weaker competition. I absolutely think Karlsson and Drew Doughty and other defensemen in the NHL could do what Bobby Orr did. Players are better athletes all around these days. The best defensemen right now is quite likely a better hockey player than the best in 1975. Not guaranteed, but likely.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Adunifon
      Adunifon
      (39 years old)
    2. Caveman59
      Caveman59
      (61 years old)
    3. Mech12
      Mech12
      (45 years old)
    4. metbid
      metbid
      (71 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...