Jump to content
IGNORED

General COVID-19 Topic


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, iacas said:

 

Florida is doing so well, eh?

Judge Judy Reaction GIF by Agent M Loves Gifs

I'm pretty sure that one of our members posted recently about how he was "proud" of Florida's response. It does make your head spin.

Their response has been reviled worldwide as an outrageous and catastrophic disaster.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

57 minutes ago, Shorty said:

I'm pretty sure that one of our members posted recently about how he was "proud" of Florida's response. It does make your head spin.

Their response has been reviled worldwide as an outrageous and catastrophic disaster.

Not to indict just Florida, but there are stories of people going after people with masks on and bullying them. The story I heard about was this guy in Florida stopped his bike ride to berate a woman who was out on a walk. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

01VIRUS-HERDIMMUNITY1-videoSixteenByNine

Widely circulating coronavirus variants and persistent hesitancy about vaccines will keep the goal out of reach. The virus is here to stay, but...

Well, this is not good.  Seems part of the problem is people not getting vaccinated.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

10 minutes ago, Yukari said:

Well, this is not good.  Seems part of the problem is people not getting vaccinated.

It's come down to paying people to get their vaccination.  Or offering them a free beer. A local brewery is doing just that and offering shots on site.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

It's come down to paying people to get their vaccination.  Or offering them a free beer. A local brewery is doing just that and offering shots on site.

It's infuriating that people are so selfish or stupid that they won't get a free vaccine after a year+ of a pandemic that's killed so many and so disrupted life. But there's a vast literature on the effectiveness of paying people for getting vaccinations. The federal government should just start giving $100 in cash to everyone on their way out of the facility after getting their 2nd shot (or their one J&J).

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 5/2/2021 at 8:44 PM, Vinsk said:

It’s a bit too early for that. We don’t really know how to interpret the results at this time.

We have a fairly good idea if there was a strong immune response generated. Agree this is not commonly available like a pertussis titer. But the data clearly exists based on the ongoing follow up studies. 
 

So it might not be perfect but you could get an insight.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I was thinking about this. Since COVID was ranked third is number of deaths in 2020, only cancer and heart attacks out did COVID, wouldn't the way to think about taking the COVID vaccine be this. 

If someone told you that two shots, with very minimal side effects (compared to other drugs humans take), would make you highly (95%) unlikely of not having a heart attack or getting cancer would you take the shots? 

I bet everyone would sign up for those shots in a heartbeat. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I got my 2nd pfizer vac shot way back on Feb 10, but that's not to say I wasn't a bit apprehensive. People have known that vaccines usually take a great period of time to develop, and the Pfizer and Moderna were manufactured at 'warp speed', which I do credit the companies and the administration for doing. Just the same, I understand the population's hesitant behavior because of the time frame uniqueness of these vaccines. The way I felt when I made my decision was a trust for what was offered knowing I was not totally sure how I would react, and an acceptance of what remotely could happen. Being one of the first vaccinated, there wasn't a great deal of 'track record' to give total confidence. I do think one of the major aspects that convinced me was that it could not only save my life, but the lives of others. I think naysayers have got to stop being, I suppose, selfish and think how they can help others by getting the vaccine. We all hate the restrictions with a passion, but don't do all we can to end them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, criley4way said:

We have a fairly good idea if there was a strong immune response generated. Agree this is not commonly available like a pertussis titer. But the data clearly exists based on the ongoing follow up studies. 
 

So it might not be perfect but you could get an insight.

No, we don’t. For now we’re encouraging vaccination. Titer testing post vaccination is not recommended as it’s trivial at this time.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
25 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

I got my 2nd pfizer vac shot way back on Feb 10, but that's not to say I wasn't a bit apprehensive. People have known that vaccines usually take a great period of time to develop, and the Pfizer and Moderna were manufactured at 'warp speed', which I do credit the companies and the administration for doing.

Let's be clear.

  • The technology for the vaccines were developed a decade ago.
  • The vaccines went through basically the same steps as other vaccines. Flu vaccines are developed in about the same amount of time, because they're different every year.
  • "Warp Speed" was the name of the distribution, not the development of the vaccines.
25 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

Just the same, I understand the population's hesitant behavior because of the time frame uniqueness of these vaccines.

The population needs to look at the science, and it's funny how the people complaining about their freedoms or wearing masks, or whatever, are often the ones who are most reluctant to get the vaccine.

25 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

The way I felt when I made my decision was a trust for what was offered knowing I was not totally sure how I would react, and an acceptance of what remotely could happen. Being one of the first vaccinated, there wasn't a great deal of 'track record' to give total confidence.

At the same time, hundreds of thousands of people went before you.

25 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

I think naysayers have got to stop being, I suppose, selfish and think how they can help others by getting the vaccine. We all hate the restrictions with a passion, but don't do all we can to end them.

Yep.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 hours ago, saevel25 said:

I was thinking about this. Since COVID was ranked third is number of deaths in 2020, only cancer and heart attacks out did COVID, wouldn't the way to think about taking the COVID vaccine be this. 

If someone told you that two shots, with very minimal side effects (compared to other drugs humans take), would make you highly (95%) unlikely of not having a heart attack or getting cancer would you take the shots? 

I bet everyone would sign up for those shots in a heartbeat. 

 

+1

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 hours ago, iacas said:

Let's be clear.

  • The technology for the vaccines were developed a decade ago.
  • The vaccines went through basically the same steps as other vaccines. Flu vaccines are developed in about the same amount of time, because they're different every year.
  • "Warp Speed" was the name of the distribution, not the development of the vaccines.

The population needs to look at the science, and it's funny how the people complaining about their freedoms or wearing masks, or whatever, are often the ones who are most reluctant to get the vaccine.

At the same time, hundreds of thousands of people went before you.

Yep.

The essence of my post was in response to the video you posted, which I thought made some very good points. Yes, there were many people before me, but proportionally not that many. There was 'a bit' of apprehension on my part, but I thought it was for the betterment of not only me, but all of society. From what I have heard and read regarding persons enlisting in WWll is that many were disappointed when they were not chosen because of some physical/mental limitation. This was with the knowledge that many would not return because of the inherent nature of war. Now folks are afraid of a little vaccination? People need to man up a bit and think of the greater good. As per your video, much poor propaganda has been spoken inre of the vaccination. Hey, if I freak'n die from it, oh well, but the odds of that are soooo minimal they really shouldn't be considered, especially if you don't fear driving an automobile, which is exponentially more dangerous. 

"Shadows and dust, Maximus, shadows and dust"

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Billy Z said:

People need to man up a bit and think of the greater good.

... and woman up.

46 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

Only the selfish won’t get the vaccine.

... or the uncaring.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

19 hours ago, Double Mocha Man said:

... and woman up.

... or the uncaring.

I don't necessarily agree with that.  I know of people not getting the vaccine, and they are not uncaring.  For me, I do not think I need the vaccine.  I just don't.  The odds that I've seen of something majorly happening to me if I get COVID is small (and I do have a heart condition).  However, I am getting the vaccine for my friends/family.  They know that I don't think I need it; I'm doing it for them, not for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, mattm16 said:

I don't necessarily agree with that.  I know of people not getting the vaccine, and they are not uncaring.  For me, I do not think I need the vaccine.  I just don't.  The odds that I've seen of something majorly happening to me if I get COVID is small (and I do have a heart condition).  

There have been many who have had this same mindset who were 'rudely awakened'.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, mattm16 said:

I don't necessarily agree with that.  I know of people not getting the vaccine, and they are not uncaring.  For me, I do not think I need the vaccine.  I just don't.  The odds that I've seen of something majorly happening to me if I get COVID is small (and I do have a heart condition).  However, I am getting the vaccine for my friends/family.  They know that I don't think I need it; I'm doing it for them, not for me.

I've been told getting the vaccine will help prevent you from passing the virus to others. 

I would think that if you don't think the virus will affect you, you'd be MORE likely to get the vaccine. You know, so that you don't pass it on to others who will be affected. Being as you won't even know that you have it.... because it doesn't affect you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

57 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

I've been told getting the vaccine will help prevent you from passing the virus to others. 

I would think that if you don't think the virus will affect you, you'd be MORE likely to get the vaccine. You know, so that you don't pass it on to others who will be affected. Being as you won't even know that you have it.... because it doesn't affect you. 

I also don't agree with that.  If a person doesn't think it will affect them, my thoughts are they would be less likely to get the vaccine.  Again, these are my thoughts, and I am getting the vaccine even though I don't think COVID would affect me.  From what I have been told, most likely it will be like the flu or a cold.  However, as I said, I am getting it due to other people (family/friends want me to).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasfeb21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • This is a pet peeve of mine too. I love par 5s where driving is made dangerous like you said. Especially combined with green complexes that make running it up with a wood dangerous but are relatively receptive to a hybrid or long iron approach. Fully eliminating the driver landing area and forcing every single player to play the hole the same way is just lazy design and makes for boring holes.  
    • Day 34 (5/6/21) - Hit a small bucket at the range today, about 1/3 each wedges (full swing motion), hybrids and Driver. After striking the  first couple of wedges really near the hosel, I placed my Driver headcover about 2" outside the target line, which definitely helped me to move the strike closer to the center of the face. Low point control was generally good, as were distance and direction. Drivers were pretty solid, with better trajectory than I have been hitting and mostly with a gentle draw. The only exception was a fade which would have worked OK. Hybrids were a problem as I had poor low point control and either hit fat or thin, resulting in poor distance and trajectory. Low point control with my hybrids will be a priority. 
    • I really can't think of disliking courses to a point of calling them the worst I have played from a design POV. Like few other post's above it is conditioning that can make me to not ever want to come back.   I've played a course where the 'greens' are simply tighter cut grass here locally (not sure worth mentioning the name. They weren't pretending to be anything better - $9 for the round). But of course, it was clear after the first hole that I had overpayed.. lol.  Although @mattm16, I would feel like an absolutely spoilt brat complaining about anything I've ever played looking at your 'course' pics. hah  
    • I'm not a fan of Pete Dye courses either, but Mike Strantz is the one I like the least, from a design perspective. 
    • I don't like courses that have a creek or hazard that spans like 250-280 off the tee, especially when its on a par 5.  My preference is to at least have the option to hit driver, totally fine if the landing area at 270 or whatever narrows or is tree lined or bunkers or something, but at least let it be an option, don't force me to lay up to 240 off the tee on a 525-550 yd par 5. There are at least 2 courses around me that have multiple of those holes and I steer away from those courses when possible. There is a 3rd course that has 2 holes like that too but those par 5s are shorter, more around the 500 yd mark, maybe even high 400s depending on where the tees are located so they're still reachable with 2 really good shots.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Bruce1958
      Bruce1958
      (63 years old)
    2. CTgolferman17
      CTgolferman17
      (52 years old)
    3. Hackinandwhackin
      Hackinandwhackin
      (30 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...