Jump to content
srguthrie

Club for Short Pitch Shots

8 posts / 846 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

I've been using my 56 degree sand wedge about anything that's too close for full swing (at least until I get to chipping range), but I'm wondering if maybe I should be using my 50 degree gap wedge instead.  What do most people use for these types of shots?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, srguthrie said:

I've been using my 56 degree sand wedge about anything that's too close for full swing (at least until I get to chipping range), but I'm wondering if maybe I should be using my 50 degree gap wedge instead.  What do most people use for these types of shots?

It may depend to some extent on what your swing is like for these shots.  A lot of people prefer a swing arc that just brushes the grass, with the back side of the flange (the bounce) being the only part of the club to actually contact the ground.  For that kind of shot, use a club with more bounce, you'll have a little greater margin for error.  

It may also depend on the firmness and speed of the greens you play.  The 56 should fly higher, land softer, and stop quicker than the 50, everything else being equal.  

Personally, I use my 60/8 lob wedge for most short game shots.  I've played and practiced enough to be able to close it down and hit low runners, open it up and hit high soft lobs, and almost everything in between.  The only real change is when I get close enough to hit a true chip and run, and I'll use anything down to 7 or 8 iron, but those shots aren't what you're asking about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I tend to use my 60* a lot of times for shorter chips. However, I'm never stuck using just one particular club  

It just depends on the carry distance where I need to land the ball before it starts rolling. 

Since my chipping stroke is identical to my putting stroke, I might even find myself using an 8i. 

If the shot is short enough, with nothing in my way, I might just use my putter. 

Just depends on the situation I'm faced with..

Practicing shots from various situations is the key to knowing what clubs can be used.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Really depends on the shot but in general:

  • Anything that's a chip I use my 54 degree.  The reason is that the flight to roll ratio is basically one to one, so the math is easy.  20 steps to the hole, I chip 10 steps (adjusted for slope).  I practice with it so I'm pretty accurate with it and it works for me. 
  • If I'm short sided and need less roll or need a lob, I use my 58 degree.
  • Same goes for pitches, let's say anything more than a chip and less than 60 yards - if I want more roll I use my 54 and more flight I use my 58.
  • I really don't use anything else.  Same for bunker shots - 54 is my go to club, 58 if short sided. Occasionally will use my 50 or PW for a much longer bunker shot.
  • I do like to putt from just off the green with my hybrid as opposed to chipping or putting - I find bermuda grain hard to master.  It takes some practice but works well once you are used to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bring three wedges and a putter from my bag/cart for any shot around the green.  You’re never 100% sure of what you have until you really see it up close.  90% of the time, I’m chipping or pitching with my 50° gap wedge though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

For the vast majority of shots that are outside chipping range, I'm going to use my 56 degree. If I'm shortsided or have to fly it over something and stop it quicker, then I'll use my 60. I've just never got comfortable using anything with less loft than those unless I'm chipping or hitting a bump and run from further out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thanks all.   Again, for clarification, I'm not taking about pitch shots around the green. Im questioning my strategy from the 50ish yard area where it's a half to 3/4 swing.   Sounds like my using my 56 is not out of the realm of what a lot of folks do so I'll stick with that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Affiliates

    SuperSpeed
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo
  • Posts

    • Played in our club championship this past weekend.  Shot 89 both days from silver tees.  Not that great but an ok tournament score for me and better than I did last year. Played Tuesday and shot 83 off silver which was net 70, so 2 under my cap.  Played combo's Wednesday and had my best round in years with an 80, net 65 and got my first eagle since relocating after retiring.  Also got 3 birdies in the same round.  Played again Friday and shot 84, net 72 with a couple of birdies.  Leaving the driver out of the bag for the last few rounds has certainly helped in the penalty department.  I recently replaced my 3W and the new shaft in it is so stable I feel I can trust it so much more.  Have ordered a new driver shaft with a similar spec but slightly lighter than 3W shaft, so hopefully will be able to have a similar stability with the driver and a few extra yards in the fairway.
    • Find them quite tricky. Hit them like an iron or flatter like a wood? Also my G400 hybrid has no swing weight which helps swing speed but makes me nervous. Also it just dont have a good feeling to it. Proper Woods are so fun to hit. 
    • noticed that myself, never seen him do that half takeback like JT before in his routine... then today at Wyndham, wasn't doing it.  His fidgeting does seem to have gotten worse the last couple years, at least he's not grabbing the towel 10,000 times anymore 😂.   Curious what someone else with far more knowledge on the golf swing thinks though of the commentators remark today, I believe it was Trevor Immelman and Aaron Oberholser who both agreed that if he just switched to playing a cut off the tee, it would solve a lot of his issues.
    • This is a really deep question, possibly with no right answer. I think that usage and accuracy of equipment are the main components in deciding what you want, and price just follows suit. I kind of divide it into three categories: toy (not accurate or not simulators), recreational sim (more accurate, but comes with limitations on certain data and isn't as accurate as the final category), and professional sim. The toy category is comprised of sub 500 dollar options (the measuring device itself) that measure a couple of things. The OptiShot line is the prime example. It only measures the club going over an array of infrared sensors (2 lines of sensors). It can track face angle, speed (kind of), and perceived strike location based on which sensors are triggered at what time. It doesn't even require the use of a ball to get its data, so it can be quite inaccurate. The other options here would be Mevo or SC300, though neither of these truly offer sim capabilities but are more accurate than an OptiShot as they use ball data. The rec sims only have 2 that I can think of. The Mevo+ and the SkyTrak. They operate in very different ways, with the Mevo+ operating on radar and measuring mostly the ball for the first part of flight, and the SkyTrak operating on optics measuring the point of impact, both ball and club. These are both fairly robust devices for the price (probably around 3k each for a full sim) but both have drawbacks and it could be argued over which is better. From my small knowledge about launch monitors it seems that for indoor simulation the optic driven devices excel, but outdoors radar is king, i.e. SkyTrak for indoors and Mevo+ for outdoors. On to the big dogs, the professional sims. Once again there are really two choices at the moment, and like the previous category, one is radar driven where the other is optic driven. Trackman is the premium radar system available and comes in just under 20k USD on price. Big bucks for big performance. The GCQuad (or GC2+HMT) is king for optical launch monitors and can be had for around 12k USD, but with the putting analysis and head monitoring add on, it also comes in just under 20k. Same thing here, gotta pay to play. These prices don't include the bay (mat/projector/screen) so you can really spec them as you please. The GC2 without the HMT upgrade kind of splits the difference between recreational and professional launch monitors, and the price follows suit. A certified preowned unit can be had for around 5500 USD. It really does split the difference in the optical category, being a big step up from a SkyTrak, but comes up short to the GCQuad or if you were to add the HMT unit. I know this is a lot of info, although it's just the basics when it comes to launch monitors/sims. For the actual question: If I had a room with a tall enough ceiling in my house, I would probably go for the SkyTrak at first. One of the biggest reasons is that it has compatibility with "The Golf Club 2019" which is a video game that I have on home computer. That package comes at an up-charge, but between the official courses designed by the game developer, and the many recreated courses done by fans (even has Augusta in there), there are something like 180,000 courses to play. That's a big draw for me.  There is something to be said for course packages/subscriptions and which best fits your interest/needs. I might grow tired of the SkyTrak, or find it lacking in accuracy at some point and then it would be a GCQuad for me. Snce it would be indoors only, I would prefer an optical system.  There is plenty of info online, and plenty of reviews to go along with them. I have only used the GC2s that are in my local golf galaxy, so I don't experience with most of these, but this is most of the info I have gathered. I hope this helps in some way, and if you have any questions, I can try to answer them.
    • View this round on GAME GOLF  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Cantankerish
      Cantankerish
      (46 years old)
    2. Dimes44
      Dimes44
      (37 years old)
    3. Donald Belcher
      Donald Belcher
      (84 years old)
    4. jimnm
      jimnm
      (41 years old)
    5. Zachase715
      Zachase715
      (28 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...