Jump to content
Matthew62

Elevation and Club Selection

19 posts / 969 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Hello all, 

I’m playing a course this weekend that has some elevation changes. Lake Chabot.  I’m curious about club selections with elevation Changes. Can anyone give me the scoop on this.

I have read contradicting rules.

Thanks in advance!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go up or down a club per 15 feet up or down. Now there are still variables like you are on a par 3 155 yards and 45 feet down. You wouldn’t club down 3 because you still need to hit it close to that distance. That’s the measurement ive been given by a couple different PGA teachers. 

Edited by mclaren4life
I’m a goof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mclaren4life said:

Go up or down a club per 15 yards up or down. Now there are still variables like you are on a par 3 155 yards and 45 feet down. You wouldn’t club down 3 because you still need to hit it close to that distance. That’s the measurement ive been given by a couple different PGA teachers. 

For better or worse, there's no good (legal) way to actually measure the actual elevation change up or down, its all got to be eyeballed, unless you want to use something like Google Earth ground elevations in advance.  But 15 yards, 45 feet, is a pretty big elevation difference.  Do you maybe mean 15 FEET elevation change for a one-club difference?  That would be closer to what I use.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yes lol 15 feet. Now you see why my golf game struggles. It is very difficult to judge. I try to use trees as my guide but that doesn’t help on links style courses. At best it’s a guessing game for me. 

Edited by mclaren4life

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, mclaren4life said:

Yes lol 15 feet. Now you see why my golf game struggles. It is very difficult to judge. I try to use trees as my guide but that doesn’t help on links style courses. At best it’s a guessing game for me. 

I think it is for most of us, especially for those who are playing on relatively level courses and go someplace with a lot of elevation change.  My home club is pretty hilly, so I've learned to evaluate up and downhill shots better than ever before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

I think it is for most of us, especially for those who are playing on relatively level courses and go someplace with a lot of elevation change.  My home club is pretty hilly, so I've learned to evaluate up and downhill shots better than ever before.

That’s kind of how I learned as well. You can read all the golf tips and advice you want, but until you experience it for yourself and see how your ball behaves, you don’t really know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The course I play most has some nice changes also. One hole is a solid 45 ft higher than the fairway.  Which, by the way is sloped left to right so 9 times out of 10 you have a below your feet second shot into that green. Then add to the guessing game with the times you don’t get the ball in the air like you want and it lands on the hill leading up to the green and possibly rolls back a good 10-15 yards. Ugh. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

It's very simple:

You take the cosine of the decent angle of the club you intend to hit. Divide that by the Oblate Spheroid angle on the ball being struck, which is easily calculated by the coefficient of compression times the club head speed divided by the static loft or 0.8732 multiplied by the dynamic loft. You take that result and   multiply it by the distance you would normally hit the club. Then add that to the original figure, subtracting 1/5th value of the wind speed squared, divided by the barometric pressure. Then you multiply the coefficient of the up current or 1/3 the coefficient of the down current depending on if you are right or left-handed. Your use the Pythagorean theorem to determine the overall length of the ball flight. Which is really just a simplified version of the longest leg of the right triangle. Of course that number needs to be adjusted to account for the arch involved in the flight. To factor that in all you need to do is calculate the circumference of the Earth at the exact point at which you are standing and divide the original distance times 2π times the tangent of the height of your left wrist from the ground and the shaft length of the club. We’ll ignore the actual sole thickness of the club because while it has a factor in the calculation for our purposes it won’t affect the ball flight enough for us to include it. Once you have that result you simply multiply the coefficient of slippage which can be looked up off any chart based on weather conditions and temperature. You determine the derivative of the angle of attack at address and then simply add in the number of calories you normally burn each day divided by what time of day it is and then put factor in to select your club.

So, as you can see. It’s really very simple.

When in double you can always just have Bryson DeChambeau calculate it for you.

 

You could’ve at least used paragraph breaks...🤢

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

You could’ve at least used paragraph breaks...🤢

I believe it was W.C. Fields who said "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit." 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Well, "some" elevation change for Lake Chabot is quite an understatement. There are some huge elevation changes at that course. Don't forget the last hole (par 6) which has about the last 200 yards going way uphill, gaining probably 30 or 40 yards (not feet). If you are at the bottom after your second, no matter what club you hit (unless you are DeChambeau), you will need another stroke to get up on the green.

There is also the tiny green at the bottom of a par 3 (forgot the hole number), with a similar drop (40+ yards), on which you can easily take 3 clubs less... and still overshoot the green.

Fun course as a novelty, but a bit too much, if you ask me.  Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 hours ago, Matthew62 said:

I’m playing a course this weekend that has some elevation changes. Lake Chabot.

Lake Chabot has huge elevation changes, and the greens are very tiny. There are only a few flat holes on the entire course. I've played it enough times with a slope enabled rangefinder that I have a pretty good idea of how I need to club up/down. Also, many of the east bay courses are really dry and firm right now, so there is a lot of roll out. Haven't played Lake Chabot since early May, so not sure what condition it's in now. Here's my recollection of how I played elevation changes last time around.

Hole #2, par 3, uphill: I usually club up 1X unless pin is in the front.

Hole #3, par 5, extreme uphill approach: I usually club up 2X for this one

Hole #4, par 5, also has has an extreme uphill approach: I usually club up 2X

Hole #5, par 4, extreme downhill hole: Bombs away with driver

Hole #6, par 4, uphill all the way, but short, so maybe 1X club up if laying up. Green is close to reachable for me, so usually I am pitching onto the green

Hole #7, par 3, moderate uphill: 1- 2X club up, depending on wind, pin location

Hole #8, par 5, downhill tee shot, moderate uphill approach: Bombs away with driver, maybe club up 1X on approach depending on distance.

Hole #9, par 3, extreme downhill: This hole is stupid, probably at least 40 yards downhill, but maybe 140 yards from tee to green. I usually club down 2X but depending on wind this varies.

Hole #10, par 4, uphill: Another short hole, so clubbing up depends on how aggressive you are off the tee. Probably a 1X club up if laying back off the tee.

Hole #11, par 4, uphill approach: At least a 1X club up.

Hole #13, par 4, uphill: Another shorter hole, so probably a 1X club up if playing conservative off the tee.

Hole #16, par 4, uphill approach: Again, depends on if your tee shot lands in the flat section of the fairway, or if you play aggressively and get closer to the green. Probably a 1-2X club up if playing all the way up the hill.

Hole #17, par 3, uphill: Usually 1X club up, but maybe 2 if into the wind.

Hole #18, par 6, downhill and uphill: Another stupid hole. Tee shot is slightly downhill. I think that the fairway doglegs left at around 260-280 yards and basically goes 350 yards straight down an extremely steep hill. Then back up almost to half the elevation you just went down. Most players will have their second shot from somewhere around the top of the hill. The second shot on this hole, which is often blind around the dogleg, will usually roll all the way down this hill to the valley in the bottom, regardless of what club you hit. I've hit a 7-iron 280 yards here. Then you have a ridiculous uphill shot that goes back up almost half of the hill you just came down to a green that seems like it's the size of a living room rug. Probably at least 2X club up back up the hill, but I can never really tell.

1 hour ago, sjduffers said:

Well, "some" elevation change for Lake Chabot is quite an understatement. There are some huge elevation changes at that course. Don't forget the last hole (par 6) which has about the last 200 yards going way uphill, gaining probably 30 or 40 yards (not feet). If you are at the bottom after your second, no matter what club you hit (unless you are DeChambeau), you will need another stroke to get up on the green.

My drive from my last round on the par-6 18th rolled out to 424 yards. I spent 10 minutes looking for my ball around where I saw it bounce, and I was ready to drop in the fairway with a 2-stroke penalty, when one of the guys I was playing with drove his cart another 100+ yards down the fairway and found my ball. It was really well struck, so it might have carried 275 at most, and then bounced over the crest of the hill and rolled another 150 yards downhill and stopped against one of the cart path switchbacks. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 hours ago, ChetlovesMer said:

You take the cosine of the decent angle of the club

All of my clubs have indecent angles or I might experience more decent shots... 😁

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Zippo said:

All of my clubs have indecent angles or I might experience more decent shots... 😁

🤣 probably should have been "descent". But it doesn't really matter. It's all just a big string of BS anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, ChetlovesMer said:

🤣 probably should have been "descent". But it doesn't really matter. It's all just a big string of BS anyway.

I thought it was hilarious! And, for @Matthew62, I hope he'll come back after his rounds this weekend and let us know how it went with the elevation challenges.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My thought about knowing what club to pull on a shot with a significant  elevation change (up/down) comes from experience, and repetition. 

After a while, the golfer sees what's in front of them, and just knows. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Although I do appreciate the analysis by @ChetlovesMer I always added/subtracted the vertical elevation to the horizontal distance. This assumes a 45 deg angle of descent. So if you have a 150 yards to the center of the green and there is what looks to be a 30 foot drop (10 yards) I would play it as a 140 yard hole. 

Elevation rises are easier to visualize as opposed to drops in my opinion. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

7 hours ago, Carl3 said:

Elevation rises are easier to visualize as opposed to drops in my opinion.

The reason for that is because your descent angle doesn't stay the same. Because of backspin, the longer the ball stays in the air, the more vertical the descent angle becomes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Affiliates

    SuperSpeed
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo
  • Posts

    • Played in our club championship this past weekend.  Shot 89 both days from silver tees.  Not that great but an ok tournament score for me and better than I did last year. Played Tuesday and shot 83 off silver which was net 70, so 2 under my cap.  Played combo's Wednesday and had my best round in years with an 80, net 65 and got my first eagle since relocating after retiring.  Also got 3 birdies in the same round.  Played again Friday and shot 84, net 72 with a couple of birdies.  Leaving the driver out of the bag for the last few rounds has certainly helped in the penalty department.  I recently replaced my 3W and the new shaft in it is so stable I feel I can trust it so much more.  Have ordered a new driver shaft with a similar spec but slightly lighter than 3W shaft, so hopefully will be able to have a similar stability with the driver and a few extra yards in the fairway.
    • Find them quite tricky. Hit them like an iron or flatter like a wood? Also my G400 hybrid has no swing weight which helps swing speed but makes me nervous. Also it just dont have a good feeling to it. Proper Woods are so fun to hit. 
    • noticed that myself, never seen him do that half takeback like JT before in his routine... then today at Wyndham, wasn't doing it.  His fidgeting does seem to have gotten worse the last couple years, at least he's not grabbing the towel 10,000 times anymore 😂.   Curious what someone else with far more knowledge on the golf swing thinks though of the commentators remark today, I believe it was Trevor Immelman and Aaron Oberholser who both agreed that if he just switched to playing a cut off the tee, it would solve a lot of his issues.
    • This is a really deep question, possibly with no right answer. I think that usage and accuracy of equipment are the main components in deciding what you want, and price just follows suit. I kind of divide it into three categories: toy (not accurate or not simulators), recreational sim (more accurate, but comes with limitations on certain data and isn't as accurate as the final category), and professional sim. The toy category is comprised of sub 500 dollar options (the measuring device itself) that measure a couple of things. The OptiShot line is the prime example. It only measures the club going over an array of infrared sensors (2 lines of sensors). It can track face angle, speed (kind of), and perceived strike location based on which sensors are triggered at what time. It doesn't even require the use of a ball to get its data, so it can be quite inaccurate. The other options here would be Mevo or SC300, though neither of these truly offer sim capabilities but are more accurate than an OptiShot as they use ball data. The rec sims only have 2 that I can think of. The Mevo+ and the SkyTrak. They operate in very different ways, with the Mevo+ operating on radar and measuring mostly the ball for the first part of flight, and the SkyTrak operating on optics measuring the point of impact, both ball and club. These are both fairly robust devices for the price (probably around 3k each for a full sim) but both have drawbacks and it could be argued over which is better. From my small knowledge about launch monitors it seems that for indoor simulation the optic driven devices excel, but outdoors radar is king, i.e. SkyTrak for indoors and Mevo+ for outdoors. On to the big dogs, the professional sims. Once again there are really two choices at the moment, and like the previous category, one is radar driven where the other is optic driven. Trackman is the premium radar system available and comes in just under 20k USD on price. Big bucks for big performance. The GCQuad (or GC2+HMT) is king for optical launch monitors and can be had for around 12k USD, but with the putting analysis and head monitoring add on, it also comes in just under 20k. Same thing here, gotta pay to play. These prices don't include the bay (mat/projector/screen) so you can really spec them as you please. The GC2 without the HMT upgrade kind of splits the difference between recreational and professional launch monitors, and the price follows suit. A certified preowned unit can be had for around 5500 USD. It really does split the difference in the optical category, being a big step up from a SkyTrak, but comes up short to the GCQuad or if you were to add the HMT unit. I know this is a lot of info, although it's just the basics when it comes to launch monitors/sims. For the actual question: If I had a room with a tall enough ceiling in my house, I would probably go for the SkyTrak at first. One of the biggest reasons is that it has compatibility with "The Golf Club 2019" which is a video game that I have on home computer. That package comes at an up-charge, but between the official courses designed by the game developer, and the many recreated courses done by fans (even has Augusta in there), there are something like 180,000 courses to play. That's a big draw for me.  There is something to be said for course packages/subscriptions and which best fits your interest/needs. I might grow tired of the SkyTrak, or find it lacking in accuracy at some point and then it would be a GCQuad for me. Snce it would be indoors only, I would prefer an optical system.  There is plenty of info online, and plenty of reviews to go along with them. I have only used the GC2s that are in my local golf galaxy, so I don't experience with most of these, but this is most of the info I have gathered. I hope this helps in some way, and if you have any questions, I can try to answer them.
    • View this round on GAME GOLF  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Cantankerish
      Cantankerish
      (46 years old)
    2. Dimes44
      Dimes44
      (37 years old)
    3. Donald Belcher
      Donald Belcher
      (84 years old)
    4. jimnm
      jimnm
      (41 years old)
    5. Zachase715
      Zachase715
      (28 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...