Jump to content
Bump-n-MI

Can a Low Capper Beat a LPGA Pro… Results!

74 posts / 4757 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Results from round 1:

 .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

Groupings: Pro #1, Pro #2, Me, Member #3 (member #1 played behind us in a separate group with single digits). Temps were in the 70’s, winds steady out of the east at 10mph, greens were lightening, and pin placements were extremely difficult (Sunday best per our greens keeper). 

  • Pro #1 - 70
  • Pro #2 - 72
  • Member #1 - 68
  • Member #2 (me) - 76
  • Member #3 - 75

I started off bogie, bogie, double…..hard to recoup from that.  Nerves definitely got the best of me and anything routine became a mental struggle (i.e. I was a complete head case).  40 on the front and 36 on the back.  I missed way too may fairways and found myself scrambling the entire front.  Both pros played decent but they quickly learned anything above the hole is trouble.  Member #3 was +1 going into 17 and crapped the bed.  Member #1 shoots 68 in his sleep so it was an average outing.  

Lessons learned:  Both pros made mistakes but their mistakes were consistent.  Misses were ALWAYS right.  Short game was decent.  But they struggled on the greens.  Distance off the tee was comparable to mine but there was a big discrepancy on club selection with approach shots.  They ALWAYS clubbed down and smoothed their swings.  I, on the other hand, prefer(d) full swings.  Proximity to the pin wasn’t even close.  I found myself, on average, of ~8-10 feet outside their approach shots. 

 

Stay tuned because the results for round 2 and 3 change…….. 

 

Edited by Bump-n-MI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Bump-n-MI said:

Member #1 - effortlessly long, 290+ if I had to guess, however, he always plays to his strengths (i.e. lots of 3 woods and irons)

A +2.8 isn’t hitting driver off the tee usually? That seems odd....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, Vinsk said:

A +2.8 isn’t hitting driver off the tee usually? That seems odd....

Why?  Quite a few 350-380 yd par 4's.  50 -70 yard approach shots on rock hard lightning fast greens are way less desirable than 90-110 yd approach shots.  Holes 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, and 17 all require shot shape off the tee.   

 

Both pros hit 3 wood off many of the holes listed above.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Bump-n-MI said:

Why?  Quite a few 350-380 yd par 4's.  50 -70 yard approach shots on rock hard lightning fast greens are way less desirable than 90-110 yd approach shots

I don’t know this particular course...but I don’t think shot statistics would support this. Right? Proximity to the hole from 50-70 vs 90-110? Show me where the 90-110 produces shorter birdie putts. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

26 minutes ago, Bump-n-MI said:

Quite a few 350-380 yd par 4's.  50 -70 yard approach shots on rock hard lightning fast greens are way less desirable than 90-110 yd approach shots.

Are the greens harder/fater than the PGA Tour? Because… if not, then no, they're not "less desirable" at all.

https://thesandtrap.com/gallery/image/41-strokes-gained-table-5-2/

Those numbers hold up (trend similarly) for basically all golfers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Off topic but I will answer the original question.  The +2.8 that averages 290+ hits more 3 woods and irons than drivers. Why?  Because he feels that gives him the best opportunity to score. Now, with that said, he played in the Michigan AM at Boyne a couple weeks ago (7100 yds) and his club selection changed drastically.  Position outweighs distance where we play.  As for the pros, guess they approach the game with a similar a mindset.  Curious as to why you guys are questioning this.....

Throw the stats out the window  @Vinsk and @iacas, thick rough, tight fairways, hard and elevated greens, and 50-70 yd approach shots are not conducive to birdies at our course.  

 

So, any guesses on round 2?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bump-n-MI said:

Throw the stats out the window  @Vinsk and @iacas, thick rough, tight fairways, hard and elevated greens, and 50-70 yd approach shots are not conducive to birdies at our course.

No thanks… the stats are illustrative of what has happened and what will continue to happen. The PGA Tour has thick rough, too, and you didn't answer my question. I doubt your greens are faster/firmer than on the PGA Tour.

And don't get me wrong: I'm not saying always hit it to 50-70 instead of 110, but… most of the time, it makes more sense to hit from 60 than 110. A few million shots hit by players of many ability levels say so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Bump-n-MI said:

Distance off the tee was comparable to mine but there was a big discrepancy on club selection with approach shots.  They ALWAYS clubbed down and smoothed their swings.  I, on the other hand, prefer(d) full swings.  Proximity to the pin wasn’t even close.  I found myself, on average, of ~8-10 feet outside their approach shots. 

If you're hitting, say, a 9-iron approach shot, do you take a full swing, or are you already doing something like this with your shorter clubs?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, iacas said:

No thanks… the stats are illustrative of what has happened and what will continue to happen. The PGA Tour has thick rough, and you missed my point: I doubt your greens are faster/firmer than on the PGA Tour.

Didn't miss your point at all. He is NOT a tour player, just a dynamite amateur that chooses to play to his strengths, stats or no stats. Our greens are fast and firm, and agreed, not to PGA standards. His club selection is completely irrelevant to this thread.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Shindig said:

If you're hitting, say, a 9-iron approach shot, do you take a full swing, or are you already doing something like this with your shorter clubs?

 

Good thread Shindig.  I close my stance and shorten my swing on any P-60 shot.  One big difference is I always play the ball middle - back.  However, this approach doesn't lend itself to great results where I play.  As mentioned above, our greens are hard, elevated, and small.  A higher trajectory is much more desirable.  Something to work on before the club championship next month!  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Bump-n-MI said:

Didn't miss your point at all. He is NOT a tour player

All the more reason to hit the shots he can hit closer to the hole.

Not in every situation, but hitting to 110 instead of 60 is not often the better play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, iacas said:

All the more reason to hit the shots he can hit closer to the hole.

Not in every situation, but hitting to 110 instead of 60 is not often the better play.

Yep, agree.  But as mentioned in my previous post he chooses to play to his strengths. 

 

We are veering way off course.  The intent of this thread was to provide a real-world experience of low cappers playing against established women professionals.  I have been around this game an awfully long time, had the luxury of playing against some Nike Tour players back in the mid 90's and some senior tour players in the early 2000's...both times I was throttled and left in awe of just how good those guys were/are.   However, this opportunity to play with the women was nothing short of extraordinary.  And I know many of you have often wondered how your game would fare against women professionals.....hopefully this thread will provide a little insight from multiple perspectives.   

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Bump-n-MI said:

How many of you low cappers think you can beat mid-range Symetra Tour player?

Let me set the table.  My club has 2 fulltime Symetra Tour players slapping it around with us hacks until their season opens up in 2 weeks.   The course plays to 6300 yds, par 70

Realistically the men have three advantages.

1) Length - Here I am assuming the men are bigger and stronger and all of you are playing off the same tees.

2) Strength - In a scenario where you are in deep rough, in a plugged bunker lie etc, where strength is an asset, like gouging out a ball.

3) Home course experience and knowledge - Yes, the ladies are members of the course, but they will probably play it a couple of times a year at best, whereas the men will probably be playing it 2 to 3 times a week.

If the men are able to convert this properly, maybe the +2 golfer has a chance.  The scratch and 2 golfers will be out of their depth, and the +2 golfer will be struggling unless things go his way.

I normally would have said not a hope in hell, especially against the Solheim Cup player, but the above give the +2 a glimmer of hope, though nowhere close to 50:50. More like 20:80.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Bump-n-MI said:

I'll add some more info.  Both pros hit it a long way.

  • Pro #1 - 265yds (tour stats, actually let the LPGA tour in driving distance a few years ago)
  • Pro #2 - 270yds (no tour stats, but she was consistently out-driving Pro #1)
  • Member #1 - effortlessly long, 290+ if I had to guess, however, he always plays to his strengths (i.e. lots of 3 woods and irons)
  • Me - effortlessly short 265ish but hit 75+% of fairways
  • Member #2 - longest I've ever played with (and I've been playing for 40 years).  Won't even throw a number out there for fear of being called a BS'r. 

Looking at the 2020 Symetra player priority list...from your 1st post....I thought it was Kristy McPherson...she's won under $2.5M...but she's not a long hitter....then I thought it might be Vicky Hurst (a fairly long hitter).....but she's toiled longer on the Symetra vs. LPGA...and won about only $1.6M...both have been on Solheim teams.

If #1 really has been a LPGA leader in driving distance a few years ago...I'm thinking Joanna Klatten...but she's made less than $500k and not been on a Solheim.

So unless the info on Pro #1 is incorrect....I'm struggling who on the Symetra fits the info provided.

The members had/have a big intangible.....course knowledge....IMO....it might be worth 1 or 2 strokes per rd.....IMO....member #1 had a bit on an advantage not having to play in the group with the gals (nerves) and the ability to watch them a bit in the group ahead....hope he plays with the gals in rd 2 & 3.

The Symetra pros play for a living...no surprise on their process, work ethic and day to day muscle memory....I believe the members all have regular day jobs and just naturally talented golfers.

Symetra pros are talented.....and yes we are not comparing them to the LPGA premier pros in this thread....but there's a bit difference in talent and mental toughness of elite LPGA pros.....especially the top 30.

Glad you're having a great time playing with the gals....it's always GREAT playing golf with really TALENTED female golfers which is so rare to play a random rd of golf with.

Edited by Mr22putt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, pganapathy said:

I normally would have said not a hope in hell, especially against the Solheim Cup player, but the above give the +2 a glimmer of hope, though nowhere close to 50:50. More like 20:80.

I haven't done all the research....but the only current Symetra players from Solheim Cups that I can surmise are McPherson and Hurst (2009 and 2011, respectively and only once each) and that was a long time ago and both are out of form and why they are now on the Symetra tour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bump-n-MI said:

Yep, agree.  But as mentioned in my previous post he chooses to play to his strengths. 

 

We are veering way off course.  The intent of this thread was to provide a real-world experience of low cappers playing against established women professionals.  I have been around this game an awfully long time, had the luxury of playing against some Nike Tour players back in the mid 90's and some senior tour players in the early 2000's...both times I was throttled and left in awe of just how good those guys were/are.   However, this opportunity to play with the women was nothing short of extraordinary.  And I know many of you have often wondered how your game would fare against women professionals.....hopefully this thread will provide a little insight from multiple perspectives.   

 

Actually discussed this a number of times in the past on this forum.

Mathematically it’s easy to calculate.

A genuine male scratch golfer, keeps his card pretty easily on the LPGA tour running about middle of the pack…

Edited by David in FL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 hours ago, David in FL said:

Actually discussed this a number of times in the past on this forum

awesome, but I didn't search the form.

12 hours ago, David in FL said:

Mathematically it’s easy to calculate

Sure, but there are variables that cannot be calculated into a mathematical equation. 

12 hours ago, David in FL said:

A genuine male scratch golfer, keeps his card pretty easily on the LPGA tour running about middle of the pack…

"genuine" eh.  Welp, I'm a "genuine" scratch and I got my butt kicked the first day I played with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m kind of confused at all the arguments in this thread.  @Bump-n-MI is just here providing a bit of insight on his real life experience, in real time.     There’s no argument to be had here.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Affiliates

    SuperSpeed
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo
  • Posts

    • Played in our club championship this past weekend.  Shot 89 both days from silver tees.  Not that great but an ok tournament score for me and better than I did last year. Played Tuesday and shot 83 off silver which was net 70, so 2 under my cap.  Played combo's Wednesday and had my best round in years with an 80, net 65 and got my first eagle since relocating after retiring.  Also got 3 birdies in the same round.  Played again Friday and shot 84, net 72 with a couple of birdies.  Leaving the driver out of the bag for the last few rounds has certainly helped in the penalty department.  I recently replaced my 3W and the new shaft in it is so stable I feel I can trust it so much more.  Have ordered a new driver shaft with a similar spec but slightly lighter than 3W shaft, so hopefully will be able to have a similar stability with the driver and a few extra yards in the fairway.
    • Find them quite tricky. Hit them like an iron or flatter like a wood? Also my G400 hybrid has no swing weight which helps swing speed but makes me nervous. Also it just dont have a good feeling to it. Proper Woods are so fun to hit. 
    • noticed that myself, never seen him do that half takeback like JT before in his routine... then today at Wyndham, wasn't doing it.  His fidgeting does seem to have gotten worse the last couple years, at least he's not grabbing the towel 10,000 times anymore 😂.   Curious what someone else with far more knowledge on the golf swing thinks though of the commentators remark today, I believe it was Trevor Immelman and Aaron Oberholser who both agreed that if he just switched to playing a cut off the tee, it would solve a lot of his issues.
    • This is a really deep question, possibly with no right answer. I think that usage and accuracy of equipment are the main components in deciding what you want, and price just follows suit. I kind of divide it into three categories: toy (not accurate or not simulators), recreational sim (more accurate, but comes with limitations on certain data and isn't as accurate as the final category), and professional sim. The toy category is comprised of sub 500 dollar options (the measuring device itself) that measure a couple of things. The OptiShot line is the prime example. It only measures the club going over an array of infrared sensors (2 lines of sensors). It can track face angle, speed (kind of), and perceived strike location based on which sensors are triggered at what time. It doesn't even require the use of a ball to get its data, so it can be quite inaccurate. The other options here would be Mevo or SC300, though neither of these truly offer sim capabilities but are more accurate than an OptiShot as they use ball data. The rec sims only have 2 that I can think of. The Mevo+ and the SkyTrak. They operate in very different ways, with the Mevo+ operating on radar and measuring mostly the ball for the first part of flight, and the SkyTrak operating on optics measuring the point of impact, both ball and club. These are both fairly robust devices for the price (probably around 3k each for a full sim) but both have drawbacks and it could be argued over which is better. From my small knowledge about launch monitors it seems that for indoor simulation the optic driven devices excel, but outdoors radar is king, i.e. SkyTrak for indoors and Mevo+ for outdoors. On to the big dogs, the professional sims. Once again there are really two choices at the moment, and like the previous category, one is radar driven where the other is optic driven. Trackman is the premium radar system available and comes in just under 20k USD on price. Big bucks for big performance. The GCQuad (or GC2+HMT) is king for optical launch monitors and can be had for around 12k USD, but with the putting analysis and head monitoring add on, it also comes in just under 20k. Same thing here, gotta pay to play. These prices don't include the bay (mat/projector/screen) so you can really spec them as you please. The GC2 without the HMT upgrade kind of splits the difference between recreational and professional launch monitors, and the price follows suit. A certified preowned unit can be had for around 5500 USD. It really does split the difference in the optical category, being a big step up from a SkyTrak, but comes up short to the GCQuad or if you were to add the HMT unit. I know this is a lot of info, although it's just the basics when it comes to launch monitors/sims. For the actual question: If I had a room with a tall enough ceiling in my house, I would probably go for the SkyTrak at first. One of the biggest reasons is that it has compatibility with "The Golf Club 2019" which is a video game that I have on home computer. That package comes at an up-charge, but between the official courses designed by the game developer, and the many recreated courses done by fans (even has Augusta in there), there are something like 180,000 courses to play. That's a big draw for me.  There is something to be said for course packages/subscriptions and which best fits your interest/needs. I might grow tired of the SkyTrak, or find it lacking in accuracy at some point and then it would be a GCQuad for me. Snce it would be indoors only, I would prefer an optical system.  There is plenty of info online, and plenty of reviews to go along with them. I have only used the GC2s that are in my local golf galaxy, so I don't experience with most of these, but this is most of the info I have gathered. I hope this helps in some way, and if you have any questions, I can try to answer them.
    • View this round on GAME GOLF  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Cantankerish
      Cantankerish
      (46 years old)
    2. Dimes44
      Dimes44
      (37 years old)
    3. Donald Belcher
      Donald Belcher
      (84 years old)
    4. jimnm
      jimnm
      (41 years old)
    5. Zachase715
      Zachase715
      (28 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...