Jump to content

15 posts / 1568 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Has anyone had any experience with Sub 70 golf clubs?  I have been seeing some really good reviews of the equipment, and they seem to have a really generous trade in program that I could probably take advantage of since I have something like six sets of irons that have varying amounts of value - yes, I am a club junkie - as well as various hybrids, wedges, and drivers, and my wife would probably love to see me clean out the club collection.

I really like the look of the 699 Pro Irons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I’ve also heard positive things about the clubs.  Only drawback is resale/ trade in value not being an oem.

if you can clear out a bunch of crap that is only losing value sitting around, go for it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

23 hours ago, bwdial said:

Has anyone had any experience with Sub 70 golf clubs?  I have been seeing some really good reviews of the equipment, and they seem to have a really generous trade in program that I could probably take advantage of since I have something like six sets of irons that have varying amounts of value - yes, I am a club junkie - as well as various hybrids, wedges, and drivers, and my wife would probably love to see me clean out the club collection.

I really like the look of the 699 Pro Irons.

As a direct to consumer brand/business model club company they are getting positive reviews by many on the web. Have friends that say their customer service is really good. You can call and speak to them about model/club specs your're interested in. They also rave about their demo program. My only personal experience with DTC (direct to consumer) brand is with Hogan. I participated in a demo with them. Really like it when you can try before buying. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a set of irons from them last year. They were great to work with. I was looking at several different sets and read about them and decided to demo their 739 irons which seemed to fit my game. They performed as well as anything else I was looking at. I live close to their facility and was able to have them fit me. I tried several of their other clubs in their fitting studio and was impressed with their different clubs. I will definitely be buying from them again when the budget allows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bit the bullet and bought a used set on the cheap.  I had to get them extended and regripped with midsized grips, picked them up today...

... and it rained.

Hopefully I'll be able to get out tomorrow after work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

This topic and another on the forum piqued my interest in the Sub 70 brand. I currently play a “players style” CB set, but I’ve been wanting to try a mixed CB/MB combo set for awhile, which Sub 70 sells.

I’m not ready to quite splurge $$$ on fitting and major brand clubs in case I end up preferring my old set. Sub 70 prices looked appealing, but I was a little apprehensive about shaft customizations adding significant cost to their base price, but after speaking with the CEO, the price ended up being low enough that I figured why the hell not. I ended up getting 639 forged CB/MB combo set, 4-7 iron in CB and 8-P in MB.

The clubs look nice to me. If I’m being picky, the top line looks a little thicker than I’m used to because the edges are more squared off compared to my Wilsons that are rounded. I prefer the satin finish on the Sub 70 compared to the chrome on the Wilsons. 

When the air quality in my area improves I’m going to do some ball flight comparison using my Mevo. The Sub 70 have more modern lofts (7 iron is 32 degrees, compared to Wilson at 35 degrees) so the Sub 70 clubs might be longer.

Generally I like the concept of the DTC business model. There is some risk in it not being a known quantity, but the company was super easy to work with. By contrast, I was interested in trying the new Ben Hogan clubs 3 or so years ago, but they wouldn’t build a mixed set, so I said no thanks.

Anyways, worst case I’ve got a backup set of clubs, and if they work out, maybe I’ve got a set that I’ll enjoy playing for awhile. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I had the 699 irons made for me.  The quality and PERSONAL customer service, with a phone call, is great.  Being able to choose your head, shaft, and grip was crucial.  I get a lot of questions of what irons are those?

Very satisfied.

701.jpg

702.jpg

703.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

black and white vintage GIF

Those look really hot.  Hopefully I'll get to hit them tomorrow morning.

Eventually, I would like to get to the level of the 699 Pro irons, and get fit for them from the factory.

Edited by bwdial

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

They don't have point of sell retail display, but the styles shown on the photos are appealing.  I was also eyeballing the combo set. 

The price point is also very attractive.  Not sure of all the busy works on the back of the club heads, a little too much dressing up the cosmetics, maybe.  

If I don't already have 30+ sets of irons in the garage , plus two kids in grad schools, might just jump on it.  That price point is a very good motivator.  For less than the price of a used set of OEM, one can have a brand new,semi custom made iron set.  Big part of it was the savings from marketing and promotional expenses.  This is cutting into the component world.

I wonder about the designing and the making of the heads.  Didn't see any reference within their own site.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Release said:

They don't have point of sell retail display, but the styles shown on the photos are appealing.  I was also eyeballing the combo set. 

The price point is also very attractive.  Not sure of all the busy works on the back of the club heads, a little too much dressing up the cosmetics, maybe.  

If I don't already have 30+ sets of irons in the garage , plus two kids in grad schools, might just jump on it.  That price point is a very good motivator.  For less than the price of a used set of OEM, one can have a brand new,semi custom made iron set.  Big part of it was the savings from marketing and promotional expenses.  This is cutting into the component world.

I wonder about the designing and the making of the heads.  Didn't see any reference within their own site.  

 

I've seen a video where the owner of the company talks about working with designers and manufacturers in China to develop their designs.  I can't remember where I saw it, but I think it was something on a review site.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Release said:

Not sure of all the busy works on the back of the club heads, a little too much dressing up the cosmetics, maybe.

Tbh, I wasn’t sure if I liked it or not in the website photos, but in person it’s more subtle, and I think it looks pretty good. I went for it because it was a good price to explore a combo set.  Different aesthetic than a classic blade or players CB design though. Depends on the golfer’s visual preferences I supposed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

13 hours ago, bwdial said:

I've seen a video where the owner of the company talks about working with designers and manufacturers in China to develop their designs.  I can't remember where I saw it, but I think it was something on a review site.

I'd missed that part, didn't have time to review all of the content.  That would  my guess also, since even the OEM are shipping the components from China to be assembled here.

I know the major manufacturing and factories were gradually moving from the SE China to inland because of the increased wages, increased overhead had brought up the total cost of manufacturing, so the factories moved their equipments inland.  

Next step would be moving to Vietnam, like some of the factories already done so.  Know a few shafts were made in Vietnam now.  Whether Vietnam or other countries could take over completely, that will leave to be seen.  

The economic revolution had its costs.  Fair wages, insurance , labor union ( Right ?  ), and recent years the income tax  ( Ha, they should have the income tax there long ago since they had moved from a State welfare system to Western capitalism ( ish) system ).   

Anyway, no surprise there.  The issue will be consistency in the supply line and the stability of the pricing.  Not sure if the practice of sub-contract to supporting contractors to meet the volume demand still true.  Used to be everything will be forged/cast in the primary factory with the best equipment available then, later batch will be sub contracted out to smaller factories all around their country to maintain the competitive low cost. thus the quality control will suffer.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Darkfrog said:

Tbh, I wasn’t sure if I liked it or not in the website photos, but in person it’s more subtle, and I think it looks pretty good. I went for it because it was a good price to explore a combo set.  Different aesthetic than a classic blade or players CB design though. Depends on the golfer’s visual preferences I supposed. 

I agree, the price point is very attractive, as the line has blurred into getting the components and put them together.  

I wonder of they'll ship components to the hobbyist instead of assembled set.  I'm sure someone would take that choice if the price point is meaningfully different.

My personal preference is a blank head with only the numbers on the sole nothing in the cavity except for moving the weight around.   A plan functioning tool is more beautiful in my eyes than something with fancy decorative design or promotional logo.

Pretty certain those design in the cavity was presented by the factory designer as a free feature which to make the total package more attractive.    We'll see, some golfers might like those patterns, just like some had stamped and pint filled lots of stuff on their putters and wedges.  Not my cup of tea.  But there is an idea if that blank looking head is available to the public with lower cost.  Some of us will take up on it.

Edited by Release

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So far, I've only been able to hit them into the net in the backyard, and I'm nursing a sore right elbow, but they really feel hot off the face.  I am looking forward to getting them out on the course and see what they can do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

28 minutes ago, bwdial said:

So far, I've only been able to hit them into the net in the backyard, and I'm nursing a sore right elbow, but they really feel hot off the face.  I am looking forward to getting them out on the course and see what they can do.

Take a few Ibuprofen and pack couple of travelers of bourbon for the course. You gotta go play ‘em!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Affiliates

    SuperSpeed
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo
  • Posts

    • Many of my issues with the “design” are related to pace of play and/or safety issues. Trees that needlessly block your view of an area, for example… stuff like that. Obviously, based on only one playing, and I’m only really highlighting the things I think could be better or that are negatives. I’m not including the positive aspects of the thing here (I’d rate the course as a 5.5/10 or 6/10 - it’s not worth two hours for me to drive, but it’s still a slightly better than average course). So, mostly just the negatives…: Why have rough there? There’s also a dense bunch of pines right that serve no real purpose. Thin them out and allow recovery shots as well as easier tracking of a ball hit into them. Mostly fine. Short right fwy bunker kinda useless. The fairway is 17 yards wide at 250 yards. Left is dead. Right is trees. Difficult holes are fine, but nobody is going to want to be in the valley left, so there are going to be a lot of people looking in the trees right. None of us hit the green from 210 yards, and we spent about six or seven minutes progressively looking for everyone’s balls. Total balls found: 13. Number that were ours? All four, eventually. Did we still wait on the next tee after playing out? Yes. Balls were embedded everywhere on this hole. No real issues here. The left fairway is again 17-18 yards wide, the right fairway is 22 and runs out after 260 yards. We were hit into on this hole even though we kept a cart in the left fairway plainly visible from the tee by someone who hit through the middle in the trees where three of our tee shots went (all but one ended up downhill to the right with a relatively clean angle to the green. I reached with a 6I). Pace of play nightmare type hole. Mostly fine. You can’t see that the water extends around the back as much as it does, and it’s almost the same yardage from every set of tees, which doesn’t make sense to me. I wonder how the front tee players play this hole. Great example here of some bad stuff, IMO. First, trees just off the tee block your sight line to the left rough, nearly hiding all of two bunkers that are left as well as the cart path (behind more trees) on a cart-path-only hole. Then up the right, there’s an elevated bunker that hides the pond behind it, with thick, soft rough that’s 50+ yards from the cart path. Flatten the hill where the bunker right is so you can see the pond. If you want a bunker there, put it down by the water to stop balls from rolling in, though honestly it’s just not necessary as players hitting bunker shots over a pond are going to chunk or blade them 90% of the time, leading to slower play. Thin the trees out so you can see up the left side of the hole, both for safety and pace of play reasons. The fairway is again 21 yards wide just before you get to the hazard, which is about 230 yards off the back of the long strip tee, and 260 off the black tees. Good hole, though the possibly blind second shot is a mild pace of play/safety issue. I say possibly because I was in the left rough, and hit a 7I over trees to 40 yards shy of the green. It appeared that it may be blind going up and over the hill, but maybe it’s not tall enough to actually be blind. If not, the hole is fine/good. Decent hole. Fine. Green has a good amount of slope for a 210-yard tee shot, not a big size. Good hole. Trees right by the tee block your view up the right-hand side if you hit a ball to the right edge of the fairway, let alone just into the rough. The cart path is up the right-hand side, too, making it a pace of play and a safety issue, especially as most players slice. Otherwise, a good hole. Generally I’m not a fan of massive features on a green when it’s a blind shot. The green has an odd shape, a big tier, and is completely blind (you can see the flagstick). “It’s only blind once” they say, but for a busy almost “destination” type course (I’m using the term loosely, for just folks within an hour or two), this is another place where a few minutes of pace could be saved. Decent hole otherwise. Another 19-yard wide fairway at 250 yards off the tee. We could barely see the top of the flagstick from where we were teeing off (fortunately it was toward the back). I love a good downhill island par three, but it’s generally good to be able to see where the ball lands. Otherwise much of the drama is gone, unless you want to run forward so you can see the green. A good hole with a poor choice of hole locations yesterday. And a minor safety issue, as three of us drove well over the hilltop. We waited long enough so we knew they’d moved on, but people could be hit into here. I think the course could be pretty darn good with a few changes, starting with firming up the conditions. Plugged balls in areas that are clearly too wet to mow very often (long rough) are a pace of play nightmare, and also just not fun golf. Firmer conditions would let better players hit 3W on some tees and still feed the ball into better areas instead of trying to hit driver into 20-yard-wide areas with a giant slope right and trees left (or vice versa). I played pretty well. Got boned once or twice, but that’s fine, and they weren’t even on the obvious holes (once I think was a bad yardage - I think he got the slope behind the green and not the flagstick). The greens, because of how soft they were, were beat to heck. So many ball marks, footprints, etc. Billy Horschel would have done his Chambers Bay wiggly snake hand motion a few times on putts.
    • If you find yourself losing focus on the range, change up what you're doing. I can get more out of a 15-minute range session than many people can get out of an hour or 70 balls.
    • I was thinking it could be a good option. But since that is the starting shaft that had bad results, scrap that idea. The blue is counterbalanced though, so that might be an issue. If you want to do a cheap experiment, get some lead tape and put 2-3 inches of it somewhere on the back of the head and see if that does anything to your ball flight.
    • Day 18 -  playing in a couple of scrambled in the next week, so it hit some balls trying to not think about technique...just wanting to make solid contact. 
    • Day 12 - mirror work since I couldn't get to the range.  Working on getting the staff steeper from A2 to A4
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 3puttmaster
      3puttmaster
      (36 years old)
    2. Ed
      Ed
      (55 years old)
    3. Elisa Marton
      Elisa Marton
      (28 years old)
    4. Jorge L
      Jorge L
      (42 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...