Jump to content
golfthyme

Is There a Reason for the 100-Foot High Approach Shot?

34 posts / 1617 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, iacas said:

100 feet is not that high.

While I agree, remember that there are mortals on the forum.

The higher we can get it, the better of a downward trajectory we can get it on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, iacas said:

100 feet is not that high.

No, not really. What would you consider a high apex @iacas?

1 minute ago, Bonvivant said:

While I agree, remember that there are mortals on the forum.

The higher we can get it, the better of a downward trajectory we can get it on.

You can have a 78 foot apex, if your descent angle is 55° that ball will stop. And for the record, the apex is only one number in the formula.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I used to hit my Hogan Apex exactly 100 feet. Coincidence? Hogan 4 shafts. 

Edited by TourSpoon
punctuation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TourSpoon said:

I used to hit my Hogan Apex exactly 100 feet. Coincidence? Hogan 4 shafts. 

 

There is no coincidence to exacting precision. 😜

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I prefer to come in from a high apex.  I have no accurate clue of how high I actually hit it but what I know is that if I come in high there will be less roll and less likely I will run off the back of the green.  It may be my personal issue but form 40+ yards out I really cannot read the roll of a green and could just as easily roll off the back of the green or stop well short. By coming in High I can pick my number and have a better chance of staying close to that target distance.  My preference is @ 100 yards out because I can take a nice easy full swing on my Sand-wedge and the ball is typically not more than 2-3 feet form my ball mark.  I still need to execute an accurate shot but at least I am confident if I do execute I have a good chance of getting the result I want.  Of course, if I do not execute a good shot than it does not matter what I am trying to do, the result will likely be bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 8/8/2020 at 2:03 PM, golfthyme said:

Or does it just look cool?

im old school, keep the ball as close to ground as possible and rolling on the green as soon as possible. That’s more accurate and better control than a 100 yard approach shot flying 100 feet high, if there’s water or a bunker in front of the green that’s different, I dont even own a hybrid or a lofted wedge! Old school!

I don't think 100' is high or low; it depends on ball speed and spin rate.  Really, what is important is descent angle.  You want a reasonably steep angle of descent for a "normal" full approach into the green so the ball will stop.  Obviously, a person can alter the descent angle to chase it to the back pin, flight down a wedge, flight down other short clubs to mitigate "suck back," hitting into the wind, etc.  I think the pros tend to be around 50* on most approaches into the green (on normal average full shots), while driver descent angle is around 40* to get some roll (may be undesirable in some cases so as to hold a tight fairway).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, TourSpoon said:

I used to hit my Hogan Apex exactly 100 feet. Coincidence? Hogan 4 shafts. 

 

 

1 hour ago, boogielicious said:

There is no coincidence to exacting precision. 😜

Exactly, the Hogan 3 shafts were only good for 75 feet. 🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, onthehunt526 said:

No, not really. What would you consider a high apex @iacas?

You can have a 78 foot apex, if your descent angle is 55° that ball will stop. And for the record, the apex is only one number in the formula.

100' is slightly higher than normal.

It's not "high" — which I'd take to mean 110+ or 120+ feet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 hours ago, iacas said:

100' is slightly higher than normal.

It's not "high" — which I'd take to mean 110+ or 120+ feet.

Well I’d be in the higher than normal category, that explains why my 6-iron stops like a wedge. (That and sharp descent angle). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I used to have a really high ball flight. it was pretty routine for the ball to be in or an inch from the pitch mark. I have several pics I took over the years of the ball embedded in the green. I KNEW where my wedges would land. Injuries have altered my swing and now I have a lot less arc. On a completely unrelated note, I tend to hit a club weaker than I used to and routinely see the ballrun off the green at which point I mutter aspersions against the green not holding...truth is, I needed that trajectory to control my distance.

 

that is the best reason I can imagine for a high trajectory...distance control.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue with high ball flights with amateurs is it comes with poor golf mechanics. This leads to inconsistent ball flights. Also, it will make it very hard to hit full swing wedge shots with consistent distance. 

100' is not that high. It's slightly higher than average, but not crazy high. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Given the choice, I normally go with the higher, drop, and stop approach shots. 

High lob shots are part of my bag of tricks, and I'm pretty good at them. I also find high fliers easier to read than the turf surfaces....lol

Lower,  ground runners are ok, but the turf conditions have to be in good shape. Especially on the longer shots. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

270 Feet....WOW!.  Is there now going to be a "High Apex" competition along with the "Long Drive" events?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Affiliates

    SuperSpeed
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo
  • Posts

    • I’m planning on playing tomorrow, and I may or may not decide to play the front tees, just to do something different. That got me thinking: have you ever played the forward tees at your home course? If so, how was it? What were the major differences between them and the tees you normally play? I’ve played the front tees on a few occasions, all in team practices. We played the back nine from the red tees once my freshman year, and I shot 46. This past season, we played holes 1, 2 and 9 where we played two-man teams, worst shot scramble from the reds. That was one of my favorite things we did during practice. We also did a 6-hole competition, playing the aforementioned loop twice. I shot +3, which was only two off the winning score. In terms of differences, it’s about a thousand-yard difference between the whites and reds (6063 white, 5044 red). Although it doesn’t make a huge difference on a lot of the holes, it will take a club or two off my approach, which is good because I’m usually stronger with the shorter irons. No. 4, Par 5. 345 red compared to 478 white. Although I don’t have to hit over the lake with the tee shot, I would still need to worry about trees on the right, OB left, and a bunker about 220 from the red tee. In a way, it may be a tougher hole from the reds than the whites because of how precise the tee shot has to be. In home matches here, we’ll sometimes play this hole from the reds, as a par 4.  No. 9, Par 5. 372 red compared to 442 white. Dogleg left hole, with a bunker at the corner of the dogleg. You can easily carry that bunker from the red tees, while shorter hitters need a good drive to get past it from the whites. No. 13, Par 4. This one is huge. 300 red compared to 421 white. A very tough par 4 from any tee but the reds. Still no pushover at 300 yards, but you can hit a 200-yard tee shot and it won’t hurt you at all. The same length tee shot from the whites will leave you with a difficult downhill lie for your second shot, so you need at least 220 or 230 from back there. No. 16, Par 5. 465 red compared to 523 white. From the white tees, the hole goes gradually downhill after the bunker on the right, which is 240 out. Most of my drives are a little bit short of that trap. From the reds, I can probably land my tee shot on that slope and get a bit of extra roll, leaving me 220, at most, into the green with a well-struck drive. No. 17, Par 4. Another huge difference. 256 red compared to 355 white. Not a tough hole from any tee box, but the reds make this a definite birdie opportunity, since I can get close to or on the putting surface with my tee shot. Because the hole is a dogleg, it’s probably only 240 or so on a straight line. I’ve driven the green before. No. 18, Par 3. Only 94 red compared to 157 white. This epic finishing hole has you hitting over a lake. It’s a mid or long iron from the back two tees, but only a wedge from the front two tees, meaning it’s an easier shot for me. If I play the reds, I think I could shoot low 80s, maybe high 70s if I have my A-game.
    • In an 18 hole round a guy or gal probably averages 6 to 8 gimme-length putts.  Half of those you can just rake in.  The other half, especially when they're an 18 incher, slick green, left to right... they're gonna read those putts, perhaps from both sides of the hole.  And then there are the practice swings.  And if they make it there's the victory dance!  All time consuming.
    • Seems like a lot.  I would have thought it'd be a quarter of that.
    • You're a 12 handicap. From 6400 yards.
    • interesting opinion. I’ve literally been playing nothing but Prov1/Prov1x for 20 years. I agree, not much has come close to it, although I’ve seen some nice balls released by other manufacturers thats have closed the gap. That’s about all I agree with you about however. Feels like a rock? I guess that’s what is so neat about golf equipment and varying opinions. I’m very impressed with the ball, and like I said, I’ve played nothing but Prov1 for 20 years. I scored really well with the ball at TPC Myrtle Beach and Pawleys plantation again today. The ball is solid. It doesn’t spin as much off the tee, and certainly seems to have  more distance, but green side spin was very good and it has nice softness off the Scotty Cameron and rolls true.  Usually very cynical about balls, but this one caught my attention and the Results have been there. I literally rotated a Prov1, Prov1x and AVX last few rounds and amazed.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 3puttmaster
      3puttmaster
      (36 years old)
    2. Ed
      Ed
      (55 years old)
    3. Elisa Marton
      Elisa Marton
      (28 years old)
    4. Jorge L
      Jorge L
      (42 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...