Jump to content
golfthyme

Is There a Reason for the 100-Foot High Approach Shot?

34 posts / 1599 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, iacas said:

100 feet is not that high.

While I agree, remember that there are mortals on the forum.

The higher we can get it, the better of a downward trajectory we can get it on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, iacas said:

100 feet is not that high.

No, not really. What would you consider a high apex @iacas?

1 minute ago, Bonvivant said:

While I agree, remember that there are mortals on the forum.

The higher we can get it, the better of a downward trajectory we can get it on.

You can have a 78 foot apex, if your descent angle is 55° that ball will stop. And for the record, the apex is only one number in the formula.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I used to hit my Hogan Apex exactly 100 feet. Coincidence? Hogan 4 shafts. 

Edited by TourSpoon
punctuation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TourSpoon said:

I used to hit my Hogan Apex exactly 100 feet. Coincidence? Hogan 4 shafts. 

 

There is no coincidence to exacting precision. 😜

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I prefer to come in from a high apex.  I have no accurate clue of how high I actually hit it but what I know is that if I come in high there will be less roll and less likely I will run off the back of the green.  It may be my personal issue but form 40+ yards out I really cannot read the roll of a green and could just as easily roll off the back of the green or stop well short. By coming in High I can pick my number and have a better chance of staying close to that target distance.  My preference is @ 100 yards out because I can take a nice easy full swing on my Sand-wedge and the ball is typically not more than 2-3 feet form my ball mark.  I still need to execute an accurate shot but at least I am confident if I do execute I have a good chance of getting the result I want.  Of course, if I do not execute a good shot than it does not matter what I am trying to do, the result will likely be bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 8/8/2020 at 2:03 PM, golfthyme said:

Or does it just look cool?

im old school, keep the ball as close to ground as possible and rolling on the green as soon as possible. That’s more accurate and better control than a 100 yard approach shot flying 100 feet high, if there’s water or a bunker in front of the green that’s different, I dont even own a hybrid or a lofted wedge! Old school!

I don't think 100' is high or low; it depends on ball speed and spin rate.  Really, what is important is descent angle.  You want a reasonably steep angle of descent for a "normal" full approach into the green so the ball will stop.  Obviously, a person can alter the descent angle to chase it to the back pin, flight down a wedge, flight down other short clubs to mitigate "suck back," hitting into the wind, etc.  I think the pros tend to be around 50* on most approaches into the green (on normal average full shots), while driver descent angle is around 40* to get some roll (may be undesirable in some cases so as to hold a tight fairway).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, TourSpoon said:

I used to hit my Hogan Apex exactly 100 feet. Coincidence? Hogan 4 shafts. 

 

 

1 hour ago, boogielicious said:

There is no coincidence to exacting precision. 😜

Exactly, the Hogan 3 shafts were only good for 75 feet. 🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, onthehunt526 said:

No, not really. What would you consider a high apex @iacas?

You can have a 78 foot apex, if your descent angle is 55° that ball will stop. And for the record, the apex is only one number in the formula.

100' is slightly higher than normal.

It's not "high" — which I'd take to mean 110+ or 120+ feet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 hours ago, iacas said:

100' is slightly higher than normal.

It's not "high" — which I'd take to mean 110+ or 120+ feet.

Well I’d be in the higher than normal category, that explains why my 6-iron stops like a wedge. (That and sharp descent angle). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I used to have a really high ball flight. it was pretty routine for the ball to be in or an inch from the pitch mark. I have several pics I took over the years of the ball embedded in the green. I KNEW where my wedges would land. Injuries have altered my swing and now I have a lot less arc. On a completely unrelated note, I tend to hit a club weaker than I used to and routinely see the ballrun off the green at which point I mutter aspersions against the green not holding...truth is, I needed that trajectory to control my distance.

 

that is the best reason I can imagine for a high trajectory...distance control.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue with high ball flights with amateurs is it comes with poor golf mechanics. This leads to inconsistent ball flights. Also, it will make it very hard to hit full swing wedge shots with consistent distance. 

100' is not that high. It's slightly higher than average, but not crazy high. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Given the choice, I normally go with the higher, drop, and stop approach shots. 

High lob shots are part of my bag of tricks, and I'm pretty good at them. I also find high fliers easier to read than the turf surfaces....lol

Lower,  ground runners are ok, but the turf conditions have to be in good shape. Especially on the longer shots. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

270 Feet....WOW!.  Is there now going to be a "High Apex" competition along with the "Long Drive" events?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Affiliates

    SuperSpeed
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo
  • Posts

    • It’s kind of a weird situation, though, because the guy improved to the point that he wouldn’t even qualify for the flight he’s already in. I’m assuming the competition is gross scoring within the flight.
    • 79 today for a differential of 5.8. Ball striking with the irons was better but my wedges and putting were awful. Couldn't control the distance or direction at all with how bad I was striking it for some reason. SG (compared to scratch) Driving: 2.49 Approach (>100 yds): 0.19 Short game (<100 yds): -2.66 Putting: -2.40 I also track the "Tiger Five," which is a better way of quantifying all the silly mistakes I make during my rounds. These were: Bogeys on par 5s: 0 Double bogeys: 0 Three putts: 4 Bogeys with 9-iron or less: 2 Blown easy saves (which I quantify as any nGIR that isn't in a bunker/deep rough or terribly short sided): 3
    • Very recently a thread was started here about PingEye2 iron sets and subject was some folk (experienced players) were seeking out these clubs to play AGAIN.  I have played Eye2 irons for many years, now on my second set as the first set was stolen.  As old as this design is, people have always got good memories and respect for these clubs.  and you can find sets for $100 or less ALL DAY LONG.  Buy a set, re-grip, and he's set up - to see if he likes the game.  With the difference from buying sets suggested, you have $$ for that driver and putter (these clubs will be more per each than a couple sets of Eye2s). and a bag. Be sure to put new 'velvet' grips on the properly fit clubs (according to the Ping site) and your son will have the best starter set he could find - and he may just play them for years to come.  You know, you're Ping.  PS - I had been planning on a new set of irons just because but when I tuck one up close from 100 or 150 yards, I forget about it.  I am shopping putters tho.    
    • Seconding this. Pretty much any OEM's game improvement or super game improvement from a couple model years ago will give him the performance and forgiveness he needs for a solid price. Just make sure you do your research on the ebay seller. I've had good success with it, but if you are more skeptical, there are plenty of second-hand retailers online.
    • It's up to the Committee to decide, in advance, and publish for the competitors, what the rules are around handicaps.  What any of us thinks is "right" should be overruled by the specific rules of the competition.  Now if I'm on that Committee, I would want to use the handicap as of the date of the match, but I'm not the one making the decisions.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bandstan
      bandstan
      (50 years old)
    2. boobiemiles
      boobiemiles
      (29 years old)
    3. ButterCuts1372
      ButterCuts1372
      (35 years old)
    4. Dombaker
      Dombaker
      (24 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...