Jump to content
iacas

Gary Player's Rant on Trees

Gary Player's Rant on Trees  

27 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you agree with Gary Player re: trees on a golf course? (See the first post)

    • Yes
      6
    • No
      17
    • This fence is mighty comfortable!
      4


30 posts / 1250 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Trees have saved many lives for me on the golf course. Mostly left lining trees.🙂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I’m a fan of tree lined courses. That said a course has a design that should match the area and terrain. An inland setting with trees calls for a parkland style design. A barren Oceanside area calls for a links. The photos of old courses when they where built is misleading. Some of those designers planned for the course to mature. Trees force golfers to hit the ball straight or use shotmaking to navigate around. That’s how golf should be played. Bomb and gougers don’t like trees because they want to hit it anywhere and be in good  shape. Unfortunately that’s not golf but it’s where the game is going.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I generally do not like trees on golf courses. On most courses, they are overgrown and narrow playing corridors, making the course more difficult than it should be. Any tree that's in play and not trimmed so someone can hit a golf ball under them is a crime.

That said, there are some courses where the trees fit in nicely. If they do not narrow playing corridors too much and allow for recovery, then they're fine. 

Gary Player, though...

The Rock Reaction GIF by WWE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

For me, there's a big difference between tree lined fairways and forest lined holes. Holes separated by large trees that are cleared of thick brush underneath are fine, because even tho you might be blocked, you still can find your ball and advance it - think most of Firestone. It's when everything is overgrown and you can't even find your ball that I don't like - like TPC Boston.

Oh, and Gary Player is an asshat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I fully disagree with GP.  He talks about being a conservationist and a tree huger.  I am not aware that they are cutting down the Giant Redwoods, Sequoias, etc. to make room for a golf course.  I do not agree with bulldozing the Amazon or "Ancient" trees that cannot be replaced but that is not comparable to cutting a tree on a golf course.  Also, trees in general are renewable resource. That is why we have not run out of lumber to build homes or paper to enable the endless stream of junk mail in our mail-boxes.    As for cutting 80 year old trees on a course, if it is a 100 year old course then the tree was not in the original design so it can be justified to bring the course back to the original design.  Even if the tree was placed on the course 80 years ago by the architect, it's impact on the course design today may not be what was intended at the time.  Even if being true to the original design is not the question, courses have the right to make improvements as they feel necessary.  I do no think they are just cutting them down for firewood.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I voted no. I think Gary Player is an idiot. The fact that he is comparing deforestation in the Amazon to golf course tree maintenance is ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I agree there’s a difference between trees and a forest. I get more satisfaction out of hitting a successful punch cut out from under a branch than I do a good shot from the fairway. Strategically placed trees create shot making decisions. One or two trees placed properly on a dog leg creates a target decision of the tee. If you want to play on a cow pasture why pay a green fee?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gary Player is a complete quack, but I do appreciate trees on most golf courses, and I feel they definitely have their place in much of the golf world.  Probably put me in the in-between category.

Watching the PGA Championship at TPC Harding Park, I considered the course very ordinary with the exception of large Cypress trees lining each hole.

As president of my golf club, I just spearheaded an effort to add 20 trees between a couple of holes where golfers tend to hit the ball onto the wrong hole and not have any penalty for it.  I viewed it as a dangerous situation that these trees could eventually help remedy.

The PGA Tour plays on very few courses where trees are not part of play. 

Shinnecock Hills and Oakmont have great earthwork on them to make interesting elevation changes and undulations that most courses do not have.  The same could be said for most of the courses on The Open rotation.  I can see on courses that have great earthwork that large trees all over the place would take away from the undulation design elements.  It is pretty tough to say that courses that do not have these elevation changes and undulations should cut down most of their trees to get back to the designers "original intent".  I really don't care to always play "goat tracks" where we have flat holes and somewhat flat greens with the only potential obstacle being long rough.  To me golf is great because every course offers different challenges for the golfer.  It can be played just about anywhere with each course offering up local challenges for the golfer.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 9/23/2020 at 11:39 AM, iacas said:

Yeah, I know. But I think even Gary Player would say the Old Course is a great course. It might be one of only about three he would say that about a course on which he never won, but…

BTW, Oakmont in 1994 vs. Oakmont in 2009 or 2016? No contest. Removing thousands of trees made Oakmont WAY better.

Brookside Country Club in Canton, Ohio. They found the original design by Donald Ross and took out over a thousand trees. It opened the views of the course and made it much more playable and visually pleasing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I voted "no" as I disagree with Player... I do agree with many comments above that depending on the location of the course and its age the removal of trees (or lack of trees altogether) makes for a better course. I don't think this is an either/or discussion, however, as many tree lined holes/courses rank amongst my favorites. As someone else said I do enjoy threading the ball through trees or having to get creative in hitting punch shots when hitting the *rare* wayward drive. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 9/24/2020 at 12:59 PM, iacas said:

Ditto. I've never known a time when I didn't dislike him.

Fine golfer and perpetual jerk. Aggressive little man with a complex, who has not improved with age.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Affiliates

    SuperSpeed
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo
  • Posts

    • I do get a bad feeling that we're going to see a lot more of this fairly soon in the U.S. The numbers they've been announcing in the last few weeks don't sound good. Maybe the politicians are trying to get to the election without upsetting would-be voters more than they have to. A long frosty winter spent indoors 99% of the time sounds like a terrible idea to me as far as the virus is concerned. Then again, us in the northern parts of America don't get much golf in the winter anyway, so I do feel badly for @Nail.     
    • Streaming is convenient, if you can watch while the event/program is being streamed. I have an NBC sports gold golf subscription, and for those times when I happen to be doing nothing else, it is really nice to watch live golf, if they happen to be showing featured groups at that particular time. That's about twice a month for maybe an hour.  For those times, I really like it.   It's great to be able to get it on my iPhone, my iPad or on my MBP. The problem is that most of my free viewing time is hours after the live event (or the next day), so I have my DVR pre-programmed to record PGA and European Tour broadcasts. Nothing else going on at 9 p.m.? That's usually when I can watch a little golf. With this move to all-things-streaming, I'm concerned that there will be a a move to drop/reduce the broadcasts (majors excepted), meaning I'll be out of luck.  NBC sports gold gives some highlights of the day's round, but so far their "full event replays" is extremely limited and appears to be several days delayed. What do you think?  Are the Golf Channel's days as a separate channel numbered?
    • I don't suppose to know the correct answer to this pandemic.  But, like most, have an opinion. My opinion is that closing golf courses is not going to do much to minimize the spread of Covid-19. Especially if the proper measures are taken by the course management to avoid the contact with the virus.  Almost all of the courses here have pool noodles in the holes, no ball washers, no rakes for the traps, allow one person motorized golf carts (trollies?), and masks required to enter the clubhouse/proshops.   I have also observed a change, not mandated by Government, in golfers' behavior.  No handshakes, no high fives, and no picking up your fellow foursome's golf balls or clubs for them.  I only point this out because I think this observation says that given the opportunity to play most golfers will play, but behave to be as safe as possible. Finally there is no way to be 100% safe in life.  Today, the probability of dying of this virus is small, even for an old guy like me. The consequences of being locked down with no outlets for stress is pretty well documented.  These consequences ought to be balanced against the probability of contracting the virus for a given activity.  But that isn't the Doctors' job, but it is the job of Government to make these trade offs.  But many don't and take the path that seem the "safe way", when in fact it well may not be the safest way for the individuals.  
    • Can you let me know what category that puts you in from Erik's earlier post?
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...