Jump to content
IGNORED

NHL 2020-21 (or just 2021)


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, billchao said:

You and I must have different definitions of “really hurt.” Jake Evans is out indefinitely with a concussion.

Good point, but I guess I was thinking of something more permanent that I don't like to even mention.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 175
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Nikolaj Ehlers (#27 in blue) is properly getting a lot of credit for holding the scrum back from the injured Evans.  

Man, Tom Wilson just can't help himself. He's not just a goon, but he undermines his actual ability when he pulls stupid shit like this. He should be out for awhile. But it's the NHL, and th

I’m having a hard time seeing this. First, you said someone is really going to get hurt one of these days, even though the kid is out with a concussion. Then, you said you were thinking of something m

  • Administrator
5 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

Maybe, but it is severe in the aspect it is the playoffs.

That should be irrelevant.

Same rules throughout. The NHL sucks at that though.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
8 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

Good point, but I guess I was thinking of something more permanent that I don't like to even mention.

I feel like you’re overlooking the significance of a traumatic brain injury.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

26 minutes ago, billchao said:

I feel like you’re overlooking the significance of a traumatic brain injury.

No I'm not overlooking anyting, I'm just saying the nhl needs to stop these type of hits. You are reading into my comment something that isn't there. I am on the side of the injured player.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
19 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

No I'm not overlooking anyting, I'm just saying the nhl needs to stop these type of hits. You are reading into my comment something that isn't there. I am on the side of the injured player.

Ummmmm.

1 hour ago, Billy Z said:

Somebody's really going to get hurt one of these days.

Again, someone did.

And you think four games sends a message.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
4 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

You are reading into my comment something that isn't there.

I’m having a hard time seeing this. First, you said someone is really going to get hurt one of these days, even though the kid is out with a concussion. Then, you said you were thinking of something more permanent, as if a brain injury doesn’t have the potential for permanent repercussions.

My point is the things you said can happen have already happened. Time and time again.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

24 minutes ago, iacas said:

Ummmmm.

Again, someone did.

And you think four games sends a message.

I did say I wouldn't mind seeing more games suspension. By the way, Montreal won the game this evening 1-0. Winnipeg could have used his offense but didn't have it. You could say he lost the game for Winnipeg tonight by being out and suspended. 

9e753f90-c41a-11eb-bfff-89cbe9865ef8

Current Habs players and some outspoken former NHLers like Sean Avery had plenty to say...

There are some who argue that they didn't see a problem with Scheifele's hit, not me, the other night as quoted in the following link.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Four games for that hit feels a little weak. Seems clear from the video that Sheifele had no real chance to actually prevent the goal with the hit and that he was angling for the hit rather than a play on the puck anyways. NHL better hope the series doesn't go to Game 6.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ever since the CTE became a well-known public fact, the NHL has been walking a tight rope.

The league knows full well that a large number of its customers want a physical game with full, robust body checking. But now it can't afford to have guys get seriously injured the way they used to. The result is this weird, uneven style of disciplining various infractions. In regard to the Schiefele-Evans incident I've seen people say he ought to get 10 games, 4 games or nothing at all, even a charging minor.

The challenge for the NHL is finding some sort of consistent way to deal with things. I'm not sure if this is ultimately going to render pro hockey into a non-checking league or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
32 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

The challenge for the NHL is finding some sort of consistent way to deal with things. I'm not sure if this is ultimately going to render pro hockey into a non-checking league or not.

There’s a significant gap between enforcing rules for player safety and making the league no body checking. The object isn’t to make the sport injury-free, which is impossible, but to remove unnecessary danger to players from non-hockey plays.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 minutes ago, billchao said:

There’s a significant gap between enforcing rules for player safety and making the league no body checking. The object isn’t to make the sport injury-free, which is impossible, but to remove unnecessary danger to players from non-hockey plays.

There is a heck of a lot of gray area in there.

"Non-hockey plays"? So what exactly is that anyway? Obviously there are gratuitous examples (Hunter on Turgeon), It, I think, is easier in theory than it is in practice.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

7 hours ago, mcanadiens said:

There is a heck of a lot of gray area in there.

"Non-hockey plays"? So what exactly is that anyway? Obviously there are gratuitous examples (Hunter on Turgeon), It, I think, is easier in theory than it is in practice.

Could you not say something like "where the hit was primarily intended to hurt the opposing player rather than separate them from the puck"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
7 hours ago, mcanadiens said:

There is a heck of a lot of gray area in there.

Not as much as you and other dinosaurs like to pretend there is.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
9 hours ago, mcanadiens said:

"Non-hockey plays"? So what exactly is that anyway?

They’re in here:

https://cms.nhl.bamgrid.com/images/assets/binary/319997074/binary-file/file.pdf

The term isn’t explicitly defined, but one can argue that any play that breaches the rules and results in a penalty is not a hockey play.

If they changed all non-fighting major penalties to include a game misconduct and automatic suspension with fines, that would go a long way towards preventing unnecessary injuries.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Great game last night, Boston/NYI, especially when rooting for the Isles! 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

9 hours ago, iacas said:

Not as much as you and other dinosaurs like to pretend there is.

If there wasn't still grey area then, by your logic, the NHL would have dealt out several of your 10-game suspensions. I know. The dinosaurs are still in charge.

Don't fret. The trend is obvious.

Player protection is a priority and eventually the NHL will be a non-contact version of the sport. I'm sure you and your enlightened friends will enjoy the game very much.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

15 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

If there wasn't still grey area then, by your logic, the NHL would have dealt out several of your 10-game suspensions. I know. The dinosaurs are still in charge.

Don't fret. The trend is obvious.

Player protection is a priority and eventually the NHL will be a non-contact version of the sport. I'm sure you and your enlightened friends will enjoy the game very much.

Hockey, like Rugby and the NFL etc is not just a contact sport. It’s an IMPACT sport. Rugby has recently introduced tighter laws in the “gray” area involving head impacts. The result of this is that the impacts are still significant, the game is still physical, but players needs must be more accurate with their physicality. They can still be rough sports and a fair bit safer.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Good for you, what course are you qualifying at?  Good luck.
    • Considering how many people he comes into contact with and how often he is flying, it is unfortunate but not a total surprise. You can catch Covid-19 again even with being vaccinated and previously infected. It just means that your infection is mild.
    • Or, he understands how it transfers, and he was only around his wife for two months. He didn't need to get tested… because in getting tested, maybe he would have gone out more than he did in isolating at home, perhaps? You are making a LOT of assumptions, as you often do, @Shorty. Cool it.
    • The Club at Lac La Belle - 6.5 I wasn't a big fan of this course. It was beautiful and well-maintained, but I found parts of it to be a little contrived. It's definitely a target golf course and for someone like me who is wild off the tee, it took all the fun of strategizing out of it because the risks were just too high. I did like that there was variety in the course layout with a good mix of short/long, right/left, uphill/downhill holes. I'm not sure I'd make a trip out to this one again if I'm ever back in the area for golf, but it's less than 10 minutes away from a delicious French bakery with the best croissants I have ever had, so that bumps up the score a little  I'd go back just for the croissants. The Sandbox - 7.0 This little 17 hole par 3 course was just fun. It gave you different looks and a variety of options for play. I really liked it and tried a bunch of different things I normally wouldn't have on a regular course. A 7.0 is probably the most I'd give to a par 3 course, though. Lawsonia Links - 7.5 I really enjoyed this course. Overall I found the layout to be good. There were plenty of places to miss, but you still needed to hit good golf shots to play well. I liked the way the mounds and bunkers were designed to play with the shape of the holes visually. There were really only a couple of holes I didn't like - 13 in particular, even though I made par both times using completely different strategies. It's just bordering on too many blind shots for me, though. I'd definitely play this course again if I have the chance. Mammoth Dunes - 8.5 This course was spectacular to look at - absolutely visually stunning. The pictures don't do it justice because they fail to capture the scale of everything. The place is massive. I'll echo what the others have wrote above: it's a journey. You feel like you're not going out to play a round of golf, but rather that you're going on an adventure while hitting a golf ball on the way. I understand now how some other reviews I've read or seen describe a feeling of getting lost, or losing your bearings for a bit. I wasn't thinking about routing. I had no idea where the clubhouse was. I didn't really care about any of it because I was out in this beautiful landscape. The golf itself for me was just there. I would be perfectly happy spending an afternoon just walking the course without playing it. And that's a bit of a detriment, because at the end of the day, it is a golf course. As a golf course, I found it didn't really matter much how you played it as long as you hit decent shots. There was certainly an ideal way to play the course well, and I hit some awful shots and paid the price for them, but plenty of just okay shots I got away with because of the layout. In the end that's fine. I don't need every course I play to be a grueling test of my skills.  I'd make a return trip and play this course again. Sand Valley - 9.0 This one is a golf course first and a spectacular view second. Where Mammoth Dunes focuses on the adventure, Sand Valley focuses on the golf. It's still visually stunning, but just not quite on the grand scale that Mammoth Dunes is. And Sand Valley does not let you forget for even one second that you're out there to do one thing: to play golf. I don't remember having a single shot out there that didn't require my undivided attention. The course absolutely punished you for missing your spots. But the flip side of that coin is that it was extremely rewarding to hit good shots there. An example is #8 mentioned above - I don't think I have ever felt so pleased to hit a GW to 35' before in my life, and I might never again. The course is a challenge in the best way. It makes you want to rise up to face it. I want to go back and battle it again. I shot my best score of the week with an 87 at Lawsonia, but it's the 94 the second time playing Sand Valley that I'm most proud of. Like Mammoth Dunes above, I'd make a return trip specifically to play this course again. Bonus Stuff The facilities at Sand Valley Golf Resort were top notch. The prices at the pro shop were fair. The food and drinks were also reasonably priced and delicious. The food truck at The Sandbox had the best food in the whole complex, IMO. Lac La Belle I felt was fancy but overpriced. I bought a polo at the pro shop at Sand Valley, but a similar shirt at Lac La Belle was like 50% more expensive. The golf carts had beautiful leather seats, but I absolutely hate geo-mapping on the GPS systems. I don't know how many times it slowed me down to tell me not to drive in the fescue even though I was driving parallel to it 20 yards away. Lawsonia had an older clubhouse and it certainly had a quaint feeling to it. That's not a bad thing. I did not look to see the prices they were charging for their merchandise.
    • Every YouTube video should start with a 10- to 45-minute diagnosis to make sure the video you're about to watch applies to you. There are a LOT of reasons why someone hits a slice. YouTube videos do not start with a 45-minute "disclaimer" because nobody would get through it. They just want to stop slicing, but if the video shows a fix for something that the student doesn't do, the video is less than worthless — it may actually cause more damage. Don't watch YouTube videos unless they're just working on some fundamental things, or you're very confident that what they're going to show you actually applies to you.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Armando Araujo
      Armando Araujo
      (46 years old)
    2. chris3putt
      chris3putt
      (54 years old)
    3. CrazyHorsePete
      CrazyHorsePete
      (34 years old)
    4. DHak20
      DHak20
      (44 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...