Jump to content
IGNORED

Will a Ball Rollback Be Announced by 2023?


Note: This thread is 1218 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Ball Rollback by 2023?  

35 members have voted

  1. 1. Will the USGA/R&A announce that they are rolling back golf ball distance by January 1, 2023?

    • Yes, for all golfers.
      4
    • Yes, but only for top players.
      5
    • No.
      26

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 01/01/2022 at 04:59 AM

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
35 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

You hear occasional players talking about having separate "PGA Tour Rules"

And they’re not talking about distance when they talk about that.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
5 minutes ago, iacas said:

And they’re not talking about distance when they talk about that.

I realize that, but the lack of action on having PGA Tour Rules of Golf leads me to believe that there's no way the Tour will take action towards a PGA Tour Equipment Rules.  Sorry if I didn't make that clear.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, iacas said:

You sure it's not just a variant of "back in my day…"?

One thing I sometimes wonder about when it comes to the "back in my day..." discussion is how different the greens and fairways were? From watching classic golf like from the 50's and 60's it looks to my eye like the greens are closer to what todays fairways look like, and the fairways are closer to what today's rough looks like, etc... 

I would think that would make hitting it further a little easier today compared to back then but wouldn't it also make putting more difficult today as compared to back then? Or am I way out of whack?

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
1 hour ago, iacas said:

You sure it's not just a variant of "back in my day…"?

“And the rough was like a foot tall! My persimmon was only a little bigger than the ball. Wind, everyday, was at least 25 mph! The courses were much hillier!”

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I do see it happening as it will be deemed the "right thing to do" from the old guard. I still have a ton of old rubber band balls that were given to me, a ton of 2-3-4 piece OPB's that have been handed off to me and the occasional find on the course.  What will I do with all these balls if they make them illegal.  I know, I will still play them, lose them and find them.  Is the whole need to roll the ball back in response to the pro golfers coming into their own as fully skilled athletes?  Not to say that Hogan, Jones, Trevino, Palmer, Nicklaus were not in their day, but the modern pro trains differently, uses the same science that gives us super athletes we see in other sports.  Just as in automobile racing, the rules only make the competitors try harder to find that little edge, and it becomes a law of diminishing returns, we've seen that already with the ball makers, club makers. Yes,  I love seeing the long ball hitters hit, but what really makes the game fun to watch is when it is the mastery of the complete game in play - long ball, short ball, bunker shots, recovery shots, and putting all come together for that one gentleman or lady on that one day where life for a moment is in perfect harmony and a champion is crowned.  For me a bad hack, I will never have to worry about hitting it too far.  If it means playing a "deadened" ball, so be it.  I can still have a good time and enjoy the game.

Ping G400 SFT 10deg  R flex
Ping G410 3w R flex
Ping G400 3h and 4h R flex
Taylormade SLDR 5i thru PW graphite shaft R flex
Cleveland CBX wedges - 50, 54, 58 or 52, 58 (depending on my mood)
Odyssey Versa or White Steel #5
Srixon Q Star

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
42 minutes ago, WillieT said:

Yes,  I love seeing the long ball hitters hit, but what really makes the game fun to watch is when it is the mastery of the complete game in play - long ball, short ball, bunker shots, recovery shots, and putting all come together for that one gentleman or lady

You don't think that today's players have "mastery of the complete game"?

175-225 is still a VERY important range in the game, today, in determining who does well on the PGA Tour.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, iacas said:

You don't think that today's players have "mastery of the complete game"?

175-225 is still a VERY important range in the game, today, in determining who does well on the PGA Tour.

Oh contraire @iacas - I should have been more clear in my assessing the mastery of the complete game, as the range you noted is very key.  Mastery of this range is one of the highest Separation Values a player can master.  My summation should have included "approach" shots as well, which would have included this area.  

Ping G400 SFT 10deg  R flex
Ping G410 3w R flex
Ping G400 3h and 4h R flex
Taylormade SLDR 5i thru PW graphite shaft R flex
Cleveland CBX wedges - 50, 54, 58 or 52, 58 (depending on my mood)
Odyssey Versa or White Steel #5
Srixon Q Star

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

21 hours ago, iacas said:

Dude, no. They certainly hit the ball harder with composite rackets and bigger heads that weigh less.

And you missed the point on the rest.

Have they had to make tennis courts bigger?

Semper Fi,

Doc

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
7 minutes ago, Seenya said:

Have they had to make tennis courts bigger?

Is there something here that has anything at all to do with whether you think the USGA/R&A will roll back ball distances?  Anything at all?  After the short digression into other sports which you initiated, its probably time to get back to the original topic.

  • Like 2

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
3 minutes ago, Seenya said:

Have they had to make tennis courts bigger?

Let's revisit what you had said:

23 hours ago, Seenya said:

Golf is the only sport where technology is used to make the game easier FOR PROFESSIONALS.

No, it isn't, and that's a preposterous thing to say. Tons of things have made the game easier for professionals in all sports.

Hell, they engineer gloves to make it easier for wide receivers to catch the football in the NFL. They've used doppler radar and other high-end tech to help make pitchers more effective, throw harder, with more spin, etc. Technology is pervasive.

And, like I said, tennis players use larger, lighter, faster rackets than they used to. That's a SPORT where TECH has made the game EASIER (at every level, including for PROFESSIONALS).

23 hours ago, Seenya said:

They make footballs that the average Joe can throw a country mile

They have "big cup" tournaments in golf, too.

23 hours ago, Seenya said:

smaller basketballs for younger players

smaller clubs for younger players in golf

23 hours ago, Seenya said:

big bats for junior baseball

___touredge.jpg

23 hours ago, Seenya said:

light weight bowling balls, and on and on

light weight clubs for juniors (and I don't think light weight bowling balls are illegal in high level competition, just that nobody would want to use those).

23 hours ago, Seenya said:

But they can't use them in the professional game.

Again, you can't use a Nerf football in even Little Gridders, either.

In that case you're talking about a toy, and in the others… accommodations made for children, which golf also has. (And maybe doesn't have enough of.)

23 hours ago, Seenya said:

If old timers, like myself, could carry a 7 handicap on 7000+ yard courses with persimmon woods and blades then the modern pros should be able to win with rolled back technology.

Of course they'd still win with the rolled back tech. They're better than players were back then. Give them persimmon and balata and blades and… they'd hit it better than the guys did back then. And farther.

You don't have a point here, @Seenya.

6 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

Is there something here that has anything at all to do with whether you think the USGA/R&A will roll back ball distances?  Anything at all?  After the short digression into other sports which you initiated, its probably time to get back to the original topic.

Seconded.

  • Like 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1218 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Welcome to TST @Camjr.   We're glad you've joined.  
    • Angle is not a factor. I hit the ball 100’ high. Par is net birdie. My CH is 16. The rough between the bunkers is like 10’ wide though. That’s not something you’re going to try to hit on purpose. Most of the area to the left of that is fescue/native vegetation and I’m pretty sure there isn’t a flat lie in any of it. It’s the second hole.
    • Hello all.  I'm about to be 57 yrs old, started playing when I was 16, and have quit and restarted the game more times than I can count.  I had started playing a weekly round with a friend, and finally made the jump to Senior A shafted Tour Edge clubs.  Instantly gained 10 yds with an easier swing (why didn't I make that jump sooner???).  Glad to be a part of the group. Cheers all,
    • I think I like this hole.  It is a clear "Risk-Reward" choice.  Since most of the shots in your cone cleared the bunkers I would say they are a minor risk and not a big issue.  Playing the aggressive line may give you 70ish yards in from what looks to be playable rough while conservative play is 120ish from fairway.  I know you said 70 vs 120 is minor for you but how does the approach angle in impact your results?  I figure both strategies are playing for Birdie since holing out from either is mostly luck. Looking at your proximity hole I think it says @ 50 feet when hitting from the fairway from 100-150 and 40 feet if hitting 50-100 from the rough.  Neither of those is an easy birdie putt.   I like the approach angle from the rough between the bunkers & the adjacent tees over the angle from @ 120 in the fairway but I really do not like the idea of hitting onto the adjacent tee boxes and that may impact my confidence with making the shot.  Also, too far left may be a worse approach angle then from the fairway short of the bunkers. For me this may come down to how confident do I feel when I reach that tee box.  If I am stroking it well off the tee leading up to the hole I would try for over the bunkers and the better angle in but if I am struggling that day I would likely opt for the fairway to take more bad stuff out of play.
    • Wordle 1,035 2/6 🟨🟨🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...