Jump to content
IGNORED

Typical Golfers vs. Typical TheSandTrap.Com Golfer


Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

On this forum, the common story I hear here is that a lot of people pick up the game, take 6-12 months to break 100 and another 1-2 years to break 90.

My hypothesis/question is, isn’t this story a rarity?  While a golf message board is more likely to be frequented by better golfers, I hear this story more often than I would have expected.

Here is the profiles of my four-some:

  • Player 1: Playing 8 years, practicing daily & takes lessons.  A good drive goes about 220-230.  Scores 100-110.  Not tall/strong/athletic, but is reasonably coordinated.
  • Player 2: Playing off/on about 10 years.  Drives 250 dead straight on the regular but rest of game is below average.  Scores 95-105. Never practices, doesn’t even warm up.  Thinks practice doesn’t help him.  Driver never misses.  Same build as player 1.
  • Player 3: Late 40’s, great swing and as a teenager could score in mid 80’s.  Very little practice, now doesn’t break 100 due to poor consistency.  Same build as player 1.
  • Player 4: Early 60’s, is/was very athletic, great distance with all clubs, but inconsistent.  Usually scores about 110 but once in a while can card in the low 90's or better.

To add to this narrative, when I am on the course and casually walk by other groups, I notice that most swings are much worse than ours.  So, what I see is that us hacks who rarely break 100 seem to be above average, but reading this forum gives me the impression we’re very much in the weaker category.

So, my conclusion is that the audience on this message board do not accurately reflect the general population of golfers and/or is a bubble of the upper echelon of golfers.

Thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Moderator
53 minutes ago, Effington said:

Hey guys,

On this forum, the common story I hear here is that a lot of people pick up the game, take 6-12 months to break 100 and another 1-2 years to break 90.

My hypothesis/question is, isn’t this story a rarity?  While a golf message board is more likely to be frequented by better golfers, I hear this story more often than I would have expected.

Here is the profiles of my four-some:

  • Player 1: Playing 8 years, practicing daily & takes lessons.  A good drive goes about 220-230.  Scores 100-110.  Not tall/strong/athletic, but is reasonably coordinated.
  • Player 2: Playing off/on about 10 years.  Drives 250 dead straight on the regular but rest of game is below average.  Scores 95-105. Never practices, doesn’t even warm up.  Thinks practice doesn’t help him.  Driver never misses.  Same build as player 1.
  • Player 3: Late 40’s, great swing and as a teenager could score in mid 80’s.  Very little practice, now doesn’t break 100 due to poor consistency.  Same build as player 1.
  • Player 4: Early 60’s, is/was very athletic, great distance with all clubs, but inconsistent.  Usually scores about 110 but once in a while can card in the low 90's or better.

To add to this narrative, when I am on the course and casually walk by other groups, I notice that most swings are much worse than ours.  So, what I see is that us hacks who rarely break 100 seem to be above average, but reading this forum gives me the impression we’re very much in the weaker category.

So, my conclusion is that the audience on this message board do not accurately reflect the general population of golfers and/or is a bubble of the upper echelon of golfers.

Thoughts?

I certainly can’t and won’t speak for anyone other than myself. I played at golf for probably 3-4 years before consistently breaking 100, but I was playing maybe 10-12/year with maybe a half dozen range sessions in there...never taking a lesson. 
 

When I did break 90 consistently, it was prob around the 10-year mark and it’s only been in the last few years that I have consistently shot in the Mid-lower 80’s, breaking 80 a couple of times per year (now in my 22nd year of having touched a club). I think that’s a pretty normal progression, one very different from what you describe the “typical Sandtrap golfer” to be. 
 

But to your point, I think those of us here, put more attention, time, and energy into the game “the average golfer.” I see in your foursome, that no one is given to much practice, certainly not daily or even weekly practice.  It’s the passion to improve what drives the fruit of success in any arena.

***and I don’t consider my swing pretty by any stretch

But I also may not be the “typical Sandtrap golfer” 🤷‍♂️

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)

It's probably safe to say that the more frequent posters to this board are generally the more serious, more practiced and generally better golfers, but not entirely.  A few of us, like myself, are world-class hacks that probably aren't much better than your friends there. 

Probably the commonality on this forum is that the members do want to improve and are willing to spend the time and resources to do so. It sounds like your foursome doesn't share that mentality.

Edited by mcanadiens
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • iacas changed the title to Typical Golfers vs. Typical TheSandTrap.Com Golfer

I think it goes without saying that participants on sites like this tend to be either more into golf than than most golfers or trying actively to improve (I know that I frequented sites much more heavily when I was in the "big improvement" mode). Active golfers tend to be better golfers, much in the same that studies show that golfers who walk tend to score lower - probably because golfers who walk tend to be better golfers, not that they play better from walking (although in my individual case I think I do play better when I walk).

As to your foursome, if you are regular players meaning weekly or so, then your results are surprising to me. I  believe that most golfers who are reasonably athletic and coordinated should be able to play in the 90's unless you are playing Bethpage Black every week (or similar difficult course / wrong tees). Failure to do so likely indicates that they've never practiced enough to achieve minimal proficiency or poor course management or lousy short game. All of these aren't that hard to improve but improvement doesn't come without putting some time in. Just my two cents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Moderator
1 hour ago, mcanadiens said:

Probably the commonality on this forum is that the members do want to improve and are willing to spend the time and resources to do so.

It’s this. There is a greater percentage of golfers here who are seriously interested in improving and not representative of the greater population.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Most of the handful of guys here that I've played with are better than average golfers. 

That being said, I think the average golfer is much worse than whatever the average handicap is that is publicized by the USGA or whatever

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

When I was in the grove for about four years straight I would hover in the low 90’s  and break 90 a few times a year. During this time is was playing 3 times a week and hit the range once a week. Now life has caught up to me and I play about twice a month and my game and scores reflect it. I still enjoy golf and just try to keep expectations simple. My chipping and putting is still pretty decent since it’s something I can do in the yard. The rest of my game is a tragedy. That being said I don’t think a weekend golfer who puts no time into practice or other work into their game can expect improvement no matter how long they have played. But that shouldn’t take away from the enjoyment or love of the game. Just temper expectations and remember it’s you against the course, not other golfers. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure how many users are on the forum, but it is a very very very small amount compared to all those who play golf. Yea, it is understandable that this segment of golfers might be those who are more serious when working on their golf game. 

Also, they get some good advice from some pretty competent instructors. 😉

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

10 hours ago, Effington said:

Hey guys,

On this forum, the common story I hear here is that a lot of people pick up the game, take 6-12 months to break 100 and another 1-2 years to break 90.

My hypothesis/question is, isn’t this story a rarity?  While a golf message board is more likely to be frequented by better golfers, I hear this story more often than I would have expected.

Here is the profiles of my four-some:

  • Player 1: Playing 8 years, practicing daily & takes lessons.  A good drive goes about 220-230.  Scores 100-110.  Not tall/strong/athletic, but is reasonably coordinated.
  • Player 2: Playing off/on about 10 years.  Drives 250 dead straight on the regular but rest of game is below average.  Scores 95-105. Never practices, doesn’t even warm up.  Thinks practice doesn’t help him.  Driver never misses.  Same build as player 1.
  • Player 3: Late 40’s, great swing and as a teenager could score in mid 80’s.  Very little practice, now doesn’t break 100 due to poor consistency.  Same build as player 1.
  • Player 4: Early 60’s, is/was very athletic, great distance with all clubs, but inconsistent.  Usually scores about 110 but once in a while can card in the low 90's or better.

To add to this narrative, when I am on the course and casually walk by other groups, I notice that most swings are much worse than ours.  So, what I see is that us hacks who rarely break 100 seem to be above average, but reading this forum gives me the impression we’re very much in the weaker category.

So, my conclusion is that the audience on this message board do not accurately reflect the general population of golfers and/or is a bubble of the upper echelon of golfers.

Thoughts?

I would say that many of us are into improving our game, but not necessarily in any upper echelon. I see it as a little sad that your group in not up for a little practice. It can go a long way to more enjoyment and fulfillment.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 4/11/2021 at 6:23 AM, Effington said:

Hey guys,

On this forum, the common story I hear here is that a lot of people pick up the game, take 6-12 months to break 100 and another 1-2 years to break 90.

My hypothesis/question is, isn’t this story a rarity?  While a golf message board is more likely to be frequented by better golfers, I hear this story more often than I would have expected.

Hn of golfers.

Thoughts?

A person who takes 6-12 years to break 100 is much less likely to bring it up than someone who does it quickly. Some form of confirmation bias may be in play.

 

Have not seen a study done but I would place a small wager that the venn diagram showing golfers who break 100 with those who routinely break 100 after 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and finally the golfers who interact on forums...the overlap is going to skew heavily towards the quick learner mentioning it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No offense to the OP, but I don't get how people can be enthusiastic about golf and settle for 100+, particularly if you have some athletic ability. Personally, I am on a quest to improve every time I tee it up. I take lessons and I love the range and the putting green. I am not a great athlete but I don't know if I would play if I couldn't break 100. Breaking 80 is a daily quest at this stage of my life.

I do play pretty regularly with a guy who hits it accurately about 240 off the tee, but can't scare 90. He insists that breaking 90 is a goal and he plays at least 4 times a week but doesn't have any idea where the range is. Baffles my mind. I told him last week that if I could drive it like him I would be an 8 handicap. He asked me if that was a complement or an insult.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The main issue with golf is time.  When my job and other responsibilities allowed me to play at least once per week and practice in between, I could play consistently in the high 80s.  But as a weekend golfer it’s tough to maintain enough consistency to stay in the low 90s.  Adding age to the equation makes maintaining consistency even more difficult.  It’s still a fun game if you manage your expectations realistically.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Appreciate all the feedback!  Definitely sounds like the general consensus is in agreement with my theory.

For what it's worth, I'm player 1.  While I was never a top athlete in my younger years, I consider myself reasonably coordinated.  That being said, playing golf has been a humbling experience.  Based on my readings here, I've struggled to improve more than the huge majority of players, despite great efforts.

However, there's a ying to the yang.  What my enormous struggles has given me is a really great appreciation for any player who can hit the ball consistently well, and all it takes (right now) for me to enjoy myself is decent ball striking, which I'm defining as anything that is even remotely sniffing regulation.  Which is better than most.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TST = better than average golfer? Not sure. I think it's more like, TST = bit more serious about golf GPA than average golfer.Of course not speaking for all TST posters.

Intent alone makes a good chunk of difference. You gotta WANT to maintain at least a 2.8-3.0 GPA. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don’t think TST is necessarily a group of better than average golfers. I think we’re probably a micro community that has a  similar ratio of high level golfers to complete hacks as the general population. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I suspect it has to do with the motivation of each player. We play as a three maybe twice a month. I will get out once, sometimes twice a week. I have been playing for a long time and have actually never shot over 100. I was a range rat for 1-1/2 seasons before my Dad let me go out and actually play. Shot a 98 (no mullies or gimme's- My Grandad played with us and was Scottish, so no coddling allowed). I loved it and tried to improve until I was around a 4/6 depending on the course. But there was no place to really go as that hdcp, AND I had found surfing, skateboarding and girls taking up more of my time. I never really "lost" my game. Took a few years off in my early 20's, but picked it right back up and have kind of settled in shooting low-mid 80's with a 79 thrown in on a good day. My buddies are in it for the craic- they have shot essentially the same score for the last 25 years we've played together. 100-105 with maybe a high 90 thrown in on an easier course. No real game plan to improve. In the spring, they might go to the range once or twice, hit a few 7 Irons to warm up and then just beat Driver for 80 balls and call themselves ready to go. When we play for a bit of something, they each get a stroke a hole and I have never lost. Even if they do a best ball off the card, I'm collecting. And yet, none of us really care. We know we aren't playing for millions, and most times not even for quarters. Sure, they get all aggravated with chili dips, chunks and 4 putts, but the beer cooler is in the cart and I remind them we aren't good enough to get that angry about it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Vinsk said:

I don’t think TST is necessarily a group of better than average golfers. I think we’re probably a micro community that has a  similar ratio of high level golfers to complete hacks as the general population. 

I'm not sure about this. The fact that we all have taken the time to participate in a golf forum shows that we take this more serious than most. While we certainly have our share of high, mid, and low handicap players, I'd guess that the skill level of the average SandTrapper is greater than that of an average golfer.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

30 minutes ago, tristanhilton85 said:
6 hours ago, Vinsk said:

 

I'm not sure about this. The fact that we all have taken the time to participate in a golf forum shows that we take this more serious than most

I don’t think we know this. There are plenty who come here to run their ball washers about more than golf. They don’t practice or care what their scores are. They don’t take golf seriously at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Yeah I think it will be great for that, and also for getting used to the bunkers. They are a bit tricky to hit out of.  I'm actually thinking about brining a Sunday bag for the Sandbox rounds.  Something to consider I guess with only needing a few clubs. 
    • Still should have at least been called… it would have been reviewed and probably upheld as a 5 and 10, but mitigating circumstances might have made it a double-minor.    In other news, the Isles win game four against Tampa to tie the series and guarantee at least one more game in the Coliseum.
    • OK. It’s NBC’s drone camera. Its resolution sucks. Just notice on the wide angle overhead shots. The picture quality is terrible.    Throw in the 4D camera it feels like NBC is using old technology and not keeping up.    OTOH it spent a chunk of money on the Olympics. 
    • I'm not sure if this is the right thread to post this in (I debated the thread about putting and why to not accelerate through the ball) or not.   How does one practice the putting stroke slowly? I'm starting to wonder if my issue with speed is a bad putting stroke, and there's something convenient that I'm doing well on the bead drill (the ruler one) fairly consistently.  So I want to do something to check that my stroke itself is okay, and I got mixed results from a drill from Utley's putting book earlier today.   Other than "swing the putter very slowly" ... is that the right thing?
    • I've got that book @billchao...Golf my Way.  And I remember laying my hands on the pages.  
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dan42nepa
      Dan42nepa
      (65 years old)
    2. James Dalton
      James Dalton
      (80 years old)
    3. JMHARDING
      JMHARDING
      (31 years old)
    4. mwh1023
      mwh1023
      (54 years old)
    5. Skeesh
      Skeesh
      (49 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...