Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Good day all

Swing improved a bit so I recently was fitted for new irons. Yay, out of the clunky super game improvement irons to the Callaway Apex DCB's.  LOVE THEM.

My gapping issue is that I now hit my 5iron about 170-175 yards. With the former set that was my 7wood (Titleist 917f2). The next up, after the 7 wood (the lpga club) is the 5 wood (Ping G410) and it fires on a regular basis at 200 yards and a bit more.

So there is that hole between the 5iron and 5 wood. What to do? Hybrid? or ???

I know all y'all will be able to share opinions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most likely a 4 hybrid will fit in that gap.  Hit some and see what fits your distance gap and you are comfortable with.  However, I must ask the question.  How many clubs do you currently have in your bag.  Do you need to remove a club to accommodate this gap.  And if so, does this affect gapping elsewhere.  The reason for these questions is that your scoring clubs are your shorter irons.  Even assuming you find a club that fits the gap perfectly, it is doubtful you will be able to hit a green accurately and regularly from 200 or so yards out with a long iron/hybrid/fairway wood.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MrFreeze said:

I know all y'all will be able to share opinions.

My 2 cents: You need a 185ish club. Hybrid, hybrid iron, high numbered wood, regular iron, that's up to you. I just see that  between 170 to 200 is a common enough distance and a big enough gap that you need to fill it with something reliable. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Get the 7 wood bent a few degrees stronger.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

20 minutes ago, pganapathy said:

Most likely a 4 hybrid will fit in that gap.  Hit some and see what fits your distance gap and you are comfortable with.  However, I must ask the question.  How many clubs do you currently have in your bag.  Do you need to remove a club to accommodate this gap.  And if so, does this affect gapping elsewhere.  The reason for these questions is that your scoring clubs are your shorter irons.  Even assuming you find a club that fits the gap perfectly, it is doubtful you will be able to hit a green accurately and regularly from 200 or so yards out with a long iron/hybrid/fairway wood.

Hello

Thank you for the quick response.

I am playing (14):

Callaway Epic Speed 9*
Ping G410 LST 3wood
Ping G410 5wood
Titleist 917F2 7wood
5-PW Callaway Apex DCB
50, 54, 58 Ping Glide Forged
Odyssey White Hot OG putter

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MrFreeze said:

Hello

Thank you for the quick response.

I am playing (14):

Callaway Epic Speed 9*
Ping G410 LST 3wood
Ping G410 5wood
Titleist 917F2 7wood
5-PW Callaway Apex DCB
50, 54, 58 Ping Glide Forged
Odyssey White Hot OG putter

 

Honestly, I think you would be better off not dropping a wedge for a hybrid/long iron, unless there is a club you don't use much.  For example, I tend to use my PW for most shots around a green and from 100 yards in unless I need a specialty club.  My SW and LW are for bunkers and high flop shots where I need to carry something, or where I need more loft than my 45* PW.  In my case I could potentially drop the LW.  Consider which club can be dropped and whether that would cost you strokes

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 5/2/2021 at 1:15 PM, MrFreeze said:

Hello

Thank you for the quick response.

I am playing (14):

Callaway Epic Speed 9*
Ping G410 LST 3wood
Ping G410 5wood
Titleist 917F2 7wood
5-PW Callaway Apex DCB
50, 54, 58 Ping Glide Forged
Odyssey White Hot OG putter

 

Your 5 iron and 7 wood go the same distance? Usually the 7 wood is more like a 3 iron distance in the grand scheme of things. 
 

I’m a 1.5 handicap and I eschew hybrids though I have 2 of them in my bag currently. I’m trying to get used to hitting the hybrids again. But I hit my irons a little further than yours, but that’s not the point.

My suggestion would be if your insistent on plugging the gap between 175 to 200 (5i to 5w). What would be your target distance with this club? 180-185? 185-190?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)

Why not just get a 4 iron? If you hit the 5 fine I don't think there is much reason to fear the 4 with a set like the Apex DCB.

Edited by measureoffsetinnm
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would prob go for a 3 or4 hybrid and replace it for the 7 wood. The way I look at it a hybrid is easier to hit of the tee and from the grass. I always carried an iron set 3-pw. but I carry driver 3 wood and a strong 3 hybrid also ( Titleist 818 H1 set in D1 position ) I did order a new set of irons to make my life a little easier on the course, I play the Mizuno MP59's now and I hardly use the 3 iron, only on a long par 3 with some wind. so in the end it was easy for me to get the new set 4-pw and get an extra wedge in the bag. I will have the Mizuno JPX 921 forged irons soon, with Vokey Sm8 wedges 50 55 60.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 5/22/2021 at 3:53 AM, measureoffsetinnm said:

Why not just get a 4 iron? If you hit the 5 fine I don't think there is much reason to fear the 4 with a set like the Apex DCB.

That 4-iron is like a 3-iron... but a 3-iron you have a chance with. Sort of like my ZX5 irons. @MrFreeze are you looking for a 190 yard club or a little closer to the 5-iron distance... say 185?

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, onthehunt526 said:

That 4-iron is like a 3-iron... but a 3-iron you have a chance with. Sort of like my ZX5 irons. @MrFreeze are you looking for a 190 yard club or a little closer to the 5-iron distance... say 185?

Right I forgot to look at lofts. Still as you point out it is one you should have a chance with. Sometimes the best answer is the simplest one!

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, measureoffsetinnm said:

Right I forgot to look at lofts. Still as you point out it is one you should have a chance with. Sometimes the best answer is the simplest one!

Long irons are only hard to hit, the lack of visible loft gets in our heads. I think @MrFreeze needs a 21°-23° hybrid or take .75° off his 7-wood. Which might sneak him a 10 yards. 4-iron might be a big ask for him.

On 5/2/2021 at 1:15 PM, colin007 said:

Get the 7 wood bent a few degrees stronger.

I think his 917 is adjustable.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

7 minutes ago, onthehunt526 said:

Long irons are only hard to hit, the lack of visible loft gets in our heads. I think @MrFreeze needs a 21°-23° hybrid or take .75° off his 7-wood. Which might sneak him a 10 yards. 4-iron might be a big ask for him.

This is true but I think worth considering still because of how satisfied he said he was with them. That confidence can help with the mental block that otherwise might be there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 5/21/2021 at 10:07 PM, onthehunt526 said:

Your 5 iron and 7 wood go the same distance? Usually the 7 wood is more like a 3 iron distance in the grand scheme of things. 
 

I’m a 1.5 handicap and I eschew hybrids though I have 2 of them in my bag currently. I’m trying to get used to hitting the hybrids again. But I hit my irons a little further than yours, but that’s not the point.

My suggestion would be if your insistent on plugging the gap between 175 to 200 (5i to 5w). What would be your target distance with this club? 180-185? 185-190?

My NEW 5 iron is going the same distance as my old 7wood. Yes.

Ok. So I went and hit a ton of 20* / 21* hybrids. Nothing really worked well for me. Tried them all. So I went over and tried some 7 woods. The technology has grown great since the 917f2 I had. I finally settled on the Callaway Speed 7 wood. Super easy to hit. Goes about 190ish.

Thank you all.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, MrFreeze said:

My NEW 5 iron is going the same distance as my old 7wood. Yes.

Ok. So I went and hit a ton of 20* / 21* hybrids. Nothing really worked well for me. Tried them all. So I went over and tried some 7 woods. The technology has grown great since the 917f2 I had. I finally settled on the Callaway Speed 7 wood. Super easy to hit. Goes about 190ish.

Thank you all.

Epic Speed? Like Phil’s Super Driver?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

53 minutes ago, MrFreeze said:

My NEW 5 iron is going the same distance as my old 7wood. Yes.

Ok. So I went and hit a ton of 20* / 21* hybrids. Nothing really worked well for me. Tried them all. So I went over and tried some 7 woods. The technology has grown great since the 917f2 I had. I finally settled on the Callaway Speed 7 wood. Super easy to hit. Goes about 190ish.

Thank you all.

Well I can't say upgrading the 7 wood head is not also a simple answer. Update your signature!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Thanks, but I don’t need any of them. I’m just fine. Appreciate the thought though.  👍  
    • It was a smashed 3-wood. Any other strike and I am at the bottom of the hill. It rewarded a great shot. 
    • I know your post was a few days ago, but one point to clarify (unless I misunderstood you): even if a person was previously infected, they should be vaccinated. From https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/faq.html  
    • So my list, in reverse order: Naga-Waukee War Memorial, 6.5 Naga-Waukee is a solid golf course that was fun to play, well kept, and had enough architectural integrity. Your interest is captured from the first hole right on through to the end, without a truly weak hole among them (with #11 being the worst, but still acceptable). The course allows and encourages you to move the ball both ways off the tee if you're up for it, it allows and hints at hitting different clubs off the tees and into the greens, with elevation changes both up and down. About the only thing some might complain about is that the 18th is a bit soft. I had about 55 yards in for my approach shot. Some people don't like that kind of thing; I don't mind. It's a half-par hole that may decide a match. Swap the 17th and the 18th and you may placate a few more people. The greens were good — they had enough variety of shape, size, and slope to stay relevant without being over the top or crazy. I wasn't really looking at this course as an architectural test, because it was my first round on non-muddy turf in about ten days given the rains we had in Erie the previous two weeks, but I was surprised at the challenge it presented while still being quite playable. A very, very good golf course that, were it in my area, I think I could play and enjoy all the time. @cipher should join. 😄 The Club at Lac la Belle, 7.0 Admittedly, I wasn't particularly invested in playing this round. It came at the end of a long week, and as we had seen the course the day before when we visited the putting course (which is fun, and which I wish more courses had, though maintenance might be a PITA), I had seen almost enough of what I wanted to see: winding fairways, tall fescue rough, bunkers, undulating greens. Parkland golf. Only the ninth hole is essentially untouched from what existed in the previous decade(s), with four completely new holes on completely newly owned property across the street. Apparently the course was often flooded, so they rebuilt the course higher up and in the process rebuilt almost every hole. Some shared similar green or tee sites, but many were totally new. Let's start with the positives. The course was in good shape. The greens played firm (I suspect they were still just year-old USGA spec greens, or at least new construction). The clubhouse and conditions and everything were nice. The negatives? It's parkland, target golf. It's long rough/fescue off the fairways. It's tall, mature trees. There really aren't very many options, and there aren't many real decisions to make. Hit it here, hit it there. The first four greens are a bit over the top. The second and third hole tee shots are, to borrow an architectural term, dumb. The second requires a hybrid or 4I through a chute of trees (hook is optional), while the third features a blind penalty area creeping in to the right-ward 80%. The fourth, a par three, has a green so over the top that almost all tee shots will end up in about four places, and if the holes are cut in about the same places, putting there will be pretty boring after a few rounds. The course wasn't tough to walk, but despite having rickshaws, the course wasn't the best for walking with a push cart because tall fescue often blocked direct paths from green to tee. A few of the holes were interesting, but none were really "wow, now that's cool" level. Lac la Belle isn't a bad course, but it's nowhere near a great one. Mammoth Dunes, 7.5 I'll let others talk about the scale and size of the place. It's right there in the name, so I'll skip talking about it, except to share some numbers about the first hole: the first fairway is 100 yards wide. The first green is 52 yards wide, and occupies about 14,000 square feet. That's 1/3 of an acre. I'll start with the main thing that knocks this down a bit from Sand Valley (and puts it below Lawsonia Links by a good bit): I didn't like the lack of separation in Mammoth Dunes. The first fairway lets you hit it anywhere in that 100 yards, and the first green, though yes it's more visible from high up on the right-hand side, also lets you hit it anywhere, from which the ball will tend to funnel toward the hole or the middle of the green. Ballstriking isn't rewarded (or punished) at quite the level I appreciate. Many players will shoot some of their best scores ever on Mammoth Dunes, which is great for a resort course — it's fun, it's different, it's BIG… — but it's not what I enjoy about golf. I don't need every good shot to be rewarded and every bad shot punished, but I want more separation between the quality and the result. This all made the architecture feel unimportant, and the results of both your decisions and your shots feel less important. Now, not every hole features this pattern, and let's bear in mind I still ranked this course as a 7.5. The second hole was great - a centerline bunker slightly offset to the left makes it appear as though a drive to the left in the narrower area is the preferred line, but that line blocks you out from seeing much of the green with a large dune to the left. The better line is to the right, and it still leaves a wedge in. Given the size of the greens, much of the "strategy," light as it may be at Mammoth Dunes, depends on the location of the flag on the green. Since it can literally be 100 feet from where it was the day before, the optimal way to play each hole can change each day. That can make a course more interesting, and Mammoth is not uninteresting. I just don't think it's nearly as "separation-friendly" as Sand Valley. Or Lawsonia. Or some other truly great 8.0-or-above type courses. Lawsonia Links, 8.5 I'm curious how a course like this, were it built today, would be received. In some ways, Langford and Moreau were Mike Strantz before Mike Strantz. When they weren't stealing boxcars from the local rail yard to build up green sites, they were using steam shovels in the days of horse-powered earth-moving equipment to really move some dirt around. Though they seemed to leave the general topography alone, they created some dramatic features with the mounds throughout the fairways and the green sites and surrounding features. The first time playing it presents a real strategic puzzle. You're constantly questioning your lines, and even with a rangefinder, you're sometimes still questioning lines when you're the third to play from the tee! Mounds from 8 to 20 feet high — some of which feature bunkers, some of which are just grass (and you often have no way of truly knowing which you're looking at) — play tricks on your eyes with depth. They obscure things beyond them, sometimes for 100+ yards. They offer aiming points. And they often appear to be much farther out than they are. The greens at Lawsonia require accuracy, but are still often large enough to allow you to play away from the worst "side" of the green. You'll have a long putt, and often one that will break 20% of the distance of the putt or more, but you can play safe. Or you can take on the hill and, occasionally, face a shot to a green that's ten feet above your head. The par threes are a bit of a mixed bag. I found the tenth to be a bit obnoxious - it was playing about 240 the day we played with tons of movement in the green. It's a tougher hole than many short par fours I've played. The other par threes, including the fourth, are solid. The par fives are great, with the exception of the 13th, which @DeadMan already talked about. Though, I will note that @saevel25 was able to get near the green in two, and keep his ball there. I don't think that hole is as bad as Daniel says it is, as I think sometimes you can have a bit of an exhilarating second shot in trying to get to within about 40 yards of the green to keep your ball up top… and if you're close, in waiting to see if it will stay there. The par fours are great. Though the first is blind, it's only blind once. The first green, even with a short iron in hand, serves as a good introduction to what L&M created at Lawsonia, as the left side falls down about 15 feet from the edge of the green at about a 60° slope. Other "blind" shots exist, but you're given a clue where to aim, and trust is important. Lawsonia will play very different in different winds. It pays to be a good putter, or to put yourself in good positions with uphill putts, as the greens, while not nearly as massive as Mammoth or even Sand Valley, have a good amount of moment to them. Despite the tenth being my least favorite hole on the course, the back nine is all played in one open area with tremendous views across the expanse. You can see (and hear) the travails of people six holes away from you, with holes playing up and down and across a valley with ripples and humps and bumps. On many of the holes, a strategy from the tee may be anything from 4I to driver. The eighth was a good example here, as you could cut a driver around the corner, lay out to the left with a 4I, or (as I did), hit a 3W to the right-center of the angled fairway (semi-blind as steam-shovel-built mounds partially obscure the view) to leave a partial wedge to the (again) perched green. How close to the flagstick do you aim when the hole is cut toward an edge? Lawsonia has remained a good challenge because of the design and architecture, as well as a few found yards here and there (like the 18th, where the back tees are 85 yards behind the next set forward). Sand Valley, 9.0 A grind in the best possible way from start to finish. I likened it to Oakmont in the sense that it's unrelenting and requires precision and focus for the entire 18 holes. You have some wider fairways, and around the greens you have a bunch of options on how to get the ball to the hole, but decisions are mentally taxing. And never-ending. The first hole is a bigger challenge than you may think at first, particularly if you choose to take an aggressive line. The second hole can punch you in the mouth quickly if you miss the green (particularly to the right). The third is a solid par three, the fourth a long and uphill par five. Five played 190 to an elevated, downhill green from the top of a dune that exposed you to the wind. Six has a hidden bunker that it takes knowledge to avoid, and five has a gash bunker crossing the fairway at a very oblique angle. All interesting, all different, and all to be played differently depending on the wind that day. On the sixth, for example, I hit 3W, PW one day from the back (Black) tees, then driver, 7I the next day from two tees forward (the "Sand" tees). On the 7th, I played it Driver, 5I, 5I the first day (Black), and driver, 6I, pitch the second day (Sand). As I'm not going to talk about every hole… I'll stop now. You'll hear a few times that Mammoth is concave and Sand Valley is convex, and that's generally true. Coore & Crenshaw let you make decisions, and if you pull off the shot, you'll be rewarded with better angles, better visibility, or an easier next shot (or putt). None of the putting greens felt unfair, but you could get out of position on them. There were places to miss, but you had to know where they were. Well above the hole was never among them, nor was well below the green staring up at a bunch of fescue grass. You could miss a tee shot, for example, a bit too far right, and still be in the fairway, but you may have a partially blind and/or tougher angle. The 17th has a reputation for being controversial, but I don't really see it. It's a blind, long, uphill par three… which plays down into a giant bowl. Get the ball anywhere in the bowl and you'll have a makable putt. The first time I played it I came up just shy of the green, then putted down into the bowl, used a backstop, and rolled the ball to two feet. The second time my ball stopped six inches from an ace to a completely different hole location. But… miss the bowl and you have to work. The 18th can be a bit gimmicky, what with the big slope and all — but it can also be a really fun way to finish your round. 16 is a bruiser… unless you can thread the needle a bit. Play right of the center bunker and you have a better view, but a longer shot. I hit 3I, Dan hit 8I into that green after similar length tee shots. Sand Valley, in contrast to Mammoth Dunes, offers a bunch of separation. The line between good and bad shots is very narrow, as are the results: good shots are rewarded, bad shots punished, often proportionately. There are options, and the wind plays a good role. The fairways are wide, but the optimal sides and angles are small. And yes, angles matter, because Sand Valley (and Mammoth Dunes), being on sand, will allow you to bounce and/or roll the ball onto greens and around the course. Tee shots will bound a bit, and roll out. Approaches can be played to release, if you like, though the greens will generally hold a well-struck high shot. Options abound… as does punishment for poor execution.
    • Ah, yes, great.  Haven't got to #19 and interpretations in my studies!  Thank you!! Hypothetically, if a player had this situation, and took an unplayable, and then dropped it in the wrong place (i.e. the fairway).  That's DQ yes? I guess it'd have to be, a serious breach, nothing else makes sense. I see it in 14.7b(1).  
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. CrappyGolfer
      CrappyGolfer
      (68 years old)
    2. Jacob Vance
      Jacob Vance
      (25 years old)
    3. jax731
      jax731
      (54 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...