Jump to content
IGNORED

Is Phil the 3rd Best Player of All Time?


DeadMan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, saevel25 said:

Where did you get these numbers? Unless you are manipulating the data for your argument? 

Screen Shot 2021-06-09 at 3.01.43 PM.png

Doesn't matter. # of wins, # of majors, strength of competition. 

 

 

Hogan won 3 more majors than Phils 6 hence 50%…….. etc 

Saying “doesn’t matter” is a bit blinkered. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, Beastie said:

Hogan won 3 more majors than Phils 6 hence 50%…….. etc 

Saying “doesn’t matter” is a bit blinkered. 

To me it doesn't matter how long it took him to get the stats. Just like it was bad luck that Hogan had a career altering injury, we can't be giving him credit for wins he didn't get. 

Also, I think looking at it as a straight percentage of how many majors Phil has to Hogan is better. If we are comparing the two, and if you want to look at how close Phil was. He achieved 6 majors to Hogan's 9. Which is 66% of Hogan's total. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Somebody with better IT than me needs to put up a poll, then we can come up with the official Sandtrap All Time Top Ten. 

1 minute ago, saevel25 said:

To me it doesn't matter how long it took him to get the stats. Just like it was bad luck that Hogan had a career altering injury, we can't be giving him credit for wins he didn't get. 

Also, I think looking at it as a straight percentage of how many majors Phil has to Hogan is better. If we are comparing the two, and if you want to look at how close Phil was. He achieved 6 majors to Hogan's 9. Which is 66% of Hogan's total. 

 

Fair enough, and I also agree that Hogans fields were weaker by far. But how much weaker??

How about Watson he’s closer in time frame. Or Seve or even Faldo?? Seve was amazing in the 80’s and won shitloads in Europe and America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

Where did you get these numbers? Unless you are manipulating the data for your argument?

Matt, he said 50% more, he didn't say 50% of the win totals.

9 is 50% more than 6.

64 is 42% more than 45.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yea, there are multiple ways to say how ever much more or less Phil is compared with Hogan. 

9 is 50% more than 6
6 is 33% less than 9
6 is 66% of 9

All of is mathematically correct. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
16 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Yea, there are multiple ways to say how ever much more or less Phil is compared with Hogan. 

9 is 50% more than 6
6 is 33% less than 9
6 is 66% of 9

All of is mathematically correct. 

We know. I'm glad you do too now. 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think the equipment issue is being oversimplified.  While Jack was one of the longest of his generation, another of his very significant advantages was his ability to hit the ball very high, relative to his peers.  It was said that Jack could hit a 2-iron as high as most players hit their 6-iron.  That height was a tremendous advantage at US Open type courses and Augusta.  Now with 5-woods (whose value was shown by Ray Floyd when he tore up ANGs par 5s at the Masters) and, even moreso, hybrids, just about everyone can hit that very high shot that previously Jack had a virtual Monopoly on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I would put him in the second half of the top 10 probably 7 or 8.  with: Player Jones, Vardon, Morris and Hagen.  Behind: Hogan, Palmer, Snead, Nicholas and Woods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


2 hours ago, saevel25 said:

Yea, there are multiple ways to say how ever much more or less Phil is compared with Hogan. 

9 is 50% more than 6
6 is 33% less than 9
6 is 66% of 9

All of is mathematically correct. 

 

@ChetlovesMer are you paying attention?   :banana:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

13 pages of comments pretty well establishes that it is hard to head-to-head compare two players from different eras.

For me, ability to intimidate other golfers is one "it" factor that differentiates them.

Payne Stewart (my all time favorite) once said in an interview, that he loved to compete in the wind and rain, because he felt that it took about 1/2 the field out of the competition before they even teed off, thereby improving his chances.

Tiger definitely had the intimidation factor, in spades.

Jack had it, too.  Arnie less so, perhaps because he was perceived as such a nice guy.

In my opinion, Phil in his prime had it almost as much as Jack did.

I would put Phil somewhere between #3 and #5.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 minutes ago, Divot Master said:

For me, ability to intimidate other golfers is one "it" factor that differentiates them.

It’s golf, not MMA. 

mw-logo-245x245@1x.png

to make timid or fearful : frighten; especially : to compel or deter by or as if by threats… See the full...

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 hours ago, saevel25 said:

Yea, there are multiple ways to say how ever much more or less Phil is compared with Hogan. 

9 is 50% more than 6
6 is 33% less than 9
6 is 66% of 9

All of is mathematically correct. 

 

Hmm... Math is hard.

 

1 hour ago, dennyjones said:

@ChetlovesMer are you paying attention?   :banana:

I paid attention... didn't understand a word of it. 

I'm no longer aloud to mention where I went to school... but I think you all know anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, ncates00 said:

It’s golf, not MMA. 

mw-logo-245x245@1x.png

to make timid or fearful : frighten; especially : to compel or deter by or as if by threats… See the full...

 

 

 
A synonym of intimidate is unnerve which means to make one lose courage or confidence.   This would have nothing to do with making one frightened; especially : to compel or deter by or as if by threats.    Many golfers have mentioned that playing with Tiger was intimidating.   A quick google search verified as much.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

10 hours ago, dennyjones said:
 
A synonym of intimidate is unnerve which means to make one lose courage or confidence.   This would have nothing to do with making one frightened; especially : to compel or deter by or as if by threats.    Many golfers have mentioned that playing with Tiger was intimidating.   A quick google search verified as much.

Fair enough. “Unnerving” is a great word choice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo after clicking this link. For Mevo+, click this link or the image above.
  • Posts

    • OMG. Your Sharpie test isn’t anywhere near as accurate as GEARS. And the friend has seen thousands and thousands of shots hit on GEARS.
    • Not saying the "average person" is buying the GEARS set up, the average person buys access to the technology that otherwise would be unavailable to them.  Here's an experiment. Go check the lie angle question that started this thread using GEARS, and then cross check those results with the sharpie check. See how the results compare. 
    • Interesting discussion. I’m not a good player by any stretch, but I do tend to pull my shorter clubs more often than my longer ones. I can’t remember the last time I pulled a well struck 4i, now that I think about it.
    • Two pros playing, and it was safer to be in the fairway they were playing rather than a parallel fairway.
    • A GEARS-that costs as much as a well outfitted SUV-is hardly something the average people can buy. Dude-I am with EriK - your responses have been highly disappointing. Manufacturers have missed things before. They are not always chasing what is best but what they can sell. This makes sense to me and I see what your friend is saying @iacas. I think the GCQuad will show dynamic lie angle-right? Yes-appears so: What We Measure | Foresight Sports Precision, Not Guesswork How We Measure Foresight Sports launch monitors use a combination of infrared object tracking and high-speed...
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. A Gap Wedge
      A Gap Wedge
      (18 years old)
    2. Asmanning95
      Asmanning95
      (26 years old)
    3. Brettbern
      Brettbern
      (41 years old)
    4. ethan-333
      ethan-333
      (28 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...