Jump to content
IGNORED

Is Phil the 3rd Best Player of All Time?


DeadMan

Recommended Posts

Upon first seeing the question, my gut reaction was "hell no." But..... upon reviewing the list of golf's all time greats, I was surprised how well Mickelson's resume stacks up. 

I think I still have to answer no. I would put Tom Watson ahead of Phil. And instinctively, I want to give Arnie the nod, even though the numbers don't seem to bear that out. 

Hogan? Snead? Player? That might take some digging, but I would guess the quality of competition would position Phil well within that group. 

Gun to my head, I would say top 5. But not #3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

21 minutes ago, Big C said:

I think I still have to answer no. I would put Tom Watson ahead of Phil. And instinctively, I want to give Arnie the nod, even though the numbers don't seem to bear that out. 

I am not sure if winning 5 Opens helps his case. Did he just have a knack for those type of course? Not sure how to judge that his game fit The Open versus the other majors. Maybe it was a time were the Open still had weaker fields compared to the other majors. Also, he has less PGA tour wins than Phil.

Yea, I don't think the conversation can be Watson or Phil for #3. Phil's majors match up to Watson's if you compare strength of era's, and he has more PGA Tour wins. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
On 5/26/2021 at 5:35 PM, Billy Z said:

The Mickelson File

• Winner of six major championships (3 Masters, 1 British Open, 2 PGA Championships)

• One of only 8 players with as many as three Masters wins

• One of only 15 men to hold at least three legs of the career Grand Slam

• Runner-up at the U.S. Open a record six times

• 24 top-3 finishes, 39 top-10 finishes at major championships

• Winner of 45 PGA Tour events, tied for eighth all time

If he wins a US Open then I would firmly put him at #3. If not, he would be in the top 6. Not sure a specific rank between #3 to #6 can be 'assigned'. 

Off topic: 

Like a million others, I am a fan all over again. Haven't cared for him as much since the gut wrench of 2006 US Open loss. Suddenly I find myself forgetting some dumb stuff of last few years and am following him on IG.. lol! I don't know, or even care if his fan interactions are elaborately practiced theater for opportune moments, but they are entertaining and heart warming. I have a clear favorite to root for for Torrey next month and for once in last few years he seems to be a legit contender. I hope he swings for fences, never know if he is going to be flaming this brightly for too long.  

Edited by GolfLug
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

I am not sure if winning 5 Opens helps his case. Did he just have a knack for those type of course? Not sure how to judge that his game fit The Open versus the other majors. Maybe it was a time were the Open still had weaker fields compared to the other majors. Also, he has less PGA tour wins than Phil.

 

The answer is quite simple.

Peter Thomson  won 5 Opens.

He will never be in any conversation about the 10  best players of all time. And with an equal number of majors as Phil until last week, it shows how using majors as THE measure is bogus.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

Peter won them when they had weaker fields than most PGA Tour events. Watson won his five when they were much better. Nowhere near as good as now (some Americans didn’t even make the trip when they qualified), but better than in Peter’s time.


Also, I tweeted my list above.

Predictably someone is coming at me about Hagen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

Ha ha ha. I was blocked by the golf historian guy. Jeezus what thin skins people have. I didn’t even say anything except some fairly obvious (to me) facts.

Including that Yes, it’s easier to beat like eight people than 140+. I mean duh.

  • Funny 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
1 hour ago, iacas said:

Peter won them when they had weaker fields than most PGA Tour events. Watson won his five when they were much better. Nowhere near as good as now (some Americans didn’t even make the trip when they qualified), but better than in Peter’s time.

 

That is my point exactly. When people direct our gaze to lists of major winners and try to use that as their prime supporting evidence it is misleading at best and dumb at worst.

Was just checking and in the 1959 Open (won by Player) of the 90 players there were three from the U.S. and one Aussie, (Thomson). Not exactly a stellar field.

In 1965 there were only 5 from the U.S.A.

 

Edited by Shorty
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
3 minutes ago, Shorty said:

That is my point exactly. When people direct our gaze to lists of major winners and try to use that as their prime supporting evidence it is misleading at best and dumb at worst.

Don’t tell @SHistorians on Twitter! 🙂

  • Funny 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

59 minutes ago, iacas said:

Don’t tell @SHistorians on Twitter! 🙂

lol. Right, and Margaret Court is the GOAT female tennis player cuz she won more championships than Serena.🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
27 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

lol. Right, and Margaret Court is the GOAT female tennis player cuz she won more championships than Serena.🙄

Margaret Court IS the GOAT. Of hated Australian sportspeople.  🤮

No-one even comes close.

Edited by Shorty
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
30 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

lol. Right, and Margaret Court is the GOAT female tennis player cuz she won more championships than Serena.🙄

Yup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 5/25/2021 at 4:32 PM, iacas said:

Phil was a top five player, in the Tiger era, for a LOOOOOOONG freaking time.

How many weeks was Mickelson inside the top 5 for, in his career? 

Incidentally, total weeks inside the top 50:

Mickelson: 1,353 weeks

Els: 965 weeks

Current Players (Longest Streak): McIlroy: 598 weeks

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 5/27/2021 at 8:29 PM, TourSpoon said:

 You are right if you want to define a Hall of Famer with six majors and top 5 for a long time by saying he is non dominant. I mean 1300 weeks in the top 50 is definitely the sign of non-dominance.  Seven hundred weeks of top ten must be another non-dominant trait. Face it, he is one of the best players of all time even if he doesn't fit your definition of being a dominant force in golf. 

Most weeks at #2 OWGR:

Mickelson: 270 weeks

Furyk: 39 weeks

Olazabal: 35 weeks

Mickelson, considering Tiger, and the fields he played against, is almost definitely a top 5 player ever. 3rd behind Tiger and Mickelson? It's actually possible.

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


2 hours ago, csh19792001 said:

Most weeks at #2 OWGR:

 

 

This is as bad as arguing that Jack's second place major wins should count for something in the Tiger v Jack debate.  Worse actually since beyond the second place finishes Jack had actual wins, while beyond Phil's weeks at #2 is not a single week where he was #1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
1 hour ago, turtleback said:

This is as bad as arguing that Jack's second place major wins should count for something in the Tiger v Jack debate.  Worse actually since beyond the second place finishes Jack had actual wins, while beyond Phil's weeks at #2 is not a single week where he was #1.

I see your point and it is well taken.  It’s shocking he was never world number 1 in a 30 year career.
 

That said, it’s quite hard to be at world number 1 when your entire prime is up against a guy who was by far the GOAT and 683 weeks at number one.
 

And 283 consecutive weeks at world number 1. 

Edited by csh19792001
Link to comment
Share on other sites


2 hours ago, turtleback said:

This is as bad as arguing that Jack's second place major wins should count for something in the Tiger v Jack debate.  Worse actually since beyond the second place finishes Jack had actual wins, while beyond Phil's weeks at #2 is not a single week where he was #1.

Fair enough, who are the top 5-10 golfers ever, in your opinion? Do you have them in order?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
3 hours ago, turtleback said:

This is as bad as arguing that Jack's second place major wins should count for something in the Tiger v Jack debate.  Worse actually since beyond the second place finishes Jack had actual wins, while beyond Phil's weeks at #2 is not a single week where he was #1.

Hard disagree there @turtleback, because we're NOT looking at who the top ONE player is, we're down the list. We're talking about #3.

So, staying in the top five or top ten in the OWGR begins to matter. To me, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Last time out I did make my first birdie of the year at 3. Hit a PW up hill to a 125 yard flag to 6 inches. Landed it short of the stick with a low trajectory hoping to skip it back to the flag and have it check up. Couldn’t have missed making a 2 my very much. Rest of the day I did my best to Kevin Na some birdie putts. Was feeling it after that shot. At 4 I smoked a driver and then hit a gap wedge from 92 to within 5 feet. I hit what I thought was a great putt and started walking it in.... lipped out on the high side tho. At 11 I hit my 2nd way right but my 3rd within 5 feet at the par 5. Again tried to walk one in only to lip on the high side: guess I should leave the walking in of birds too the pros!
    • Commenting ,just before  taking the shot (especially negative thoughts) affect your golf swing. Man I feel bad for you. It was awful. Action with some new rules should be taken for this. 
    • Well, at least you have the par-4s down!  I had a round a few weeks ago at my home course that would have been my second-ever no sixes (first was not at my home course)... played the par-5s in -1 (all pars and a birdie), but two sixes on par-4s did me in for the challenge.  Thankfully I have the badge from two years ago or so, but it'll be nice to have a few more rounds that fit this. 
    • Day 206.  Stop me if you've heard this one before.  15 minutes after work of 6-iron shots (about a half dozen total balls this time).  Same focus:  setup, backswing pace and length.
    • Day 52: COVID-19 day 6/7 short game drills. After that, did a few minutes of rehearsals for my priority piece. Lesson coming up at the end of this week to see where I have gone wrong with this one.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. goofi22
      goofi22
      (43 years old)
    2. HackardLaw
      HackardLaw
      (38 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...