Jump to content
IGNORED

National Anthems Before Sporting Events


National Anthem at Sporting Events  

32 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the national anthem be played before all sporting events?

    • Yes
      12
    • No
      20


Recommended Posts

On 6/2/2021 at 3:21 AM, phillyk said:

The list is missing the most important metric, # of golf courses! 

Scotland FTW!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The National Anthem is not just for the military. I have no idea who perpetuates this idea. It is for ALL Americans. The man who wrote it was a lawyer. The song honors our nation, not just those who s

I consider myself a very patriotic individual. I've lived in other countries and firmly believe that even though the US has its share of issues, it's still the greatest country to be a citizen of. I f

@mcanadiens nobody is saying the national anthem is not ABOUT the military or a war or battle-Duh of course it is. What people are saying is that it is not FOR the military.-It is for everyone be

Posted Images

2 hours ago, Billy Z said:

Most eople are so far removed from the 'greatest Generation' that ever lived, and many don't respect and appreciate the country they live in as they should.

Everybody romanticizes the past, and chooses to not every have a critical eye. Just because the media (movies, TV, novels) like to make it seem like post WWII was the greatest time to live in the US. For many subsets of our melting pot of a country it was not. 

Also, being critical of your country, is respecting it. It means you care about the country you live in. I want this country to be WAY better than it is now. We have a LONG way to go. It means that I need to be critical of it. The worst thing that can happen is be complacent. To me, harping on the good old days as some sort of paradise is just complacency. 

Here is the history of the national anthem at sporting events..

Why the Star-Spangled Banner is Played At Sporting Events - HISTORY

It was played during 1918 world series. Then afterwards, some MLB teams played it on holidays or special occasions. 

In 1931 it became the official national anthem and it spread to being played at sporting events. 

Basically, it was the choice of the owners, and the leagues to play it or not. It was never a government mandate. I am for one, in favor of the leagues/owners deciding to play it or not. They should take the criticism from those who do not like it. Which is fine. 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Informative 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
43 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

I am for one, in favor of the leagues/owners deciding to play it or not. They should take the criticism from those who do not like it. Which is fine. 

I'm on board with this approach.  I've said before, I enjoy it on the few occasions I attend a live event, so I (selfishly) hope it continues to be played.  If a league or team decides not to play it, I'll miss it but I'll still attend the games.  I just don't believe the government should be involved in the decision.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

52 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Everybody romanticizes the past, and chooses to not every have a critical eye. Just because the media (movies, TV, novels) like to make it seem like post WWII was the greatest time to live in the US. For many subsets of our melting pot of a country it was not. 

Also, being critical of your country, is respecting it. It means you care about the country you live in. I want this country to be WAY better than it is now. We have a LONG way to go. It means that I need to be critical of it. The worst thing that can happen is be complacent. To me, harping on the good old days as some sort of paradise is just complacency. 

Here is the history of the national anthem at sporting events..

Why the Star-Spangled Banner is Played At Sporting Events - HISTORY

It was played during 1918 world series. Then afterwards, some MLB teams played it on holidays or special occasions. 

In 1931 it became the official national anthem and it spread to being played at sporting events. 

Basically, it was the choice of the owners, and the leagues to play it or not. It was never a government mandate. I am for one, in favor of the leagues/owners deciding to play it or not. They should take the criticism from those who do not like it. Which is fine. 

 

 

This is this far fetched concept that the past was the "good ole days". As one who has a history degree and spent most of my academic career reading history, It is simply not true.
most people (race, religion, gender) are better off today than 50 years ago, and certainly better than 100 or 150 years ago.

As far as the anthem, I could care less. You want to stand, take your cap off, go for it. You don't, then don't. To me the anthem has no place in sports. it is just part of the larger DOD advertising effort.

Sport teams are largely privately owned companies, if they do not want to play it, they are under no obligation to do so.
Please spare me the "patriotic gesture" talking points. The pledge and anthem are nothing more than simple indoctrination and promoting nationalism. 

usa-today-8818627.0.jpg

The McCain/Flake reports finds $53 million in Department of Defense spending for patriotic displays at sporting events.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

24 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

I'm on board with this approach.  I've said before, I enjoy it on the few occasions I attend a live event, so I (selfishly) hope it continues to be played.  If a league or team decides not to play it, I'll miss it but I'll still attend the games.  I just don't believe the government should be involved in the decision.

This

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

Everybody romanticizes the past, and chooses to not have a critical eye. Just because the media (movies, TV, novels) like to make it seem like post WWII was the greatest time to live in the US. For many subsets of our melting pot of a country it was not. 

Many interesting points you have made, but I didn't say the post-world War II was the greatest time to live. Although it did breed a group of people that appreciated what they had because of the hard times they had endured. Today I think many people are spoiled and too far removed from hard times. Personally, I think we are ripe for a fall. It is strange, but hard times produce and appreciation for the few good things that you have, as opposed to having many things and being spoiled.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, Billy Z said:

Many interesting points you have made, but I didn't say the post-world War II was the greatest time to live.

You specifically call out the "Greatest Generation"... Why are they called that, because decades later people romanticize that generation. Don't get me wrong, they did very good things and sacrificed a lot. You mentioned that generation in the same sentence as people not appreciating the country they live in. Now, how am I suppose to take that sentence. 

3 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

Personally, I think we are ripe for a fall. It is strange, but hard times produce and appreciation for the few good things that you have, as opposed to having many things and being spoiled.

Hard times also breed contentment. You just can't say hard times just breed appreciation all around. Again, we romanticize the past. 

Just like today, there are a good number of people younger than 35 who work hard. Blindly following generalizations is just a waste of time. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
11 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

Although it did breed a group of people that appreciated what they had because of the hard times they had endured.

Maybe. But you’re assuming that war is the only “hard time” one can endure. You’re also assuming that people today don’t appreciate what they have or that they haven’t endured their own personal “hard times.” 

 

11 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

Today I think many people are spoiled and too far removed from hard times.

Again, you’re assuming only one kind of “hard time.” Financial crises, family strife, work problems, mental issues, physical limitations, disability, lost loved ones, health issues, and countless other things are also “hard times” one can endure. You’re also assuming there were less spoiled people back in the day. 

 

11 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

It is strange, but hard times produce and appreciation for the few good things that you have, as opposed to having many things and being spoiled.

Sure, but so can being successful. You’re assuming that only hard times can produce that. Growth and success can also produce appreciation. For instance, going to grad school and getting a great job can make you proud of your accomplishments and appreciate what you now have. 

19 minutes ago, Elmer said:

As one who has a history degree and spent most of my academic career reading history, It is simply not true.

One doesn’t even have to have a history degree (of which I also have and a law degree) to know this. It’s pretty much common sense. 

Edited by ncates00
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just now, saevel25 said:

Hard times also breed contentment. You just can't say hard times just breed appreciation all around. Again, we romanticize the past. 

Just like today, there are a good number of people younger than 35 who work hard. Blindly following generalizations is just a waste of time. 

I think @saevel25 has hit the nail on the head. It's human nature to remember things better than they actually were. 

I've kinda lost the forest in the trees. I'm not sure what any of this has to do with the Anthem being played before a sporting event. So to get it back on track my issue isn't with or against the anthem itself. My issue is making a law to require the anthem. It feels like a slippery slope to me. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, ChetlovesMer said:

My issue is making a law to require the anthem. It feels like a slippery slope to me.

I agree. And, as I have already laid out above somewhere in this thread, it’s likely unconstitutional. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, ncates00 said:

 

One doesn’t even have to have a history degree (of which I also have and a law degree) to know this. It’s pretty much common sense. 

I wish it was common sense. I hear a lot of "things were so much better back then", "you kids just have no idea", "disrespectful youth" etc...etc..
You think it was common knowledge, or you would think people would have picked this up if they read 1 book, say about the Great Depression, may the Jim Crow South, etc...
but no!

3 minutes ago, ncates00 said:

I agree. And, as I have already laid out above somewhere in this thread, it’s likely unconstitutional. 

I do not think there is any doubt that it is unconstitutional.
Govt dictating to private business on free speech and expression.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

7 minutes ago, Elmer said:

any doubt

Hardly is the case in law. 

 

8 minutes ago, Elmer said:

Govt dictating to private business on free speech and expression.

Yeah, but the law requires a little more analysis than that. There are rules and elements that must be met. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
18 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

I've kinda lost the forest in the trees. I'm not sure what any of this has to do with the Anthem being played before a sporting event. So to get it back on track my issue isn't with or against the anthem itself. My issue is making a law to require the anthem. It feels like a slippery slope to me. 

I was just thinking the same thing, the discussion has moved quite a ways :offtopic:.  I think its a good idea to move back to the Anthem, and to governmental efforts to require it to be played.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Day 3: COVID-19 day 6 and 7 drills again. Then downswing priority piece work with 7-iron, not much, just 10 balls. 
    • Day 69, August 2, 2021 More work on shortening my backswing. I don’t want to even get to hands to right shoulder… at least feeling like that.
    • I'm sure if you look at about two years ago on this site, I mentioned somewhere that after having my first ever sub-80 round (a nice 77 in a tournament!), I failed to break 90 for I think two months.  These things happen. Can't hit an iron?  What's the longest swing you can make with your PW and hit a good result?  If the answer is a chip, go hit some chips and, after some good ones, expand into pitches.  Similar with pitches into 3/4 shots, etc.   This is very likely something you can work out by going back to what you do well.  
    • First range session after another productive session with @iacas.  Working on getting my weight forward and also feel like my front forearm is turning to close the clubface.  Did work with my 6I, Driver, 3W, and 4H and hit all clubs really well with ball flights that overall I wasn't unhappy with.  Playing tomorrow and Wednesday so we'll see how we do.    
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. camerongautx
      camerongautx
      (30 years old)
    2. CyboNinja
      CyboNinja
      (40 years old)
    3. Hawk367
      Hawk367
      (54 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...