Jump to content
IGNORED

Free Lift From Swale


Mkgrady

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

I think you two, @DaveP043 and @Ruler, may be talking about two different images.

The below, IMO, should not be GUR or a penalty area. Just play it.

On 10/17/2021 at 3:20 PM, Darkfrog said:

This is what the channels look like on my course (not a great angle but it shows the concept):

C4F4A89C-D1B2-4D67-852B-F779F3037EE7.thumb.jpeg.53b0a3570b500f54b8e54517750c40fb.jpeg

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

43 minutes ago, iacas said:

I think you two, @DaveP043 and @Ruler, may be talking about two different images.

The below, IMO, should not be GUR or a penalty area. Just play it.

 

Well, that depends on the purpose of that 'channel'. I agree to the 'just play it' but the dispute will begin once there is still water in that 'channel'. Is that Temporary water or is it Penalty Area water..?

In the end of the day, it is the responsibility of the course to determine what those undulations are and inform players accordingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 10/17/2021 at 3:20 PM, Darkfrog said:

This is what the channels look like on my course (not a great angle but it shows the concept):

C4F4A89C-D1B2-4D67-852B-F779F3037EE7.thumb.jpeg.53b0a3570b500f54b8e54517750c40fb.jpeg

On a local course, there is a similar channel that runs the width of the fairway, but is about half as wide and usually has some standing water in it. We always take a free drop away from the direction of the green, w/o penalty, and play on. The channel is meant as drainage, so we don't consider it a natural part of the course. Although, for any official games, the local rules dictate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


40 minutes ago, WilliamB said:

On a local course, there is a similar channel that runs the width of the fairway, but is about half as wide and usually has some standing water in it. We always take a free drop away from the direction of the green, w/o penalty, and play on. The channel is meant as drainage, so we don't consider it a natural part of the course. Although, for any official games, the local rules dictate.

I beg your pardon?

You take a free drop based on which Rule?

Edited by Ruler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

35 minutes ago, Ruler said:

I beg your pardon?

You take a free drop based on which Rule?

Basically, our own rules. Although, talking to the pro shop, they suggest the same. Different strokes for different folks. Golf is a 'game', and how each play it is their right. Some who make it a profession, are very exacting on how they deal with the rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


8 minutes ago, WilliamB said:

Golf is a 'game', and how each play it is their right. Some who make it a profession, are very exacting on how they deal with the rules.

I have no problem with people playing the way they choose, but we ARE in a part of TST specifically for Rules of Golf.  @Ruler and I may disagree on whether a specific depressed area fits the Definition of Penalty Area, or on what may be or should be defined as GUR by the Committee, but we're each trying to have those discussions within the Rules as written.  These kinds of discussions can be really useful in learning about the rules, they certainly have helped me to improve my understanding.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

46 minutes ago, WilliamB said:

Basically, our own rules. Although, talking to the pro shop, they suggest the same. Different strokes for different folks. Golf is a 'game', and how each play it is their right. Some who make it a profession, are very exacting on how they deal with the rules.

At this point Erik would say 'this is a Rules forum' and I would concur with him. Making one's own rules is not what golf is about.

There is nothing wrong to play golf not abiding to the Rules of Golf but it is IMHO important to know when one is doing that. However, there is no contribution presenting here rules that do not exists.

Edited by Ruler
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

36 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

I have no problem with people playing the way they choose, but we ARE in a part of TST specifically for Rules of Golf.  @Ruler and I may disagree on whether a specific depressed area fits the Definition of Penalty Area, or on what may be or should be defined as GUR by the Committee, but we're each trying to have those discussions within the Rules as written.  These kinds of discussions can be really useful in learning about the rules, they certainly have helped me to improve my understanding.  

Fair enough, and I see your point regarding this being a 'rules thread', and should post accordingly.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
20 minutes ago, WilliamB said:

Fair enough, and I see your point regarding this being a 'rules thread', and should post accordingly.

Yes, another thing I might say is that if you're making up your own rules, you're not playing golf. You're playing a game that resembles golf.

  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 10/21/2021 at 3:50 PM, iacas said:

I think you two, @DaveP043 and @Ruler, may be talking about two different images.

The below, IMO, should not be GUR or a penalty area. Just play it.

 

If that is fairway and not light rough the damaged areas should be marked and deemed GUR. But not otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
8 minutes ago, Rulesman said:

If that is fairway and not light rough the damaged areas should be marked and deemed GUR. But not otherwise.

Nah. The damaged area appears to be from divots. And most of those aren’t in the depression. Play it.

Your white paint budget must be much higher than mine.

  • Funny 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

22 hours ago, iacas said:

Nah. The damaged area appears to be from divots. And most of those aren’t in the depression. Play it.

Your white paint budget must be much higher than mine.

You may be right but the patch towards the top and the one bottom right look to be bigger than a normal divot hole. Also the divots are a) behind the holes and b) look to be much smaller that the holes.

I would like to see some sort of scale, the grass seems to be very long for a fairway cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 10/21/2021 at 5:50 PM, iacas said:

I think you two, @DaveP043 and @Ruler, may be talking about two different images.

The below, IMO, should not be GUR or a penalty area. Just play it.

 

From the picture and the posts from the OP I have come to the conclusion that this undulation is built for the purpose of both collecting and directing water (away from the fairway). If that is the case it falls under the Definition of a Penalty Area as it is equivalent to a ditch - an open water course (whether or not containing water). But if it is just an undulation created with no other specific purpose than to satisfy the course designer then it is not a PA and any water in it would be Temporary Water. 

52 minutes ago, Rulesman said:

I would like to see some sort of scale, the grass seems to be very long for a fairway cut.

IMO that is due to the shape of the undulation, the mower blades cannot reach the bottom.

But I agree with you, the worn out area could be marked as GUR as long as it is outside the margins of the undulation (no GUR in a PA). It does not matter whether the wear origins from hitting balls, as long as it is a substantially large area and not fit for play.

Edited by Ruler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 10/17/2021 at 12:20 PM, Darkfrog said:

This is what the channels look like on my course (not a great angle but it shows the concept):

C4F4A89C-D1B2-4D67-852B-F779F3037EE7.thumb.jpeg.53b0a3570b500f54b8e54517750c40fb.jpeg

I would just play anything as it lies in this or similar cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
1 hour ago, Ruler said:

From the picture and the posts from the OP I have come to the conclusion that this undulation is built for the purpose of both collecting and directing water (away from the fairway).

Nah, I see it as more of a depression around an underground drain line. I say that because the course I played throughout high school had one of these on the sixth fairway, and the super was working on it this year when we rated the course.

It was always just the general area/through the green. Sometimes it was a little longer, but it was even a little wider than this one seems to be.

The water goes under the ground, through a drain line. I believe this one is actually that, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

20 minutes ago, iacas said:

The water goes under the ground, through a drain line. I believe this one is actually that, too.

It too think that's the case: it's a French drain.  (Diagram from Wikipedia).

French_drain_diagram.jpg

There are rocks on top of the pipe, and if they are exposed it should be treated as an immovable obstruction (same as cart path), but if the sod on top is consistent with the rest of the area, even though it is in a depression, it should be treated as the general area, unless explicitly mentioned as GUR and/or in a local rule. This is what @Rulesman also stated, above, per the R&A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

29 minutes ago, iacas said:

Nah, I see it as more of a depression around an underground drain line. I say that because the course I played throughout high school had one of these on the sixth fairway, and the super was working on it this year when we rated the course.

It was always just the general area/through the green. Sometimes it was a little longer, but it was even a little wider than this one seems to be.

The water goes under the ground, through a drain line. I believe this one is actually that, too.

If it is a French drain then it might be treated as an Immovable Obstruction (or GUR), depending whether there is enough soil on top of the construction or not.

Personally I would like to see such channels on top of a French drain to be treated as IO's. After all, it is a construction and makes playing more difficult than on either side of that channel.

Edited by Ruler
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
2 minutes ago, Ruler said:

If it is a French drain then it might be treated as an Immovable Obstruction (or GUR), depending whether there is enough soil on top of the construction or not.

Do you see any rocks? 🙂 I don't.

Play it as it lies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct links for Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package. Save 10% on Mevo with coupon code "IACAS" as well.
  • Posts

    • Day 164 (22 May 22) - worked on getting weight on lead foot - used the reverse stork drill and 3w.  Key was to stay as balanced as possible, did okay.  Followed with some lefty swings with the Dunlop lefty 7i, focused on the pressure of my weight on my lead “right” foot.  Then turned it back around and completed the drill session with full swings with my SLDR 7i and the hard foam balls. 
    • Correct. The R10 is much closer to the Mevo, not the Mevo+. Yeah. 😄
    • At $300 and requiring only 3’ for a radar unit, I don’t think it’s going to be very accurate. So no, it’s not going be dominating the Mevo market anytime soon. There are those of us who didn’t get the Garmin R10 at a fraction of the price of a Mevo+ (and Pro package) because of questionable accuracy. Hell, the gifs on their site show people “playing” the simulator without even hitting a ball. It’s basically a video game at that point.
    • Yet another question about the technology for filming a swing. I read Erik's updated "Filming your Swing" blog post as part of researching my next phone purchase. My current phone, which is on its last legs, was able to record video up to 1080p at up to 120 fps (Pixel 3XL).  However, that camera isn't great at the moment (various reasons unrelated to its specifications) and I'm going to get a new device soon, too.  Its likely successor for me is only able to do 30fps at 1080p, so that won't work for filming a golf swing.  It can do 720p @ 480 fps though (device I'm likely to get is a Galaxy A42).  Will that work for this?  I realize the post says "at least 720p video," but I don't know if I should shoot for better than that (such as if it is expected to be outdated soon).  It also seems odd to me that a camera could do only 30fps at 1080p but 480 fps at 720p, but I know almost nothing about these things. I am also debating getting a separate camera for golf swings if this won't work;  my prior separate-camera is a Canon PowerShot ELPH 110.  I believe it tops out at 720p / 30 fps;  if there's a reasonably priced camera that works for my golf swing filming, I'd be happy to get that and not sweat the camera on the phone. Other than filming my golf swing, my phone is pretty much a communication device and podcast player, so I'm not going higher end except if doing so is the most effective way to get a good camera for my golf swing. (Apologies if this should have been a separate thread, but I figured it was on-topic here and I didn't think there was another forum than Member Swings where this would be an appropriate top-level post)
    • Day 127: Played 18 this morning. Tried to simplify the mechanics of my priority piece (which is two things) into a feel but didn’t work great, so just settled on on of them after a few holes. Played okay except for a dumb triple bogey on #12.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. DocP
      DocP
      (61 years old)
    2. Isaac03
      Isaac03
      (38 years old)
    3. phillyk
      phillyk
      (32 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...